Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Architectural Research

ISSN 2095-2635

ISSN 2095-2643(Online)

CN 10-1024/TU

Postal Subscription Code 80-966

Front. Archit. Res.    2023, Vol. 12 Issue (4) : 613-629    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foar.2023.04.001
REVIEW
Design and science: Content analysis of published peer-reviewed research over the last four decades
Milica Vujovic1(), Djordje Stojanovic2, Tina Selami1, Michael Hensel1
1. Faculty of Architecture and Planning, Department of Digital Architecture and Planning, TU Wien, A-1060 Vienna, Austria
2. Faculty of Architecture, Buliding and Planning, University of Melbourne, Melbourne VIC 3000, Australia
 Download: PDF(1694 KB)  
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

The relationship between design and science in architecture continually receives attention from scholars, but to our knowledge, no substantial and systematic literature reviews have been undertaken to generate insights into how the relationship between the two has developed in recent times. As most of the related debate remains theoretical, this paper presents evidence acquired through content analysis of selected 782 peer-reviewed papers published in the last four decades, a period in which design requirements continue to grow in complexity and research efforts increasingly concentrate on design methods. In response, this study departs from the two keywords, architectural science and building science, and develops search strings to support examination of the relationship between science and architectural design since the 1980s, when research that addresses the building environment started to intensify. The analysis employs tools based on machine learning algorithms for text analytics in combination with traditional content analysis methods. The presented research method is fully replicable and stands as one of the contributions of this study. The findings capture the expansion of the research context concerned with the built environment through a careful selection of defining terms, and generate an informed discussion on how the role of science in the architectural design process has changed.

Keywords Architectural science      Building science      Architectural design      Content analysis      Literature review     
Corresponding Author(s): Milica Vujovic   
Issue Date: 25 July 2023
 Cite this article:   
Milica Vujovic,Djordje Stojanovic,Tina Selami, et al. Design and science: Content analysis of published peer-reviewed research over the last four decades[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2023, 12(4): 613-629.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/foar/EN/10.1016/j.foar.2023.04.001
https://academic.hep.com.cn/foar/EN/Y2023/V12/I4/613
[1] Saba Fattahi Tabasi, Saeed Banihashemi. Design and mechanism of building responsive skins: State-of-the-art and systematic analysis[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2022, 11(6): 1151-1176.
[2] Louis Vitalis, Natasha Chayaamor-Heil. Forcing biological sciences into architectural design: On conceptual confusions in the field of biomimetic architecture[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2022, 11(2): 179-190.
[3] Natasha Chayaamor-Heil, Louis Vitalis. Biology and architecture: An ongoing hybridization of scientific knowledge and design practice by six architectural offices in France[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2021, 10(2): 240-262.
[4] Salomé A. Bentinck, Clarine J. van Oel, Machiel J. van Dorst. Perception of privacy in a university building: The transparency paradox[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2020, 9(3): 579-587.
[5] Ahdha Moosa, Khoa Do, Emil Jonescu. Design response to rising sea levels in the Maldives: A study into aquatic architecture[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2020, 9(3): 623-640.
[6] Saman Jamshidi, Jan S. Parker, Seyedehnastaran Hashemi. The effects of environmental factors on the patient outcomes in hospital environments: A review of literature[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2020, 9(2): 249-263.
[7] Ahlam Ammar Sharif. Users as co-designers: Visualespatial experiences at Whitworth Art Gallery[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2020, 9(1): 106-118.
[8] Rania Aburamadan, Claudia Trillo. Applying design science approach to architectural design development[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2020, 9(1): 216-235.
[9] Wei Chang, Charlie Q.L. Xue. Towards international: China-aided stadiums in the developing world[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2019, 8(4): 604-619.
[10] Gökçe Ketizmen Önal, Hülya Turgut. Cultural schema and design activity in an architectural design studio[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2017, 6(2): 183-203.
[11] Ashraf M. Soliman. Appropriate teaching and learning strategies for the architectural design process in pedagogic design studios[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2017, 6(2): 204-217.
[12] Zifeng Guo,Biao Li. Evolutionary approach for spatial architecture layout design enhanced by an agent-based topology finding system[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2017, 6(1): 53-62.
[13] Runjiao Liu,Difei Jiang,Lei Shi. Agent-based simulation of alternative classroom evacuation scenarios[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2016, 5(1): 111-125.
[14] Sajjad Nazidizaji,Ana Tomé,Francisco Regateiro. Does the smartest designer design better? Effect of intelligence quotient on students’ design skills in architectural design studio[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2015, 4(4): 318-329.
[15] Anastasia D. Stavridou. Breathing architecture: Conceptual architectural design based on the investigation into the natural ventilation of buildings[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2015, 4(2): 127-145.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed