A Sense of Awe: On the Differences between Confucian
Thought and Christianity

doi:10.1007/s11466-010-0006-5

Front. Philos. China

2010, Vol. 5

Issue (1) : 111-133 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11466-010-0006-5

Research articles

A Sense of Awe: On the Differences between Confucian Thought and Christianity

REN Jiantao,

School of International Studies, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872, China;

Download: PDF(634 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks

Abstract The fundamental importance of reverence is recognized by all major world cultures. Confucianism’s account of “The three things of which the sage is in awe” is seen in Chinese culture through the value placed on reverence. “The three things of which the sage is in awe” both manifests itself as an approach to value and is also an expression of practical ethical guidance. The essential aspect of reverence is a sincere and ethical outlook; accordingly it is a part of virtue ethics. In this kind of virtue ethics, ethical practice accords with self-conscious conduct that is guided by a sense of reverence, and this forms the guiding thought of Confucianism. From a comparative cultural perspective, the Confucian sense of reverence founded upon ethical self-awareness and Christian sense of reverence founded on divine worship are different. However, both take reverence to be the root of culture, thus proving that reverence is an element that none of the world’s major cultures can be without. In the early modern period, a sense of reverence was seen something enchanted and harmful to the rational progress of civilization. However, the contemporary reenchantment movements in some ways call up a return to such reverence. 　

Keywords reverence Confucianism Christianity religion virtue reenchantment

Issue Date: 05 March 2010

Cite this article:

REN Jiantao. A Sense of Awe: On the Differences between Confucian Thought and Christianity[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2010, 5(1): 111-133.

URL:

https://academic.hep.com.cn/fpc/EN/10.1007/s11466-010-0006-5
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fpc/EN/Y2010/V5/I1/111

[1]	YUAN Li. Developing Ethical Leadership in China: The Value of Confucian Virtue Ethics[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2020, 15(4): 586-611.
[2]	HU Xinkai. Complete Virtue and the Definition of Happiness in Aristotle[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2020, 15(2): 293-314.
[3]	TENG Fei. Joining the Transformation of Nature—The Post-Natural and Confucian Perspective on Earth Stewardship in the Anthropocene[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2020, 15(1): 53-72.
[4]	NI Peimin. How Is the Kantian or Confucian Metaphysics Applicable to Human Dignity—Response to Wang Xiaowei[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2020, 15(1): 29-35.
[5]	WANG Xiaowei. Toward a Confucian Notion of Human Dignity[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2020, 15(1): 7-28.
[6]	Jacklyn A. Cleofas. An Understanding of Character from Holistic Thinking: What Asian Psychology Teaches Us about the Debate on Situationism[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2019, 14(3): 384-405.
[7]	Henrique Schneider. Tricking or Benefitting the People? Guanzi on Objective Government and Subjective Preferences[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2019, 14(3): 363-383.
[8]	Michele Ferrero. *Motivation to Act in Confucianism and Christianity: In Matteo Ricci’s The True Meaning of the Lord of Heaven* (Tianzhu Shiyi 天主實義)**[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2019, 14(2): 226-247.
[9]	Yoshimi Orii. The Limits of a Confrontational Approach: Fabian Fukansai’s Critiques of Neo-Confucianism and Christianity[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2019, 14(2): 181-200.
[10]	Jan Szaif. Drunkenness as a Communal Practice: Platonic and Peripatetic Perspectives[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2019, 14(1): 94-110.
[11]	XU Keqian. A Contemporary Re-Examination of Confucian Li 禮 and Human Dignity[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2018, 13(3): 449-464.
[12]	NI Peimin. *Toward a Gongfu* Reconstruction of Confucianism —Responses to Comments by Huang Yong, Fan Ruiping, and Wang Qingjie**[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2018, 13(2): 240-253.
[13]	PENG Guoxiang. Contemporary Chinese Philosophy in the Chinese-Speaking World: An Overview[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2018, 13(1): 91-119.
[14]	Ady Van Den Stock. The Semantics of Wisdom in the Philosophy of Tang Junyi: Between Transformative Knowledge and Transcendental Reflexivity[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2018, 13(1): 39-54.
[15]	Alicia Hennig. Three Different Approaches to Virtue in Business- Aristotle, Confucius, and Lao Zi[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2016, 11(4): 556-586.

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed