Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Philosophy in China

ISSN 1673-3436

ISSN 1673-355X(Online)

CN 11-5743/B

邮发代号 80-983

Frontiers of Philosophy in China  2008, Vol. 3 Issue (1): 139-150   https://doi.org/10.1007/s11466-008-0009-7
  research-article 本期目录
A critique of social radicalism: The debate between the Neo-Left and Liberalism —A discussion of Plessner within the Chinese context
A critique of social radicalism: The debate between the Neo-Left and Liberalism —A discussion of Plessner within the Chinese context
 CAO Weidong
School of Chinese Language and Literature, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
 全文: PDF(323 KB)   HTML
Abstract

Compared with another founder of philosophical anthropology Max Scheler, Plessner is desolated by Chinese academe. His works have not been translated into Chinese systematically, and there are few articles about his life and thoughts. The reasons for this are complicated, but the most important point of these is that Plessner has paid most of his attention to the German problems. However, Plessner’s thought, especially his critique of social radicalism, enlightens us a lot. Plessner’s critique of modernity stimulates us to think about the controversy which broke out between New Left-wingers and Liberalists in the late 20th century and to discern the common ground between the two parties: Radicalism.

出版日期: 2008-03-05
Corresponding Author(s): CAO Weidong,Email:caoweidong2000@sina.com   
 引用本文:   
. A critique of social radicalism: The debate between the Neo-Left and Liberalism —A discussion of Plessner within the Chinese context[J]. Frontiers of Philosophy in China, 2008, 3(1): 139-150.
CAO Weidong. A critique of social radicalism: The debate between the Neo-Left and Liberalism —A discussion of Plessner within the Chinese context. Front Phil Chin, 2008, 3(1): 139-150.
 链接本文:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fpc/CN/10.1007/s11466-008-0009-7
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fpc/CN/Y2008/V3/I1/139
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed