Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Architectural Research

ISSN 2095-2635

ISSN 2095-2643(Online)

CN 10-1024/TU

Postal Subscription Code 80-966

Front. Archit. Res.    2023, Vol. 12 Issue (6) : 1157-1170    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foar.2023.08.003
CASE STUDY
Spatial sight analysis of Hangzhou Xiaoyingzhou based on tourists’ landscape preference
Yiying Chen(), Qiwei Ma, Lihua Xu(), Yijun Shi, Zhangwei Lu, Yaqi Wu, Mao Feng
College of Landscape Architecture and Architecture, Zhejiang Agriculture and Forestry University, Hangzhou 310000, China
 Download: PDF(3027 KB)  
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

Tourist preferences are important for the high-quality planning and design of recreation spaces. The famous scenic locale of West Lake in Hangzhou, China, is used as an example in this study. Based on multi-source data (e.g., online comments, and tourist photographs), we used content analysis, kernel density estimation, and image semantic segmentation technology to determine the spatial distribution of tourists’ landscape preferences. We analyzed these spatial sight characteristics from the viewpoint, sight distance, and perspectives. The results show that tourists’ landscape preferences are mainly concentrated on landscape architecture for recreation. The viewpoints of these preferences are concentrated in the north-south embankment—far beyond that of the east-west embankment. The preferences also show a spatial sequence in terms of sight distance, and the best visual effect is the open platform at the north and south islands of Xiaoyingzhou. From the perspective of vision, the degree of spatial openness in the tourists’ landscape preferences is proportional to the distance of vision; the two factors have a convergent relationship. The discussion of the characteristics of tourists’ landscape preference and space sight creation in Xiaoyingzhou provides a reference for the quality improvement of island recreation space.

Keywords Landscape preference      Photo content analysis      Landscape      Xiaoyingzhou      Line of sight analysis     
Corresponding Author(s): Yiying Chen,Lihua Xu   
Issue Date: 20 December 2023
 Cite this article:   
Yiying Chen,Qiwei Ma,Lihua Xu, et al. Spatial sight analysis of Hangzhou Xiaoyingzhou based on tourists’ landscape preference[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2023, 12(6): 1157-1170.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/foar/EN/10.1016/j.foar.2023.08.003
https://academic.hep.com.cn/foar/EN/Y2023/V12/I6/1157
[1] Ignacio-Javier Gil-Crespo, Concetta Cusano, Claudia Cennamo. The Tower of Nisida as centre of 17th century fortified naples system[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2023, 12(2): 308-318.
[2] Ruoshi Zhang. Integrating ergonomics data and emotional scale to analyze people’s emotional attachment to different landscape features in the Wudaokou Urban Park[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2023, 12(1): 175-187.
[3] Karen Lee Bar-Sinai, Tal Alon-Mozes, Aaron Sprecher. Editing landscapes: Experimental frameworks for territorial-based robotic fabrication[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2023, 12(1): 104-117.
[4] Hocine Sami Belmahdi, Abderezak Djemili. Urban landscape structure anatomy: Structure patterns and typology identification in the space-time of Setif City, Algeria[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2022, 11(3): 421-439.
[5] Haifei Zhou, Edoardo Currà, Jiawei Leng, Yu Xu, Wenkang Hu. Contradiction and consistency: Deconstruction of landscape bridges based on multiple temporal-spatial scales[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2022, 11(1): 53-72.
[6] Celia López-Bravo, José Peral López, Eduardo Mosquera Adell. The management of water heritage in Portuguese cities: Recent regeneration projects in Évora, Lisbon, Braga and Guimarães[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2022, 11(1): 73-88.
[7] Xin Jin, Jianguo Wang. Assessing Linear Urban Landscape from dynamic visual perception based on urban morphology[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2021, 10(1): 202-219.
[8] Angeliki Triandafillou Paraskevopoulou, Emmanouela Kamperi. Design of hospital healing gardens linked to pre- or post-occupancy research findings[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2018, 7(3): 395-414.
[9] Gunnar Cerwén, Jacob Kreutzfeldt, Carola Wingren. Soundscape actions: A tool for noise treatment based on three workshops in landscape architecture[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2017, 6(4): 504-518.
[10] Deni Ruggeri,Deven Young. Community in the information age: Exploring the social potential of web-based technologies in landscape architecture and community design[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2016, 5(1): 15-26.
[11] Kota Maruya,Sampei Yamashita,Tadashi Uchiyama. Community spaces in the minds of traditional craftsmen in a pottery village in Japan[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2015, 4(4): 253-262.
[12] Ayman Hassaan Mahmoud,Reham H. Omar. Planting design for urban parks: Space syntax as a landscape design assessment tool[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2015, 4(1): 35-45.
[13] Archana Sharma. Urban greenways: Operationalizing design syntax and integrating mathematics and science in design[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2015, 4(1): 24-34.
[14] Tomohiro Fukuda,Tian Zhang,Nobuyoshi Yabuki. Improvement of registration accuracy of a handheld augmented reality system for urban landscape simulation[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2014, 3(4): 386-397.
[15] Shan Jiang. Therapeutic landscapes and healing gardens: A review of Chinese literature in relation to the studies in western countries[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2014, 3(2): 141-153.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed