Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering

ISSN 2095-2430

ISSN 2095-2449(Online)

CN 10-1023/X

Postal Subscription Code 80-968

2018 Impact Factor: 1.272

Front. Struct. Civ. Eng.    2020, Vol. 14 Issue (1) : 127-137    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-019-0583-x
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Long-term effects of electrochemical realkalization on carbonated concrete
Peng ZHU1,2, Ji ZHANG1, Wenjun QU1()
1. College of Civil Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China
2. Key Laboratory of Performance Evolution and Control for Engineering Structures, Shanghai 200092, China
 Download: PDF(1673 KB)   HTML
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

The long-term effects of electrochemical realkalization on carbonated reinforced concrete with a W/C ratio of 0.65 were studied. Fourteen out of 16 carbonated specimens had been subjected to realkalization seven years ago, and the alkalinity of the concrete, the electrochemical characters (corrosion current density and potential) of the specimens and the corrosion conditions of the steel bars were examined. Results of different specimens and also at different time (4, 10, 13 months and 7 years after realkalization) were compared. According to the phenolphthalein and pH meter test, the alkalinity of the concrete had disappeared after seven years. Based on the potentiodynamic polarization test, various corrosion conditions had developed on the steel bars, which was verified by visual observation. All bars were in the depassivated state, and their corrosion current densities increased significantly after seven years. Cracks developed in some of the specimens, and the diverse compactness of concrete and excessive current of realkalization were considered to be possible causes. The effects of the realkalization treatment vanished after seven years.

Keywords realkalization      concrete      carbonation      polarization curve      corrosion     
Corresponding Author(s): Wenjun QU   
Just Accepted Date: 24 October 2019   Online First Date: 17 December 2019    Issue Date: 21 February 2020
 Cite this article:   
Peng ZHU,Ji ZHANG,Wenjun QU. Long-term effects of electrochemical realkalization on carbonated concrete[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2020, 14(1): 127-137.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fsce/EN/10.1007/s11709-019-0583-x
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fsce/EN/Y2020/V14/I1/127
component content (kg/m3)
Portland cement 32.5 323
water 210
sand 727
aggregate (with maximum size of 15 mm) 1189
W/C ratio 0.65
Tab.1  Concrete mix design
Fig.1  Specimen design (unit: mm). The specimens were concrete cylinders (diameter: 70mm, height: 250 mm) with F10mm plain steel bars in the center. The top and bottom were all isolated with epoxy resin and the surrounding area was exposed to the air. Wires were welded to one side of the steel bar for treatment and measurement.
treatment realkalization specimen name
current (A/m2) duration (days)
carbonation and realkalization 3 14 CR3&14-1, CR3&14-2, CR3&14-3
3 28 CR3&28-1, CR3&28-2
5 14 CR5&14-1, CR5&14-2
10 14 CR10&14-1, CR10&14-2, CR10&14-3
10 28 CR10&28-1, CR10&28-2
3/5/10 14/28 CRX-1, CRX-2
carbonation without realkalization C-1, C-2
Tab.2  Realkalization  parameters
cracking images
no cracks
CR3&14-2 CR3&14-3
CR3&28-1 CR3&28-2
CR5&14-1 CR5&14-2
CR10&14-1 CR10&14-3
CR10&28-1
longitudinal cracks
CR3&14-1 CR10&14-2
CR10&28-2
extensive longitudinal cracks;
part of the concrete fell out;
easily crushed when tapped with a hammer
CRX-1 CRX-2
Tab.3  Crack development in the realkalized specimens
Fig.2  Corrosion current density and potential 7 years after realkalization. The names below the columns indicate the specific specimens and the digits above indicate the values of (a) corrosion current density and (b) corrosion potential.
Fig.3  Polarization curves before and 0, 4, 10, 13 months [14] and 7 years after realkalization. (a) Before and 0 months after realkalization; (b) 0 months and 4 months after realkalization; (c) 4 months and 10 months after realkalization; (d) 10 months and 13 months after realkalization; (e) 13 months and 7 years after realkalization; (f) 7 years after realkalization (10 A/m2). The change rules of polarization curves of specimens under the realkalization condition 3/5 A/m2, 14/28 days measured 0, 4, 10, 13 months and 7 years after realkalization are present in Fig. 3(a) - (e), and the specimens under the realkalization condition measured 10 A/m2, 14/28 days 7 years after realkalization are shown in Fig. 3(f).
Fig.4  Corrosion current density and potential over 7 years. The corrosion current density and potential calculated from the polarization curves are present. The x-axis indicates the time (months) after realkalization and -5 indicates carbonated specimen before treatment.(a) Corrosion current density; (b) corrosion potential.
Fig.5  Results of the phenolphthalein tests for specimens CR3&14-2, CR3&14-1, CRX-1 and CRX-2 after seven years. A 1% phenolphthalein solution was sprayed onto the freshly cut surfaces as a pH indicator. The region with pH value not less than 8 appeared red, while the region with pH value less than 8 remained unchanged. The pH was tested by concrete powders (depth of 0-5 mm from the steel bar) and the values were present in the subheadings.(a) CR3&14-2 (pH= 7.94); (b) CR3&14-1 (pH= 7.86); (c) CRX-1 (pH= 7.78); (d) CRX-2 (pH= 7.42).
Fig.6  pH around the steel bar 4, 10, and 13 months after realkalization. The x-axis indicates the time (months) after realkalization and the pH was tested by concrete powders (depth of 0-5 mm from the steel bar).The pH around the steel bar 4, 10, and 13 months after realkalization was directly related to the charge. The higher the charge was, the higher the pH was. In the period from 4 months to 13 months, the pH around the steel bar dropped over time in all the treated specimens. Based on the pH test, the pH decreased to below 8.0 after 7 years from the value of more than 12.0 immediately following realkalization and 11.56 ~ 12.19 13 months later.
Fig.7  Corrosion conditions of the steel bars seven years after realkalization. The images were part of the steel bars removed from the specimens. The above six specimens are carbonated and realkalized specimens CR3&14-2, CR10&14-3, CR3&14-1, CR10&28-2, CRX-1 and CRX-2 and the other two are carbonated specimens C-1 and C-2. (a) CR3&14-2, i = 3.47 mA/cm2; (b) CR10&14-3, i = 15.34 mA/cm2; (c) CR3&14-1, i = 35.37mA/cm2; (d) CR10&28-2, i = 43.15mA/cm2; (e) CRX-1 (not measured); (f) CRX-2 (not measured); (g) C-1; (h) C-2.
1 E Redaelli, M Carsana, M Gastaldi, F Lollini, L Bertolini. Electrochemical techniques for the repair of reinforced concrete suffering carbonation-induced corrosion. Corrosion Reviews, 2011, 29(5–6): 179–190
https://doi.org/10.1515/CORRREV.2011.008
2 W Yeih, J J Chang. A study on the efficiency of electrochemical realkalisation of carbonated concrete. Construction & Building Materials, 2005, 19(7): 516–524
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2005.01.006
3 J Mietz. Electrochemical realkalisation for rehabilitation of reinforced concrete structures. Materials and Corrosion, 1995, 46(9): 527–533
https://doi.org/10.1002/maco.19950460904
4 K I Matsumoto, T Ueda, M Ashida, T Miyagawa. Study on realkalization with electrolyte containing lithium ion. International Journal of Modern Physics B, 2003, 17(8&9): 1446–1451
https://doi.org/10.1142/S0217979203019137
5 L. Odden The repassivating effect of electrochemical realkalisation and chloride extraction. In: Proceedings of Corrosion and Corrosion Protection of Steel in Concrete. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press, 1994, 1473–1488
6 E E Velivasakis, S K Henriksen, D Whitmore. Chloride extraction and realkalization of reinforced concrete stop steel corrosion. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, 1998, 12(2): 77–84
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3828(1998)12:2(77)
7 C Andrade, M Castellote, J Sarría, C Alonso. Evolution of pore solution chemistry, electro-osmosis and rebar corrosion rate induced by realkalisation. Materials and Structures, 1999, 32(6): 427–436
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02482714
8 J Meitz. Electrochemical Rehabilitation Methods for Reinforced Concrete Structures. A State of the Art Report. EFC Publication 24. London: The Institute of Materials, 1998
9 W J Qu, Y Xiong, L Guo. Influencing factor of realkalization technique for carbonated concrete and study of its durability. Journal of Building Materials, 2008, 11(1): 21–27 (in Chinese)
10 Y Y Tong, V Bouteiller, E Marie-Victoire, S Joiret. Durability evaluation of a realkalisation treatment using impressed current. In: 11DBMC International Conference on Durability of Building Materials and Components. Istanbul: Istanbul Technical University, 2008
11 P H L C Ribeiro, G R Meira, P R R Ferreira, N Perazzo. Electrochemical realkalisation of carbonated concretes—Influence of material characteristics and thickness of concrete reinforcement cover. Construction & Building Materials, 2013, 40: 280–290
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.09.076
12 C Andrade, I Martínez, M Castellote, P García De Viedma. Efficiency control of electrochemical repair techniques. In: Concrete Repair, Rehabilitation and Retrofitting II—Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Concrete Repair, Rehabilitation and Retrofitting, ICCRRR. Cape Town: CRC Press, 2009, 31–37
13 E Redaelli, L Bertolini. Electrochemical repair techniques in carbonated concrete. Part I: Electrochemical realkalisation. Journal of Applied Electrochemistry, 2011, 41(7): 817–827
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10800-011-0301-4
14 K Wang, W J Qu, P H Li, J X Zhang. A long-term electrochemical study on carbonated reinforced concrete after realkalization. Journal of Tongji University (Natural Science), 2012, 40(3): 353–360 (in Chinese)
15 GB/T50081. Standard for Test Method of Mechanical Properties on Ordinary Concrete. Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press, 2002 (in Chinese)
16 P F G Banfill. Re-alkalisation of carbonated concrete-effect on concrete properties. Construction & Building Materials, 1997, 11(4): 255–258
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0950-0618(97)00045-7
17 E Garcia-Diaz, J Riche, D Bulteel, C Vernet. Mechanism of damage for the alkali-silica reaction. Cement and Concrete Research, 2006, 36(2): 395–400
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2005.06.003
18 B Fournier, M A Berube. Alkali-aggregate reaction in concrete: A review of basic concepts and engineering implications. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 2000, 27(2): 167–191
https://doi.org/10.1139/l99-072
19 M Siegwart, J F Lyness, B J McFarland. Change of pore size in concrete due to electrochemical chloride extraction and possible implications for the migration of ions. Cement and Concrete Research, 2003, 33(8): 1211–1221
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-8846(03)00047-4
20 CEN/TS 14038-1. Electrochemical Realkalisation and Chloride Extraction Treatments for Reinforced Concrete—Part 1: Realkalisation. London: European committee for standardization, 2004
21 NACE SP0107. Standard Practice: Electrochemical Realkalization and Chloride Extraction for Reinforced Concrete. Houston: NACE international, 2007
22 P A M Basheer, , T D. Sloan, Corrosion of Steel in Reinforced Concrete Structure. COST Action 521Final Report, 2003
23 ASTM C876. Standard Test Method for Corrosion Potentials of Uncoated Reinforcing Steel in Concrete. West Conshohocken: ASTM International, 2015
24 GB/T 50344. Technical Standard for Inspection of Building Structure. Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press, 2004 (in Chinese)
25 T Vidal, A Castel, R François. Analyzing crack width to predict corrosion in reinforced concrete. Cement and Concrete Research, 2004, 34(1): 165–174
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-8846(03)00246-1
26 A Djerbi, S Bonnet, A Khelidj, V Baroghel-bouny. Influence of traversing crack on chloride diffusion into concrete. Cement and Concrete Research, 2008, 38(6): 877–883
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2007.10.007
27 L Bertolini, E Redaelli, D Lattanzi, M Mapelli. Conservation techniques on the reinforced concrete pillars of the church of the San Carlo Borromeo hospital in Milan. European Journal of Environmental and Civil Engineering, 2010, 14(4): 411–425
https://doi.org/10.1080/19648189.2010.9693234
28 Y Y Tong, V Bouteiller, E Marie-Victoire, S Joiret. Efficiency investigations of electrochemical realkalisation treatment applied to carbonated reinforced concrete—Part 1: Sacrificial anode process. Cement and Concrete Research, 2012, 42(1): 84–94
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2011.08.008
29 P Montes, T W Bremner, D H Lister. Influence of calcium nitrite inhibitor and crack width on corrosion of steel in high performance concrete subjected to a simulated marine environment. Cement and Concrete Composites, 2004, 26(3): 243–253
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0958-9465(03)00043-X
[1] Subhasis PRADHAN, Shailendra KUMAR, Sudhirkumar V. BARAI. Understanding the behavior of recycled aggregate concrete by using thermogravimetric analysis[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2020, 14(6): 1561-1572.
[2] Fulin Qu, Wengui Li, Xiaohui Zeng, Zhiyu Luo, Kejin Wang, Daichao Sheng. Effect of microlimestone on properties of self-consolidating concrete with manufactured sand and mineral admixture[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2020, 14(6): 1545-1560.
[3] Mohammad Reza AZADI KAKAVAND, Ertugrul TACIROGLU. An enhanced damage plasticity model for predicting the cyclic behavior of plain concrete under multiaxial loading conditions[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2020, 14(6): 1531-1544.
[4] Harun TANYILDIZI, Abdulkadir ŞENGÜR, Yaman AKBULUT, Murat ŞAHİN. Deep learning model for estimating the mechanical properties of concrete containing silica fume exposed to high temperatures[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2020, 14(6): 1316-1330.
[5] Fangyu LIU, Wenqi DING, Yafei QIAO, Linbing WANG. An artificial neural network model on tensile behavior of hybrid steel-PVA fiber reinforced concrete containing fly ash and slag power[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2020, 14(6): 1299-1315.
[6] Luisa PANI, Flavio STOCHINO. Punching of reinforced concrete slab without shear reinforcement: Standard models and new proposal[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2020, 14(5): 1196-1214.
[7] Masoud RANJBARNIA, Milad ZAHERI, Daniel DIAS. Three-dimensional finite difference analysis of shallow sprayed concrete tunnels crossing a reverse fault or a normal fault: A parametric study[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2020, 14(4): 998-1011.
[8] Chunfeng ZHAO, Xin YE, Avinash GAUTAM, Xin LU, Y. L. MO. Simplified theoretical analysis and numerical study on the dynamic behavior of FCP under blast loads[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2020, 14(4): 983-997.
[9] Divahar RAVI, Aravind Raj PONSUBBIAH, Sangeetha Sreekumar PRABHA, Joanna Philip SARATHA. Experimental, analytical and numerical studies on concrete encased trapezoidally web profiled cold-formed steel beams by varying depth-thickness ratio[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2020, 14(4): 930-946.
[10] Zhao-Hui LU, Hong-Jun WANG, Fulin QU, Yan-Gang ZHAO, Peiran LI, Wengui LI. Novel empirical model for predicting residual flexural capacity of corroded steel reinforced concrete beam[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2020, 14(4): 888-906.
[11] Luthfi Muhammad MAULUDIN, Chahmi OUCIF, Timon RABCZUK. The effects of mismatch fracture properties in encapsulation-based self-healing concrete using cohesive-zone model[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2020, 14(3): 792-801.
[12] Feng YU, Cheng QIN, Shilong WANG, Junjie JIANG, Yuan FANG. Stress-strain relationship of recycled self-compacting concrete filled steel tubular column subjected to eccentric compression[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2020, 14(3): 760-772.
[13] Kaiwen HUANG, Ao LI, Bing XIA, Tao DING. Prediction on CO2 uptake of recycled aggregate concrete[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2020, 14(3): 746-759.
[14] Rwayda Kh. S. AL-HAMD, Martin GILLIE, Safaa Adnan MOHAMAD, Lee S. CUNNINGHAM. Influence of loading ratio on flat slab connections at elevated temperature: A numerical study[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2020, 14(3): 664-674.
[15] Luthfi Muhammad MAULUDIN, Chahmi OUCIF. Computational modeling of fracture in concrete: A review[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2020, 14(3): 586-598.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed