Manipulating atomic states via optical orbital
angular-momentum

doi:10.1007/s11467-008-0024-0

Frontiers of Physics in China - Selected Publications from Chinese Universities

2008, Vol. 3

Issue (2): 113-125 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11467-008-0024-0

本期目录

Manipulating atomic states via optical orbital angular-momentum

LIU Xiong-jun¹, LIU Xin², KWEK Leong-Chuan³, OH ChooHiap⁴

1.Department of Physics, National University of Singapore；Department of Physics, Texas A & M University; 2.Department of Physics, Texas A & M University; 3.Department of Physics, National University of Singapore；National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University; 4.Department of Physics, National University of Singapore

全文: PDF(859 KB) HTML

Abstract：Optical orbital angular-momentum (OAM) has more complex mechanics than the spin degree of photons, and may have a broad range of application. Manipulating atomic states via OAM has become an interesting topic. In this paper, we first review the general theory of generating adiabatic gauge field in ultracold atomic systems by coupling atoms to external optical fields with OAM, and point out the applications of the generated adiabatic gauge field. Then, we review our work in this field, including the generation of macroscopic superposition of vortex-antivortex states and spin Hall effect (SHE) in cold atoms.

出版日期: 2008-06-05

引用本文:

. Manipulating atomic states via optical orbital angular-momentum[J]. Frontiers of Physics in China - Selected Publications from Chinese Universities, 2008, 3(2): 113-125.
LIU Xiong-jun, LIU Xin, KWEK Leong-Chuan, OH ChooHiap. Manipulating atomic states via optical orbital angular-momentum. Front. Phys. , 2008, 3(2): 113-125.

链接本文:

https://academic.hep.com.cn/fop/CN/10.1007/s11467-008-0024-0
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fop/CN/Y2008/V3/I2/113

1	Parkins A S Marte P Zoller P Kimble H J Phys.Rev. Lett. 1993 713095. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.71.3095
2	Pelizzari T Gardiner S A Cirac J I Zoller P Phys. Rev.Lett. 1995 753788. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.75.3788
3	Cirac J I Zoller P Kimble H J Mabuchi H Phys. Rev.Lett. 1997 783221. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.78.3221
4	Vitanov N V Fleischhauer M Shore B W Bergmann K Adv. At.Mol., Opt. Phys. 2001 4655
5	Kimble H J Phys. Scr. 1998 76127. doi: 10.1238/Physica.Topical.076a00127
6	Harris S E Field J E Kasapi A Phys. Rev. A 1992 46R29. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.46.R29
7	Scully M O Zubairy M S Quantum OpticsCambridgeCambridgeUniversity Press 1999
8	Hau L V Harris S E Dutton Z Behroozi C H Nature(London) 1999 397594. doi: 10.1038/17561
9	Fleischhauer M Lukin M D Phys. Rev. Lett. 2000 845094. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.5094
10	Fleischhauer M Lukin M D Phys. Rev. A 2002 65022314. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.65.022314
11	Liu C Dutton Z Behroozi C H Hau L V Nature(London) 2001 409490. doi: 10.1038/35054017
12	Phillips D F Fleischhauer A Mair A Walsworth R L Lukin M D Phys. Rev. Lett. 2001 86783. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.783
13	Fleischhauer M Gong S Q Phys. Rev. Lett. 2002 88070404. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.070404
14	Kuang L M Zhou L Phys. Rev. A 2003 68043606. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.68.043606
15	Wu Y Saldana J Zhu Y Phys. Rev. A 2003 67013811. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.67.013811
16	Wu Y Deng L Phys. Rev. Lett. 2004 93143904. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.143904
17	Wu Y Payne M G Hagley E W Deng L Phys. Rev.A 2004 70063812. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.70.063812
18	Wu Y Phys. Rev. A 2005 71053820. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.71.053820
19	Sun C P Li Y Liu X F Phys. Rev. Lett. 2003 91147903. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.147903
20	Liu X J Jing H Ge M L Phys. Rev. A 2004 70055802. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.70.055802
21	Liu X J Jing H Liu X Ge M L Phys.Lett. A 2006 355437. doi: 10.1016/j.physleta.2006.02.031
22	Liu X J Liu X Liu Z X Kwek L C Oh C H Phys. Rev. A 2007 75023809. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.75.023809
23	André A Duan L-M Lukin M D Phys. Rev. Lett. 2002 88243602. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.243602
24	Matsukevich D Kuzmich A Science 2004 306663. doi: 10.1126/science.1103346
25	Julsgaard B Sherson J Cirac J I Fiurasek J A Polzik E S Nature (London) 2004 432482. doi: 10.1038/nature03064
26	Blinov B B Moehring D L Duan L M Monroe C Nature(London) 2004 428153. doi: 10.1038/nature02377
27	Matsukevich D N Chaneliere T Bhattacharya M Lan S Y Jenkins S D Kennedy T A B Kuzmich A Phys. Rev. Lett. 2005 95040405. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.040405
28	Rosenfeld W Berner S Volz J Weber M We. Infurter H Phys. Rev. Lett. 2007 98050504. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.050504
29	Lewenstein M Sanpera A Ahufinger V Damski B Sen De A Sen U Adv. Phys. 2007 56243. doi: 10.1080/00018730701223200
30	Engels P Coddington I Haljan P C Cornell E A Phys.Rev. Lett. 2002 89100403. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.100403
31	Paredes B Fedichev P Cirac J I Zoller P Phys. Rev.Lett. 2001 87010402. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.010402
32	Paredes B Fedichev P Cirac J I Zoller P Phys. Rev.A 2002 66033609. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.66.033609
33	Abo-Shaeer J R Raman C Vogels J M Ketterle W Science 2001 292476. doi: 10.1126/science.1060182
34	Ho T L Phys. Rev. Lett. 2001 87060403. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.060403
35	Fischer U R Baym G Phys. Rev. Lett. 2003 90140402. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.90.140402
36	Søensen A S Demler E Lukin M D Phys. Rev. Lett. 2005 94086803. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.086803
37	Abrikosov A A Sov. Phys. JETP 1957 51174
38	Juzeliunas G Ohberg P Phys. Rev. Lett. 2004 93033602. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.033602
39	Jaksch D Zoller P New J. Phys. 2003 556. doi: 10.1088/1367‐2630/5/1/356
40	Juzeliunas G Ohberg P Ruseckas J Klein A Phys. Rev.A 2005 71053614. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.71.053614
41	Ruseckas J Juzeliunas G Ohberg P Fleischhauer M Phys. Rev. Lett. 2005 95010404. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.010404
42	Gabriel M T Tores Juan P Lluis T Nature Physics 2007 3305. doi: 10.1038/nphys607
43	Allen L Barnett S M Padgett M J Optical Angular MomentumBristolInstitute of Physics 2003
44	Wright E M Arlt J DhoLaKia K Phys. Rev. A 2001 63013608. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.63.013608
45	Allen L Padgett M J Babiker M Prog. Opt. 1999 39291
46	Soskin M S Vasnetsov M V Prog. Opt. 2001 42219
47	Wilczek F Zee A Phys. Rev. Lett. 1984 522111. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.52.2111
48	Wilson K G Phys. Rev. D 1974 102445. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.10.2445
49	Sun C P Ge M L Phys. Rev. D 1990 411349. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.41.1349
50	Liu X-J Liu X Kwek L C Oh C H Phys.Rev. Lett. 2007 98026602arXiv: cond-mat/0603083. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.026602
51	Zhu S-L Fu H Wu C-J Zhang S-C Duan L-M Phys. Rev. Lett. 2006 97240401. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.240401
52	Matthews M R Anderson B P Haljan P C Hall D S Wieman C E Cornell E A Phys. Rev. Lett. 1999 832498. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.83.2498
53	Marzlin K-P Zhang W Wright E M Phys. Rev. Lett. 1997 794728. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.79.4728
54	Nandi G Walser R Schleich W P Phys. Rev. A 2004 69063606. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.69.063606
55	Dutton Z Ruostekoski J Phys. Rev. Lett. 2004 93193602. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.193602
56	Liu X-J Jing H Liu X Ge M-L Eur.Phys. J. D 2006 37261. doi: 10.1140/epjd/e2005‐00260‐0
57	Kapale1 K T Dowling J P Phys. Rev. Lett. 2005 95173601. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.173601
58	Liu M Wen L H Xiong H W Zhan M S Phys.Rev. A 2006 73063620. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.73.063620
59	Faddeev L Niemi A J Phys. Rev. Lett. 2000 853416. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.3416
60	Babaev E Faddeev L D Niemi A J Phys. Rev. B 2002 65100512. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.65.100512
61	Murakami S Nagaosa N Zhang S-C Science 2003 3011348. doi: 10.1126/science.1087128
62	Sinova J Culcer D Niu Q Sinitsyn N A Jungwirth T MacDonald A H Phys. Rev. Lett. 2004 92126603. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.126603
63	Kato Y K Myers R C Gossard A C Awschalom D D Science 2004 3061910. doi: 10.1126/science.1105514
64	Wunderlich J Kaestner B Sinova J Jungwirth T Phys. Rev. Lett. 2005 94047204. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.047204
65	Nikolic B K Souma S Zârbo L P Sinova J Phys. Rev.Lett. 2005 95046601. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.046601
66	Murakami S Nagaosa N Zhang S-C Phys. Rev. Lett. 2004 93156804. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.156804
67	Kane C L Mele E J Phys. Rev. Lett. 2005 95226801. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.226801
68	Sinitsyn N A Hill J E Min Hongki Sinova J MacDonald A H arXiv: cond-mat/0602598
69	Bernevig B A Hughes Taylor L Zhang S-C Science 2006 3141757. doi: 10.1126/science.1133734
70	Bernevig B A Zhang S-C Phys. Rev. Lett. 2006 96106802. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.106802
71	DeMarco B Jin D S Science 1999 2851703. doi: 10.1126/science.285.5434.1703
72	Gehm M E Preparation of an Optically-trapped Degenerate Fermi Gas of ⁶Li: Finding the Route to Degeneracy, Doctor Thesis,Duke University 2003
73	Shen L Senozan N Phillips N Phys. Rev. Lett. 1965 141025. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.14.1025
74	Bouquet F Fisher R A Phillips N E Hinks D G Jorgensen J D Phys. Rev. Lett. 2001 87047001. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.047001
75	Moulopoulos K Ashcroft N W Phys. Rev. B 1999 5912309. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.59.12309
76	Grimm R Weidemuller M Optical Dipole Traps for NeutralAtomsIn: Advances in Atomic, Molecularand Optical Physics 2000 Vol. 4295
77	Hadzibabic Z Gupta S Stan C A Schunck C H Zwierlein M W Dieckmann K Ketterle W Phys. Rev.Lett. 2003 91160401. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.160401
78	Dudarev Artem M Diener Roberto B Carusotto Iacopo Niu Q Phys. Rev.Lett. 2004 92153005. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.153005
79	Liu X-J Liu X Kwek L C Oh C H arXiv: condmat/0701506
80	Li Y Bruder C Sun C P Phys. Rev. Lett. 2007 99130403. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.130403
81	Stanescu T D Zhang C W Galitski V Phys. Rev. Lett. 2007 99110403. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.110403
82	Osterloh K Baig M Santos L Zoller P Lewenstein M Phys. Rev. Lett. 2005 95010403. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.010403

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed