Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering

ISSN 2095-2430

ISSN 2095-2449(Online)

CN 10-1023/X

Postal Subscription Code 80-968

2018 Impact Factor: 1.272

Front. Struct. Civ. Eng.    2020, Vol. 14 Issue (1) : 109-122    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-019-0579-6
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Using thermodynamic parameters to study self-healing and interface properties of crumb rubber modified asphalt based on molecular dynamics simulation
Dongliang HU1, Jianzhong PEI2(), Rui LI2, Jiupeng ZHANG2, Yanshun JIA1, Zepeng FAN3
1. School of Transportation, Southeast University, Nanjing 211189, China
2. School of Highway, Chang’an University, Xi’an 710064, China
3. School of Transportation Science and Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150090, China
 Download: PDF(3038 KB)   HTML
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

The thermodynamic property of asphalt binder is changed by the addition of crumb rubber, which in turn influences the self-healing property as well as the cohesion and adhesion within the asphalt-aggregate system. This study investigated the self-healing and interface properties of crumb rubber modified asphalt (CRMA) using thermodynamic parameters based on the molecular simulation approach. The molecular models of CRMA were built with representative structures of the virgin asphalt and the crumb rubber. The aggregate was represented by SiO2 and Al2O3 crystals. The self-healing capability was evaluated with the thermodynamic parameter wetting time, work of cohesion and diffusivity. The interface properties were evaluated by characterizing the adhesion capability, the debonding potential and the moisture susceptibility of the asphalt-aggregate interface. The self-healing capability of CRMA is found to decrease as the rubber content increases. The asphalt-Al2O3 interface with higher rubber content has stronger adhesion and moisture stability. But the influence of crumb rubber on the interfacial properties of asphalt-SiO2 interface has no statistical significance. Comparing with the interfacial properties of the asphalt-SiO2 interface, the asphalt-Al2O3 interface is found to have a stronger adhesion but a worse moisture susceptibility for its enormous thermodynamic potential for water to displace the asphalt binder.

Keywords crumb rubber modified asphalt      surface free energy      self-healing      interface properties      molecular dynamics simulation     
Corresponding Author(s): Jianzhong PEI   
Just Accepted Date: 04 September 2019   Online First Date: 27 December 2019    Issue Date: 21 February 2020
 Cite this article:   
Dongliang HU,Jianzhong PEI,Rui LI, et al. Using thermodynamic parameters to study self-healing and interface properties of crumb rubber modified asphalt based on molecular dynamics simulation[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2020, 14(1): 109-122.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fsce/EN/10.1007/s11709-019-0579-6
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fsce/EN/Y2020/V14/I1/109
Fig.1  Molecular structures of CRMA compositions for molecular simulations: (a) asphaltene; (b) naphthene aromatic; (c) saturate; (d) crumb rubber (C5H8)16.
Fig.2  Molecular model of CRMA; the crumb rubber molecules are highlighted.
Fig.3  Comparison between calculated densities of asphalt binder from MD simulations and the experimentally measured results.
Fig.4  Molecular models of CRMA with a 10 Å crack.
Fig.5  Molecular models of asphalt-aggregate interface: (a) asphalt-SiO2 interface; (b) asphalt-Al2O3 interface.
Fig.6  Schematic representation of silica surface from the top view: (a) nonhydroxylated; (b) fully hydroxylated. The silicon atoms and bonds are deleted. Red and white atoms are hydrogen and oxygen atoms, respectively.
Fig.7  Molecular models of asphalt-water-aggregate interface: (a) asphalt-water-SiO2 interface; (b) asphalt-water-Al2O3 interface.
Fig.8  The changes of density and configuration of CRMA model with crack. (simulation under NPT ensemble at 298K and 1 atm)
Fig.9  MSD plotting and the linear fitting for virgin asphalt binder molecules around the crack surfaces.
Fig.10  Wetting time of crack healing of CRMA.
Fig.11  Work of cohesion between the crack surfaces of CRMA.
Fig.12  Diffusivity of molecules around the crack surfaces of CRMA.
Fig.13  The work of adhesion between the aggregate and CRMA: (a) work of adhesion between Al2O3 and CRMA; (b) work of adhesion between SiO2 and CRMA.
Fig.14  The work of debonding and the energy ratio (ER) of asphalt-Al2O3 interface.
Fig.15  The work of debonding and the energy ratio of asphalt-SiO2 interface.
1 J Zhang, S Cui, J Cai, J Pei, Y Jia. Life-cycle reliability evaluation of semi-rigid materials based on modulus degradation model. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 2018, 22(6): 2043–2054
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-018-0646-x
2 F M Nejad, P Aghajani, A Modarres, H Firoozifar. Investigating the properties of crumb rubber modified bitumen using classic and SHRP testing methods. Construction & Building Materials, 2012, 26(1): 481–489
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.06.048
3 R Li, Y Dai, P Wang, C Sun, J Zhang, J Pei. Evaluation of Nano-ZnO dispersed state in bitumen with digital imaging processing techniques. Journal of Testing and Evaluation, 2017, 46(3): 20160401
4 Y Yildirim. Polymer modified asphalt binders. Construction & Building Materials, 2007, 21(1): 66–72
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2005.07.007
5 D Lo Presti. Recycled Tyre Rubber Modified Bitumens for road asphalt mixtures: A literature review. Construction & Building Materials, 2013, 49: 863–881
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.09.007
6 F Xiao, S Yao, J Wang, J Wei, S Amirkhanian. Physical and chemical properties of plasma treated crumb rubbers and high temperature characteristics of their rubberised asphalt binders. Road Materials and Pavement Design, 2018 (in press)
https://doi.org/10.1080/14680629.2018.1507922
7 R Li, Y Yu, B Zhou, Q Guo, M Li, J Pei. Harvesting energy from pavement based on piezoelectric effects: Fabrication and electric properties of piezoelectric vibrator. Journal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy, 2018, 10(5): 054701
https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5002731
8 M Abdelrahman, S Carpenter. Mechanism of interaction of asphalt cement with crumb rubber modifier. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1999, 1661(1): 106–113
https://doi.org/10.3141/1661-15
9 X Shu, B Huang. Recycling of waste tire rubber in asphalt and Portland cement concrete: An overview. Construction & Building Materials, 2014, 67: 217–224
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.11.027
10 L Zanzotto, G Kennepohl. Development of rubber and asphalt binders by depolymerization and devulcanization of scrap tires in asphalt. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1996, 1530(1): 51–58
https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198196153000107
11 M Mull, K Stuart, A Yehia. Fracture resistance characterization of chemically modified crumb rubber asphalt pavement. Journal of Materials Science, 2002, 37(3): 557–566
https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013721708572
12 H Yu, Z Leng, Z Zhou, K Shih, F Xiao, Z Gao. Optimization of preparation procedure of liquid warm mix additive modified asphalt rubber. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2017, 141: 336–345
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.043
13 R Li, C Wang, P Wang, J Pei. Preparation of a novel flow improver and its viscosity-reducing effect on bitumen. Fuel, 2016, 181: 935–941
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2016.05.028
14 S Wang, C Yuan, D Jiaxi. Crumb tire rubber and polyethylene mutually stabilized in asphalt by screw extrusion. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 2014, 131(23): 81–86
https://doi.org/10.1002/app.41189
15 S Sultana, A Bhasin. Effect of chemical composition on rheology and mechanical properties of asphalt binder. Construction & Building Materials, 2014, 72: 293–300
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.09.022
16 A Bhasin, D N Little, K L Vasconcelos, E Masad. Surface free energy to identify moisture sensitivity of materials for asphalt mixes. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2007, 2001(1): 37–45
https://doi.org/10.3141/2001-05
17 A E Alvarez, E Ovalles, A Epps Martin. Comparison of asphalt rubber-aggregate and polymer modified asphalt-aggregate systems in terms of surface free energy and energy indices. Construction & Building Materials, 2012, 35: 385–392
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.04.029
18 Y Tan, M Guo. Using surface free energy method to study the cohesion and adhesion of asphalt mastic. Construction & Building Materials, 2013, 47: 254–260
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.05.067
19 A Bhasin, J Howson, E Masad, D Little, R Lytton. Effect of modification processes on bond energy of asphalt binders. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2007, 1998(1): 29–37
https://doi.org/10.3141/1998-04
20 D Cheng, D Little, R Lytton, J Holste. Surface energy measurement of asphalt and its application to predicting fatigue and healing in asphalt mixtures. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2002, 1810(1): 44–53
https://doi.org/10.3141/1810-06
21 D Sun, G Sun, X Zhu, A Guarin, B Li, Z Dai, J Ling. A comprehensive review on self-healing of asphalt materials: Mechanism, model, characterization and enhancement. Advances in Colloid and Interface Science, 2018, 256: 65–93
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cis.2018.05.003
22 A Bhasin, D Bommavaram, M Greenfiled. Intrinsic healing in asphalt binders—Measurement and impact of molecular morphology. In: The 6th International Conference on Maintenance and Rehabilitation of Pavements and Technological Control. Torino: Turin Polytechnic, 2009
23 J Zhang, Z Fan, D Hu, Z Hu, J Pei, W Kong. Evaluation of asphalt-aggregate interaction based on the rheological properties. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 2018, 19(7): 586–592
https://doi.org/10.1080/10298436.2016.1199868
24 A Bhasin, D N Little, R Bommavaram, K Vasconcelos. A framework to quantify the effect of healing in bituminous materials using material properties. Road Materials and Pavement Design, 2008, 9(sup1): 219–242
https://doi.org/10.1080/14680629.2008.9690167
25 K Kanitpong, H Bahia. Relating adhesion and cohesion of asphalts to the effect of moisture on laboratory performance of asphalt mixtures. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2005, 1901(1): 33–43
https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198105190100105
26 B V Kök, H Çolak. Laboratory comparison of the crumb-rubber and SBS modified bitumen and hot mix asphalt. Construction & Building Materials, 2011, 25(8): 3204–3212
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.03.005
27 X Qu, Q Liu, M Guo, D Wang, M Oeser. Study on the effect of aging on physical properties of asphalt binder from a microscale perspective. Construction & Building Materials, 2018, 187: 718–729
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.07.188
28 R Li, Q Guo, H Du, J Pei. Mechanical property and analysis of asphalt components based on molecular dynamics simulation. Journal of Chemistry, 2017, 2017: 1531632
29 Z Chen, J Pei, R Li, F Xiao. Performance characteristics of asphalt materials based on molecular dynamics simulation—A review. Construction & Building Materials, 2018, 189: 695–710
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.09.038
30 L Zhang, M L Greenfield. Analyzing properties of model asphalts using molecular simulation. Energy & Fuels, 2007, 21(3): 1712–1716
https://doi.org/10.1021/ef060658j
31 A Bhasin, R Bommavaram, M L Greenfield, D N Little. Use of molecular dynamics to investigate self-healing mechanisms in asphalt binders. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 2011, 23(4): 485–492
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000200
32 G Xu, H Wang. Molecular dynamics study of oxidative aging effect on asphalt binder properties. Fuel, 2017, 188: 1–10
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2016.10.021
33 M Guo, Y Tan, J Wei. Using molecular dynamics simulation to study concentration distribution of asphalt binder on aggregate surface. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 2018, 30(5): 04018075
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0002258
34 P Wang, F Zhai, Z Dong, L Wang, J Liao, G Li. Micromorphology of asphalt modified by polymer and carbon nanotubes through molecular dynamics simulation and experiments: Role of strengthened interfacial interactions. Energy & Fuels, 2018, 32(2): 1179–1187
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.7b02909
35 Y Ding, B Huang, X Shu, Y Zhang, M E Woods. Use of molecular dynamics to investigate diffusion between virgin and aged asphalt binders. Fuel, 2016, 174: 267–273
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2016.02.022
36 R Li, H Du, Z Fan, J Pei. Molecular dynamics simulation to investigate the interaction of asphaltene and oxide in aggregate. Advances in Materials Science and Engineering. 2016, 2016: 3817123
37 H Sun. COMPASS: An ab initio force-field optimized for condensed-phase applications overview with details on alkane and benzene compounds. Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 1998, 102(38): 7338–7364
https://doi.org/10.1021/jp980939v
38 A C van Duin, S Dasgupta, F Lorant, W A Goddard. ReaxFF: A reactive force field for hydrocarbons. Journal of Physical Chemistry A, 2001, 105(41): 9396–9409
https://doi.org/10.1021/jp004368u
39 T Pan, Y Lu, S Lloyd. Quantum-chemistry study of asphalt oxidative aging: An XPS-aided analysis. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2012, 51(23): 7957–7966
https://doi.org/10.1021/ie3007215
40 S Kmiecik, D Gront, M Kolinski, L Wieteska, A E Dawid, A Kolinski. Coarse-grained protein models and their applications. Chemical Reviews, 2016, 116(14): 7898–7936
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00163
41 S J Marrink, H J Risselada, S Yefimov, D P Tieleman, A H De Vries. The MARTINI force field: Coarse grained model for biomolecular simulations. Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 2007, 111(27): 7812–7824
https://doi.org/10.1021/jp071097f
42 B Arash, H S Park, T Rabczuk. Mechanical properties of carbon nanotube reinforced polymer nanocomposites: A coarse-grained model. Composites. Part B, Engineering, 2015, 80: 92–100
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2015.05.038
43 Materials Studio. Version 8.0. San Diego, CA: Biovia Inc., 2014
44 L Artok, Y Su, Y Hirose, M Hosokawa, S Murata, M Nomura. Structure and reactivity of petroleum-derived asphaltene. Energy & Fuels, 1999, 13(2): 287–296
https://doi.org/10.1021/ef980216a
45 H Yao, Q Dai, Z You. Molecular dynamics simulation of physicochemical properties of the asphalt model. Fuel, 2016, 164: 83–93
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2015.09.045
46 R Siddique, T R Naik. Properties of concrete containing scrap-tire rubber—An overview. Waste Management, 2004, 24(6): 563–569
47 Y Tanaka. Structural characterization of natural polyisoprenes: Solve the mystery of natural rubber based on structural study. Rubber Chemistry and Technology, 2001, 74(3): 355–375
https://doi.org/10.5254/1.3547643
48 D Sun, T Lin, X Zhu, Y Tian, F Liu. Indices for self-healing performance assessments based on molecular dynamics simulation of asphalt binders. Computational Materials Science, 2016, 114: 86–93
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2015.12.017
49 J Read, D Whiteoak. The Shell Bitumen Handbook. Thomas Telford, 2003
50 D D Li, M L Greenfield. Chemical compositions of improved model asphalt systems for molecular simulations. Fuel, 2014, 115: 347–356
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2013.07.012
51 D Argyris, D R Cole, A Striolo. Dynamic behavior of interfacial water at the silica surface. Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2009, 113(45): 19591–19600
https://doi.org/10.1021/jp906150n
52 R Wool, K O’connor. A theory crack healing in polymers. Journal of Applied Physics, 1981, 52(10): 5953–5963
https://doi.org/10.1063/1.328526
53 R Schapery. Nonlinear fracture analysis of viscoelastic composite materials based on a generalized J integral theory. In: Kawata K, Akasak T, eds. Japan-U.S. Conference on Composite materials: Mechanics, mechanical properties and fabrication. Tokyo: Japan Society for Composite Materials Tokyo, 1982: 171–180
54 Y Gao, Y Zhang, F Gu, T Xu, H Wang. Impact of minerals and water on bitumen-mineral adhesion and debonding behaviours using molecular dynamics simulations. Construction & Building Materials, 2018, 171: 214–222
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.03.136
55 D Frenkel, B Smit. Understanding Molecular Simulation: From Algorithms to Applications. Academic Press: New York, 2002
56 Q Lv, W Huang, F Xiao. Laboratory evaluation of self-healing properties of various modified asphalt. Construction & Building Materials, 2017, 136: 192–201
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.01.045
[1] Luthfi Muhammad MAULUDIN, Chahmi OUCIF, Timon RABCZUK. The effects of mismatch fracture properties in encapsulation-based self-healing concrete using cohesive-zone model[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2020, 14(3): 792-801.
[2] Fucheng GUO, Jiupeng ZHANG, Jianzhong PEI, Weisi MA, Zhuang HU, Yongsheng GUAN. Evaluation of the compatibility between rubber and asphalt based on molecular dynamics simulation[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2020, 14(2): 435-445.
[3] Kunamineni VIJAY, Meena MURMU. Effect of calcium lactate on compressive strength and self-healing of cracks in microbial concrete[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2019, 13(3): 515-525.
[4] Md. Shahriar QUAYUM,Xiaoying ZHUANG,Timon RABCZUK. Computational model generation and RVE design of self-healing concrete[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2015, 9(4): 383-396.
[5] Zhong Qi YUE, Shaopeng FAN, Zhifa YANG, Lihui LI, Luqing ZHANG, Zhongjian ZHANG, . A hypothesis for crack free interior surfaces of Longyou caverns caved in argillaceous siltstone 2000 years ago[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2010, 4(2): 165-177.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed