Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Architectural Research

ISSN 2095-2635

ISSN 2095-2643(Online)

CN 10-1024/TU

Postal Subscription Code 80-966

Front. Archit. Res.    2021, Vol. 10 Issue (3) : 555-571    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foar.2021.02.005
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Regardless if it is comedy, action, thriller, or biography: A review of urban crime in the 1980s cinema of Chicago
Hamed Goharipour1(), Huston Gibson2(), Gholamreza Latifi3()
1. Department of Urban Studies, The College of Wooster, Wooster, OH 44691, USA
2. Department of Landscape Architecture and Regional & Community Planning, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506, USA
3. Department of Social, Urban, and Regional Planning, Allameh Tabataba’i University, Tehran, Iran
 Download: PDF(2248 KB)  
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

This study investigates the cinematic representation of city crime transactions in Chicago in the 1980s. The narrative nature of cinema provides an imaginative context for interpreting the physical and nonphysical dimensions of urban crimes. From a critical interpretive position, based on Peirce’s semiotics, this study uses “urban cinesemiotics” as the method to select image signs, identify their associated Chicagoan objects, and interpret their designoriented meaning. The theoretical roots of crime prevention through environmental design constitute the basis for the interpretation of movies. A total of 27 crime-related scenes from 9 Chicagoan movies made in the 1980s illustrate that most urban settings suffer from the lack of crime-preventive environmental design. In particular, natural surveillance (eyes on the street), encounter and enclosure, and border vacuums are major environmental factors that affect urban crimes in Chicago. Some crime scenes also depict why environmental design cannot influence individuals’ criminal intentions necessarily nor can they solve urban safety single-handedly.

Keywords Crime      Urban theory      CPTED      Design      Cinema      Chicago     
Corresponding Author(s): Hamed Goharipour   
Issue Date: 08 October 2021
 Cite this article:   
Hamed Goharipour,Huston Gibson,Gholamreza Latifi. Regardless if it is comedy, action, thriller, or biography: A review of urban crime in the 1980s cinema of Chicago[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2021, 10(3): 555-571.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/foar/EN/10.1016/j.foar.2021.02.005
https://academic.hep.com.cn/foar/EN/Y2021/V10/I3/555
[1] Gonçalo Araújo, Inês Pereira, António Leitão, Manuel Correia Guedes. Conflicts in passive building performance: Retrofit and regulation of informal neighbourhoods[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2021, 10(3): 625-638.
[2] Jingyun Shen, Zhiwei Lian. Multivariate analysis of subjective evaluation of indoor lighting environment[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2021, 10(3): 614-624.
[3] Maria Philokyprou, Aimilios Michael, Eleni Malaktou. A typological, environmental and socio-cultural study of semi-open spaces in the Eastern Mediterranean vernacular architecture: The case of Cyprus[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2021, 10(3): 483-501.
[4] Lingjiang Huang, Changchao Fan, Zhiqiang (John) Zhai. A graphical multi-objective performance evaluation method with architect-friendly mode[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2021, 10(2): 420-431.
[5] Chenyi Cai, Biao Li. Training deep convolution network with synthetic data for architectural morphological prototype classification[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2021, 10(2): 304-316.
[6] David O’Brien, Sandra Carrasco. Contested incrementalism: Elemental’sQuinta Monroy settlement fifteen years on[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2021, 10(2): 263-273.
[7] Natasha Chayaamor-Heil, Louis Vitalis. Biology and architecture: An ongoing hybridization of scientific knowledge and design practice by six architectural offices in France[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2021, 10(2): 240-262.
[8] Dongqing Han, Yacheng Song, Enqi Wang, Hua Liu, Rong Fang. Multiple dimensions of urban design development from a practice perspective: A case study of an institute in Nanjing[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2021, 10(1): 79-91.
[9] Stavroula Thravalou, Maria Philokyprou. Urban design considerations in the environmental assessment of vernacular buildings with timber projections (sachnisi): The case of Nicosia’s historic center[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2021, 10(1): 176-189.
[10] Jun Cao, Junkai Zhu, Qingyao Zhang, Ke Wang, Junyan Yang, Qiao Wang. Modeling urban intersection form: Measurements, patterns, and distributions[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2021, 10(1): 33-49.
[11] Xiao Wang, Yacheng Song, Peng Tang. Generative urban design using shape grammar and block morphological analysis[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2020, 9(4): 914-924.
[12] Yuyang Wang, Asterios Agkathidis, Andrew Crompton. Parametrising historical Chinese courtyarddwellings: An algorithmic design framework for the digital representation of Siheyuan iterations based on traditional design principles[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2020, 9(4): 751-773.
[13] Ran Xu, Haishan Xia, Mei Tian. Wayfinding design in transportation architecture e are saliency models or designer visual attention a good predictor of passenger visual attention?[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2020, 9(4): 726-738.
[14] Ahdha Moosa, Khoa Do, Emil Jonescu. Design response to rising sea levels in the Maldives: A study into aquatic architecture[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2020, 9(3): 623-640.
[15] Salomé A. Bentinck, Clarine J. van Oel, Machiel J. van Dorst. Perception of privacy in a university building: The transparency paradox[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2020, 9(3): 579-587.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed