Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Philosophy in China

ISSN 1673-3436

ISSN 1673-355X(Online)

CN 11-5743/B

邮发代号 80-983

Frontiers of Philosophy in China  2010, Vol. 5 Issue (3): 432-448   https://doi.org/10.1007/s11466-010-0107-1
  research-article 本期目录
The Destiny of Modern Virtue Ethics
The Destiny of Modern Virtue Ethics
GAN Shaoping()
Institute of Philosophy, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, Beijing 100732, China
 全文: PDF(221 KB)   HTML
Abstract

The revival of Aristotelian virtue ethics since the 1980s does not signify that it goes back to its original form; rather, it is generally manifested in three different variations: The first is a variation of what is known as communitarianism, the second is universalism, and the third is phronesis. On the social level of morality, the serious attempt of modern virtue ethics towards improving the moral spirit of society is laudable. However, its method and reasoning deviates greatly from the demands of modern society’s integration of its operating rules and regulations, and concept of values; hence all of its attempts can hardly escape the fate of becoming just a fantasy. Yet, on the level of dealing with ethic conflicts and moral paradox, modern virtue ethics—via interpreting the theory of phronesis by Aristotle—proposes the valuable thought of a balanced morality that principlism should concern itself with and nourish itself from.

Key wordsvirtue ethics    Aristotle    communitarianism    universalism    theory of phronesis
出版日期: 2010-09-05
Corresponding Author(s): GAN Shaoping,Email:gansp-zxs@cass.org.cn   
 引用本文:   
. The Destiny of Modern Virtue Ethics[J]. Frontiers of Philosophy in China, 2010, 5(3): 432-448.
GAN Shaoping. The Destiny of Modern Virtue Ethics. Front Phil Chin, 2010, 5(3): 432-448.
 链接本文:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fpc/CN/10.1007/s11466-010-0107-1
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fpc/CN/Y2010/V5/I3/432
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed