Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering

ISSN 2095-2430

ISSN 2095-2449(Online)

CN 10-1023/X

邮发代号 80-968

2019 Impact Factor: 1.68

Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering  2024, Vol. 18 Issue (4): 536-550   https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-024-1013-2
  本期目录
Crack identification in concrete, using digital image correlation and neural network
Jingyi WANG, Dong LEI(), Kaiyang ZHOU, Jintao HE, Feipeng ZHU, Pengxiang BAI
College of Mechanics and Materials, Hohai University, Nanjing 211100, China
 全文: PDF(5844 KB)   HTML
Abstract

In engineering applications, concrete crack monitoring is very important. Traditional methods are of low efficiency, low accuracy, have poor timeliness, and are applicable in only a limited number of scenarios. Therefore, more comprehensive detection of concrete damage under different scenarios is of high value for practical engineering applications. Digital image correlation (DIC) technology can provide a large amount of experimental data, and neural network (NN) can process very rich data. Therefore, NN, including convolutional neural networks (CNN) and back propagation neural networks (BP), can be combined with DIC technology to analyze experimental data of three-point bending of plain concrete and four-point bending of reinforced concrete. In addition, strain parameters can be used for training, and displacement parameters can be added for comprehensive consideration. The data obtained by DIC technology are grouped for training, and the recognition results of NN show that the combination of strain and displacement parameters, i.e., the response of specimen surface and whole body, can make results more objective and comprehensive. The identification results obtained by CNN and BP show that these technologies can accurately identify cracks. The identification results for reinforced concrete specimens are less affected by noise than those of plain concrete specimens. CNN is more convenient because it can identify some features directly from images, recognizing the cracks formed by macro development. BP can issue early warning of the microscopic cracks, but it requires a large amount of data and computation. It can be seen that CNN is more intuitive and efficient in image processing, and is suitable when low accuracy is adequate, while BP is suitable for occasions with greater accuracy requirements. The two tools have advantages in different situations, and together they can play an important role in engineering monitoring.

Key wordsdigital image correlation    convolutional neural network    back propagation neural neural network    damage detection    concrete
收稿日期: 2023-02-06      出版日期: 2024-06-13
Corresponding Author(s): Dong LEI   
 引用本文:   
. [J]. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, 2024, 18(4): 536-550.
Jingyi WANG, Dong LEI, Kaiyang ZHOU, Jintao HE, Feipeng ZHU, Pengxiang BAI. Crack identification in concrete, using digital image correlation and neural network. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2024, 18(4): 536-550.
 链接本文:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fsce/CN/10.1007/s11709-024-1013-2
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fsce/CN/Y2024/V18/I4/536
Fig.1  
Fig.2  
Fig.3  
Fig.4  
Mix proportionMaterial utilization amount (kg/m3)
CementWaterAggregate
1:0.5:53691851846
Tab.1  
Concrete strength(MPa)Concrete mix proportion
CementSandRubbleWater
25.23556401235185
Tab.2  
Fig.5  
Fig.6  
Fig.7  
Fig.8  
Fig.9  
Fig.10  
Fig.11  
TypeNameSizeStep size and remarksQuantity
InputImageInput224 × 224 × 31
Convolution layerConvolution2d7 × 7 × 3[2 2]1
1 × 1 × 64[1 1]1
3 × 3 × 64[1 1]1
1 × 1 × 192[1 1]4
5 × 5 × 16[1 1]1
3 × 3 × 96[1 1]2
1 × 1 × 256[1 1]4
3 × 3 × 128[1 1]2
5 × 5 × 32[1 1]1
1 × 1 × 480[1 1]4
5 × 5 × 16[1 1]1
1 × 1 × 512[1 1]12
5 × 5 × 24[1 1]2
3 × 3 × 112[1 1]1
5 × 5 × 32[1 1]3
3 × 3 × 144[1 1]1
1 × 1 × 528[1 1]4
3 × 3 × 160[1 1]2
1 × 1 × 832[1 1]8
5 × 5 × 48[1 1]1
3 × 3 × 192[1 1]1
Pooling layerMaxPooling23 × 3[2 2]4
3 × 3[1 1]9
GlobalAveragePooling21
NormalizationCrossChannelNormalizationEach element has five channels2
Dropout40% discarded1
Activiation layerRelu57
The depth of the seriesDepthConcatenationFour input9
Fully connected layerFullyConnected1
Output layerSoftmax1
ClassificationClassification of output1
Tab.3  
Content informationTraining set (100 in total)Verification set (278 in total)
Number of strain nephogram1–50, 329–37851–328
Load process (kN)0–2.628, 18.12.686–18.072
Judgment indicator0 (negative), 1 (positive)To identify [0,1]
Tab.4  
Fig.12  
Fig.13  
Hyper-parametersValue
Momentum factor0.03
Learning rate0.01
Error tolerance0.01
Maximum iteration20000
Tab.5  
Number of the selected groupThe first principal strain ?1The second principal strain ?2Strain in x-direction ?xxStrain in y-direction ?yyShear strain ?xyHorizontal displacement uLongitudinal displacement v
A
B
C
D
E
F
Tab.6  
Content informationTraining Set (133 in total)Verification set (224 in total)
Number of mat files1–100, 341–373101–324
Load process (kN)0–4.989, 18.15.058–18.051
Judgment indicator0 (negative), 1 (positive)to identify [0,1]
Tab.7  
Fig.14  
Content informationIdentify point of convolutional neural networkIdentify point of BP neural network
Corresponding strain nephogram number277185–204
Load (kN)17.60310.156–11.963
Time (seconds)1358920.5–1015.5
Tab.8  
Content informationTraining Set (26 in total)Verification set (24 in total)
Number of strain nephogram1–429–505–28
Load process (kN)0–0.767.43–131.06–7.16
Judgment indicator0 (negative)1 (positive)to identify [0,1]
Tab.9  
Fig.15  
Fig.16  
Fig.17  
Fig.18  
Fig.19  
Hyper-parameterValue
Momentum factor0.03
Learning rate0.01
Error tolerance0.01
Maximum iteration20000
Tab.10  
Number of the selected groupThe first principal strain ?1The second principal strain ?2Strain in x-direction ?xxStrain in y-direction ?yyShear strain ?xyHorizontal displacement uLongitudinal displacement v
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
Tab.11  
Content informationTraining Set (20 in total)Verification set (24 in total)
Number of mat files1–10, 51–6011–50
Load process (kN)0–2.39, 132.65–13
Judgment indicator0 (negative), 1 (positive)to identify [0,1]
Tab.12  
Fig.20  
1 J ZhangZ SongH BingH XieP Li. Research progress on fatigue of highway concrete bridges under vehicle loading. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2023, 55(12): 65−79 (in Chinese)
2 X Liu, Q H Sun, W Song, Y H Bao. Structural behavior of reinforced concrete tunnel linings with synthetic fibers addition. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2023, 131: 104771
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2022.104771
3 M Mishra, P B Lourenco, G V Ramana. Structural health monitoring of civil engineering structures by using the internet of things: A review. Journal of Building Engineering, 2022, 48: 103954
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.103954
4 K Koike, T Yamaji, T Nishida, K Yonamine, A Adachi, K Nakagawa. Influence of transportation and pumping on the properties of concrete with large amount of copper slag fine aggregate in actual construction of port and harbor structures. Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management, 2022, 24(4): 1368–1377
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-022-01432-7
5 Q An, X J Chen, H J Wang, H M Yang, Y J Yang, W Huang, L Wang. Segmentation of concrete cracks by using fractal dimension and UHK-Net. Fractal and Fractional, 2022, 6(2): 95
https://doi.org/10.3390/fractalfract6020095
6 A Chauhan, U K Sharma. Identifying factors influencing corrosion rate in reinforced concrete under simulated natural climate. Current Science, 2022, 123(11): 1327–1333
https://doi.org/10.18520/cs/v123/i11/1327-1333
7 B N Zhao, L Dong, J J Fu, L Q Yang, W X Xu. Experimental study on micro-damage identification in reinforced concrete beam with wavelet packet and DIC method. Construction & Building Materials, 2019, 210: 338–346
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.03.175
8 Y Y HuangH ZhengY H Zhou. Study of concrete block’s thermal stress considering tensile and pressure different creep. Journal of Wuhan University of Technology, 2011, 33(3): 87−92 (in Chinese)
9 S Y Liang. Review on concrete cracking and maintenance. Sichuan Cement, 2016, 38(7): 262
10 Z N TongY Gao. Cause and influence of mass concrete crack. International Conference on Chemical, Material and Food Engineering. 2015, 22:497–499
11 S L Zhou, Q Zhao, J Q Guo. Analysis and control technology of hydraulic concrete crack. Water Resources Planning and Design, 2021, (4): 110–114
12 G H Luo, J W Pan, J T Wang. Study on the influence factors of Rayleigh wave method for detecting the crack depth of concrete Surface. Water Resources and Hydropower Technology, 2021, 52(9): 165–171
13 X Z Liu. Laser ultrasonic detection method for crack depth of concrete. Journal of Central South University (Science and Technology), 2021, 52(3): 839−847 (in Chinese)
14 S H WeiY F LiuJ H Liu. Research on surface crack detection of concrete structure based on UAV and digital image method. Special Structures, 2020, 37(5):107–111
15 Y W Li, H Xiang, W Peng. Research and application of high dam concrete crack detection technology based on UAV and underwater robot. Building Technology Development, 2021, 48(3): 52–54
16 L Cheng, G Y Tian. Surface crack detection for carbon fiber reinforced plastic (CFRP) materials using pulsed eddy the current thermography. IEEE Sensors Journal, 2011, 11(12): 3261–3268
https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2011.2157492
17 L X Zhang, J K Shen, B J Zhu. A review of the research and application of deep learning-based computer vision in structural damage detection. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 2022, 21(1): 1–21
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-022-2074-7
18 H W Huang, Q T Li, D M Zhang. Deep learning based image recognition for crack and leakage defects of metro shield tunnel. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2018, 77: 166–176
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2018.04.002
19 X L Ma, J Lu. Research on Road Surface Crack Image Classification Algorithm Based on Grayscale Analysis. Journal of Wuhan University of Technology (Traffic Science and Engineering), 2018, 42(5): 748–752, 756
20 X S ChaiX Y ZhuJ C LiF XueX S Xin. Tunnel lining crack recognition algorithm based on deep convolutional neural network. Railway Construction, 2018, 58(6): 60–65
21 Z D Zhang, C Jung. GBDT-MO: Gradient-boosted decision trees for multiple outputs. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 2021, 32(7): 3156–3167
https://doi.org/10.1109/TNNLS.2020.3009776
22 F Vieira, F Taveira-Pinto, P Rosa-Santos. Novel time-efficient approach to calibrate VARANS-VOF models for simulation of wave interaction with porous structures using artificial neural networks. Ocean Engineering, 2021, 235: 103975
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2021.109375
23 M B Alazzam, F Hajjej, A S AlGhamdi, S Ayouni, M A Rahman. Mechanics of materials natural fibers technology on thermal properties of polymer. Advances in Materials Science and Engineering, 2022, 2022: 1–5
https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/7774180
24 A Ghasemi, R Amirabadi, U R Kamalian, A R Mazyak. Numerical modeling investigation of perforated geometry of caisson breakwater under irregular waves by considering porous media. Ocean Engineering, 2023, 269: 113558
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.113558
25 M Z Li, R J Yan, L Xu, C G Soares. A general framework of higher-order shear deformation theories with a novel unified plate model for composite laminated and FGM plates. Composite Structures, 2021, 261: 113560
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.113560
26 T Le-Duc, Q H Nguyen, H Nguyen-Xuan. Balancing composite motion optimization. Information Sciences, 2020, 520: 250–270
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2020.02.013
27 A Farzam, B Hassani. Isogeometric analysis of in-plane functionally graded porous microplates using modified couple stress theory. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2019, 91: 508–524
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2019.05.012
28 B L Dang, H Nguyen-Xuan, M A Wahab. An effective approach for VARANS-VOF modelling interactions of wave and perforated breakwater using gradient boosting decision tree algorithm. Ocean Engineering, 2023, 268: 113398
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.113398
29 R Girshick. Fast R-CNN. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Vision. Xi’an: IEEE, 2015, 1440–1448
30 V T Tran, T K Nguyen, H Nguyen-Xuan, M A Wahab. Vibration and buckling optimization of functionally graded porous microplates using BCMO-ANN algorithm. Thin-walled Structures, 2023, 182: 110267
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2022.110267
31 H Kilic, U Yuzgec, C Karakuzu. Improved antlion optimizer algorithm and its performance on neuro fuzzy inference system. Neural Network World, 2019, 29(4): 235–254
https://doi.org/10.14311/NNW.2019.29.016
32 S C Yuan. Review of root-mean-square error calculation methods for large deployable mesh reflectors. International Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 2022, 2022: 5352146
https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/5352146
33 L V Ho, T T Trinh, G de Roeck, T Bui-Tien, L Nguyen-Ngoc, M Abdel Wahab. An efficient stochastic-based coupled model for damage identification in plate structures. Engineering Failure Analysis, 2022, 131: 105866
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2021.105866
34 H W Guo, X Y Zhuang, P W Chen, N Alajlan, T Rabczuk. Stochastic deep collocation method based on neural architecture search and transfer learning for heterogeneous porous media. Engineering with Computers, 2022, 38(6): 5173–5198
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-021-01586-2
35 H W Guo, X Y Zhuang, P W Chen, N Alajlan, T Rabczuk. Analysis of three-dimensional potential problems in non-homogeneous media with physics-informed deep collocation method using material transfer learning and sensitivity analysis. Engineering with Computers, 2022, 38(6): 5423–5444
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-022-01633-6
36 HP HuY Yang. A combined GLQP and DBN-DRF for face recognition in unconstrained environments. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Control, Automation and Artificial Intelligence. Paris: Atlantis Press, 2017, 553–557
37 K Nayoung, K Y Min, S Ko. Performance improvement method of convolutional neural network using agile activation function. KIPS Transactions on Software and Data Engineering, 2021, 9(7): 213–220
38 D Svozil, V Kvasnicka, J Pospichal. Introduction to multi-layer feed-forward neural networks. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 1997, 39(1): 43–62
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-7439(97)00061-0
39 M G Guo, H Gong. Research on AlexNet improvement and optimization method. Computer Engineering and Application., 2021, 56(20): 124–131
40 K H ChanS K ImW Ke. VGGreNet: A Light-Weight VGGNet with Reused Convolutional Set. In: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Utility and Cloud Computing (UCC). IEEE, 2020: 434–439
41 D L Peng, T X Wang. Pruning algorithm based on GoogLeNet model. Control and Decision, 2019, 34(6): 1259–1264
42 Y Su, J X Song. A detection method based on Bayesian hierarchical network for abnormal interaction. In: Proceedings of the 2016 4th International Conference on Advanced Materials and Information Technology Processing (AMITP 2016). Lima: Atlantis Press, 2016, 60: 333–340
43 M TanL Quoc. Efficientnet: Rethinking model scaling for convolutional neural networks. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning. Long Beach, CA: PMLR, 2019, 6105–6114
44 J C Xu, J K Zhang, Z Z Shen. Recognition method of internal concrete structure defects based on 1D-CNN. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 2022, 42(6): 5215–5226
https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-211784
45 B X Wang, W G Zhao, P Gao, Y F Zhang, Z Wang. Crack damage detection method via multiple visual features and efficient multi-task learning model. Sensors, 2018, 18(6): 1796
https://doi.org/10.3390/s18061796
46 X Q Zhang, M Z Akber, W Zheng. Predicting the slump of industrially produced concrete using machine learning: A multiclass classification approach. Journal of Building Engineering, 2022, 58: 104997
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2022.104997
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed