Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Philosophy in China

ISSN 1673-3436

ISSN 1673-355X(Online)

CN 11-5743/B

邮发代号 80-983

Frontiers of Philosophy in China  2008, Vol. 3 Issue (1): 99-122   https://doi.org/10.1007/s11466-008-0007-9
  research-article 本期目录
The limit of charity and agreement
The limit of charity and agreement
 YE Chuang
Department of Philosophy, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China;
 全文: PDF(347 KB)   HTML
Abstract

Radical interpretation is used by Davison in his linguistic theory not only as an interesting thought experiment but also a general pattern that is believed to be able to give an essential and general account of linguistic interpretation. If the principle of charity is absolutely necessary to radical interpretation, it becomes, in this sense, a general methodological principle. However, radical interpretation is a local pattern that is proper only for exploring certain interpretation in a specific case, and consequently the principle of charity is an applicable principle in the limited scope. It is neither the case that every linguistic interpretation is in nature radical nor that the principle of charity is the primary and fundamental principle for all linguistic interpretation as Davidson believes.

出版日期: 2008-03-05
Corresponding Author(s): YE Chuang,Email:yechuang@phil.pku.edu.cn   
 引用本文:   
. The limit of charity and agreement[J]. Frontiers of Philosophy in China, 2008, 3(1): 99-122.
YE Chuang. The limit of charity and agreement. Front Phil Chin, 2008, 3(1): 99-122.
 链接本文:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fpc/CN/10.1007/s11466-008-0007-9
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fpc/CN/Y2008/V3/I1/99
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed