Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering

ISSN 2095-2430

ISSN 2095-2449(Online)

CN 10-1023/X

邮发代号 80-968

2019 Impact Factor: 1.68

Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering  2023, Vol. 17 Issue (11): 1690-1706   https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-023-0022-x
  本期目录
Seismic design and analysis of a high-rise self-centering wall building: Case study
Ying ZHOU, Rui WANG, Yiqiu LU()
State Key Laboratory of Disaster Reduction in Civil Engineering, College of Civil Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China
 全文: PDF(10371 KB)   HTML
Abstract

Post-tensioning self-centering walls are a well-developed and resilient technology. However, despite extensive research, the application of this technology has previously been limited to low-rise buildings. A ten-story self-centering wall building has now been designed and constructed using the state-of-art design methodologies and construction detailing, as described in this paper. The building is designed in accordance with direct displacement-based design methodology, with modification of seismic demand due to relevant issues including higher-mode effects, second order effects, torsional effects, and flexural deformation of wall panels. Wall sections are designed with external energy-dissipating devices of steel dampers, and seismic performance of such designed self-centering walls is evaluated through numerical simulation. It is the first engineering project that uses self-centering walls in a high-rise building. The seismic design procedure of such a high-rise building, using self-centering wall structures, is comprehensively reviewed in this work, and additional proposals are put forward. Description of construction detailing, including slotted beams, flexible wall-to-floor connections, embedded beams, and damper installation, is provided. The demonstration project promotes the concept of seismic resilient structures and contributes to the most appealing city planning strategy of resilient cities at present. The paper could be a reference for industry engineers to promote the self-centering wall systems worldwide.

Key wordsself-centering wall    post-tensioned precast concrete wall    seismic resilient structure    high-rise building    seismic design    engineering practice
收稿日期: 2023-02-13      出版日期: 2024-01-24
Corresponding Author(s): Yiqiu LU   
 引用本文:   
. [J]. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, 2023, 17(11): 1690-1706.
Ying ZHOU, Rui WANG, Yiqiu LU. Seismic design and analysis of a high-rise self-centering wall building: Case study. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2023, 17(11): 1690-1706.
 链接本文:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fsce/CN/10.1007/s11709-023-0022-x
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fsce/CN/Y2023/V17/I11/1690
Fig.1  
Fig.2  
Fig.3  
seismic fortification intensityminor earthquakemoderate earthquakemajor earthquakemega earthquake
60.040.120.280.36
70.080.230.500.70
7.50.120.340.721.00
80.160.450.901.35
8.50.240.681.202.00
90.320.901.402.70
Tab.1  
earthquake levelreturn period (year)three-level performance (conventional structures)four-level performance (seismic resilient structures)
minor earthquake50operationaloperational
moderate earthquake475operational after appropriate repairoperational
major earthquake2475life safety with no collapsefunctional after appropriate repair/replacement
mega earthquake10000life safety with no collapse
Tab.2  
Fig.4  
Fig.5  
Fig.6  
Fig.7  
itemrotational mode1st mode2nd mode3rd modecombined mode
period (s)3.900.770.150.07
participation factor1.42861.4649–0.6897–0.1461
equivalent displacement (mm)219.9026.181.610.29
Tab.3  
story No.rotational modetarget displacement with linear assumption (mm)1st mode2nd mode3rd modecombined modetarget displacement in consideration of higher-mode effects (mm)
10600314.1438.35–1.11–0.04316.48596.84
9540282.7333.12–0.48–0.01284.66536.84
8480251.3127.940.120.02252.86476.87
7420219.9022.660.590.04221.07416.90
6360188.4917.760.910.04189.32357.04
5300157.0713.051.030.03157.62297.25
4240125.66 8.910.970.01125.98237.58
3180 94.24 5.430.75–0.01 94.40178.03
2120 62.83 2.680.45–0.03 62.89118.60
1 60 31.41 0.590.16–0.02 31.42 59.25
Tab.4  
Fig.8  
Fig.9  
parametervalue
wall length (mm)4200
wall width (mm)200
wall panel height (mm)30000
thickness of cover concrete (mm)20
Tab.5  
parametervalue
vertically distributed reinforcementΦF10@200
horizontally distributed reinforcementΦF10@200
configuration of densified stirrupsΦF10@50
height of stirrup densification (mm)800
material strength of steel strand (MPa)fpy = 1670
unbonded length of steel strand (mm)30000
initial prestressing force of steel strand0.5fpy
Tab.6  
parametervalue
material strength of confined concrete (MPa)34.1
vertical dimension of confined concrete (mm)800
horizontal dimension of confined concrete (mm)800
material strength of unconfined concrete (MPa)19.1
Tab.7  
parametervalue on Grid 1/Grid 10value on Grid 4/Grid 7
steel strand configuration2?s15.29?s15.2
yield force of dampers (kN)270295
base moment at target base rotation angle (kN·m)2934.05255.2
Tab.8  
Fig.10  
Fig.11  
Fig.12  
Fig.13  
Fig.14  
Fig.15  
Fig.16  
record No.record namecharacteristic period (s)sourceearthquake level
SW01AW10.45artificialminor
SW02AW20.45artificialminor
SW03RSN67_SFERN_ISD0140.45naturalminor
SW04RSN1115_KOBE_SKI0000.45naturalminor
SW05RSN1161_KOCAELI_GBZ0000.45naturalminor
SW06RSN1245_CHICHI_CHY102-E0.45naturalminor
SW07RSN5823_SIERRA.MEX_CHI0000.45naturalminor
SW08AW30.50artificialmega
SW09AW40.50artificialmega
SW10RSN175_IMPVALL.H_H-E121400.50naturalmega
SW11RSN1499_CHICHI_TCU060-E0.50naturalmega
SW12RSN1546_CHICHI_TCU122-E0.50naturalmega
SW13RSN1594_CHICHI_TTN051-E0.50naturalmega
SW14RSN1833_HECTOR_SNC0900.50naturalmega
Tab.9  
Fig.17  
Fig.18  
Fig.19  
1 G W Housner. The behavior of inverted pendulum structures during earthquakes. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 1963, 53(2): 403–417
https://doi.org/10.1785/BSSA0530020403
2 S PampaninD MarriottA Palermo. PRESSS Design Handbook. Auckland: New Zealand Concrete Society, 2010
3 I Takewaki, S Murakami, S Yoshitomi, M Tsuji. Fundamental mechanism of earthquake response reduction in building structures with inertial dampers. Structural Control and Health Monitoring, 2012, 19(6): 590–608
https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.457
4 M J N PriestleyG M CalviM J Kowalsky. Displacement-Based Seismic Design of Structures. Pavia: IUSS Press, 2007
5 ITG-5.1-07 ACI. Acceptance Criteria for Special Unbonded Post-Tensioned Precast Structural Walls Based on Validation Testing. Farmington Hills, MI: American Concrete Institute, 2007
6 ITG-5.2-09 ACI. Requirements for Design of a Special Unbonded Post-Tensioned Precast Shear Wall Satisfying ACI ITG-5.1 and Commentary. Farmington Hills, MI: American Concrete Institute, 2009
7 W Y Kam, S Pampanin. The seismic performance of RC buildings in the 22 February 2011 Christchurch earthquake. Structural Concrete, 2011, 12(4): 223–233
https://doi.org/10.1002/suco.201100044
8 A H BuchananD BullR DhakalG MacRaeA PalermoS Pampanin. Base Isolation and Damage-Resistant Technologies for Improved Seismic Performance of Buildings. Research Report 2011-02. 2011
9 Federation for Structural Concrete International. Precast-Concrete Buildings in Seismic Areas. FIB Bulletin No. 78. 2016
10 Y ZhouA GuY LuG SongR HenryG Rodgers. Large-scale shaking table experimental study on a low-damage self-centering wall building. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2020, 53(10): 62 (in Chinese)
11 A Gu, Y Zhou, R S Henry, Y Lu, G W Rodgers. Simulation of shake-table test for a two-story low-damage concrete wall building. Structural Control and Health Monitoring, 2022, 29(10): e3038
12 R S Henry, Y Zhou, Y Lu, G W Rodgers, A Gu, K J Elwood, T Y Yang. Shake-table test of a two-storey low-damage concrete wall building. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 2021, 50(12): 3160–3183
https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.3504
13 Y Lu, R S Henry, Y Zhou, G W Rodgers, Q Yang, A Gu. Data set for a shake-table test of a 2-story low-damage concrete wall building. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2022, 148(7): 04722002
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0003348
14 50011-2010 GB. Code for Seismic Design of Buildings. Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press, 2016 (in Chinese)
15 51408-2021 GB/T. Standard for Seismic Isolation Design of Building. Beijing: China Planning Press, 2021 (in Chinese)
16 Y ZhouA Q Gu. Displacement-based seismic design of self-centering shear walls under four-level seismic fortifications. Journal of Building Structures, 2019, 40(3): 118–126 (in Chinese)
17 Y ZhouH WuA Gu. Earthquake engineering: From earthquake resistance, energy dissipation, and isolation to resilience. Engineering Mechanics, 2019, 36(6): 1–12 (in Chinese)
18 B SmithY Kurama. Seismic Design Guidelines for Special Hybrid Precast Concrete Shear Walls. Research Report NDSE 2012-02. 2012
19 3101:2006 NZS. Concrete Structures Standard—The Design of Concrete Structure. Wellington: Standards New Zealand, 2006
20 K M Twigden. Dynamic response of unbonded post-tensioned concrete walls for seismic resilient structures. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree. Auckland: University of Auckland, 2016
21 3-2010 JGJ. Technical Specification for Concrete Structures of Tall Building. Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press, 2010 (in Chinese)
22 J B Mander, M J N Priestley, R Park. Theoretical stress–strain model for confined concrete. Journal of Structural Engineering, 1988, 114(8): 1804–1826
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1988)114:8(1804
23 B Yang, X Lu. Displacement-based seismic design approach for prestressed precast concrete shear walls and its application. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 2018, 22(10): 1836–1860
https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2017.1309607
24 H WuY Zhou. Parametric study on seismic performance of self-centering precast concrete walls with multiple rocking joints. In: Proceedings of the 17th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Tokyo: Japan Association for Earthquake Engineering, 2020, 2c-0159
25 A Gu, Y Zhou, Y Xiao, Q Li, G Qu. Experimental study and parameter analysis on the seismic performance of self-centering hybrid reinforced concrete shear walls. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2019, 116: 409–420
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.10.003
26 I Takewaki, H Akehashi. Comprehensive review of optimal and smart design of nonlinear building structures with and without passive dampers subjected to earthquake loading. Frontiers in Built Environment, 2021, 7: 631114
https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2021.631114
27 H Akehashi, I Takewaki. Bounding of earthquake response via critical double impulse for efficient optimal design of viscous dampers for elastic-plastic moment frames. Japan Architectural Review, 2022, 5(2): 131–149
https://doi.org/10.1002/2475-8876.12262
28 PEER. PEER Ground Motion Database. Berkeley: University of California, 2020
29 H Akehashi, I Takewaki. Resilience evaluation of elastic-plastic high-rise buildings under resonant long-duration ground motion. Japan Architectural Review, 2022, 5(4): 373–385
https://doi.org/10.1002/2475-8876.12280
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed