Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering

ISSN 2095-2430

ISSN 2095-2449(Online)

CN 10-1023/X

Postal Subscription Code 80-968

2018 Impact Factor: 1.272

Front. Struct. Civ. Eng.    2019, Vol. 13 Issue (3) : 716-724    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-018-0508-0
RESEARCH ARTICLE
The role of geometrical features in the architectural- structural interaction: Some case studies of the Iranian ancient architecture
Maryam ZANDIYEHVAKILI1(), Isa HOJAT2, Mehdi MAHMUDI1
1. Faculty of Architecture and Urban Development, Art University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran
2. Faculty of Architecture, College of Fine Arts, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
 Download: PDF(1318 KB)   HTML
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

This research aims to enhance the interaction between a structure and its architectural form. Having a qualitative approach, the present work discovers some successfully used geometrical features of the Iranian ancient architecture in terms of the architectural-structural interaction. We define four qualitative criteria for this assessment, i.e., construction-ability, cost effectiveness, participation of the structure in fulfillment of the visual, and functional-semantic needs of the architectural form. For this purpose, two case studies including the Jamé Mosque of Isfahan and the Soltaniyeh building are investigated. The outcomes of this research help designers to not only design efficient structures by adapting non-load bearing elements with the general form of the structure, but also meet concepts such as the unity or perfectionism in the structure.

Keywords architectural-structural interaction      geometrical features      structure      architectural form      Iranian ancient architecture     
Corresponding Author(s): Maryam ZANDIYEHVAKILI   
Just Accepted Date: 01 August 2018   Online First Date: 06 September 2018    Issue Date: 05 June 2019
 Cite this article:   
Maryam ZANDIYEHVAKILI,Isa HOJAT,Mehdi MAHMUDI. The role of geometrical features in the architectural- structural interaction: Some case studies of the Iranian ancient architecture[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2019, 13(3): 716-724.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fsce/EN/10.1007/s11709-018-0508-0
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fsce/EN/Y2019/V13/I3/716
Fig.1  The southern dome of Jamé Mosque of Isfahan, Tarkin dome [18]
Fig.2  The northern dome of Jamé Mosque of Isfahan [18]
Fig.3  Soltaniyeh, load-path diagram
Fig.4  Golden ration in the northern dome of the Jamé Mosque [27]
Fig.5  Modulation in the northern dome of Jamé Mosque [29]
Fig.6  Simple geometric shapes in Soltaniyeh building
Fig.7  “Chamaneh” arch in Soltaniyeh dome
Fig.8  Squinch of the northern dome of Jamé Mosque [18]
Fig.9  “Patkaneh” muqarnas in the western porch of Jamé Mosque [18]
Fig.10  Muqarnases in the transition area of Soltaniyeh’s dome [41]
Fig.11  Force flow chart in the “Rasmi-Karbandi” [16]
Fig.12  The “Karbandi” structure in the No. 60 of Jamé Mosque’s vaults [25]
Fig.13  An example of brickwork in the southern dome of the Jamé Mosque [25]
ASI parameters Iranian architecture’s guidelines about the application of geometry
construction-ability • Attachment of non-structural elements to the overall shape of the structure by using geometric solutions such as proportions, modulation, basic geometric shapes and symmetry
• Matching the shape of ceilings and the method of deployment of the load bearing elements within the architectural form considering the force patterns
cost-effective architectural forms Utilize the appropriate geometry (shapes and sizes) to have fully stressed design
participation of structure in fulfillment of the visual needs of the form Match the used geometric patterns to decorate the form with the structural considerations
participation of structure in fulfillment of the functional and semantic requirements of the form Move from the plurality of structural elements into unity in the form, balance and perfectionism by using geometric solutions such as proportions, modulation, symmetry, and the use of proper geometry (shapes and dimensions)
Tab.1  Iranian architecture’s guidelines about the application of geometry based on the parameters on the architectural-structural interaction (ASI)
Tarkin The ribbed dome which is divided at the base into curved segments and follows the curve of the elevation.
Ahang vault A barrel vault which is an architectural element formed by the extrusion of a single curve or pair of curves along a given distance.
Chaharbakhsh vault A groined vault (also sometimes known as a double barrel vault or cross vault) which is produced by the intersection at right angles of two-barrel vaults.
the golden ratio In mathematics, two quantities are in the golden ratio if their ratio is the same as the ratio of their sum to the larger of the two quantities.
Gaz A unit in architecture which is about 1.0666 m.
Peymun Modulation in the Islamic architecture.
Sabuee dome The dome with the Chamaneh arch.
muqarnas It is a form of ornamented vaulting in the Islamic architecture, the geometric subdivision of a squinch, or cupola, or corbel, into many miniature squinches, producing a sort of cellular structure, sometimes also called a “honeycomb” vault.
Patkaneh It is a type of muqarnas with self-load bearing feature.
Soltaniyeh building Soltaniyeh building is another name of the Mausoleum of Oljaito which is in Soltaniyeh city in Iran.
Shabestan It is a space that can be usually found in traditional architecture of mosques, houses, and schools in Iran ancient architecture.
squinch It is a construction filling in the upper angles of a square room to form a base to receive an octagonal or spherical dome.
Karbandi It is one of the ornaments in Islamic architecture which can also have structural function and is formed by crossing the arches.
Khagi dome A dome which is in the form of an egg.
Iranian ancient architecture It is defined as a kind of architecture that was designed and built in Iran since the beginning of the 4th century AD, after the emergence and manifestation of wisdom, Islamic philosophy and mysticism.
  
1 L M Dabbour. Geometric proportions: The underlying structure of design process for Islamic geometric patterns. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 2012, 1(4): 380–391
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foar.2012.08.005
2 G Necipoglu. The Topkapi Scroll: Geometry and Ornament in Islamic Architecture. Los Angeles: Getty Center for the History, 1995
3 T Burckhardt. Sacred Art in East and West: Its Principles and Methods. Underlining ed. Perennial, 1967
4 S H Nasr. Islamic Art and Spirituality. New York: State University of New York Press, 1987
5 R Guénon. The Reign of Quantity & the Signs of the Times. Sophia Perennis, 2004
6 I El-Said, T El-Bouri, K Critchlow, S S Damlūjī. Islamic Art and Architecture: The System of Geometric Design. Garnet Publishing, 1998
7 M Tahbaz. The sacred form. Soffeh, 2004, 14(38): 95–124
8 N Ardalan, L Bakhtiar. The Sense of Unity: The Sufi Tradition in Persian Architecture. 2nd ed. Skokie: Kazi Publications, 2000
9 H Lurzadeh. Reviving the Forgotten Skills of Iranian Architecture. 3rd ed. Tehran: Molly, 2010
10 Z Buzurgmihri, J Mehrpooya. Geometry in Architecture. Tehran: Sobhan Noor, 2006
11 A Al-Buzjani. Applied Geometry. Tehran: Surush, 1990
12 M K Pirnia. Introduction to Islamic Architecture of Iran. Tehran: Soroush Danesh, 2005
13 G J Kashani. Arch and Vault. Tehran: Surush, 1987
14 L Abolqasemi. The norm of formation in Islamic architecture of Iran. In: Kiani M Y, ed. Iranian Architecture of the Islamic Period. Tehran: Ministry of Islamic Guidance Press, 1987, 394–378
15 M Hejazi, F Mehdizadeh Saradj. Relation among meaning, aesthetics, shape and structure in Islamic architecture of Iran. Journal of Researches in Islamic Architecture, 2014, 1(2): 7–22
16 A Zia-Abadi. Karbandi is the origin of space structures. In: Proceedings of the Second National Conference on Space Structures. Tehran, 2007
17 H Safaeipour, G H Memarian, M R Bemanian. Understanding the essence of Patkâné vaulting through analyzing primitive cases in Persian architecture. Journal of Iranian Architecture Studies, 2014, 1(5): 15–19
18 ICHHTO. Jamé Mosque of Isfahan. UNESCO Report. 2011
19 E Galdieri. Esfahan: Jamé Mosque of Isfahan. 1984
20 F Guerrier, L Giorgi, G. Tampone Piero Sanpaolesi. Restoration and Method. Nardini Press S.R.L., 2012
21 A R Biruni. Al-Tafehim. Tehran: Homa, 1983
22 A U Pope. Persian Architecture. New York: George Braziller, 1965
23 J K Grütter. Aesthetics in Architecture: Basics of Architectural Perception. 1987
24 A Zarkesh. Architectural priority on structures in contemporary architecture. Book of Month: Art, 2008, 20–31
25 E Galdieri, F F Tehrani. Restoration of a brick dome, an experience of Iran. Soffeh, 1999, 28: 72–77
26 S M Mojabi. The morphology of Iran’s traditional architecture. International Journal of Industrial Engineering and Production Management, 2007, 18(5): 55–61
27 M Hejazi, F Mehdizadeh Saradj. Relation among meaning, aesthetics, shape and structure in Islamic architecture of Iran. Journal of Researches in Islamic Architecture, 2014, 2: 7–22
28 M Hejazi. Sacred geometry in nature and Persian architecture. History of Science, 2009, 6(2): 17–44
29 M Ghannad. A study on the north dome of Masjid-I-Jami Isfahan. In: Proceedings of the ISAMA-BRIDGES Conference. Alhambra, 2003, 473–484
30 G H Memarian. Vault structures in the Islamic architecture of Iran. Tehran: Gihad Danesgahi of the University of Science and Technology, 1987
31 A Papadopoulo, H Jazani. Islamic Architecture. Tehran: Markaz-I Nashr-I Farhangi-I Raj, 1989
32 R Hillenbrand. Islamic Architecture: Form, Function and Meaning. Columbia: Columbia University Press, 2004
33 H R Naderi F, S Ahmadibarough. Sacred geometry and its display in Islamic art (with emphasis on the Iranian mosques). Book of Month: Art, 2010, 146: 24–33
34 A Sharbaf. Sharbaf and His Works. Tehran: Iranian Cultural Heritage Organization, 2006
35 F F Tehrani. Beyond the geometry, arc and dome. Soffeh, 1992, 2(4): 34–46
36 M R Bemanian. The role and application of Peymun in Iranian architecture. The Modares Semiannual Art, 2002, 1(1): 1–10
37 Mahdavinejad M J. Islamic architecture’s wisdom, deep search of spiritual constructs of Islamic architecture of Iran. HONAR-HA-YE-ZIBA, 2004, 19: 55–66
38 M Khakpour, M Khazaee. Unity and plurality in Islamic art by looking at the works of Burkhart. Book of Month: Art, 2010, 7(1): 16–27
39 T Burckhardt. Art of Islam: Language and Meaning. London: World Wisdom, 2009
40 M Tahbaz. Traces of sacrosanctity in Islamic Persian architecture. Soffeh, 2005, 14(39): 103–123
41 P. Sanpaolesi The Dome of Santa Maria del Fiore and the Soltanieh Mausoleum. Florence: Art History Institute in Florence, 1972
[1] Yurong ZHANG, Shengxuan XU, Yanhong GAO, Jie GUO, Yinghui CAO, Junzhi ZHANG. Correlation of chloride diffusion coefficient and microstructure parameters in concrete: A comparative analysis using NMR, MIP, and X-CT[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2020, 14(6): 1509-1519.
[2] Sang I. PARK, Sang-Ho LEE. Heuristic solution using decision tree model for enhanced XML schema matching of bridge structural calculation documents[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2020, 14(6): 1403-1417.
[3] El Houcine MOURID, Said MAMOURI, Adnan IBRAHIMBEGOVIC. Progressive collapse of 2D reinforced concrete structures under sudden column removal[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2020, 14(6): 1387-1402.
[4] Beibei SUN, Hao WU, Weimin SONG, Zhe LI, Jia YU. Hydration, microstructure and autogenous shrinkage behaviors of cement mortars by addition of superabsorbent polymers[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2020, 14(5): 1274-1284.
[5] Nader KARBALLAEEZADEH, Hosein GHASEMZADEH TEHRANI, Danial MOHAMMADZADEH SHADMEHRI, Shahaboddin SHAMSHIRBAND. Estimation of flexible pavement structural capacity using machine learning techniques[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2020, 14(5): 1083-1096.
[6] Jie LI. A PDEM-based perspective to engineering reliability: From structures to lifeline networks[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2020, 14(5): 1056-1065.
[7] Chunfeng ZHAO, Xin YE, Avinash GAUTAM, Xin LU, Y. L. MO. Simplified theoretical analysis and numerical study on the dynamic behavior of FCP under blast loads[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2020, 14(4): 983-997.
[8] Lingyun YOU, Kezhen YAN, Jianhong MAN, Nengyuan LIU. Anisotropy of multi-layered structure with sliding and bonded interlayer conditions[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2020, 14(3): 632-645.
[9] Yu-Fei WU, Ying-Wu ZHOU, Biao HU, Xiaoxu HUANG, Scott SMITH. Fused structures for safer and more economical constructions[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2020, 14(1): 1-9.
[10] Nishant SHARMA, Kaustubh DASGUPTA, Arindam DEY. Optimum lateral extent of soil domain for dynamic SSI analysis of RC framed buildings on pile foundations[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2020, 14(1): 62-81.
[11] Tugrul TALASLIOGLU. Optimal dome design considering member-related design constraints[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2019, 13(5): 1150-1170.
[12] Mingjie ZHANG, Fuyou XU. Variational mode decomposition based modal parameter identification in civil engineering[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2019, 13(5): 1082-1094.
[13] Reza KHADEMI-ZAHEDI, Pouyan ALIMOURI. Finite element model updating of a large structure using multi-setup stochastic subspace identification method and bees optimization algorithm[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2019, 13(4): 965-980.
[14] Zhenyuan LUO, Weiming YAN, Weibing XU, Qinfei ZHENG, Baoshun WANG. Experimental research on the multilayer compartmental particle damper and its application methods on long-period bridge structures[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2019, 13(4): 751-766.
[15] M. SALAR, M. R. GHASEMI, B. DIZANGIAN. Practical optimization of deployable and scissor-like structures using a fast GA method[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2019, 13(3): 557-568.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed