Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Optoelectronics

ISSN 2095-2759

ISSN 2095-2767(Online)

CN 10-1029/TN

Postal Subscription Code 80-976

Front. Optoelectron.    2021, Vol. 14 Issue (3) : 263-277    https://doi.org/10.1007/s12200-020-1009-z
REVIEW ARTICLE
3D printing of glass by additive manufacturing techniques: a review
Dao ZHANG1, Xiaofeng LIU2, Jianrong QIU1,3()
1. State Key Laboratory of Modern Optical Instrumentation and School of Optical Science and Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China
2. School of Materials Science and Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China
3. Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan National Laboratory for Optoelectronics, Wuhan 430074, China
 Download: PDF(7192 KB)   HTML
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

Additive manufacturing (AM), which is also known as three-dimensional (3D) printing, uses computer-aided design to build objects layer by layer. Here, we focus on the recent progress in the development of techniques for 3D printing of glass, an important optoelectronic material, including fused deposition modeling, selective laser sintering/melting, stereolithography (SLA) and direct ink writing. We compare these 3D printing methods and analyze their benefits and problems for the manufacturing of functional glass objects. In addition, we discuss the technological principles of 3D glass printing and applications of 3D printed glass objects. This review is finalized by a summary of the current achievements and perspectives for the future development of the 3D glass printing technique.

Keywords three-dimensional (3D) printing      glass      fused deposition modeling (FDM)      selective laser sintering/melting (SLS/SLM)      stereolithography (SLA)      digital light processing (DLP)      direct ink write (DIW)      optical devices      microfluidic     
Corresponding Author(s): Jianrong QIU   
Just Accepted Date: 05 June 2020   Online First Date: 10 July 2020    Issue Date: 30 September 2021
 Cite this article:   
Dao ZHANG,Xiaofeng LIU,Jianrong QIU. 3D printing of glass by additive manufacturing techniques: a review[J]. Front. Optoelectron., 2021, 14(3): 263-277.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/foe/EN/10.1007/s12200-020-1009-z
https://academic.hep.com.cn/foe/EN/Y2021/V14/I3/263
Fig.1  (a) Cross section view of the structure of the 3D printing system that is based on the FDM technique. (b) Temperature distribution around the nozzle during the printing process. (c) Photograph of the nozzle during printing. (d) SEM image of a 3D printed glass sample. (e) Optical transparency of printed glass parts (top view of a 70 mm tall cylinder). Reproduced from Ref. [30]
Fig.2  (a) Photograph of 3D printed chalcogenide glass samples with the composition of As40S60. (b) SEM image of the printed As40S60 chalcogenide glass. (c) Absorption spectra of an unpolished As40S60 printed chalcogenide glass sample (with the thickness of approximately 2 mm) and of a polished slice of the As40S60 precursor glass (2.3-mm thickness). (d) Raman spectra of the original As40S60 chalcogenide glass, glass filament, and printed samples. Reproduced from Ref. [31]
Fig.3  (a) Photograph of a 3D glass printing system. (b) SEM images of 3D printed glass. Reproduced from Ref. [32]
Fig.4  3D printing of fused silica glass. (a) Ultraviolet-curable monomer mixed with amorphous silica nanoparticles is structured in a stereolithography system. The resulting polymerized composites transformed into fused silica glass through thermal debinding and sintering (scale bar, 7 mm). (b) and (c) Examples of printed and sintered glass structures: Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT) logo ((b) scale bar, 5 mm) and pretzel ((c) scale bar, 5 mm). (d) Demonstration of the high thermal resistance of printed fused silica glass (scale bar, 1 cm). The flame had the temperature of approximately 800°C. Reproduced from Ref. [42]
Fig.5  (a) Schematic illustration of the stereolithography system for glass AM. (b) Transmittance spectra of sintered silica glass and fused silica. (c) Photographs of the additive manufactured silica glass doped with Eu3+, Tb3+, and Ce3+ and their photoluminescence under irradiation with a 254 nm UV lamp (The scale bars represent 5 mm). Reproduced from Refs. [43,48]
Fig.6  (a) Schematic diagram of the process, which illustrates the geometrical complexity generated by the illumination pattern and the nanostructure emerging from the phase separation phenomenon. (b) and (c) During this process, acrylate monomers and pre-ceramic precursors, such as poly(diethoxysiloxane), are photopolymerized to form a three-dimensionally defined bicontinuous structure of organic and preceramic polymers. (d) The as-printed object is pyrolysed to form a nanoporous structure that can be optionally further sintered into transparent multi-material glasses and glass-ceramics. (e) Illustrative picture of a complex-shaped object at different stages of the process. (f) Optical transmittance of the 3D printed glass in comparison to a highly transparent reference. (g) Phase diagram of the boro-phospho-silicate system indicating the glass composition used to print the objects shown in this figure. (h) Transparent and dense boro-phospho-silicate glasses obtained by sintering 3D printed porous objects. Reproduced from Ref. [51]
Fig.7  Schematic diagram of 3D printing that is based on a sol ink and the obtained transparent silica glass objects. (a) Printing of the sol gel ink by a DLP printer. (b)−(d) Printed structures composed of 15 wt% of S1 and 13.3 wt% of 3-acryloxypropyl trimethoxysilane (APTMS) at different stages: (b) wet gel structure after printing; (c) dry structure after the removal of solvents (drying at 50°C); (d) silica structure after burning away organic residues at 800°C. (e) Structures printed with ink composed of 15 wt% of S1 and 5.3 wt% of APTMS. (f) Transparent silica object after burning away organic residues at 800°C. (g) Environmental scanning electron microscopy (ESEM) image of the 3D printed silica object. Reproduced from Ref. [52]
Fig.8  (a) and (b) Illustration and photograph of the filament-fed fused quartz AM process. (c) Single wall printing. (d) Photographs of the printed fused quartz cylinder. (e) Photographs of the printed cubes. Reproduced from Refs. [6365]
Fig.9  (a) Schematic diagram for the sol–gel-derived DIW SiO2/SiO2–TiO2 glass fabrication. (1) SiO2 particle sol preparation. (2) TiO2–SiO2 core–shell particle preparation. (3) Ink preparation by solvent exchange from the particle sol to DIW printable ink. (4) DIW printing of a glass preform. (5) Organic removal to low density inorganic glass preform. (6) Sintering to full density optical quality glass (unpolished). (b) UV–vis optical transmission spectra. (c) Optical dispersion curves. Reproduced from Ref. [69]
Fig.10  (a) Microstereolithography of a hollow castle gate (scale bar, 270 mm). (b) A cookie (scale bar, 7 mm) and a coin (scale bar, 4 mm) were successfully replicated and printed in glass. Reproduced from Refs. [17,42]
Fig.11  (a) Micro-optical diffractive structure, which creates the optical projection pattern shown at the bottom (illuminated with a green laser pointer; scale bar, 100 mm). (b) Micro lenses fabricated using greyscale lithography (inset scale bar, 100 mm). (c) 3D printed multicomponent glass. Reproduced from Refs. [42,68]
Fig.12  (a) Microfluidic fused silica chip fabricated by 3D printing; a nylon thread is embedded into the channel (scale bar, 9 mm). (b) Microfluidic zigzag (scale bar, 11 mm). (c) Two-layer microfluidic glass chip (scale bar, 4 mm). (d) Microfluidic chip with its channel filled with colored solutions (scale bar, 350 mm). Reproduced from Refs. [17,18]
1 K V Wong, A Hernandez. A review of additive manufacturing. ISRN Mechanical Engineering, 2012, 2012: 1–10
https://doi.org/10.5402/2012/208760
2 S H Jariwala, G S Lewis, Z J Bushman, J H Adair, H J Donahue. 3D printing of personalized artificial bone scaffolds. 3D Printing and Additive Manufacturing, 2015, 2(2): 56–64
https://doi.org/10.1089/3dp.2015.0001
3 H Bikas, P Stavropoulos, G Chryssolouris. Additive manufacturing methods and modelling approaches: a critical review. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2015, 83(1–4): 389–405
4 P Balling, J Schou. Femtosecond-laser ablation dynamics of dielectrics: basics and applications for thin films. Reports on Progress in Physics, 2013, 76(3): 036502
https://doi.org/10.1088/0034-4885/76/3/036502 pmid: 23439493
5 H N Chia, B M Wu. Recent advances in 3D printing of biomaterials. Journal of Biological Engineering, 2015, 9(1): 4
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13036-015-0001-4 pmid: 25866560
6 B Berman. 3-D printing: the new industrial revolution. Business Horizons, 2012, 55(2): 155–162
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2011.11.003
7 S Bose, S Vahabzadeh, A Bandyopadhyay. Bone tissue engineering using 3D printing. Materials Today, 2013, 16(12): 496–504
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mattod.2013.11.017
8 B C Gross, J L Erkal, S Y Lockwood, C Chen, D M Spence. Evaluation of 3D printing and its potential impact on biotechnology and the chemical sciences. Analytical Chemistry, 2014, 86(7): 3240–3253
https://doi.org/10.1021/ac403397r pmid: 24432804
9 N Liu, H Guo, L Fu, S Kaiser, H Schweizer, H Giessen. Three-dimensional photonic metamaterials at optical frequencies. Nature Materials, 2008, 7(1): 31–37
https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat2072 pmid: 18059275
10 F Rengier, A Mehndiratta, H von Tengg-Kobligk, C M Zechmann, R Unterhinninghofen, H U Kauczor, F L Giesel. 3D printing based on imaging data: review of medical applications. International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery, 2010, 5(4): 335–341
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-010-0476-x pmid: 20467825
11 X Wang, M Jiang, Z Zhou, J Gou, D Hui. 3D printing of polymer matrix composites: a review and prospective. Composites, Part B, Engineering, 2017, 110: 442–458
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.11.034
12 C Y Yap, C K Chua, Z L Dong, Z H Liu, D Q Zhang, L E Loh, S L Sing. Review of selective laser melting: materials and applications. Applied Physics Reviews, 2015, 2(4): 041101
https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4935926
13 A J Ikushima, T Fujiwara, K Saito. Silica glass: a material for photonics. Journal of Applied Physics, 2000, 88(3): 1201–1213
https://doi.org/10.1063/1.373805
14 J Friend, H H Tan, M J S Spencer, T Morishita, M R Bassett. Density functional theory calculations of phenol-modified monolayer silicon nanosheets. In: Proceedings of SPIE Micro/Nano Materials, Devices, and Systems. Melbourne: SPIE, 2013, 89230D
15 T Billiet, E Gevaert, T De Schryver, M Cornelissen, P Dubruel. The 3D printing of gelatin methacrylamide cell-laden tissue-engineered constructs with high cell viability. Biomaterials, 2014, 35(1): 49–62
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.09.078 pmid: 24112804
16 K S Elvira, X Casadevall i Solvas, R C Wootton, A J deMello. The past, present and potential for microfluidic reactor technology in chemical synthesis. Nature Chemistry, 2013, 5(11): 905–915
https://doi.org/10.1038/nchem.1753 pmid: 24153367
17 F Kotz, K Plewa, W Bauer, N Schneider, N Keller, T Nargang, D Helmer, K Sachsenheimer, M Schäfer, M Worgull, C Greiner, C Richter, B E Rapp. Liquid glass: a facile soft replication method for structuring glass. Advanced Materials, 2016, 28(23): 4646–4650
https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201506089 pmid: 27060964
18 F Kotz, P Risch, K Arnold, S Sevim, J Puigmartí-Luis, A Quick, M Thiel, A Hrynevich, P D Dalton, D Helmer, B E Rapp. Fabrication of arbitrary three-dimensional suspended hollow microstructures in transparent fused silica glass. Nature Communications, 2019, 10(1): 1439
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-09497-z pmid: 30926801
19 G D Goh, Y L Yap, H K J Tan, S L Sing, G L Goh, W Y Yeong. Process–structure–properties in polymer additive manufacturing via material extrusion: a review. Critical Reviews in Solid State and Material Sciences, 2020, 45(2): 113–133
https://doi.org/10.1080/10408436.2018.1549977
20 J Huang, Q Chen, H Jiang, B Zou, L Li, J Liu, H Yu. A survey of design methods for material extrusion polymer 3D printing. Virtual and Physical Prototyping, 2020, 15(2): 148–162
https://doi.org/10.1080/17452759.2019.1708027
21 V E Kuznetsov, A N Solonin, A G Tavitov, O D Urzhumtsev, A H Vakulik. Increasing strength of FFF three-dimensional printed parts by influencing on temperature-related parameters of the process. Rapid Prototyping Journal, 2018, 26: 107–121
https://doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-01-2019-0017
22 G Ćwikła, C Grabowik, K Kalinowski, I Paprocka, P Ociepka. The influence of printing parameters on selected mechanical properties of FDM/FFF 3D-printed parts. IOP Conference Series. Materials Science and Engineering, 2017, 227: 012033
https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/227/1/012033
23 B Wittbrodt, J M Pearce. The effects of PLA color on material properties of 3-D printed components. Additive Manufacturing, 2015, 8: 110–116
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2015.09.006
24 S Thirunahary, M M R Ketham, H Akhil, N K Mavoori. A critical review on of 3D printing materials and details of materials used in FDM. International Journal of Scientific Research in Science, Engineering and Technology, 2017, 3(2): 353–361
25 R Polak, F Sedlacek, K Raz. Determination of FDM printer settings with regard to geometrical accuracy. In: Proceedings of the 28th International DAAAM Symposium. 2017, 0561–0566
26 A K Sood, R K Ohdar, S S Mahapatra. Parametric appraisal of mechanical property of fused deposition modelling processed parts. Materials & Design, 2010, 31(1): 287–295
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2009.06.016
27 D Popescu, A Zapciu, C Amza, F Baciu, R Marinescu. FDM process parameters influence over the mechanical properties of polymer specimens: a review. Polymer Testing, 2018, 69: 157–166
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2018.05.020
28 Y H Choi, C M Kim, H S Jeong, J H Youn. Influence of bed temperature on heat shrinkage shape error in FDM additive manufacturing of the ABS-engineering plastic. World Journal of Engineering and Technology, 2016, 4(3): 186–192
https://doi.org/10.4236/wjet.2016.43D022
29 J B Soares, J Finamor, F P Silva, L Roldo, L H Cândido. Analysis of the influence of polylactic acid (PLA) colour on FDM 3D printing temperature and part finishing. Rapid Prototyping Journal, 2018, 24(8): 1305–1316
https://doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-09-2017-0177
30 J Klein, M Stern, G Franchin, M Kayser, C Inamura, S Dave, J Weaver, P Houk, P Colombo, M Yang, N Oxman. Additive manufacturing of optically transparent glass. 3D Printing and Additive Manufacturing, 2015, 2(3): 92–105
31 E Baudet, Y Ledemi, P Larochelle, S Morency, Y Messaddeq. 3D-printing of arsenic sulfide chalcogenide glasses. Optical Materials Express, 2019, 9(5): 2307
https://doi.org/10.1364/OME.9.002307
32 Engineering Niomta. Progress has been made in research on 3D printing technology and equipment for glass at Ningbo Institute of Materials Technique and Engineering. 2015 (in Chinese)
33 A Garg, A Bhattacharya, A Batish. On surface finish and dimensional accuracy of FDM parts after cold vapor treatment. Materials and Manufacturing Processes, 2016, 31(4): 522–529
https://doi.org/10.1080/10426914.2015.1070425
34 G Li. Effect of FDM rapid prototyping process parameter on step effect. Mechanical Engineering & Automation, 2017, 12(6): 131–135 (in Chinese)
35 E Ceretti, P Ginestra, P I Neto, A Fiorentino, J V L Da Silva. Multi-layered scaffolds production via fused deposition modeling (FDM) using an open source 3D printer: process parameters optimization for dimensional accuracy and design reproducibility. Procedia CIRP, 2017, 65: 13–18
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2017.04.042
36 J Kiendl, C Gao. Controlling toughness and strength of FDM 3D-printed PLA components through the raster layup. Composites Part B, Engineering, 2020, 180: 107562
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.107562
37 N Mohan, P Senthil, S Vinodh, N Jayanth. A review on composite materials and process parameters optimisation for the fused deposition modelling process. Virtual and Physical Prototyping, 2017, 12(1): 47–59
https://doi.org/10.1080/17452759.2016.1274490
38 R H Hambali, K M Cheong, N Azizan. Analysis of the influence of chemical treatment to the strength and surface roughness of FDM. IOP Conference Series. Materials Science and Engineering, 2017, 210: 012063
https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/210/1/012063
39 H Hong, Y B Seo, D Y Kim, J S Lee, Y L Lee, H Lee, O Ajiteru, M T Sultan, O J Lee, S H Kin, C H Park. Digital light processing 3D printed silk fibroin hydrogel for cartilage tissue engineering. Biomaterials, 2018, 232: 119679
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.119679
40 S H Kim, Y K Yeon, J M Lee, J R Chao, Y J Lee, Y B Seo, M T Sultan, O J Lee, J S Lee, S I Yoon, I S Hong, G Khang, S J Lee, J J Yoo, C H Park. Precisely printable and biocompatible silk fibroin bioink for digital light processing 3D printing. Nature Communications, 2018, 9(1): 1620
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-03759-y pmid: 29693652
41 J Z Manapat, J D Mangadlao, B D Tiu, G C Tritchler, R C Advincula. High-strength stereolithographic 3D printed nanocomposites: graphene oxide metastability. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2017, 9(11): 10085–10093
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.6b16174 pmid: 28230346
42 F Kotz, K Arnold, W Bauer, D Schild, N Keller, K Sachsenheimer, T M Nargang, C Richter, D Helmer, B E Rapp. Three-dimensional printing of transparent fused silica glass. Nature, 2017, 544(7650): 337–339
https://doi.org/10.1038/nature22061 pmid: 28425999
43 C Liu, B Qian, R Ni, X Liu, J Qiu. 3D printing of multicolor luminescent glass. RSC Advances, 2018, 8(55): 31564–31567
https://doi.org/10.1039/C8RA06706F
44 A Sadeqi, H Rezaei Nejad, R E Owyeung, S Sonkusale. Three dimensional printing of metamaterial embedded geometrical optics (MEGO). Microsystems & Nanoengineering, 2019, 5(1): 16
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41378-019-0053-6 pmid: 31057943
45 S Waheed, J M Cabot, N P Macdonald, T Lewis, R M Guijt, B Paull, M C Breadmore. 3D printed microfluidic devices: enablers and barriers. Lab on a Chip, 2016, 16(11): 1993–2013
https://doi.org/10.1039/C6LC00284F pmid: 27146365
46 G Strano, L Hao, R M Everson, K E Evans. A new approach to the design and optimisation of support structures in additive manufacturing. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2012, 66(9–12): 1247–1254
47 E A Yu, J Yeom, C C Tutum, E Vouga, R Miikkulainen. Evolutionary decomposition for 3D printing. In: Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference. Berlin: ACM Publication, 2017, 1272–1279
48 C Liu, B Qian, X Liu, L Tong, J Qiu. Additive manufacturing of silica glass using laser stereolithography with a top-down approach and fast debinding. RSC Advances, 2018, 8(29): 16344–16348
https://doi.org/10.1039/C8RA02428F
49 D Wu, Z Zhao, Q Zhang, H J Qi, D Fang. Mechanics of shape distortion of DLP 3D printed structures during UV post-curing. Soft Matter, 2019, 15(30): 6151–6159
https://doi.org/10.1039/C9SM00725C pmid: 31317163
50 D A Komissarenko, P S Sokolov, A D Evstigneeva, I A Shmeleva, A E Dosovitsky. Rheological and curing behavior of acrylate-based suspensions for the DLP 3D printing of complex zirconia parts. Materials (Basel), 2018, 11(12): 2350
https://doi.org/10.3390/ma11122350 pmid: 30469515
51 D G Moore, L Barbera, K Masania, A R Studart. Three-dimensional printing of multicomponent glasses using phase-separating resins. Nature Materials, 2020, 19(2): 212–217
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41563-019-0525-y pmid: 31712744
52 I Cooperstein, E Shukrun, O Press, A Kamyshny, S Magdassi. Additive manufacturing of transparent silica glass from solutions. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2018, 10(22): 18879–18885
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.8b03766 pmid: 29741081
53 V S D Voet, T Strating, G H M Schnelting, P Dijkstra, M Tietema, J Xu, A J J Woortman, K Loos, J Jager, R Folkersma. Biobased acrylate photocurable resin formulation for stereolithography 3D printing. ACS Omega, 2018, 3(2): 1403–1408
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.7b01648 pmid: 31458469
54 P Bertrand, F Bayle, C Combe, P Goeuriot, I Smurov. Ceramic components manufacturing by selective laser sintering. Applied Surface Science, 2007, 254(4): 989–992
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2007.08.085
55 H Rao, S Giet, K Yang, X Wu, C H J Davies. The influence of processing parameters on aluminium alloy A357 manufactured by Selective Laser Melting. Materials & Design, 2016, 109: 334–346
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2016.07.009
56 J H Rao, Y Zhang, X Fang, Y Chen, X Wu, C H J Davies. The origins for tensile properties of selective laser melted aluminium alloy A357. Additive Manufacturing, 2017, 17: 113–122
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2017.08.007
57 I Yadroitsev, P Bertrand, I Smurov. Parametric analysis of the selective laser melting process. Applied Surface Science, 2007, 253(19): 8064–8069
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2007.02.088
58 N Ahmed. Direct metal fabrication in rapid prototyping: a review. Journal of Manufacturing Processes, 2019, 42: 167–191
https://doi.org/doi:10.1016/j.jmapro.2019.05.001
59 F Klocke, A McClung, C Ader. Direct laser sintering of borosilicate glass. In: Proceedings of the 15th Annual Symposium on Solid Freeform Fabrication. Austi: The University of Texas, 2004, 214–219
60 R Rahmani, M Rosenberg, A Ivask, L Kollo. Comparison of mechanical and antibacterial properties of TiO2/Ag ceramics and Ti6Al4V-TiO2/Ag composite materials using combined SLM-SPS techniques. Metals, 2019, 9(8): 874
https://doi.org/10.3390/met9080874
61 C F Tey, X Tan, S L Sing, W Y Yeong. Additive manufacturing of multiple materials by selective laser melting: Ti-alloy to stainless steel via a Cu-alloy interlayer. Additive Manufacturing, 2020, 31: 100970
62 C N Kuo, C K Chua, P C Peng, Y W Chen, S L Sing, S Huang, Y L Su. Microstructure evolution and mechanical property response via 3D printing parameter development of Al–Sc alloy. Virtual and Physical Prototyping, 2020, 15(1): 120–129
https://doi.org/10.1080/17452759.2019.1698967
63 J Luo, H P Edward, C Kinzel. Additive manufacturing of glass. Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, 2014, 136(6): 061024
64 J Luo, L J Gilbert, D A Bristow, R G Landers, J T Goldstein, A M Urbas, E C Kinzel. Additive manufacturing of glass for optical applications. In: Proceedings of SPIE Laser 3D Manufacturing III. California: SPIE, 2016, 97380Y
65 J Luo, J G Luke, C Qu, G L Robert, A B Douglas, C K Edward. Additive manufacturing of optically transparent soda-lime glass using a filament-fed process. Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, 2017, 139(6): 061006
66 S H Ko, H Pan, C P Grigoropoulos, C K Luscombe, J M J Fréchet, D Poulikakos. All-inkjet-printed flexible electronics fabrication on a polymer substrate by low-temperature high-resolution selective laser sintering of metal nanoparticles. Nanotechnology, 2007, 18(34): 345202
https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-4484/18/34/345202
67 B K Park, D Kim, S Jeong, J Moon, J S Kim. Direct writing of copper conductive patterns by ink-jet printing. Thin Solid Films, 2007, 515(19): 7706–7711
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsf.2006.11.142
68 D T Nguyen, C Meyers, T D Yee, N A Dudukovic, J F Destino, C Zhu, E B Duoss, T F Baumann, T Suratwala, J E Smay, R Dylla-Spears. 3D-printed transparent glass. Advanced Materials, 2017, 29(26): 1701181
pmid: 28452163
69 J F Destino, N A Dudukovic, M A Johnson, D T Nguyen, T D Yee, G C Egan, A M Sawvel, W A Steele, T F Baumann, E B Duoss, T Suratwala, R Dylla-Spears. 3D printed optical quality silica and silica-titania glasses from sol-gel feedstocks. Advanced Materials Technologies, 2018, 3(6): 1700323
70 N A Dudukovic, L L Wong, D T Nguyen, J F Destino, T D Yee, F J Ryerson, T Suratwala, E B Duoss, R Dylla-Spears. Predicting nanoparticle suspension viscoelasticity for multimaterial 3D printing of silica–titania glass. ACS Applied Nano Materials, 2018, 1(8): 4038–4044
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsanm.8b00821
71 K Sasan, A Lange, T D Yee, N Dudukovic, D T Nguyen, M A Johnson, O D Herrera, J H Yoo, A M Sawvel, M E Ellis, C M Mah, R Ryerson, L L Wong, T Suratwala, J F Destino, R Dylla-Spears. Additive manufacturing of optical quality germania-silica glasses. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2020, 12(5): 6736–6741
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.9b21136 pmid: 31934741
72 V C Li, C K Dunn, Z Zhang, Y Deng, H J Qi. Direct ink write (DIW) 3D printed cellulose nanocrystal aerogel structures. Scientific Reports, 2017, 7(1): 8018
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-07771-y pmid: 28808235
73 H Yuk, X Zhao. A new 3D printing strategy by harnessing deformation, instability, and fracture of viscoelastic inks. Advanced Materials, 2018, 30(6): 1704028
https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201704028 pmid: 29239049
74 D Lowell, D George, J Lutkenhaus, C Tian, M Adewole, U Philipose, H Zhang, Y Lin. Flexible holographic fabrication of 3D photonic crystal templates with polarization control through a 3D printed reflective optical element. Micromachines, 2016, 7(7): 128
https://doi.org/10.3390/mi7070128 pmid: 30404300
75 L Jonušauskas, S Juodkazis, M Malinauskas. Optical 3D printing: bridging the gaps in the mesoscale. Journal of Optics, 2018, 20(5): 053001
https://doi.org/10.1088/2040-8986/aab3fe
76 F Kotz, N Schneider, A Striegel, A Wolfschläger, N Keller, M Worgull, W Bauer, D Schild, M Milich, C Greiner, D Helmer, B E Rapp. Glassomer-processing fused silica glass like a polymer. Advanced Materials, 2018, 30(22): 1707100
https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201707100 pmid: 29611238
77 S Thiele, K Arzenbacher, T Gissibl, H Giessen, A M Herkommer. 3D-printed eagle eye: compound microlens system for foveated imaging. Science Advances, 2017, 3(2): e1602655
https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1602655 pmid: 28246646
78 K Cook, J Canning, S Leon-Saval, Z Reid, M A Hossain, J E Comatti, Y Luo, G D Peng. Air-structured optical fiber drawn from a 3D-printed preform. Optics Letters, 2015, 40(17): 3966–3969
https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.40.003966 pmid: 26368688
79 T Gissibl, S Thiele, A Herkommer, H Giessen. Two-photon direct laser writing of ultracompact multi-lens objectives. Nature Photonics, 2016, 10(8): 554–560
https://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2016.121
80 N Bhattacharjee, A Urrios, S Kang, A Folch. The upcoming 3D-printing revolution in microfluidics. Lab on a Chip, 2016, 16(10): 1720–1742
https://doi.org/10.1039/C6LC00163G pmid: 27101171
81 G Weisgrab, A Ovsianikov, P F Costa. Functional 3D printing for microfluidic chips. Advanced Materials Technologies, 2019, 4(10): 1900275
82 Y He, Y Wu, J Fu, Q Gao, J Qiu. Developments of 3D printing microfluidics and applications in chemistry and biology: a review. Electroanalysis, 2016, 28(8): 1658–1678
https://doi.org/10.1002/elan.201600043
83 J M Lee, M Zhang, W Y Yeong. Characterization and evaluation of 3D printed microfluidic chip for cell processing. Microfluidics and Nanofluidics, 2016, 20(1): 5
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10404-015-1688-8
84 A Yazdi, A Popma, W Wong, T Nguyen, Y Pan, J Xu. 3D printing: an emerging tool for novel microfluidics and lab-on-a-chip applications. Microfluidics and Nanofluidics, 2016, 20(3): 50
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10404-016-1715-4
85 T J Hinton, A Hudson, K Pusch, A Lee, A W Feinberg. 3D printing PDMS elastomer in a hydrophilic support bath via freeform reversible embedding. ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering, 2016, 2(10): 1781–1786
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.6b00170 pmid: 27747289
86 T Trantidou, Y Elani, E Parsons, O Ces. Hydrophilic surface modification of PDMS for droplet microfluidics using a simple, quick, and robust method via PVA deposition. Microsystems & Nanoengineering, 2017, 3(1): 16091
https://doi.org/10.1038/micronano.2016.91 pmid: 31057854
87 Z J Lin, J Xu, Y P Song, X L Li, P Wang, W Chu, Z H Wang, Y. Cheng Freeform microfluidic networks encapsulated in laser-printed 3D macroscale glass objects. Advanced Materials Technologies, 2020, 5(2): 1900989
[1] Kun REN, Ying ZHANG, Xiaobin REN, Yumeng HE, Qun HAN. Polarization-sensitive and active controllable electromagnetically induced transparency in U-shaped terahertz metamaterials[J]. Front. Optoelectron., 2021, 14(2): 221-228.
[2] Yue WANG, Jiaxin ZHAO, Qifeng ZHU, Jianping SHEN, Zhongyue WANG, Haitao GUO, Chunxiao LIU. Near-infrared carbon-implanted waveguides in Tb3+-doped aluminum borosilicate glasses[J]. Front. Optoelectron., 2019, 12(4): 392-396.
[3] Yuhe ZHAO, Xu WANG, Dingshan GAO, Jianji DONG, Xinliang ZHANG. On-chip programmable pulse processor employing cascaded MZI-MRR structure[J]. Front. Optoelectron., 2019, 12(2): 148-156.
[4] Xiaoliang SHEN, Yue WANG, Haitao GUO, Chunxiao LIU. Near-infrared carbon-implanted Er3+/Yb3+ co-doped phosphate glass waveguides[J]. Front. Optoelectron., 2018, 11(3): 291-295.
[5] Lauro J. Q. MAIA, Jyothis THOMAS, Yannick LEDEMI, Kummara V. KRISHNAIAH, Denis SELETSKIY, Younès MESSADDEQ, Raman KASHYAP. Photonic properties of novel Yb3+ doped germanium-lead oxyfluoride glass-ceramics for laser cooling applications[J]. Front. Optoelectron., 2018, 11(2): 189-198.
[6] Andrey V. BELIKOV, Andrey N. SERGEEV, Sergey N. SMIRNOV, Anastasia D. TAVALINSKAYA. Microperforation of the human nail plate by radiation of erbium lasers[J]. Front. Optoelectron., 2017, 10(3): 299-307.
[7] Ting YANG,Shasha LIAO,Li LIU,Jianji DONG. Large-range tunable fractional-order differentiator based on cascaded microring resonators[J]. Front. Optoelectron., 2016, 9(3): 399-405.
[8] Yaojing ZHANG, Lu SUN, Ying CHANG, Wenbin LI, Chun JIANG. Multiband infrared luminescence of Er3+-Ho3+-Nd3+/Tm3+-codoped telluride glasses[J]. Front Optoelec, 2014, 7(1): 74-76.
[9] Sijun WENG, Li PEI, Ruifeng ZHAO, Junjie YANG, Yiqun WANG. Optical devices based on multilayer optical waveguide[J]. Front Optoelec, 2013, 6(2): 146-152.
[10] Jiangbo SHE, Dongdong LI. Synthesis and optical properties of europium pentafluoropropionate 1,10-phenanthroline complex and its silica glass[J]. Front Optoelec Chin, 2011, 4(4): 382-386.
[11] Eric CASSAN, Xavier LE ROUX, Charles CAER, Ran HAO, Damien BERNIER, Delphine MARRIS-MORINI, Laurent VIVIEN. Silicon slow light photonic crystals structures: present achievements and future trends[J]. Front Optoelec Chin, 2011, 4(3): 243-253.
[12] Junke JIAO, Xinbing WANG. Numerical investigation on machining glass with CO2 lasers[J]. Front Optoelec Chin, 2009, 2(3): 334-338.
[13] Changkui HU, Deming LIU. Transmission-type SPR sensor based on coupling of surface plasmons to radiation modes using a dielectric grating[J]. Front Optoelec Chin, 2009, 2(2): 182-186.
[14] ZUO Tiechuan, QI Heng, YAO Liying, CHEN Tao. Miniaturized continuous-flow polymerase chain reaction microfluidic chip system[J]. Front. Optoelectron., 2008, 1(1-2): 39-43.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed