Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering

ISSN 2095-2430

ISSN 2095-2449(Online)

CN 10-1023/X

Postal Subscription Code 80-968

2018 Impact Factor: 1.272

Front Arch Civil Eng Chin    0, Vol. Issue () : 479-495    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-011-0137-3
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Major bridge projects——a multi-disciplinary approach

The content of this paper was presented at Labse Workshop 2009, Tongji University, Shanghai, China

Klaus H. OSTENFELD, Erik Y. ANDERSEN()
COWI, Parallelvej 2, Kongens Lyngby, DK-2800, Denmark
 Download: PDF(2132 KB)   HTML
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

Modern bridge building is much more than concrete, steel and money. The overall socioeconomic impact, influence on people migration, traffic, use of primary materials, safety of construction impact on the environment, energy, risk scenarios, health, and most relevant now: climate and CO2 emissions, are among the parameters which enter into the decision process at the overall holistic conceptual level, the more detailed level of selection of bridge sites, and selection of bridge types as well as construction methods and selection of materials and products.

The paper illustrates these dilemmas and illustrates by specific examples how this complicated decision process can be managed and structured in order to arrive at an overall satisfactory solution for design, construction and maintenance throughout the lifetime (life cycle) to these sometimes contradictory parameters and requirements.

Keywords bridges      materials      climate      risk      safety      environment      socioeconomics      traffic      CO2      energy      life cycle      society      aesthetics     
Corresponding Author(s): ANDERSEN Erik Y.,Email:eya@cawi.dk   
Issue Date: 05 December 2011
 Cite this article:   
Klaus H. OSTENFELD,Erik Y. ANDERSEN. Major bridge projects——a multi-disciplinary approach

The content of this paper was presented at Labse Workshop 2009, Tongji University, Shanghai, China

[J]. Front Arch Civil Eng Chin, 0, (): 479-495.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fsce/EN/10.1007/s11709-011-0137-3
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fsce/EN/Y0/V/I/479
Fig.1  Scandinavian Fixed Links across navigable straits
Fig.2  Factors influencing the multidisciplinary bridge design task
Fig.3  Project development phases
Fig.4  Overlapping areas of expertise in a multidisciplinary working environment
Fig.5  Belt, East Bridge-main suspension bridge with approach spans, an excellent example of a visually pleasing appearance of a unique structure with landmark qualities
Fig.6  Anchor block structure for the Storebelt, East Bridge visually honest in appearance, light and with a clear structural function
Fig.7  Sheikh Zayed Bridge, Abu Dhabi, UAE
Fig.8  King Fahed Causeway–prefabricated elements being placed on site
Fig.9  Heavy lift vessel Svanen Oresund Bridge Site–placement of pier segments
Fig.10  Prefabrication yard for the elements for the Storebelt West Bridge
Fig.11  Great Belt East bridge, approach viaducts
Fig.12  Oresund Bridge. Erection of foundation caissons and superstructure by Svanen
Fig.13  Caisson foundation for pylons for the Busan-Geoje Ficed link cable stayed bridges. Prefabrication in two steps–combination of two separately prepared lower parts
Fig.14  New Little Belt Bridge, Denmark
Fig.15  Faroe Bridge, Denmark
Fig.16  Hoga Kusten bridge, Sweden
Fig.17  Pont de Normandie, France
Fig.18  H?logaland Bridge, Norway
Fig.19  Sutong Bridge, China
Fig.20  Sutong Bridge
Fig.21  Stonecutters bridge, HK, China
Fig.22  Bridge across Stretto de Messina, Italy, with a main span of 3300 m
Fig.23  Gibraltar Strait Fixed Crossing Suspension bridge
Fig.24  Yemen- Djibouti Fixed Link
Fig.25  Fehmarn Belt Bridge. Rendering of combined road and railway sable stayed bridge solution
Fig.26  Possible alignments for the Qatar-Bahrain Causeway
Fig.27  Evaluation matrix for alignment selection
project features, construction and operation activities and eventspotential environmental impacts
embankments, bridge piers and ship collision islands? blocking of flow of water with consequent impacts on regional hydrodynamics and marine environment, esp. salinity
? hindrance to shipping
? footprint may cover important marine habitats, e.g. seagrass and coral
? sedimentation may occur adjacent to embankments, impacting habitats
? reduction of habitat areas may affect fishery
? blocking may impact movement of fish/shrimp larvae and migration of fish and marine mammals
? changed flow and sedimentation patterns can affect coastal installations, harbours, intakes and outfalls and beaches
? contaminated rainfall-runoff from road surfaces impact water quality
dredging and reclamation operations? spill of fine sediments can affect seagrass (important nursery habitat for fish and shrimps) and coral by shading and smothering
? marine habitats removed by dredging
? emissions affect air quality
? sediment plumes and noise can cause fish and mammals to avoid the area
? accidental spills affect water quality
construction, operation and decommissioning of temporary works, e.g. precasting yards, storage areas, harbours, offices, labor camps? terrestrial flora and fauna including birds can be impacted
? emissions predominantly from transport, energy production and other fuel consuming equipment impact air quality
? noise and vibrations
? temporary harbours impact marine environment
? socio-economic impact on local communities and fishing industry
? possible soil and groundwater contamination
operation of completed bridge? emissions from traffic affect air quality
? accidental spills discharge to marine environment
? noise and vibrations
Tab.1  Potential impacts from implementation of major fixed link projects
Fig.28  Main span options for Storebelt, East Bridge and associated total costs
Fig.29  Left: Snapshot from simulation studies of bridge activity; right: Illustration of Domain Theory” for safe passage of vessels
Fig.30  Distribution of Design Vessel Sizes along the alignment of the Great belt East bridge including indication of the protection islands arranged around anchor blocks and piers
Fig.31  Bridge collapse after ship collision. Xijiang, China
Fig.32  Air circulation principles in a closed steel box girder (Storebelt East Bridge) and in closed box bridge girder trusses (Oresund Bridge)
Fig.33  Dehumidification plant
Fig.34  Dehumidification installation, new little belt bridge, Denmark
Fig.35  Permanent vibration equipment on suspension bridge hangers
[1] Chaohui WANG, Ke YI, Feng CHEN, Luqing LIU, Xiaolei ZHOU, Zhiwei GAO. Composition design and performance evaluation of rubber-particle cement-stabilized gravel[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2024, 18(9): 1466-1477.
[2] Yong ZHAO, Tingyu ZHU, Li YU, Ming LU. Construction technology for deep tunnels crossing superhigh-temperature fault zones with high water surges[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2024, 18(8): 1267-1280.
[3] Huihui LI, Lifeng LI, Rui HU, Meng YE. Simplified design of nonlinear damper parameters and seismic responses for long-span cable-stayed bridges with nonlinear viscous dampers[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2024, 18(7): 1103-1116.
[4] Ahmed M. ATTA, Reda N. BEHIRY, Mohammed I. HARAZ. Effectiveness of external prestressing in enhancing the non-ductile hanger failure mechanism in reinforced concrete inverted T-beams[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2024, 18(7): 1050-1065.
[5] Peng ZHU, Yunming ZHU, Wenjun QU, Liyu XIE. Stress–strain relationship for reactive powder concrete with recycled powder under uniaxial compression[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2024, 18(7): 1015-1027.
[6] Kailing DENG, Duanyi WANG, Cheng TANG, Jianwen SITU, Luobin CHEN. A cumulative damage model for predicting and assessing raveling in asphalt pavement using an energy dissipation approach[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2024, 18(6): 949-962.
[7] Wei JIANG, Wenqian LI, Xi CHEN. An extended numerical model of the first exothermic peak for three dimensional printed cement-based materials[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2024, 18(1): 80-88.
[8] Yaxin TAO, Xiaodi DAI, Geert de SCHUTTER, Kim Van TITTELBOOM. Adhesion performance of alkali-activated material for 3-dimensional printing of tunnel linings at different temperatures[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2024, 18(1): 66-79.
[9] Desheng LI, Hao ZHENG, Kang GU, Lei LANG, Shang SHI, Bing CHEN. Autogenous healing mechanism of cement-based materials[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2023, 17(6): 948-963.
[10] Amirhosein SHABANI, Mahdi KIOUMARSI, Vagelis PLEVRIS. Performance-based seismic assessment of a historical masonry arch bridge: Effect of pulse-like excitations[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2023, 17(6): 855-869.
[11] Hua-Fei HE, Zhao-Ping LI, Shao-Lin MA, Xiang-Yang CUI. Effect of strata restraint on seismic performance of prefabricated sidewall joints in fabricated subway stations[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2023, 17(5): 763-779.
[12] Mehrdad KARAMI, Mohammad NAZARI-SHARABIAN, James BRISTOW, Moses KARAKOUZIAN. Evaluation of the stability of terraced slopes in clayey gravel soil using a novel numerical technique[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2023, 17(5): 796-811.
[13] Jiale LI, Yun ZHOU, Zhiming HE, Genquan ZHONG, Chao ZHANG. Hysteretic behavior of cambered surface steel tube damper: Theoretical and experimental research[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2023, 17(4): 606-624.
[14] Wenchang SUN, Nan JIANG, Chuanbo ZHOU, Jinshan SUN, Tingyao WU. Safety assessment for buried drainage box culvert under influence of underground connected aisle blasting: A case study[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2023, 17(2): 191-204.
[15] Smitha GOPINATH, Ramesh GOPAL, Hemalatha THIYAGARAJAN. Experimental investigation on concrete overlaid with textile reinforced mortar: Influences of mix, temperature, and chemical exposure[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2023, 17(2): 271-283.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed