Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Philosophy in China

ISSN 1673-3436

ISSN 1673-355X(Online)

CN 11-5743/B

Postal Subscription Code 80-983

Front. Philos. China    2020, Vol. 15 Issue (2) : 315-329    https://doi.org/10.3868/s030-009-020-0017-6
RESEARCH ARTICLE
From Primary Goods to Capability
LI Xianjing()
Department of Philosophy, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
 Download: PDF(206 KB)  
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

While being generally appreciative of John Rawls’ theory of justice, this paper aims to describe and compare the two metrics of justice—primary goods and capability, and through critiques and responses between Amartya Sen and John Rawls, I argue that the capability metric is a better project than the social primary goods metric insofar as it can provide a more practical path for rethinking the concept of social justice, as well as a better approach in resolving fundamental social justice issues in China.

Keywords capability      primary goods      Amartya Sen      John Rawls      social justice     
Issue Date: 09 July 2020
 Cite this article:   
LI Xianjing. From Primary Goods to Capability[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2020, 15(2): 315-329.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fpc/EN/10.3868/s030-009-020-0017-6
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fpc/EN/Y2020/V15/I2/315
[1] Ralph Weber. Confucian Political Philosophy for Non-Confucians[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2015, 10(4): 547-567.
[2] Rajesh C. Shukla. Justice and Civic Friendship: An Aristotelian Critique of Modern Citizenry[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2014, 9(1): 1-20.
[3] HUANG Xianzhong. Justice as a virtue: An analysis of Aristotle’s virtue of justice[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2007, 2(2): 265-279.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed