Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Architectural Research

ISSN 2095-2635

ISSN 2095-2643(Online)

CN 10-1024/TU

Postal Subscription Code 80-966

Front. Archit. Res.    2016, Vol. 5 Issue (1) : 15-26    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foar.2015.12.001
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Community in the information age: Exploring the social potential of web-based technologies in landscape architecture and community design
Deni Ruggeri1,Deven Young2,*()
1. Department of Landscape Architecture and Spatial Planning, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Aas, N-1432, Norway
2. Landscape Architecture, Alta Planning and Design, Portland, OR 97202, United States
 Download: PDF(2800 KB)  
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

Critics have pointed at new technologies as culprits in the decline of civic life, neighboring and social capital construction in Western societies. When applied to community design and planning processes, technologies can empower residents to actively engage in decision-making, foster connections across social groups, with positive consequences on life and socialization in public spaces. What kind of participation do technologies foster? And is it the kind that bridges social and ideological divides?

The 2012 community design process for Hawthorne Park in Medford, Oregon illustrates many of the challenges and opportunities connected to the use of new technologies in design. In the process, technologies were instrumental in enlisting a larger-than-usual number of residents to participate in the design of the park. Blogs and online questionnaires were successful in gathering people's thoughts on the design choices being made, but also favored a limited, intermittent form of engagement. The results are synthesized in principles for the successful integration of web-based technologies in future community design efforts: adaptability, full participation, nuanced participation and the need for links to the physical realm.

Keywords Landscape architec- ture      Urban design      Social capital      Public outreach      Community design      Participation     
Corresponding Author(s): Deven Young   
Issue Date: 17 March 2016
 Cite this article:   
Deni Ruggeri,Deven Young. Community in the information age: Exploring the social potential of web-based technologies in landscape architecture and community design[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2016, 5(1): 15-26.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/foar/EN/10.1016/j.foar.2015.12.001
https://academic.hep.com.cn/foar/EN/Y2016/V5/I1/15
[1] Xiao Wang, Yacheng Song, Peng Tang. Generative urban design using shape grammar and block morphological analysis[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2020, 9(4): 914-924.
[2] Xiaoxin Zhao. Game of capitals: Production of influential online architecture[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2020, 9(3): 670-680.
[3] Aurel von Richthofen, Katja Knecht, Yufan Miao, Reinhard König. The ‘Urban Elements’ method for teaching parametric urban design to professionals[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2018, 7(4): 573-587.
[4] Yan Hong. Resident participation in urban renewal: Focused on Sewoon Renewal Promotion Project and Kwun Tong Town Centre Project[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2018, 7(2): 197-210.
[5] Gunnar Cerwén, Jacob Kreutzfeldt, Carola Wingren. Soundscape actions: A tool for noise treatment based on three workshops in landscape architecture[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2017, 6(4): 504-518.
[6] Arturo Valladares. Successes and failures of participation-in-design: Cases from Old Havana, Cuba[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2017, 6(3): 401-411.
[7] R.A. Oppong, A.B. Marfuln, E.S. Asare. Improving urban visibility through fractal analysis of street edges: The case of John Evans Atta Mills High Streetin Accra, Ghana[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2017, 6(2): 248-260.
[8] Adriana A. Zuniga-Teran,Barron J. Orr,Randy H. Gimblett,Nader V. Chalfoun,Scott B. Going,David P. Guertin,Stuart E. Marsh. Designing healthy communities: Awalkability analysis of LEED-ND[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2016, 5(4): 433-452.
[9] Mohamad Kashef. Urban livability across disciplinary and professional boundaries[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2016, 5(2): 239-253.
[10] Catherine Dubois,Geneviève Cloutier,André Potvin,Luc Adolphe,Florent Joerin. Design support tools to sustain climate change adaptation at the local level: A review and reflection on their suitability[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2015, 4(1): 1-11.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed