Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Architectural Research

ISSN 2095-2635

ISSN 2095-2643(Online)

CN 10-1024/TU

Postal Subscription Code 80-966

Front. Archit. Res.    2022, Vol. 11 Issue (3) : 527-541    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foar.2021.12.008
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Digital representation methods: The case of algorithmic design
Renata Castelo-Branco(), Inês Caetano, António Leitão
INESC-ID/Instituto Superior Técnico, University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal
 Download: PDF(4534 KB)  
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

Architectural representation encompasses the means used to describe architectural entities. This discipline has long been under constant change due to architects’ everpresent desire for innovation. Algorithmic design (AD) is currently making its way into the plethora of representation methods that integrate the architect’s day-to-day work tools. However, it provides its fair share of controversy and hardship as it goes. This paper assesses whether AD is suitable as a representation method for architectural design by making a systematic analysis of this medium as a contemporary representation method. Specifically, we investigate (1) its birth and evolution as a means of representation, (2) the characteristics that make it simultaneously appealing and off-putting to the architectural community, (3) the influence of technological evolution and education on its proliferation, and (4) its capacity to represent design problems in comparison to the currently predominant means of digital architectural representation, that is, computer-aided drafting and building information modeling.

Keywords Representation methods      Algorithmic design      Computer-aided drafting      Building information modeling     
Corresponding Author(s): Renata Castelo-Branco   
Issue Date: 23 June 2022
 Cite this article:   
Renata Castelo-Branco,Inês Caetano,António Leitão. Digital representation methods: The case of algorithmic design[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2022, 11(3): 527-541.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/foar/EN/10.1016/j.foar.2021.12.008
https://academic.hep.com.cn/foar/EN/Y2022/V11/I3/527
[1] Gonçalo Araújo, Inês Pereira, António Leitão, Manuel Correia Guedes. Conflicts in passive building performance: Retrofit and regulation of informal neighbourhoods[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2021, 10(3): 625-638.
[2] Asli Agirbas. Teaching construction sciences with the integration of BIM to undergraduate architecture students[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2020, 9(4): 940-950.
[3] Yuyang Wang, Asterios Agkathidis, Andrew Crompton. Parametrising historical Chinese courtyarddwellings: An algorithmic design framework for the digital representation of Siheyuan iterations based on traditional design principles[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2020, 9(4): 751-773.
[4] Inês Caetano, Luís Santos, António Leitão. Computational design in architecture: Defining parametric, generative, and algorithmic design[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2020, 9(2): 287-300.
[5] Asterios Agkathidis. Dark Matter Garden: A case study in algorithmic modelling and digital fabrication of complex steel structures[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2019, 8(3): 303-310.
[6] Danfulani Babangida Idi, KhairulAnwar Mohamed Khaidzir. Critical perspective of design collaboration: A review[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2018, 7(4): 544-560.
[7] Egwunatum I. Samuel,Esther Joseph-Akwara,Akaigwe Richard. Assessment of energy utilization and leakages in buildings with building information model energy[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2017, 6(1): 29-41.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed