Natural slopes consist of non-homogeneous soil profiles with distinct characteristics from slopes made of homogeneous soil. In this study, the limit equilibrium modified pseudo-dynamic method is used to analyze the stability of two-layered c-φ soil slopes in which the failure surface is assumed to be a logarithmic spiral. The zero-stress boundary condition at the ground surface under the seismic loading condition is satisfied. New formulations derived from an analytical method are proposed for the predicting the seismic response in two-layered soil. A detailed parametric study was performed in which various parameters (seismic accelerations, damping, cohesion, and angle of internal friction) were varied. The results of the present method were compared with those in the available literature. The present analytical analysis was also verified against the finite element analysis results.
E Spencer. A method of analysis of the stability of embankments assuming parallel interslice forces. Geotechnique, 1967, 17(1): 11–26 https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1967.17.1.11
6
K Terzaghi. Mechanisms of Land Slides. Engineering Geology (Berkeley) Volume. New York: Geological Society of America, 1950
S Hazari, S Ghosh, R P Sharma. Pseudo-static analysis of slope considering log spiral failure mechanism. In: Latha Gali M, Raghuveer Rao P, eds. Indian Geotechnical Conference. Guwahati: IIT Guwahati, 2017
12
R S Steedman, X Zeng. The influence of phase on the calculation of pseudo-static earth pressure on a retaining wall. Geotechnique, 1990, 40(1): 103–112 https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1990.40.1.103
P Ghosh. Seismic passive pressure behind a non-vertical retaining wall usingpseudo-dynamic method. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 2007, 25(6): 693–703 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-007-9141-8
15
S Ghosh, R P Sharma. Pseudo-dynamic active response of non-vertical retaining wall supporting c-F backfill. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 2010, 28(5): 633–641 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-010-9321-9
16
A Saha, S Ghosh. Pseudo-dynamic analysis for bearing capacity of foundation resting on c–f soil. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2015, 9(4): 379–387 https://doi.org/10.1179/1939787914Y.0000000081
17
I Bellezza. A new pseudo-dynamic approach for seismic active soil thrust. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 2014, 32(2): 561–576 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-014-9734-y
18
I Bellezza. Seismic active earth pressure on walls using a new pseudo-dynamic approach. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 2015, 33(4): 795–812 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-015-9860-1
19
[]. N. ChandaSeismic stability analysis of slope assuming log-spiral rupture surface using modified pseudo-dynamic method. International Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2018 (in press) https://doi.org/10.1080/19386362.2018.1529281
20
D G Fredlund, J Krahn. Comparison of slope stability methods of analysis. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 1977, 14(3): 429–439 https://doi.org/10.1139/t77-045
21
W F Chen, N Snitbhan, H Y Fang. Stability of slopes in anisotropic, nonhomogeneous soils. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 1975, 12(1): 146–152 https://doi.org/10.1139/t75-014
A Hammouri, A I H Malkawi, M M A Yamin. Stability analysis of slopes using the finite element method and limit equilibrium approach. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, 2008, 67(4): 471–478 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-008-0156-z
24
H C Chang-yu, X Jin-jian. Stability analysis of slopes using the finite element method and limiting equilibrium approach. Journal of Central South University of Technology, 2013, 21: 1142–1147
25
Z G Qian, A J Li, R S Merifield, A V Lyamin. Slope stability charts for two-layered purely cohesive soils based on finite-element limit analysis methods. International Journal of Geomechanics, 2015, 15(3): 06014022 https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000438
26
Y Lin, W Leng, G Yang, L Li, J Yang. Seismic response of embankment slopes with different reinforcing measures in shaking table tests. Natural Hazards, 2015, 76(2): 791–810 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-014-1517-5
27
P Ni, S Wang, S Zhang, L Mei. Response of heterogeneous slopes to increased surcharge load. Computers and Geotechnics, 2016, 78: 99–109 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2016.05.007
28
D Chatterjee, Krishna A M. Stability analysis of two-layered nonhomogeneous slopes. International Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2018,(in press) https://doi.org/10.1080/19386362.2018.1465686
29
J Kumar, P Samui. Stability determination for layered soil slopes using the upper bound limit analysis. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 2006, 24(6): 1803–1819 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-006-7172-1
S Sarkar, M Chakraborty. Pseudostatic slope stability analysis in two-layered soil by using variational method. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering. Rome, Italy: Taylor & Francis, 2019, 4857–4864
32
S L Kramer. Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering. New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 1996
33
MATLAB: The MathWorks, Inc. Version R2013a.Natick, MA: The MathWorks, Inc., 2014
T Matsui, K C San. Finite element slope stability analysis by shear strength reduction technique. Soil and Foundation, 1992, 32(1): 59–70 https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf1972.32.59
A K Chugh. On the boundary conditions in slope stability analysis. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 2003, 27(11): 905–926 https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.305
40
R L Kuhlemeyer, J Lysmer. Finite element method accuracy for wave propagation problems. Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division, 1973, 99: 421–427
41
J Bakr, S M Ahmad. A finite element performance-based approach to correlate movement of arigid retaining wall with seismic earth pressure. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2018, 114: 460–479 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.07.025
42
S Hazari, S Ghosh, R P Sharma. Experimental and numerical study of soil slopes at varying water content under dynamic loading condition. International Journal of Civil Engineering, 2019, 18: 215–229: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40999-019-00439-w
43
S Zhou, X Zhuang, T Rabczuk. Phase-field modeling of fluid-driven dynamic cracking in porous media. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2019, 350: 169–198 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2019.03.001
44
S Zhou, X Zhuang, T Rabczuk. Phase field modeling of brittle compressive-shear fractures inrock-like materials: A new driving force and a hybrid formulation. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2019, 355: 729–752 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2019.06.021
45
S Zhou, T Rabczuk, X Zhuang. Phase field modeling of quasi-static and dynamic crack propagation: COMSOL implementation and case studies. Advances in Engineering Software, 2018, 122: 31–49 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2018.03.012
46
S Zhou, X Zhuang, T Rabczuk. A phase-field modeling approach of fracture propagation in poroelastic media. Engineering Geology, 2018, 240: 189–203 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2018.04.008
47
S Zhou, X Zhuang, H Zhu, T Rabczuk. Phase field modelling of crack propagation, branching and coalescence in rocks. Theoretical and Applied Fracture Mechanics, 2018, 96: 174–192 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tafmec.2018.04.011
48
C Anitescu, E Atroshchenko, N Alajlan, T Rabczuk. Artificial Neural Network methods for the solution of second order boundary value problems. Computers, Materials & Continua, 2019, 59(1): 345–359 https://doi.org/10.32604/cmc.2019.06641
49
H Guo, X Zhuang, T Rabczuk. A deep collocation method for the bending analysis of Kirchhoff plate. Computers, Materials & Continua, 2019, 59(2): 433–456 https://doi.org/10.32604/cmc.2019.06660
50
H Ren, X Zhuang, T Rabczuk. Dual-horizon peridynamics: A stable solution to varying horizons. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 2004, 61(13): 762–782
51
T Rabczuk, T Belytschko. Cracking particles: A simplified meshfree method for arbitrary evolving cracks. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 2004, 61(13): 2316–2343 https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.1151