Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Architectural Research

ISSN 2095-2635

ISSN 2095-2643(Online)

CN 10-1024/TU

Postal Subscription Code 80-966

Front. Archit. Res.    2020, Vol. 9 Issue (1) : 1-19    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foar.2019.04.002
Research Article
Heritage attributes of post-war housing in Amsterdam
Lisanne Havinga(), Bernard Colenbrander, Henk Schellen
Department of the Built Environment, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
 Download: PDF(6574 KB)  
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

Modern heritage, particularly post-war social housing estates, is struggling with negative perceptions. Accordingly, this research aims to contribute to a better understanding of the heritage significance of post-war housing estates in general and the Western Garden Cities e a post-war neighborhood in Amsterdam e in particular. A review of the limited body of literature on the heritage significance of modern and post-war housing estates was performed. A significance assessment was conducted on a sample of representative case studies by using expert interviews for data collection. The experts assigned significance levels to attributes based on whether or not they need to be preserved during a sustainable refurbishment. The highest-valued attributes are parcellation, balconies, and semi-public green spaces. The most negative value was assigned to the application of external insulation, replacement of the window frames by PVC-U, and closed character of the façades on the ground floor level. The lack of heritage recognition at the lower scale level may either be due to the important details already being lost or details not yet consistently being recognized as the architecture and buildings are understudied in comparison with the urban qualities of post-war heritage.

Keywords Heritage      Significance      Attributes      Management of change      Sustainable refurbishment      Heritage impact     
Corresponding Author(s): Lisanne Havinga   
Issue Date: 23 March 2020
 Cite this article:   
Lisanne Havinga,Bernard Colenbrander,Henk Schellen. Heritage attributes of post-war housing in Amsterdam[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2020, 9(1): 1-19.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/foar/EN/10.1016/j.foar.2019.04.002
https://academic.hep.com.cn/foar/EN/Y2020/V9/I1/1
[1] Juan A. García-Esparza, Pablo Altaba Tena. A GIS-based methodology for the appraisal of historical, architectural, and social values in historic urban cores[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2020, 9(4): 900-913.
[2] Sabeeh Farhan, Venus Akef, Zuhair Nasar. The transformation of the inherited historical urban and architectural characteristics of Al-Najaf’s Old City and possible preservation insights[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2020, 9(4): 820-836.
[3] Yuyang Wang, Asterios Agkathidis, Andrew Crompton. Parametrising historical Chinese courtyarddwellings: An algorithmic design framework for the digital representation of Siheyuan iterations based on traditional design principles[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2020, 9(4): 751-773.
[4] Jonathan Ruiz-Jaramillo, Carmen Muñoz-González, Marı´a Dolores Joyanes-Dı´az, Eduardo Jiménez-Morales, José Manuel López-Osorio, Roberto Barrios-Pérez, Carlos Rosa-Jiménez. Heritage risk index: A multi-criteria decision-making tool to prioritize municipal historic preservation projects[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2020, 9(2): 403-418.
[5] Lydia Kiroff. Nexus between creative industries and the built environment: Creative placemaking in inner Auckland[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2020, 9(1): 119-137.
[6] Erwan Hamard, Cécilia Cammas, Blandine Lemercier, Bogdan Cazacliu, Jean-Claude Morel. Micromorphological description of vernacular cob process and comparison with rammed earth[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2020, 9(1): 203-215.
[7] Jian Jiao, Qiuling Xia, Fei Shi. Nondestructive inspection of a bricketimber structure in a modern architectural heritage building: Lecture hall of the Anyuan Miners’ Club, China[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2019, 8(3): 348-358.
[8] K. Kiruthiga, K. Thirumaran. Effects of urbanizati on onhistorical heritage buildings in Kumbakonam, Tamilnadu, India[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2019, 8(1): 94-105.
[9] Jeremy C. Wells. Challenging the assumption about a direct relationship between historic preservation and architecture in the United States[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2018, 7(4): 455-464.
[10] K. Kiruthiga,K. Thirumaran. Visual perception on the architectural elements of the built heritage of a historic temple town: A case study of Kumbakonam, India[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2017, 6(1): 96-107.
[11] O.K. Akanden,D. Odeleye,A. Coday,C. JimenezBescos. Performance evaluation of operational energy use in refurbishment, reuse, and conservation of heritage buildings for optimum sustainability[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2016, 5(3): 371-382.
[12] Can Tuncay Akınn,Ayhan Bekleyen,Mücahit Yıldırım. Preservation initiatives for the truncated pyramid-shaped traditional housesof Siirt, Turkey[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2016, 5(3): 360-370.
[13] Ignacio Requena-Ruiz. Thermal comfort in twentieth-century architectural heritage: Two houses of Le Corbusier and André Wogenscky[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2016, 5(2): 157-170.
[14] J. Mundo-Hernández,M.C. Valerdi-Nochebuena,J. Sosa-Oliver. Post-occupancy evaluation of a restored industrial building:A contemporary art and design gallery in Mexico[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2015, 4(4): 330-340.
[15] Riccardo d'Aquino. One or two things about architecture: Restoration works at Trajan's Market[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2015, 4(2): 81-90.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed