Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering

ISSN 2095-2430

ISSN 2095-2449(Online)

CN 10-1023/X

邮发代号 80-968

2019 Impact Factor: 1.68

Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering  2024, Vol. 18 Issue (5): 776-787   https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-024-1073-3
  本期目录
Flexural behavior of textile reinforced mortar-autoclaved lightweight aerated concrete composite panels
Liying GUO1, Mingke DENG1,2, Wei ZHANG1, Tong LI1,2, Yangxi ZHANG1,2(), Mengyu CAO3, Xian HU4
1. Department of Civil Engineering, Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology, Xi’an 710055, China
2. Key Lab of Structural Engineering and Earthquake Resistance, Ministry of Education (XAUAT), Xi’an 710055, China
3. Scene engineering design institute, Xi’an 710016, China
4. Dahua Group, Shang hai 200062, China
 全文: PDF(5477 KB)   HTML
Abstract

To improve the deficiencies of prefabricated autoclaved lightweight aerated concrete (ALC) panel such as susceptibility to cracking and low load-bearing capacity, a textile-reinforced mortar-autoclaved lightweight aerated concrete (TRM-ALC) composite panel was developed in this study. One group of reference ALC panels and five groups of TRM-ALC panels were fabricated and subjected to four-point flexural tests. TRM was applied on the tensile side of the ALC panels to create TRM-ALC. The variable parameters were the plies of textile (one or two), type of textile (basalt or carbon), and whether the matrix (without textile) was applied on the compression side of panel. The results showed that a bonding only 8-mm-thick TRM layer on the surface of the ALC panel could increase the cracking load by 180%−520%. The flexural capacity of the TRM-ALC panel increased as the number of textile layers increased. Additional reinforcement of the matrix on the compressive side could further enhance the stiffness and ultimate load-bearing capacity of the TRM-ALC panel. Such panels with basalt textile failed in flexural mode, with the rupture of fabric mesh. Those with carbon textile failed in shear mode due to the ultra-high tensile strength of carbon. In addition, analytical models related to the different failure modes were presented to estimate the ultimate load-carrying capacity of the TRM-ALC panels.

Key wordsprefabricated autoclaved lightweight aerated concrete panel    textile-reinforced mortar    cracking load    flexural capacity    stiffness
收稿日期: 2023-02-08      出版日期: 2024-06-26
Corresponding Author(s): Yangxi ZHANG   
 引用本文:   
. [J]. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, 2024, 18(5): 776-787.
Liying GUO, Mingke DENG, Wei ZHANG, Tong LI, Yangxi ZHANG, Mengyu CAO, Xian HU. Flexural behavior of textile reinforced mortar-autoclaved lightweight aerated concrete composite panels. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2024, 18(5): 776-787.
 链接本文:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fsce/CN/10.1007/s11709-024-1073-3
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fsce/CN/Y2024/V18/I5/776
Specimen ID No. of panels Plies of textile on tensile side Type of textile Matrix layer on compressive side Form of panel Thickness of panel (mm)
P-R 2 (a) 100
P-B1 3 1 basalt no (b) 108
P-B2 3 2 basalt no (b) 108
P-B2D 3 2 basalt yes (c) 116
P-C1 3 1 carbon no (b) 108
P-C1D 3 1 carbon yes (c) 116
Tab.1  
Fig.1  
Fig.2  
Type of textile Elastic modulus (GPa) Tensile strength (MPa) Ultimate strain (%) Density (g/cm3) Mesh spacing (mm × mm) Section area (mm2/m) Unit price (dollar/m2)
Basalt 34 860 2.5 2.65 10 × 10 32 4.2
Carbon 230 3600 1.5 1.74 20 × 20 44 12.6
Tab.2  
Portland cement Fly ash Micro silica Slag powder Fine-grained sand Water PVA fiber
447 494 59 177 424 353 20.8
Tab.3  
Fig.3  
Fig.4  
Fig.5  
Fig.6  
Specimen ID Pcr (kN) Pm (kN) Δ y (mm) Δu (mm) μ = Δuy Failure mode
P-R 1.23 4.85 18.80 26.13 1.40 F
1.17 5.17 18.75 26.31 F
Average and COV 1.20 (4%) 5.01 (5%) 18.78 (2%) 26.22 (1%)
P-B1 3.80 10.61 9.91 19.93 1.87 F
3.27 9.86 11.31 21.07 F
3.02 8.75 10.32 17.94 F
Average and COV 3.36 (12%) 9.74 (10%) 10.51 (7%) 19.65 (8%)
P-B2 5.32 13.19 13.18 22.38 1.89 F
5.40 11.22 12.21 25.46 F
4.80 12.35 12.31 23.48 F
Average and COV 5.17 (6%) 12.25 (8%) 12.57 (4%) 23.77 (7%)
P-B2D 6.08 15.09 7.15 23.82 2.76 F
4.62 16.09 6.88 16.60 F
6.34 15.50 6.03 15.63 F
Average and COV 5.68 (16%) 15.57 (3%) 6.78 (9%) 18.68 (24%)
P-C1 6.77 16.09 15.34 21.00 1.53 S
6.72 15.86 14.39 24.48 S
5.17 15.61 16.08 24.71 S
Average and COV 6.22 (15%) 15.85 (2%) 15.27 (6%) 23.40 (9%)
P-C1D 6.85 20.32 12.01 23.62 1.90 S
6.31 18.99 11.22 16.15 S
6.15 16.24 12.71 28.60 S
Average and COV 6.44 (6%) 18.52 (11%) 11.98 (6%) 22.79 (27%)
Tab.4  
Fig.7  
Fig.8  
Fig.9  
Fig.10  
Fig.11  
Specimen ID Pcrexp(kN) Pcrcal(kN) Pcrcal/Pcre xp Ppexp(kN) Ppcal(kN) Ppcal/Ppexp
P-B1(1) 3.80 4.00 1.05 10.61 10.48 0.99
P-B1(2) 3.27 4.00 1.22 9.86 10.48 1.06
P-B1(3) 3.02 4.00 1.32 8.75 10.48 1.19
P-B2(1) 5.32 4.25 0.80 13.19 12.27 0.93
P-B2(2) 5.40 4.25 0.79 11.22 12.27 1.00
P-B2(3) 4.80 4.25 0.89 12.35 12.27 0.99
P-B2D(1) 6.08 4.43 0.73 15.09 13.86 0.92
P-B2D(2) 4.62 4.43 0.96 16.09 13.86 0.86
P-B2D(3) 6.34 4.43 0.70 15.50 13.86 0.89
P-C1(1) 6.77 4.78 0.71 16.09 13.51 0.84
P-C1(2) 6.72 4.78 0.71 15.86 13.51 0.85
P-C1(3) 5.17 4.78 0.92 15.61 13.51 0.87
P-C1D(1) 6.85 5.23 0.76 20.32 18.43 0.91
P-C1D(2) 6.31 5.23 0.83 18.99 18.43 0.97
P-C1D(3) 6.15 5.23 0.85 16.24 18.43 1.13
Average 0.88 0.96
COV 0.21 0.11
Tab.5  
1 C Y Xu, M L Nehdi, K L Wang, Y Guo. Experimental study on seismic behavior of novel AAC prefabricated panel walls. Journal of Building Engineering, 2021, 44: 103390
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.103390
2 F D Ma, M K Deng, Y Yang. Experimental study on internal precast beam–column ultra-high-performance concrete connection and shear capacity of its joint. Journal of Building Engineering, 2021, 44: 103204
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.103204
3 Y Yardim, A M T Waleed, M S Jaafar, S Laseima. AAC-concrete light weight precast composite floor slab. Construction and Building Materials, 2013, 40: 405–410
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.10.011
4 B Wang, P Wang, Y S Chen, J Zhou, X Kong, H Wu, H Fan, F Jin. Blast responses of CFRP strengthened autoclaved aerated cellular concrete panels. Construction and Building Materials, 2017, 157: 226–236
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.09.064
5 I D P Salgado, F D A Silva. Flexural behavior of sandwich panels combining curauá fibre-reinforced composite layers and autoclaved aerated concrete core. Construction and Building Materials, 2021, 286: 122890
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.122890
6 M A Mousa, N Uddin. Experimental and analytical study of carbon fibre-reinforced polymer (FRP)/autoclaved aerated concrete (AAC) sandwich panels. Engineering Structures, 2009, 31(10): 2337–2344
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2009.05.009
7 E Tuncer, B Binici, E Canbay. Behavior and design of FRP bonded autoclaved aerated concrete beams. Construction and Building Materials, 2021, 282: 122712
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.122712
8 L A S Kouris, T C Triantafillou. State-of-the-art on strengthening of masonry structures with textile reinforced mortar (TRM). Construction and Building Materials, 2018, 188: 1221–1233
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.08.039
9 S P Yin, S L Xu, H Li. Improved mechanical properties of textile reinforced concrete thin plate. Journal of Wuhan University of Technology. Materials Science Edition, 2013, 28(1): 92–98
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11595-013-0647-z
10 F G Carozzi, A Bellini, T D’Antino, Felice G de, F Focacci, Ł Hojdys, L Laghi, E Lanoye, F Micelli, M Panizza, C Poggi. Experimental investigation of tensile and bond properties of Carbon-FRCM composites for strengthening masonry elements. Composites. Part B, Engineering, 2017, 128: 100–119
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.06.018
11 Y X Zhang, S J Zhang, M K Deng. Four-point bending tests of ECC: Mechanical response and toughness evaluation. Case Studies in Construction Materials, 2022, 17: e01573
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2022.e01573
12 N W Portal, L N Thrane, K Lundgren. Flexural behaviour of textile reinforced concrete composites: Experimental and numerical evaluation. Materials and Structures, 2017, 50(1): 1–14
https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-016-0882-9
13 F A Kariou, S P Triantafyllou, D A Bournas, L N Koutas. Out-of-plane response of masonry walls strengthened using textile-mortar system. Construction and Building Materials, 2018, 165: 769–781
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.01.026
14 F A Kariou, S P Triantafyllou, D A Bournas. TRM strengthening of masonry arches: An experimental investigation on the effect of strengthening layout and textile fibre material. Composites. Part B, Engineering, 2019, 173: 106765
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.04.026
15 P Meriggi, C Caggegi, A Gabor, G de Felice. Shear−compression tests on stone masonry walls strengthened with basalt textile reinforced mortar (TRM). Construction and Building Materials, 2022, 316: 125804
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.125804
16 W Y Gao, K X Hu, J G Dai, K Dong, K Q Yu, L J Fang. Repair of fire-damaged RC slabs with basalt fabric-reinforced concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 2018, 185: 79–92
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.07.043
17 Z Ding, M R Xu, J G Dai, B Q Dong, M J Zhang, S X Hong, F Xing. Strengthening concrete using phosphate cement-based fibre-reinforced inorganic composites for improved fire resistance. Construction and Building Materials, 2019, 212: 755–764
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.04.038
18 X Yang, W Y Gao, J G Dai, Z D Lu. Shear strengthening of RC beams with FRP grid-reinforced ECC matrix. Composite Structures, 2020, 241: 112120
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.112120
19 N W Portal, M Flansbjer, K Zandi, L Wlasak, K Malaga. Bending behaviour of novel textile reinforced concrete-foamed concrete (TRC-FC) sandwich elements. Composite Structures, 2017, 177: 104–118
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.06.051
20 F Schladitz, M Frenzel, D Ehlig, M Curbach. Bending load capacity of reinforced concrete slabs strengthened with textile reinforced concrete. Engineering Structures, 2012, 40: 317–326
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.02.029
21 L N Koutas, D A Bournas. Flexural Strengthening of two-way RC slabs with textile-reinforced mortar: Experimental investigation and design equations. Journal of Composites for Construction, 2017, 21(1): 04016065
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000713
22 H Y Zhang, H Y Liu, V Kodu, M Y Li, Y Zhou. Flexural behavior of concrete slabs strengthened with textile reinforced geopolymer mortar. Composite Structures, 2022, 284: 115220
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.115220
23 S P Yin, L L Feng, J L Zhao. Study on the tensile and flexural mechanical properties of TRE in freezing−thawing environments. Construction and Building Materials, 2021, 268: 121150
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.121150
24 Z F Dong, M K Deng, J Dai, S Song. Flexural strengthening of RC slabs using textile reinforced mortar improved with short PVA fibres. Construction and Building Materials, 2021, 304: 124613
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.124613
25 M K Deng, Z F Dong, C Zhang. Experimental investigation on tensile behavior of carbon textile reinforced mortar (TRM) added with short polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) fibres. Construction and Building Materials, 2020, 235: 117801
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117801
26 W Zhang, M K Deng, Y G Han, R Li, S Yang. Uniaxial tensile performance of high ductile fibre-reinforced concrete with built-in basalt textile grids. Construction and Building Materials, 2022, 315: 125716
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.125716
27 11969-2020 GB/T. Test Methods of Autoclaved Aerated Concrete. Beijing: China Building Materials Federation, Standardization Administration of the People’s Republic of China, 2020 (in Chinese)
28 36262 GB/T. Fibre Reinforced Polymer Composite Grids for Civil Engineering. Beijing: China Building Materials Federation, Standardization Administration of the People’s Republic of China, 2018 (in Chinese)
29 DBJ61/T112-2016. Technical Specification for Application of High Ductile Concrete. Xi’an: Shaanxi Provincial Building Standard Design Office, 2016 (in Chinese)
30 P FengH QiangL P Ye. Discussion and definition on yield points of materials, members and structures. Engineering Mechanics, 2017, 3: 41−51 (in Chinese)
31 W D He, X Wang, L N Ding, Z Wu. Efficiency of different BFRP-based strengthening techniques in improving flexural behavior of RC slabs. Construction and Building Materials, 2021, 308: 125002
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.125002
32 M Harajli, H ElKhatib, J T San-Jose. Static and cyclic out-of-plane response of masonry walls strengthened using textile-mortar system. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 2010, 22(11): 1171–1180
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000128
33 K Q ZhengZ LiuS P MengS Q Qin. Novel calculation method for shear capacity of RC beams without web reinforcement. Journal of Southeast University (Natural Science Edition), 2017, 47 (2): 362–368 (in Chinese)
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed