Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Architectural Research

ISSN 2095-2635

ISSN 2095-2643(Online)

CN 10-1024/TU

Postal Subscription Code 80-966

Front. Archit. Res.    2022, Vol. 11 Issue (6) : 1151-1176    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foar.2022.05.006
REVIEW
Design and mechanism of building responsive skins: State-of-the-art and systematic analysis
Saba Fattahi Tabasi1(), Saeed Banihashemi2
1. Department of Architecture, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
2. Department of Design and the Built Environment, University of Canberra, Canberra, Australia
 Download: PDF(7441 KB)  
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

The demand to satisfy environmental and economic performance requirements of buildings highlights the application of the responsive skin facades in offering superior performance, as compared to conventional façades. With this respect, responsive skins have become a growing field of research during the recent decade while a thorough review of studies investigating their design and technology aspects is still missing. To fill the identified gap, this study aims to present a systematic literature review and state of the art in an untouched research area of the responsive skins, integrated with their geometric and mechanism design approaches. To this end, a total of 89 studies, collected from two major bibliographic databases of Scopus and Google Scholar from the first of 2010 to the mid of 2021, were reviewed and several classifications and analyses on the associated design thinking, skin systems and responsive mechanisms were presented. The gap analysis of the findings indicates that the lack of controllable substitution design for mechanical skins is one of the reasons preventing the application of responsive skins in construction industry. Furthermore, the gap between simulation and constructability and the relationship between the designed skin geometry with climatic analysis and performance provide basis for future studies.

Keywords Responsive skin      Architectural design      Mechanism design     
Corresponding Author(s): Saba Fattahi Tabasi   
Issue Date: 29 December 2022
 Cite this article:   
Saba Fattahi Tabasi,Saeed Banihashemi. Design and mechanism of building responsive skins: State-of-the-art and systematic analysis[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2022, 11(6): 1151-1176.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/foar/EN/10.1016/j.foar.2022.05.006
https://academic.hep.com.cn/foar/EN/Y2022/V11/I6/1151
[1] Louis Vitalis, Natasha Chayaamor-Heil. Forcing biological sciences into architectural design: On conceptual confusions in the field of biomimetic architecture[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2022, 11(2): 179-190.
[2] Natasha Chayaamor-Heil, Louis Vitalis. Biology and architecture: An ongoing hybridization of scientific knowledge and design practice by six architectural offices in France[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2021, 10(2): 240-262.
[3] Salomé A. Bentinck, Clarine J. van Oel, Machiel J. van Dorst. Perception of privacy in a university building: The transparency paradox[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2020, 9(3): 579-587.
[4] Ahdha Moosa, Khoa Do, Emil Jonescu. Design response to rising sea levels in the Maldives: A study into aquatic architecture[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2020, 9(3): 623-640.
[5] Ahlam Ammar Sharif. Users as co-designers: Visualespatial experiences at Whitworth Art Gallery[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2020, 9(1): 106-118.
[6] Rania Aburamadan, Claudia Trillo. Applying design science approach to architectural design development[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2020, 9(1): 216-235.
[7] Wei Chang, Charlie Q.L. Xue. Towards international: China-aided stadiums in the developing world[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2019, 8(4): 604-619.
[8] Gökçe Ketizmen Önal, Hülya Turgut. Cultural schema and design activity in an architectural design studio[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2017, 6(2): 183-203.
[9] Ashraf M. Soliman. Appropriate teaching and learning strategies for the architectural design process in pedagogic design studios[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2017, 6(2): 204-217.
[10] Zifeng Guo,Biao Li. Evolutionary approach for spatial architecture layout design enhanced by an agent-based topology finding system[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2017, 6(1): 53-62.
[11] Runjiao Liu,Difei Jiang,Lei Shi. Agent-based simulation of alternative classroom evacuation scenarios[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2016, 5(1): 111-125.
[12] Sajjad Nazidizaji,Ana Tomé,Francisco Regateiro. Does the smartest designer design better? Effect of intelligence quotient on students’ design skills in architectural design studio[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2015, 4(4): 318-329.
[13] Anastasia D. Stavridou. Breathing architecture: Conceptual architectural design based on the investigation into the natural ventilation of buildings[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2015, 4(2): 127-145.
[14] Stephen Verderber,Shan Jiang,George Hughes,Yanwen Xiao. The evolving role of evidence-based research in healthcare facility design competitions[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2014, 3(3): 238-249.
[15] Siva Jaganathan, Lenin Jawahar Nesan, Rahinah Ibrahim, Abdul Hakim Mohammad. Integrated design approach for improving architectural forms in industrialized building systems[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2013, 2(4): 377-386.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed