Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Architectural Research

ISSN 2095-2635

ISSN 2095-2643(Online)

CN 10-1024/TU

Postal Subscription Code 80-966

Front. Archit. Res.    2020, Vol. 9 Issue (1) : 203-215    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foar.2019.06.007
Research Article
Micromorphological description of vernacular cob process and comparison with rammed earth
Erwan Hamard1(), Cécilia Cammas2, Blandine Lemercier3, Bogdan Cazacliu1, Jean-Claude Morel4
1. IFSTTAR, MAST, GPEM, F-44344, Bouguenais, France
2. INRAP, UMR 5140, AgroParisTech, F-78850, Thiverval-Grignon, France
3. UMR SAS, AGROCAMPUS OUEST, INRA, F-35042, Rennes, France
4. Faculty of Engineering, Environment and Computing, Centre for the Built and Natural Environment, Coventry University, Coventry, CV1 5FB, UK
 Download: PDF(5854 KB)  
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

Past builders have developed very low-embodied energy construction techniques optimizing the use of local building materials. These techniques are a source of inspiration for modern sustainable building. Unfortunately, this know-how was orally transmitted and was lost as earth construction fell into disuse during the 20th century in European countries. The absence of written documents makes necessary to use an archaeological approach in order to rediscover these construction strategies. Micromorphological analysis of thin sections collected in earth building walls was used for the first time to describe cob construction technique and highlighted several typical pedofeatures allowing to clearly identifying this process. Finally, a first comparison of the cob and rammed earth micromorphological features permitted to identify two key factors to distinguish these two techniques, the manufacturing state (solid or plastic) and the organization of the material in the wall.

Keywords Cob      Rammed earth      Micromorphology      Architectural heritage      Pedology     
Corresponding Author(s): Erwan Hamard   
Issue Date: 23 March 2020
 Cite this article:   
Erwan Hamard,Cécilia Cammas,Blandine Lemercier, et al. Micromorphological description of vernacular cob process and comparison with rammed earth[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2020, 9(1): 203-215.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/foar/EN/10.1016/j.foar.2019.06.007
https://academic.hep.com.cn/foar/EN/Y2020/V9/I1/203
[1] Sabeeh Farhan, Venus Akef, Zuhair Nasar. The transformation of the inherited historical urban and architectural characteristics of Al-Najaf’s Old City and possible preservation insights[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2020, 9(4): 820-836.
[2] Jonathan Ruiz-Jaramillo, Carmen Muñoz-González, Marı´a Dolores Joyanes-Dı´az, Eduardo Jiménez-Morales, José Manuel López-Osorio, Roberto Barrios-Pérez, Carlos Rosa-Jiménez. Heritage risk index: A multi-criteria decision-making tool to prioritize municipal historic preservation projects[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2020, 9(2): 403-418.
[3] Jian Jiao, Qiuling Xia, Fei Shi. Nondestructive inspection of a bricketimber structure in a modern architectural heritage building: Lecture hall of the Anyuan Miners’ Club, China[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2019, 8(3): 348-358.
[4] Weidong Hou, Wei Wang, Yan Xu. The protection project of Hanyuan Hall and Linde Hall of the Daming Palace[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2012, 1(1): 69-76.
[5] Xing Shi, Wei She, Hailong Zhou, Yunshen Zhang, Fei Shi, Wei Chen. Thermal upgrading of Hui-style vernacular dwellings in China using foam concrete[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2012, 1(1): 23-33.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed