|
|
Charging and self-discharging process of a quantum battery in composite environments |
Kai Xu1(), Han-Jie Zhu2, Hao Zhu3, Guo-Feng Zhang3(), Wu-Ming Liu2,4,5 |
1. School of Science, Tianjin University of Technology, Tianjin 300384, China 2. Beijing National Laboratory for Condensed Matter Physics, Institute of Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China 3. School of Physics, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China 4. School of Physical Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China 5. Songshan Lake Materials Laboratory, Dongguan 523808, China |
|
|
Abstract How to improve charging processes and suppress self-discharging processes has always been one of the key issues to achieve quantum batteries with high performance. Although a quantum battery is inevitably influenced by composite environments, this situation is still little understood, particularly regarding the influence of the memory effect of the composite environments and the coupling between composite environments. In this work, we investigate the effects of the composite environments, composed of two identical parts each containing a single cavity mode decaying to a reservoir, on the charging and self-discharging processes of a quantum battery. We show that increasing the two-mode coupling can effectively enhance the charging performance (i.e., the stored energy, the charging power, ergotropy) and restrain the self-discharging process (i.e., suppressing the process of dissipating the energy). However, different from the effect of two-mode coupling, we reveal that the memory effect of the reservoir in this composite environment is unfavorable to the charging process of the quantum battery, which is in sharp contrast to previous studies where the memory effect can significantly improve the charging performance of a quantum battery. Our results may benefit to the realization of quantum batteries with high performance under the actual complex environmental noise.
|
Keywords
quantum battery
quantum device
|
Corresponding Author(s):
Kai Xu,Guo-Feng Zhang
|
Issue Date: 16 January 2023
|
|
1 |
Nielsen M.L. Chuang I., Quantum Computation and Quantum Information, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2000
|
2 |
Arute F., Arya K., Babbush R., Bacon D., C. Bardin J.. et al.. Quantum supremacy using a programmable superconducting processor. Nature, 2019, 574(7779): 505
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1666-5
|
3 |
Vinjanampathy S., Anders J.. Quantum thermodynamics. Contemp. Phys., 2016, 57(4): 545
https://doi.org/10.1080/00107514.2016.1201896
|
4 |
Uzdin R., Levy A., Kosloff R.. Equivalence of quantum heat machines, and quantum-thermodynamic signatures. Phys. Rev. X, 2015, 5(3): 031044
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.5.031044
|
5 |
Campisi M., Fazio R.. Dissipation, correlation and lags in heat engines. J. Phys. A Math. Theor., 2016, 49(34): 345002
https://doi.org/10.1088/1751-8113/49/34/345002
|
6 |
Karimi B., P. Pekola J.. Otto refrigerator based on a superconducting qubit: Classical and quantum performance. Phys. Rev. B, 2016, 94(18): 184503
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.94.184503
|
7 |
Marchegiani G., Virtanen P., Giazotto F., Campisi M.. Self-oscillating Josephson quantum heat engine. Phys. Rev. Appl., 2016, 6(5): 054014
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevApplied.6.054014
|
8 |
N. Bera M., Riera A., Lewenstein M., Winter A.. Generalized laws of thermodynamics in the presence of correlations. Nat. Commun., 2017, 8(1): 2180
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-02370-x
|
9 |
Perarnau-Llobet M., Wilming H., Riera A., Gallego R., Eisert J.. Strong coupling corrections in quantum thermodynamics. Phys. Rev. Lett., 2018, 120(12): 120602
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.120602
|
10 |
Karimi B., P. Pekola J., Campisi M., Fazio R.. Coupled qubits as a quantum heat switch. Quantum Sci. Technol., 2017, 2(4): 044007
https://doi.org/10.1088/2058-9565/aa8330
|
11 |
Alicki R., Fannes M.. Entanglement boost for extractable work from ensembles of quantum batteries. Phys. Rev. E, 2013, 87(4): 042123
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.87.042123
|
12 |
Campaioli F.A. Pollock F.Vinjanampathy S., in: Thermodynamics in the Quantum Regime: Fundamental Aspects and New Directions, edited by F. Binder, L. A. Correa, C. Gogolin, J. Anders, and G. Adesso, Springer International, Cham, 2018, pp 207–225
|
13 |
Bhattacharjee S., Dutta A.. Quantum thermal machines and batteries. Eur. Phys. J. B, 2021, 94(12): 239
https://doi.org/10.1140/epjb/s10051-021-00235-3
|
14 |
Niedenzu W., Mukherjee V., Ghosh A., G. Kofman A., Kurizki G.. Quantum engine efficiency bound beyond the second law of thermodynamics. Nat. Commun., 2018, 9(1): 165
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-01991-6
|
15 |
Rossini D., M. Andolina G., Rosa D., Carrega M., Polini M.. Quantum advantage in the charging process of Sachdev−Ye−Kitaev batteries. Phys. Rev. Lett., 2020, 125(23): 236402
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.236402
|
16 |
K. Hu C.Qiu J.J. P. Souza P.Yuan J.Zhou Y. Zhang L.Chu J.Pan X.Hu L.Li J. Xu Y.Zhong Y. Liu S.Yan F.Tan D.Bachelard R.J. Villas-Boas C.C. Santos A.Yu D., Optimal charging of a superconducting quantum battery, arXiv: 2108.04298 (2021)
|
17 |
P. Pekola J.. Towards quantum thermodynamics in electronic circuits. Nat. Phys., 2015, 11(2): 118
https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys3169
|
18 |
C. Santos A., Saguia A., S. Sarandy M.. Stable and charge-switchable quantum batteries. Phys. Rev. E, 2020, 101(6): 062114
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.101.062114
|
19 |
L. Giorgi G., Campbell S.. Correlation approach to work extraction from finite quantum systems. J. Phys. At. Mol. Opt. Phys., 2015, 48(3): 035501
https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-4075/48/3/035501
|
20 |
Fusco L., Paternostro M., De Chiara G.. Work extraction and energy storage in the Dicke model. Phys. Rev. E, 2016, 94(5): 052122
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.94.052122
|
21 |
Francica G., Goold J., Plastina F., Paternostro M.. Daemonic ergotropy: Enhanced work extraction from quantum correlations. npj Quantum Inf., 2017, 3: 12
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41534-017-0012-8
|
22 |
Monsel J., Fellous-Asiani M., Huard B., Auffeves A.. The energetic cost of work extraction. Phys. Rev. Lett., 2020, 124(13): 130601
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.130601
|
23 |
Q. Dou F., J. Wang Y., A. Sun J.. Closed-loop three-level charged quantum battery. Europhys. Lett., 2020, 131(4): 43001
https://doi.org/10.1209/0295-5075/131/43001
|
24 |
V. Hovhannisyan K., Perarnau-Llobet M., Huber M., Acin A.. Entanglement generation is not necessary for optimal work extraction. Phys. Rev. Lett., 2013, 111(24): 240401
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.240401
|
25 |
M. Andolina G., Keck M., Mari A., Campisi M., Gio-vannetti V., Polini M.. Extractable work, the role of correlations, and asymptotic freedom in quantum batteries. Phys. Rev. Lett., 2019, 122(4): 047702
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.047702
|
26 |
H. Kamin F., T. Tabesh F., Salimi S., C. Santos A.. Entanglement, coherence, and charging process of quantum batteries. Phys. Rev. E, 2020, 102(5): 052109
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.102.052109
|
27 |
X. Liu J., L. Shi H., H. Shi Y., H. Wang X., L. Yang W.. Entanglement and work extraction in the central-spin quantum battery. Phys. Rev. B, 2021, 104(24): 245418
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.104.245418
|
28 |
Y. Gyhm J., Safranek D., Rosa D.. Quantum charging advantage cannot be extensive without global operations. Phys. Rev. Lett., 2022, 128(14): 140501
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.140501
|
29 |
Ferraro D., Campisi M., M. Andolina G., Pellegrini V., Polini M.. High-power collective charging of a solid-state quantum battery. Phys. Rev. Lett., 2018, 120(11): 117702
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.117702
|
30 |
Campaioli F., A. Pollock F., C. Binder F., Celeri L., Goold J., Vinjanampathy S., Modi K.. Enhancing the charging power of quantum batteries. Phys. Rev. Lett., 2017, 118(15): 150601
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.150601
|
31 |
C. Binder F., Vinjanampathy S., Modi K., Goold J.. Quantacell: Powerful charging of quantum batteries. New J. Phys., 2015, 17(7): 075015
https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/17/7/075015
|
32 |
P. García-Pintos L., Hamma A., del Campo A.. Fluctuations in extractable work bound the charging power of quantum batteries. Phys. Rev. Lett., 2020, 125(4): 040601
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.040601
|
33 |
Rossini D., M. Andolina G., Polini M.. Many-body localized quantum batteries. Phys. Rev. B, 2019, 100(11): 115142
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.100.115142
|
34 |
Friis N., Huber M.. Precision and work fluctuations in Gaussian battery charging. Quantum, 2018, 2: 61
https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2018-04-23-61
|
35 |
McKay E., A. Rodriguez-Briones N., Martin-Martinez E.. Fluctuations of work cost in optimal generation of correlations. Phys. Rev. E, 2018, 98(3): 032132
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.98.032132
|
36 |
Perarnau-Llobet M., Uzdin R.. Collective operations can extremely reduce work fluctuations. New J. Phys., 2019, 21(8): 083023
https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/ab36a9
|
37 |
Crescente A., Carrega M., Sassetti M., Ferraro D.. Charging and energy fluctuations of a driven quantum battery. New J. Phys., 2020, 22(6): 063057
https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/ab91fc
|
38 |
P. Le T., Levinsen J., Modi K., M. Parish M., A. Pollock F.. Spin-chain model of a many-body quantum battery. Phys. Rev. A, 2018, 97(2): 022106
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.97.022106
|
39 |
Sen K., Sen U.. Local passivity and entanglement in shared quantum batteries. Phys. Rev. A, 2021, 104(3): L030402
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.104.L030402
|
40 |
Peng L., B. He W., Chesi S., Q. Lin H., W. Guan X.. Lower and upper bounds of quantum battery power in multiple central spin systems. Phys. Rev. A, 2021, 103(5): 052220
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.103.052220
|
41 |
Julià-Farré S., Salamon T., Riera A., N. Bera M., Lewenstein M.. Bounds on the capacity and power of quantum batteries. Phys. Rev. Res., 2020, 2(2): 023113
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.023113
|
42 |
Pirmoradian F., Molmer K.. Aging of a quantum battery. Phys. Rev. A, 2019, 100(4): 043833
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.100.043833
|
43 |
T. Mitchison M., Goold J., Prior J.. Charging a quantum battery with linear feedback control. Quantum, 2021, 5: 500
https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2021-07-13-500
|
44 |
Crescente A., Carrega M., Sassetti M., Ferraro D.. Ultrafast charging in a two-photon Dicke quantum battery. Phys. Rev. B, 2020, 102(24): 245407
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.102.245407
|
45 |
Y. Zhang Y., R. Yang T., B. Fu L., G. Wang X.. Powerful harmonic charging in a quantum battery. Phys. Rev. E, 2019, 99(5): 052106
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.99.052106
|
46 |
Q. Dou F., J. Wang Y., A. Sun J.. Highly efficient charging and discharging of three-level quantum batteries through shortcuts to adiabaticity. Front. Phys., 2022, 17(3): 31503
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11467-021-1130-5
|
47 |
Q. Dou F., Zhou H., A. Sun J.. Cavity Heisenberg-spin-chain quantum battery. Phys. Rev. A, 2022, 106(3): 032212
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.106.032212
|
48 |
Q. Dou F., Q. Lu Y., J. Wang Y., A. Sun J.. Extended Dicke quantum battery with interatomic interactions and driving field. Phys. Rev. B, 2022, 105(11): 115405
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.105.115405
|
49 |
P. Breuer H.Petruccione F., Theory of Open Quantum Systems, Oxford University Press, New York, 2002
|
50 |
P. Breuer H., M. Laine E., Piilo J.. Measure for the degree of non-Markovian behavior of quantum processes in open systems. Phys. Rev. Lett., 2009, 103(21): 210401
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.210401
|
51 |
L. Franco R., Bellomo B., Maniscalco S., Compagno G.. Dynamics of quantum correlations in two-qubit systems within non-Markovian environments. Int. J. Mod. Phys. B, 2013, 27(01n03): 1345053
https://doi.org/10.1142/S0217979213450537
|
52 |
de Vega I., Alonso D.. Dynamics of non-Markovian open quantum systems. Rev. Mod. Phys., 2017, 89(1): 015001
https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.89.015001
|
53 |
P. Breuer H., M. Laine E., Piilo J., Vacchini B.. Non-Markovian dynamics in open quantum systems. Rev. Mod. Phys., 2016, 88(2): 021002
https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.88.021002
|
54 |
Yao Y., Q. Shao X.. Optimal charging of open spin-chain quantum batteries via homodyne-based feedback control. Phys. Rev. E, 2022, 106(1): 014138
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.106.014138
|
55 |
Ghosh S., Chanda T., Mal S., Sen(De) A.. Fast charging of a quantum battery assisted by noise. Phys. Rev. A, 2021, 104(3): 032207
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.104.032207
|
56 |
Xu K., G. Li H., G. Li Z., J. Zhu H., F. Zhang G., M. Liu W.. Charging performance of quantum batteries in a double-layer environment. Phys. Rev. A, 2022, 106(1): 012425
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.106.012425
|
57 |
Çakmak B.. Ergotropy from coherences in an open quantum system. Phys. Rev. E, 2020, 102(4): 042111
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.102.042111
|
58 |
Pirmoradian F., Molmer K.. Aging of a quantum battery. Phys. Rev. A, 2019, 100(4): 043833
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.100.043833
|
59 |
Barra F.. Dissipative charging of a quantum battery. Phys. Rev. Lett., 2019, 122(21): 210601
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.210601
|
60 |
Carrasco J., R. Maze J., Hermann-Avigliano C., Barra F.. Collective enhancement in dissipative quantum batteries. Phys. Rev. E, 2022, 105(6): 064119
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.105.064119
|
61 |
Ghosh S., Sen(De) A.. Dimensional enhancements in a quantum battery with imperfections. Phys. Rev. A, 2022, 105(2): 022628
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.105.022628
|
62 |
J. Lu W., Chen J., M. Kuang L., G. Wang X.. Optimal state for a Tavis−Cummings quantum battery via the Bethe ansatz method. Phys. Rev. A, 2021, 104(4): 043706
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.104.043706
|
63 |
Mayo F., J. Roncaglia A.. Collective effects and quantum coherence in dissipative charging of quantum batteries. Phys. Rev. A, 2022, 105(6): 062203
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.105.062203
|
64 |
Q. Quach J., J. Munro W.. Using dark states to charge and stabilize open quantum batteries. Phys. Rev. Appl., 2020, 14(2): 024092
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevApplied.14.024092
|
65 |
Chang W., R. Yang T., Dong H., B. Fu L., G. Wang X., Y. Zhang Y.. Optimal building block of multipartite quantum battery in the driven-dissipative charging. New J. Phys., 2021, 23(10): 103026
https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/ac2a5b
|
66 |
Delmonte A., Crescente A., Carrega M., Ferraro D., Sassetti M.. Characterization of a two-photon quantum battery: Initial conditions, stability and work extraction. Entropy (Basel), 2021, 23(5): 612
https://doi.org/10.3390/e23050612
|
67 |
Zhang X.Blaauboer M., Enhanced energy transfer in a Dicke quantum battery, arXiv: 1812.10139 (2018)
|
68 |
Zhao F., Q. Dou F., Zhao Q.. Charging performance of the Su−Schrieffer−Heeger quantum battery. Phys. Rev. Res., 2022, 4(1): 013172
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.4.013172
|
69 |
Farina D., M. Andolina G., Mari A., Polini M., Giovannetti V.. Charger-mediated energy transfer for quantum batteries: An open-system approach. Phys. Rev. B, 2019, 99(3): 035421
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.99.035421
|
70 |
T. Tabesh F., H. Kamin F., Salimi S.. Environment-mediated charging process of quantum batteries. Phys. Rev. A, 2020, 102(5): 052223
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.102.052223
|
71 |
Yao Y., Q. Shao X.. Stable charging of a Rydberg quantum battery in an open system. Phys. Rev. E, 2021, 104(4): 044116
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.104.044116
|
72 |
Zhao F., Q. Dou F., Zhao Q.. Quantum battery of interacting spins with environmental noise. Phys. Rev. A, 2021, 103(3): 033715
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.103.033715
|
73 |
Xu K., J. Zhu H., F. Zhang G., M. Liu W.. Enhancing the performance of an open quantum battery via environment engineering. Phys. Rev. E, 2021, 104(6): 064143
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.104.064143
|
74 |
H. Kamin F., T. Tabesh F., Salimi S., Kheirandish F., C. Santos A.. Non-Markovian effects on charging and self-discharging process of quantum batteries. New J. Phys., 2020, 22(8): 083007
https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/ab9ee2
|
75 |
C. Santos A.. Quantum advantage of two-level batteries in the self-discharging process. Phys. Rev. E, 2021, 103(4): 042118
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.103.042118
|
76 |
B. Arjmandi M., Mohammadi H., C. Santos A.. Enhancing self-discharging process with disordered quantum batteries. Phys. Rev. E, 2022, 105(5): 054115
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.105.054115
|
77 |
Gherardini S., Campaioli F., Caruso F., C. Binder F.. Stabilizing open quantum batteries by sequential measurements. Phys. Rev. Res., 2020, 2(1): 013095
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.013095
|
78 |
C. Santos A., Cakmak B., Campbell S., T. Zinner N.. Stable adiabatic quantum batteries. Phys. Rev. E, 2019, 100(3): 032107
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.100.032107
|
79 |
Y. Bai S.H. An J., Floquet engineering to reactivate a dissipative quantum battery, Phys. Rev. A 102, 060201(R) (2020)
|
80 |
Romach Y., Muller C., Unden T., J. Rogers L., Isoda T., M. Itoh K., Markham M., Stacey A., Meijer J., Pez-zagna S., Naydenov B., P. McGuinness L., Bar-Gill N., Jelezko F.. Spectroscopy of surface-induced noise using shallow spins in diamond. Phys. Rev. Lett., 2015, 114(1): 017601
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.017601
|
81 |
Y. Xia K., Twamley J.. All-optical switching and router via the direct quantum control of coupling between cavity modes. Phys. Rev. X, 2013, 3(3): 031013
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.3.031013
|
82 |
H. Liu B., Li L., F. Huang Y., F. Li C., C. Guo G., M. Laine E., P. Breuer H., Piilo J.. Experimental control of the transition from Markovian to non-Markovian dynamics of open quantum systems. Nat. Phys., 2011, 7(12): 931
https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys2085
|
83 |
Blais A., S. Huang R., Wallraff A., M. Girvin S., J. Schoelkopf R.. Cavity quantum electrodynamics for superconducting electrical circuits: An architecture for quantum computation. Phys. Rev. A, 2004, 69(6): 062320
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.69.062320
|
84 |
Chiuri A., Greganti C., Mazzola L., Paternostro M., Mataloni P.. Linear optics simulation of quantum non-Markovian dynamics. Sci. Rep., 2012, 2(1): 968
https://doi.org/10.1038/srep00968
|
85 |
E. Allahverdyan A., Balian R., M. Nieuwenhuizen T.. Maximal work extraction from finite quantum systems. Europhys. Lett., 2004, 67(4): 565
https://doi.org/10.1209/epl/i2004-10101-2
|
86 |
Lenard A.. Thermodynamical proof of the Gibbs formula for elementary quantum systems. J. Stat. Phys., 1978, 19(6): 575
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01011769
|
87 |
Pusz W., L. Woronowicz S.. Passive states and KMS states for general quantum systems. Commun. Math. Phys., 1978, 58(3): 273
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01614224
|
88 |
Lörch N., Bruder C., Brunner N., P. Hofer P.. Optimal work extraction from quantum states by photo-assisted Cooper pair tunneling. Quantum Sci. Technol., 2018, 3(3): 035014
https://doi.org/10.1088/2058-9565/aacbf3
|
89 |
Seah S.Nimmrichter S.Scarani V., Work production of quantum rotor engines, New J. Phys. 20(4), 043045 (2018)
|
90 |
Niedenzu W., Mukherjee V., Ghosh A., G. Kofman A., Kurizki G.. Quantum engine efficiency bound beyond the second law of thermodynamics. Nat. Commun., 2018, 9(1): 165
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-01991-6
|
91 |
M. Garraway B.. Decay of an atom coupled strongly to a reservoir. Phys. Rev. A, 1997, 55(6): 4636
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.55.4636
|
92 |
M. Garraway B.. Nonperturbative decay of an atomic system in a cavity. Phys. Rev. A, 1997, 55(3): 2290
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.55.2290
|
93 |
J. Dalton B., M. Barnett S., M. Garraway B.. Theory of pseudomodes in quantum optical processes. Phys. Rev. A, 2001, 64(5): 053813
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.64.053813
|
94 |
Pleasance G., M. Garraway B., Petruccione F.. Generalized theory of pseudomodes for exact descriptions of non-Markovian quantum processes. Phys. Rev. Res., 2020, 2(4): 043058
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.043058
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
|
Shared |
|
|
|
|
|
Discussed |
|
|
|
|