This paper considers and rejects the arguments that have been given in favour of the view that one can only act for the reason that p if one knows that p. The paper contrasts it with the view I hold, which is that one can act for the reason that p even if it is not the case that p.
Corresponding Author(s):
Jonathan DANCY,Email:jdancy@mail.utexas.edu
引用本文:
. Acting in Ignorance[J]. Frontiers of Philosophy in China, 2011, 6(3): 345-357.
Jonathan DANCY. Acting in Ignorance. Front Phil Chin, 2011, 6(3): 345-357.
