Characterization of irradiated nails in terms of depolarizing Mueller matrix decompositions

doi:10.1007/s12200-017-0727-3

Front. Optoelectron.

2017, Vol. 10

Issue (3) : 308-316 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12200-017-0727-3

RESEARCH ARTICLE

Characterization of irradiated nails in terms of depolarizing Mueller matrix decompositions

Sergey SAVENKOV¹(

), Alexander V. PRIEZZHEV², Yevgen OBEREMOK¹, Sergey SHOLOM³, Ivan KOLOMIETS¹

¹. Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Faculty of Radio Physics, Electronics, and Computer Systems, Vladimirskaya str. 64, 01033 Kiev, Ukraine
². Lomonosov Moscow State University, Department of Physics and International Laser Center, Vorobiovy Gory, 119992 Moscow, Russia
³. Oklahoma State University, Department of Physics, 145 Physical Sciences Building, Stillwater, Oklahoma 74078, USA

Download: PDF(485 KB) HTML
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks

Abstract

Mueller matrices were measured for natural (or reference) samples of human nails and samples irradiated by a 2 Gy ionizing radiation dose. The elements of the total Mueller matrix as a function of scattering angle were measured in backscattering mode at a wavelength of 632.8 nm. Several types of depolarizing Mueller matrix decompositions, namely, Ossikovsky, Williams, and Chipman, were calculated as a function of scattering angle for each nail sample. A comparative analysis of the sensitivity of the Mueller matrix decompositions in relation to the problem of emergency dose assessment in nails was performed.

Keywords Mueller matrix depolarization human nails ionizing radiation dose scattering

Corresponding Author(s): Sergey SAVENKOV

Just Accepted Date: 18 July 2017 Online First Date: 23 August 2017 Issue Date: 26 September 2017

Cite this article:

Sergey SAVENKOV,Alexander V. PRIEZZHEV,Yevgen OBEREMOK, et al. Characterization of irradiated nails in terms of depolarizing Mueller matrix decompositions[J]. Front. Optoelectron., 2017, 10(3): 308-316.

URL:

https://academic.hep.com.cn/foe/EN/10.1007/s12200-017-0727-3
https://academic.hep.com.cn/foe/EN/Y2017/V10/I3/308

Fig.1 Schematic illustration of the experiment,

α inp = α out

Fig.2 Dependence of elements of the matrix

M Δ d

on observation angle for samples (a) AL, (b) F23, (c) Joe

Fig.3 Dependence of elements of the matrix

M W

on observation angle for samples (a) AL, (b) F23, (c) Joe

Fig.4 Dependence of elements of the matrix

M Δ

on observation angle for samples (a) AL, (b) F23, (c) Joe

1	McKeever S W S, Sholom S. Biodosimetry versus physical dosimetry for emergency dose assessment following large-scale radiological exposures. Radiation Measurements, 2016, 92: 8–18 doi:10.1016/j.radmeas.2016.06.003
2	Bailiff I K, Sholom S, McKeever S W S. Retrospective and emergency dosimetry in response to radiologic alincidents and nuclear mass-casualty events, a review. Radiation Measurements, 2016, 94: 83–139 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radmeas.2016.09.004
3	Ainsbury E, Badie C, Barnard S, Manning G, Moquet J, Abend M, Antunes A C, Barrios L, Bassinet C, Beinke C, Bortolin E, Bossin L, Bricknell C, Brzoska K, Buraczewska I, Castaño C H, Čemusová Z, Christiansson M, Cordero S M, Cosler G, Monaca S D, Desangles F, Discher M, Dominguez I, Doucha-Senf S, Eakins J, Fattibene P, Filippi S, Frenzel M, Georgieva D, Gregoire E, Guogyte K, Hadjidekova V, Hadjiiska L, Hristova R, Karakosta M, Kis E, Kriehuber R, Lee J, Lloyd D, Lumniczky K, Lyng F, Macaeva E, Majewski M, Vanda Martins S, McKeever S W, Meade A, Medipally D, Meschini R, M’kacher R, Gil O M, Montero A, Moreno M, Noditi M, Oestreicher U, Oskamp D, Palitti F, Palma V, Pantelias G, Pateux J, Patrono C, Pepe G, Port M, Prieto M J, Quattrini M C, Quintens R, Ricoul M, Roy L, Sabatier L, Sebastià N, Sholom S, Sommer S, Staynova A, Strunz S, Terzoudi G, Testa A, Trompier F, Valente M, Hoey O V, Veronese I, Wojcik A, Woda C. Integration of new biological and physical retrospective dosimetry methods into EU emergency response plans- joint RENEB and EURADOS inter-laboratory comparisons. International Journal of Radiation Biology, 2017, 93(1): 99–109 https://doi.org/10.1080/09553002.2016.1206233 pmid: 27437830
4	Bassinet C, Woda C, Bortolin E, Della Monaca S, Fattibene P, Quattrini M S, Bulanek B, Ekendahl D, Burbidge C, Cauwels V, Kouroukla E, Geber-Bergstrand T, Piasjkowski A, Marczewska B, Bilksi P, Sholom S, McKeever S W S, Smith R, Veronese I, Gallim A, Panzeri L, Martini M. Retrospective radiation dosimetry using OSL from electronic components: results of an inter-laboratory comparison. Radiation Measurements, 2014, 71: 475–479 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radmeas.2014.03.016
5	Sholom S, McKeever S W S. Emergency OSL/TL dosimetry with integrated circuits from mobile phones. In: Proceedings of SPIE Hard X-Ray, Gamma-Ray, and Neutron Detector Physics XVI, 921319. San Diego, California, United States, 2014, 921319
6	Sholom S, McKeever S W S. Integrated circuits from mobile phones as possible emergency OSL/TL dosimeters. Radiation Protection Dosimetry, 2016, 170(1-4): 398–401 https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncv446 pmid: 26516131
7	Discher M, Woda C, Fiedler I. Improvement of dose determination using glass display of mobile phones for accident dosimetry. Radiation Measurements, 2013, 56: 240–243 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radmeas.2013.01.027
8	Discher M, Bortolin E, Woda C. Investigations of touchscreen glasses from mobile phones for retrospective and accident dosimetry. Radiation Measurements, 2016, 89: 44–51 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radmeas.2016.02.032
9	Pascu A, Vasiliniuc S, Zeciu-Dolha M, Timar-Gabor A. The potential of luminescence signals from electronic components for accident dosimetry. Radiation Measurements, 2013, 56: 384–388 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radmeas.2013.03.013
10	Sholom S, Dewitt R, Simon S L, Bouville A, McKeever S W S. Emergency dose estimation using optically stimulated luminescence from human tooth enamel. Radiation Measurements, 2011, 46(9): 778–782 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radmeas.2011.03.008 pmid: 21949479
11	Sholom S, Dewitt R, Simon S, Bouville A, McKeever S. Emergency optically stimulated luminescence dosimetry using different materials. Radiation Measurements, 2011, 46(12): 1866–1869 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radmeas.2011.03.004 pmid: 22125409
12	Sholom S, Desrosiers M. EPR and OSL emergency dosimetry with teeth: a direct comparison of two techniques. Radiation Measurements, 2014, 71: 494–497 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radmeas.2014.03.015
13	Williams B B, Flood A B, Salikhov I, Kobayashi K, Dong R, Rychert K, Du G, Schreiber W, Swartz H M. In vivo EPR tooth dosimetry for triage after a radiation event involving large populations. Radiation and Environmental Biophysics, 2014, 53(2): 335–346 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00411-014-0534-9 pmid: 24711003
14	Tipikin D S, Swarts S G, Sidabras J W, Trompier F, Swartz H M. Possible nature of the stable radiation-induced signal in nails: high-field EPR, confirming chemical synthesis, quantum chemical calculations. Radiation Protection Dosimetry, 2016, 172(1-3): 112–120 https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncw216 pmid: 27522053
15	Marciniak A, Ciesielski B. EPR dosimetry in nails – a review. Applied Spectroscopy Reviews, 2016, 51(1): 73–92 https://doi.org/10.1080/05704928.2015.1101699
16	Savenkov S, Priezzhev A, Oberemok Y, Sholom S, Kolomiets I, Chunikhina K. Characterization of natural and irradiated nails by means of the depolarization metrics. Journal of Biomedical Optics, 2016, 21(7): 071108 https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.21.7.071108 pmid: 26927390
17	Gil J J, Bernabeu E. A depolarization criterion in Mueller matrices. Optica Acta, 1985, 32(3): 259–261 https://doi.org/10.1080/713821732
18	Gil J J, Bernabeu E. Depolarization and polarization indexes of an optical system. Optica Acta, 1986, 33(2): 185–189 https://doi.org/10.1080/713821924
19	Espinosa-Luna R, Bernabeu E. On the Q(M) depolarization metric. Optics Communications, 2007, 277(2): 256–258 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optcom.2007.05.051
20	Ossikovski R. Alternative depolarization criteria for Mueller matrices. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, Optics, Image Science, and Vision, 2010, 27(4): 808–814 https://doi.org/10.1364/JOSAA.27.000808 pmid: 20360822
21	Cloude S R, Pottier E. Concept of polarization entropy in optical scattering. Optical Engineering (Redondo Beach, Calif.), 1995, 34(6): 1599–1610 https://doi.org/10.1117/12.202062
22	Cloude S R. Group theory and polarization algebra. Optik (Stuttgart), 1986, 7: 26–36
23	Savenkov S N, Muttiah R S, Oberemok Y A. Transmitted and reflected scattering matrices from an English oak leaf. Applied Optics, 2003, 42(24): 4955–4962 https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.42.004955 pmid: 12952343
24	Savenkov S N, Mishchenko L T, Muttiah R S, Oberemok Y A, Mishchenko I A. Mueller polarimetry of virus-infected and healthy wheat under ﬁeld and microgravity conditions. Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy & Radiative Transfer, 2004, 88(1-3): 327–343 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jqsrt.2003.12.035
25	Savenkov S N, Grygoruk V I, Muttiah R S, Yushtin K E, Oberemok Ye A, Yakubchak V V. Effective dichroism in forward scattering by inhomogeneous birefringent medium. Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy & Radiative Transfer, 2009, 110(1-2): 30–42 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jqsrt.2008.09.002
26	Ossikovski R. Analysis of depolarizing Mueller matrices through a symmetric decomposition. Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, Image Science, and Vision, 2009, 26(5): 1109–1118 https://doi.org/10.1364/JOSAA.26.001109 pmid: 19412227
27	Williams M W. Depolarization and cross polarization in ellipsometry of rough surfaces. Applied Optics, 1986, 25(20): 3616–3622 https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.25.003616 pmid: 18235668
28	Lu S Y, Chipman R A. Interpretation of Mueller matrices based on polar decomposition. Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, Image Science, and Vision, 1996, 13(5): 1106–1113 https://doi.org/10.1364/JOSAA.13.001106
29	Savenkov S N. Optimization and structuring of the instrument matrix for polarimetric measurements. Optical Engineering (Redondo Beach, Calif.), 2002, 41(5): 965–972 https://doi.org/10.1117/1.1467361
30	Gil J J, San José I. Reduced form of a Mueller matrix Journal of Modern Optics, 2016, 63(16): 1579–1583 https://doi.org/10.1080/09500340.2016.1162337

[1]	Tatiana A. SAVELIEVA, Marina N. KURYANOVA, Ekaterina V. AKHLYUSTINA, Kirill G. LINKOV, Gennady A. MEEROVICH, Victor B. LOSCHENOV. Attenuation correction technique for fluorescence analysis of biological tissues with significantly different optical properties[J]. Front. Optoelectron., 2020, 13(4): 360-370.
[2]	Kuanhong XU, Xiaonong ZHU, Peng HUANG, Zhiqiang Yu, Nan ZHANG. Origin of peculiar inerratic diffraction patterns recorded by charge-coupled device cameras[J]. Front. Optoelectron., 2019, 12(2): 174-179.
[3]	Yanjun ZHANG,Jinrui XU,Xinghu FU,Jinjun LIU,Yongsheng TIAN. Hybrid algorithm combining genetic algorithm with back propagation neural network for extracting the characteristics of multi-peak Brillouin scattering spectrum[J]. Front. Optoelectron., 2017, 10(1): 62-69.
[4]	Heng WANG, Peng XIANG, Mi XU, Guanghui LIU, Xiong LI, Zhiliang KU, Yaoguang RONG, Linfeng LIU, Min HU, Ying YANG, Hongwei HAN. High efficiency monobasal solid-state dye-sensitized solar cell with mesoporous TiO₂ beads as photoanode[J]. Front Optoelec, 2013, 6(4): 413-417.
[5]	Bushra NAWAZ, Rameez ASIF. Impact of polarization mode dispersion and nonlinearities on 2-channel DWDM chaotic communication systems[J]. Front Optoelec, 2013, 6(3): 312-317.
[6]	Muhammad Idrees AFRIDI, Jie ZHANG, Yousaf KHAN, Jiawei HAN, Aftab HUSSEIN, Shahab AHMAD. Impact of Rayleigh backscattering on single/dual feeder fiber WDM-PON architectures based on array waveguide gratings[J]. Front Optoelec, 2013, 6(1): 102-107.
[7]	Duan LIU, Songnian FU, Ming TANG, Ping SHUM, Deming LIU. Rayleigh backscattering noise in single-fiber loopback duplex WDM-PON architecture[J]. Front Optoelec, 2012, 5(4): 435-438.
[8]	Xiaoyan SUN, Peng HUANG, Jiefeng ZHAO, Li WEI, Nan ZHANG, Dengfeng KUANG, Xiaonong ZHU. Characteristic control of long period fiber grating (LPFG) fabricated by infrared femtosecond laser[J]. Front Optoelec, 2012, 5(3): 334-340.
[9]	Yueyin SHAO, Yongqian WEI, Zhenghua WANG. Surface-enhanced Raman scattering of sulfate ion based on Ag/Si nanostructure[J]. Front Optoelec Chin, 2011, 4(4): 378-381.
[10]	Shilie ZHENG, Sixuan GE, Hao CHI, Xiaofeng JIN, Xianmin ZHANG. Frequency response equalization in phase modulated RoF systems using optical carrier Brillouin processing[J]. Front Optoelec Chin, 2011, 4(3): 277-281.
[11]	Zhiyong BAO, Li ZHANG, Yucheng WU. Silver nanoparticles and silver molybdate nanowires complex for surface-enhanced Raman scattering substrate[J]. Front Optoelec Chin, 2011, 4(2): 166-170.
[12]	Rujian LIN, Meiwei ZHU, Zheyun ZHOU, Haoshuo CHEN, Jiajun YE. New progress of mm-wave radio-over-fiber system based on OFM[J]. Front Optoelec Chin, 2009, 2(4): 368-378.
[13]	Ziheng XU, Deming LIU, Hairong LIU, Qizhen SUN, Zhifeng SUN, Xu ZHANG, Wengang WANG. Design of distributed Raman temperature sensing system based on single-mode optical fiber[J]. Front Optoelec Chin, 2009, 2(2): 215-218.
[14]	Deming LIU, Shuang LIU, Hairong LIU. Temperature performance of Raman scattering in data fiber and its application in distributed temperature fiber-optic sensor[J]. Front Optoelec Chin, 2009, 2(2): 159-162.
[15]	ZHAO Mingfu, LIAO Qiang, CHEN Yan, ZHONG Nianbing. Fiber sensor of online biomass testing[J]. Front. Optoelectron., 2008, 1(1-2): 85-90.

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed