|
|
A collaborative approach for urban underground space development toward sustainable development goals: Critical dimensions and future directions |
Fang-Le PENG1(), Yong-Kang QIAO1,2, Soheil SABRI2, Behnam ATAZADEH2, Abbas RAJABIFARD2 |
1. Research Center for Underground Space & Department of Geotechnical Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China 2. Department of Infrastructure Engineering, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3010, Australia |
|
|
Abstract The utilization of urban underground space (UUS) offers an effective solution to urban problems but may also negatively affect urban development. Therefore, UUS development needs better concerted guidelines to coordinate various urban systems and the multiple components of the underground world. Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), which should be viewed as important yardsticks for UUS development, do not explicitly mention urban underground space, although many of them are affected by both the positive and negative consequences of its development. To fill this gap, this review lays the foundations of relevant UUS concepts and uses exemplary cases to reveal that 11 out of 17 SDGs can be linked with UUS uses. These linkages also manifest that land administration, integrated planning, architectural design, and construction technology are critical dimensions for increasing the contributions of UUS to the realization of SDGs. To achieve multi-disciplinary synergies among these four critical dimensions, a collaborative approach framework based on spatial data infrastructure is required. Thus, this work provides academics and practitioners with a holistic view of sustainable UUS development.
|
Keywords
urban underground space
Sustainable Development Goals
spatial data infrastructure
underground land administration
integrated planning
|
Corresponding Author(s):
Fang-Le PENG
|
Just Accepted Date: 20 January 2021
Online First Date: 05 March 2021
Issue Date: 12 April 2021
|
|
1 |
Chinese Academy of Engineering. Engineering Fronts 2018. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2018
|
2 |
Underground Space Sub-Society of CSRME, WiSUSP. Blue Book of Urban Underground Space Development in China 2019. Beijing: Chinese Society for Rock Mechanics & Engineering, 2019 (in Chinese)
|
3 |
T Kishii. Utilization of underground space in Japan. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2016, 55: 320–323
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2015.12.007
|
4 |
M R Doyle. From hydro/geology to the streetscape: Evaluating urban underground resource potential. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2016, 55: 83–95
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2016.01.021
|
5 |
N Bobylev, I Jefferson. Integration of urban physical infrastructure into land use governance. In: 2014 World Bank Conference on Land and Poverty. Washington, D.C.: The World Bank, 2014
|
6 |
K Attarian, B Safar Ali Najar. Vernacular and historic underground urban facilities and sustainability of cities case study: Infrastructures of Dezful. Journal of Cultural Heritage Management and Sustainable Development, 2019, 9(1): 2–23
https://doi.org/10.1108/JCHMSD-06-2017-0030
|
7 |
E Halisçelik, M A Soytas. Sustainable development from millennium 2015 to sustainable development goals 2030. Sustainable Development, 2019, 27(4): 545–572
https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.1921
|
8 |
D Griggs, M Stafford-Smith, O Gaffney, J Rockström, M C Öhman, P Shyamsundar, W Steffen, G Glaser, N Kanie, I Noble. Sustainable development goals for people and planet. Nature, 2013, 495(7441): 305–307
https://doi.org/10.1038/495305a
|
9 |
G Scott, A Rajabifard. Sustainable development and geospatial information: A strategic framework for integrating a global policy agenda into national geospatial capabilities. Geo-Spatial Information Science, 2017, 20(2): 59–76
https://doi.org/10.1080/10095020.2017.1325594
|
10 |
United Nations. Report of the Secretary-General on SDG Progress 2019 (special edition). 2019
|
11 |
B Fu, S Wang, J Zhang, Z Hou, J Li. Unravelling the complexity in achieving the 17 sustainable-development goals. National Science Review, 2019, 6(3): 386–388
https://doi.org/10.1093/nsr/nwz038
|
12 |
J Alcamo. Water quality and its interlinkages with the Sustainable Development Goals. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 2019, 36: 126–140
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2018.11.005
|
13 |
J Bouma. Soil science contributions towards sustainable development goals and their implementation: Linking soil functions with ecosystem services. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science, 2014, 177(2): 111–120
https://doi.org/10.1002/jpln.201300646
|
14 |
W Terlau, D Hirsch, M Blanke. Smallholder farmers as a backbone for the implementation of the Sustainable Development Goals. Sustainable Development, 2019, 27(3): 523–529
https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.1907
|
15 |
F Fuso Nerini, J Tomei, L S To, I Bisaga, P Parikh, M Black, A Borrion, C Spataru, V Castán Broto, G Anandarajah, B Milligan, Y Mulugetta. Mapping synergies and trade-offs between energy and the Sustainable Development Goals. Nature Energy, 2018, 3(1): 10–15
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-017-0036-5
|
16 |
D A Martin. Linking fire and the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals. Science of the Total Environment, 2019, 662: 547–558
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.12.393
|
17 |
S L Wood, S K Jones, J A Johnson, K A Brauman, R Chaplin-Kramer, A Fremier, E Girvetz, L J Gordon, C V Kappel, L Mandle, M Mulligan, P O’Farrell, W K Smith, L Willemen, W Zhang, F A DeClerck. Distilling the role of ecosystem services in the Sustainable Development Goals. Ecosystem Services, 2018, 29: 70–82
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.10.010
|
18 |
G C de Oliveira Neto, J M Ferreira Correia, P C Silva, A G de Oliveira Sanches, W C Lucato. Cleaner Production in the textile industry and its relationship to sustainable development goals. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2019, 228: 1514–1525
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.334
|
19 |
R Alawneh, F Ghazali, H Ali, A F Sadullah. A Novel framework for integrating United Nations Sustainable Development Goals into sustainable non-residential building assessment and management in Jordan. Sustainable Cities and Society, 2019, 49: 101612
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2019.101612
|
20 |
S Sabri, A Rajabifard. Spatial enablement to facilitate the new urban agenda commitments for sustainable development. In: Sustainable Development Goals Connectivity Dilemma (Open Access): Land and Geospatial Information for Urban and Rural Resilience. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2020, 199–211
|
21 |
K Rönkä, J Ritola, K Rauhala. Underground space in land-use planning. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 1998, 13(1): 39–49
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0886-7798(98)00029-7
|
22 |
N Bobylev. Underground space as an urban indicator: Measuring use of subsurface. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2016, 55: 40–51
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2015.10.024
|
23 |
N Bobylev. Mainstreaming sustainable development into a city’s master plan: A case of urban underground space use. Land Use Policy, 2009, 26(4): 1128–1137
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2009.02.003
|
24 |
A Parriaux, P Blunier, P Maire, L Tacher. The DEEP CITY project: A global concept for a sustainable urban underground management. In: Proceedings of 11th ACUUS International Conference. Athens: the 11th ACUUS Conference Organizing Committee, 2007, 255–260
|
25 |
H Q Li, A Parriaux, P Thalmann, X Z Li. An integrated planning concept for the emerging underground urbanism: Deep City Method Part 1 concept, process and application. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2013, 38: 559–568
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2013.04.010
|
26 |
H Li, X Li, A Parriaux, P Thalmann. An integrated planning concept for the emerging underground urbanism: Deep City Method Part 2 case study for resource supply and project valuation. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2013, 38: 569–580
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2013.04.009
|
27 |
X Li, C Li, A Parriaux, W Wu, H Li, L Sun, C Liu. Multiple resources and their sustainable development in Urban Underground Space. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2016, 55: 59–66
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2016.02.003
|
28 |
R Sterling, H Admiraal, N Bobylev, H Parker, J P Godard, I Vähäaho, C D F Rogers, X D Shi, T Hanamura. Sustainability issues for underground space in urban areas. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers, Urban Design and Planning, 2012, 165(4): 241–254
https://doi.org/10.1680/udap.10.00020
|
29 |
Y K Qiao, F L Peng, S Sabri, A Rajabifard. Socio-environmental costs of underground space use for urban sustainability. Sustainable Cities and Society, 2019, 51: 101757
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2019.101757
|
30 |
Y K Qiao, F L Peng, Y Wang. Monetary valuation of urban underground space: A critical issue for the decision-making of urban underground space development. Land Use Policy, 2017, 69: 12–24
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.08.037
|
31 |
Y K Qiao, F L Peng, Y Wang. Valuing external benefits of underground rail transit in monetary terms: A practical method applied to Changzhou City. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2019, 83: 91–98
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2018.09.039
|
32 |
C C D F van Ree, P J H van Beukering. Geosystem services: A concept in support of sustainable development of the subsurface. Ecosystem Services, 2016, 20: 30–36
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.06.004
|
33 |
C C D F van Ree, P J H van Beukering, J Boekestijn. Geosystem services: A hidden link in ecosystem management. Ecosystem Services, 2017, 26: 58–69
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.05.013
|
34 |
F Schrodt, J J Bailey, W D Kissling, K F Rijsdijk, A C Seijmonsbergen, D Van Ree, J Hjort, R S Lawley, C N Williams, M G Anderson, P Beier, P van Beukering, D S Boyd, J Brilha, L Carcavilla, K M Dahlin, J C Gill, J E Gordon, M Gray, M Grundy, M L Hunter, J J Lawler, M Monge-Ganuzas, K R Royse, I Stewart, S Record, W Turner, P L Zarnetske, R Field. Opinion: To advance sustainable stewardship, we must document not only biodiversity but geodiversity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2019, 116(33): 16155–16158
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1911799116
|
35 |
R Zargarian, D V Hunt, P Braithwaite, N Bobylev, C D Rogers. A new sustainability framework for urban underground space. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Engineering Sustainability, 2018, 171(5): 238–253
https://doi.org/10.1680/jensu.15.00013
|
36 |
D V Hunt, I Jefferson, C D Rogers. Assessing the sustainability of underground space usage—A toolkit for testing possible urban futures. Journal of Mountain Science, 2011, 8(2): 211–222
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-011-2093-8
|
37 |
Y Chen, D Guo, Z Chen, Y Fan, X Li. Using a multi-objective programming model to validate feasibility of an underground freight transportation system for the Yangshan port in Shanghai. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2018, 81: 463–471
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2018.07.012
|
38 |
J S Yeung, Y D Wong. The effect of road tunnel environment on car following behaviour. Accident, Analysis and Prevention, 2014, 70: 100–109
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2014.03.014
|
39 |
C X Ma, F L Peng. Some aspects on the planning of complex underground roads for motor vehicles in Chinese cities. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2018, 82: 592–612
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2018.09.034
|
40 |
Y Chen, A Whalley. Green infrastructure: The effects of urban rail transit on air quality. American Economic Journal. Economic Policy, 2012, 4(1): 58–97
https://doi.org/10.1257/pol.4.1.58
|
41 |
V Jovičić, B Volk, J Logar. Conditions for the sustainable development of underground transport in the Ljubljana Basin. Sustainability, 2018, 10(9): 2971
https://doi.org/10.3390/su10092971
|
42 |
Q Qihu. Present state, problems and development trends of urban underground space in China. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2016, 55: 280–289
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2015.11.007
|
43 |
H Q Li, Y Q Fan, M J Yu. Deep Shanghai project—A strategy of infrastructure integration for megacities. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2018, 81: 547–567
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2018.08.008
|
44 |
M I Wallace, K C Ng. Development and application of underground space use in Hong Kong. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2016, 55: 257–279
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2015.11.024
|
45 |
O Schmoll, G Howard, J Chilton, I Chorus. Protecting Groundwater for Health: Managing the Quality of Drinking-Water Sources. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2006
|
46 |
G Beardsmore, I Dumitrescu, B Harrison, M R Sandiford. Victorian Geothermal Assessment Report. 2016
|
47 |
National Development and Reform Commission. Development Review of Urban Rail Transit Industry in the 13th Five-Year Period. 2017 (available at the website of National Development and Reform Commission) (in Chinese)
|
48 |
Z L Chen, J Y Chen, H Liu, Z F Zhang. Present status and development trends of underground space in Chinese cities: Evaluation and analysis. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2018, 71: 253–270
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2017.08.027
|
49 |
M B Liu, S M Liao. A case study on the underground rapid transport system (URTS) for the international airport hubs: Planning, application and lessons learnt. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2018, 80: 114–122
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2018.06.004
|
50 |
J V Valdenebro, F N Gimena. Urban utility tunnels as a long-term solution for the sustainable revitalization of historic centres: The case study of Pamplona-Spain. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2018, 81: 228–236
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2018.07.024
|
51 |
Y Zhou, J Zhao. Assessment and planning of underground space use in Singapore. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2016, 55: 249–256
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2015.12.018
|
52 |
N Tkachenko, S Bricker, S A Jarvis. To dig or not to dig? Place and perception in subsurface housing. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers–Engineering Sustainability, 2018, 171(4): 211–220
|
53 |
A M Kim. The extreme primacy of location: Beijing’s underground rental housing market. Cities (London, England), 2016, 52: 148–158
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2015.11.027
|
54 |
Y K Qiao, F L Peng, X L Wu, S F Ding. Underground space planning in urban built-up areas: A case study of Qingdao, China. In: Proceedings of 16th ACUUS International Conference. Hong Kong, China: 16th ACUUS Conference Organizing Committee, 2018, 255–265
|
55 |
L Zhao, H Li, M Li, Y Sun, Q Hu, S Mao, J Li, J Xue. Location selection of intra-city distribution hubs in the metro-integrated logistics system. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2018, 80: 246–256
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2018.06.024
|
56 |
A Glazer. Underground cemetery construction in Jerusalem. In: Proceedings of 16th ACUUS International Conference. Hong Kong, China: 16th ACUUS Conference Organizing Committee, 2018, 123–130
|
57 |
Y K Qiao, F L Peng. Master planning for underground space in Luoyang: A case of a representative historic city in China. Procedia Engineering, 2016, 165: 119–125
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.11.743
|
58 |
R Sterling, P Nelson. City resiliency and underground space use. In: Proceedings of 13th ACUUS International Conference Advances in Underground Space Development. Singapore: 4th UPPD Conference Organizing Committee, 2013, 43–55
|
59 |
H Admiraal, A Cornaro. Future cities, resilient cities—The role of underground space in achieving urban resilience. Underground Space, 2019 (in press)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.undsp.2019.02.001
|
60 |
I Vähäaho. An introduction to the development for urban underground space in Helsinki. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2016, 55: 324–328
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2015.10.001
|
61 |
D Hidalgo, J M Martin-Marroquin, F Corona, J L Juaristi. Sustainable vacuum waste collection systems in areas of difficult access. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2018, 81: 221–227
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2018.07.026
|
62 |
S Magnusson, K Lundberg, B Svedberg, S Knutsson. Sustainable management of excavated soil and rock in urban areas—A literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2015, 93: 18–25
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.01.010
|
63 |
T. Katsumi Soil excavation and reclamation in civil engineering: Environmental aspects. Soil science and plant nutrition, 2015, 61(sup1): 22–29
|
64 |
E Broch. Planning and utilisation of rock caverns and tunnels in Norway. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2016, 55: 329–338
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2015.08.010
|
65 |
H Takasaki, H Chikahisa, Y Yuasa. Planning and mapping of subsurface space in Japan. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2000, 15(3): 287–301
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0886-7798(00)00057-2
|
66 |
A El-Geneidy, L Kastelberger, H Abdelhamid. Montréal’s Roots: Exploring the growth of Montréal’s Indoor City. Journal of Transport and Land Use, 2011, 4(2): 33–46
https://doi.org/10.5198/jtlu.v4i2.176
|
67 |
W Shi, B Jia, A Ponte, H K Wee. Multi-layer system of urban open space—Study in Montreal. New Arch-International Journal of Contemporary Architecture, 2017, 4(3): 1–8
|
68 |
K Tajima. New estimates of the demand for urban green space: Implications for valuing the environmental benefits of Boston’s big dig project. Journal of Urban Affairs, 2003, 25(5): 641–655
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9906.2003.00006.x
|
69 |
Y K Qiao, F L Peng, S Sabri, A Rajabifard. Low carbon effects of urban underground space. Sustainable Cities and Society, 2019, 45: 451–459
|
70 |
X Yang, Z Chen, H Cai, L Ma. A framework for assessment of the influence of China’s urban underground space developments on the urban microclimate. Sustainability, 2014, 6(12): 8536–8566
https://doi.org/10.3390/su6128536
|
71 |
E A Lacey, J L Patton. Life Underground: The Biology of Subterranean Rodents. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2000
|
72 |
H N Wu, S L Shen, R P Chen, A N Zhou. Three-dimensional numerical modelling on localised leakage in segmental lining of shield tunnels. Computers and Geotechnics, 2020, 122: 103549
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2020.103549
|
73 |
A Vieira, M Alberdi-Pagola, P Christodoulides, S Javed, F Loveridge, F Nguyen, F Cecinato, J Maranha, G Florides, I Prodan, G Van Lysebetten, E Ramalho, D Salciarini, A Georgiev, S Rosin-Paumier, R Popov, S Lenart, S Erbs Poulsen, G Radioti. Characterisation of ground thermal and thermo-mechanical behaviour for shallow geothermal energy applications. Energies, 2017, 10(12): 2044
https://doi.org/10.3390/en10122044
|
74 |
A Bidarmaghz, G A Narsilio. Heat exchange mechanisms in energy tunnel systems. Geomechanics for Energy and the Environment, 2018, 16: 83–95
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gete.2018.07.004
|
75 |
P Bayer, G Attard, P Blum, K Menberg. The geothermal potential of cities. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2019, 106: 17–30
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.02.019
|
76 |
Y X Wu, S L Shen, D J Yuan. Characteristics of dewatering induced drawdown curve under blocking effect of retaining wall in aquifer. Journal of Hydrology (Amsterdam), 2016, 539: 554–566
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.05.065
|
77 |
G Attard, T Winiarski, Y Rossier, L Eisenlohr. Impact of underground structures on the flow of urban groundwater. Hydrogeology Journal, 2016, 24(1): 5–19
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-015-1317-3
|
78 |
Y X Wu, H M Lyu, S L Shen, A N Zhou. A three-dimensional fluid-solid coupled numerical modeling of the barrier leakage below the excavation surface due to dewatering. Hydrogeology Journal, 2020, 28(4): 1449–1463
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-020-02142-w
|
79 |
Y X Wu, S L Shen, H M Lyu, A N Zhou. Analyses of leakage effect of waterproof curtain during excavation dewatering. Journal of Hydrology (Amsterdam), 2020, 583: 124582
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.124582
|
80 |
P Kang, S Xu. The impact of an underground cut-off wall on nutrient dynamics in groundwater in the lower Wang River watershed, China. Isotopes in Environmental and Health Studies, 2017, 53(1): 36–53
https://doi.org/10.1080/10256016.2016.1186670
|
81 |
G T Chae, S T Yun, B Y Choi, S Y Yu, H Y Jo, B Mayer, Y J Kim, J Y Lee. Hydrochemistry of urban groundwater, Seoul, Korea: The impact of subway tunnels on groundwater quality. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, 2008, 101(1–4): 42–52
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconhyd.2008.07.008
|
82 |
J Sun. Cost-benefit analysis of building waste recycling in China. Construction Science and Technology, 2016, 13: 121–123 (in Chinese)
|
83 |
W Di, H Chang. The heritage impact assessment study of Xi’an metro Line 5. Xi’an: Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology, 2013 (in Chinese)
|
84 |
J Ge, S Wang, X Sun, B Ma, W Yang. Study on metro traffic-induced vibration and the security of relics. Sciences of Conservation and Archaeology, 2015, 27(1): 7–14 (in Chinese)
|
85 |
J Mulec. Human impact on underground cultural and natural heritage sites, biological parameters of monitoring and remediation actions for insensitive surfaces: Case of Slovenian show caves. Journal for Nature Conservation, 2014, 22(2): 132–141
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnc.2013.10.001
|
86 |
M S Babel, A D Gupta, N D Domingo. Land subsidence: A consequence of groundwater over-exploitation in Bangkok, Thailand. International Review for Environmental Strategies, 2006, 6(2): 307–327
|
87 |
Y X Wu, H M Lyu, J Han, S L Shen. Dewatering–induced building settlement around a deep excavation in soft deposit in Tianjin, China. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2019, 145(5): 05019003
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002045
|
88 |
Y Tan, D Wang. Characteristics of a large-scale deep foundation pit excavated by the central-island technique in Shanghai soft clay. I: Bottom-up construction of the central cylindrical shaft. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2013, 139(11): 1875–1893
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000928
|
89 |
J Cui, J D Nelson. Underground transport: An overview. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2019, 87: 122–126
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2019.01.003
|
90 |
S Durmisevic. The future of the underground space. Cities (London, England), 1999, 16(4): 233–245
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0264-2751(99)00022-0
|
91 |
M Shan, B G Hwang, K S N Wong. A preliminary investigation of underground residential buildings: Advantages, disadvantages, and critical risks. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2017, 70: 19–29
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2017.07.004
|
92 |
W Broere. Urban underground space: Solving the problems of today’s cities. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2016, 55: 245–248
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2015.11.012
|
93 |
F L Peng, Y K Qiao, J W Zhao, K Liu, J C Li. Planning and implementation of underground space in Chinese central business district (CBD): A case of Shanghai Hongqiao CBD. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2020, 95: 103176
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2019.103176
|
94 |
J Zacharias, J He. Hong Kong’s urban planning experiment in enhancing pedestrian movement from underground space to the surface. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2018, 82: 1–8
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2018.07.025
|
95 |
Y K Qiao, F L Peng, Y Liu, Y C Zhang. Balancing conservation and development in historic cities by underground solutions. In: Proceedings of 4th UPPD International Conference. Singapore, 2018: 10–15
|
96 |
M Barker. Legal and administrative issues in underground space use: A preliminary survey of ITA member nations. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 1991, 6(2): 191–209
https://doi.org/10.1016/0886-7798(91)90066-D
|
97 |
A Rajabifard, B Atazadeh, M Kalantari. BIM and urban land administration. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2019
|
98 |
H Sandberg. Three-dimensional partition and registration of subsurface land space. Israel Law Review, 2003, 37(1): 119–167
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021223700012425
|
99 |
R Guo, L Li, S Ying, P Luo, B He, R Jiang. Developing a 3D cadastre for the administration of urban land use: A case study of Shenzhen, China. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 2013, 40: 46–55
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2012.07.006
|
100 |
F Zaini, K Hussin, M M Raid. Legal considerations for urban underground space development in Malaysia. Underground Space, 2017, 2(4): 234–245
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.undsp.2017.11.001
|
101 |
A Rajabifard, B Atazadeh, M Kalantari. A critical evaluation of 3D spatial information models for managing legal arrangements of multi-owned developments in Victoria, Australia. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 2018, 32(10): 2098–2122
https://doi.org/10.1080/13658816.2018.1484125
|
102 |
J Pasqual, P Riera. Underground land values. Land Use Policy, 2005, 22(4): 322–330
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2004.03.005
|
103 |
J Fu, J Yang. A study on value and price of urban underground space resources. Thesis for the Master’s Degree. Beijing: Tsinghua University, 2009 (in Chinese)
|
104 |
S Li, M Yang, C Li. Research on base price evaluation method and application of urban underground: A case study of Guangzhou Higher Education Mega Center. Thesis for the Master’s Degree. Guangzhou: Guangzhou University, 2012 (in Chinese)
|
105 |
Y Tang. Study on land price appraisal of urban underground space: A case study of Cixi. Thesis for the Master’s Degree. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University, 2015 (in Chinese)
|
106 |
L Zhao. Analysis and discussion on land-use right price of urban underground space in China. Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering, 2015, 11(2): 284–292 (in Chinese)
|
107 |
M Liao, Z Qu. Income method in underground space for the application of land price evaluation. Thesis for the Master’s Degree. Shenyang: Liaoning University, 2015 (in Chinese)
|
108 |
U Isikdag, M Horhammer, S Zlatanova, R Kathmann, P J Van Oosterom. Utilizing 3D building and 3D cadastre geometries for better valuation of existing real estate. In: Proceedings FIG Working Week 2015 ‘From the wisdom of the ages to the challenges of modern world’. Sofia, Bulgaria: FIG Working Week 2015 Organizing Committee, 2015, 1–18
|
109 |
S Kim, J Heo. Registration of 3D underground parcel in Korean cadastral system. Cities (London, England), 2019, 89: 105–119
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2019.01.027
|
110 |
R Guo, L Li, B He, P Luo, Z Zhao, S Ying, R Jiang. 3D Cadastre in China—A case study in Shenzhen City. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on 3D Cadastres. Delft: Organizing Committee, 2011, 291–310
|
111 |
S Ho, A Rajabifard, M Kalantari. ‘Invisible’ constraints on 3D innovation in land administration: A case study on the city of Melbourne. Land Use Policy, 2015, 42: 412–425
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.08.017
|
112 |
D Shojaei, H Olfat, S I Quinones Faundez, M Kalantari, A Rajabifard, M Briffa. Geometrical data validation in 3D digital cadastre—A case study for Victoria, Australia. Land Use Policy, 2017, 68: 638–648
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.08.031
|
113 |
M Kalantari, K M Yip, B Atazadeh, D ISA, M Adimin, K Chan, A Aien, H Olfat, D Shojaei, M R Anaraki. An LADM-based Approach for Developing and Implementing a National 3D Cadastre—A Case Study of Malaysia. In: Proceedings of the 7th International FIG Workshop on the Land Administration Domain Model. Zagreb: Organizing Committee, 2018, 47–66
|
114 |
S Ho, A Rajabifard. Towards 3D-enabled urban land administration: Strategic lessons from the BIM initiative in Singapore. Land Use Policy, 2016, 57: 1–10
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.05.011
|
115 |
S Kim, J Heo. Development of 3D underground cadastral data model in Korea: Based on land administration domain model. Land Use Policy, 2017, 60: 123–138
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.10.020
|
116 |
B Atazadeh, M Kalantari, A Rajabifard, S Ho, T Champion. Extending a BIM-based data model to support 3D digital management of complex ownership spaces. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 2017, 31(3): 499–522
https://doi.org/10.1080/13658816.2016.1207775
|
117 |
B Atazadeh, M Kalantari, A Rajabifard, S Ho. Modelling building ownership boundaries within BIM environment: A case study in Victoria, Australia. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 2017, 61: 24–38
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2016.09.001
|
118 |
ISO19152. Geographic Information-land Administration Domain Model (LADM). Geneva, Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization, 2012
|
119 |
L von der Tann, R Sterling, Y Zhou, N Metje. Systems approaches to urban underground space planning and management—A review. Underground Space, 2020, 5(2): 144–166
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.undsp.2019.03.003
|
120 |
H Admiraal, A Cornaro. Why underground space should be included in urban planning policy—And how this will enhance an urban underground future. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2016, 55: 214–220
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2015.11.013
|
121 |
M Zerhouny, A Fadil, M Hakdaoui. Underground space utilization in the urban land-use planning of casablanca (Morocco). Land (Basel), 2018, 7(4): 143
https://doi.org/10.3390/land7040143
|
122 |
F Peng, Y Qiao, G Cheng, H Zhu. Current situation and existing problems of and coping strategies for urban underground space planning in China. Earth Science Frontiers, 2019, 26(3): 57–68 (in Chinese)
|
123 |
K Rönkä, J Ritola, K Rauhala. Underground space in land-use planning. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 1998, 13(1): 39–49
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0886-7798(98)00029-7
|
124 |
I Vähäaho. 0-land use: Underground resources and master plan in Helsinki. In: Advances in Underground Space Development. Singapore: Research Publishing, 2013, 29–42
|
125 |
D Kaliampakos, A Benardos, A Mavrikos. A review on the economics of underground space utilization. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2016, 55: 236–244
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2015.10.022
|
126 |
M Doyle, P Thalmann, A Parriaux. Underground potential for urban sustainability: Mapping resources and their interactions with the Deep City Method. Sustainability, 2016, 8(9): 830
https://doi.org/10.3390/su8090830
|
127 |
M R Doyle. ‘Resources to needs’: A paradigm for addressing the potentiality of the urban volume. Urban Planning, 2017, 2(1): 6–18
https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v2i1.759
|
128 |
Z Lu, L Wu, X Zhuang, T Rabczuk. Quantitative assessment of engineering geological suitability for multilayer Urban Underground Space. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2016, 59: 65–76
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2016.06.003
|
129 |
J Peng, F L Peng. A GIS-based evaluation method of underground space resources for urban spatial planning: Part 1 methodology. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2018, 74: 82–95
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2018.01.002
|
130 |
J Peng, F L Peng. A GIS-based evaluation method of underground space resources for urban spatial planning: Part 2 application. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2018, 77: 142–165
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2018.03.013
|
131 |
D Zhou, X Li, Q Wang, R Wang, T Wang, Q Gu, Y Xin. GIS-based urban underground space resources evaluation toward three-dimensional land planning: A case study in Nantong, China. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2019, 84: 1–10
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2018.10.017
|
132 |
S J Price, R L Terrington, J Busby, S Bricker, T Berry. 3D ground-use optimisation for sustainable urban development planning: A case-study from Earls Court, London, UK. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2018, 81: 144–164
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2018.06.025
|
133 |
X Li, H Xu, C Li, L Sun, R Wang. Study on the demand and driving factors of urban underground space use. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2016, 55: 52–58
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2016.02.010
|
134 |
L O Makana, I Jefferson, D V Hunt, C D Rogers. Assessment of the future resilience of sustainable urban sub-surface environments. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2016, 55: 21–31
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2015.11.016
|
135 |
H Xie, M Gao, R Zhang, H Xu, Y Wang, J Deng. The subversive idea and its key technical prospect on underground ecological city and ecosystem. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2017, 36(6): 1301–1313 (in Chinese)
|
136 |
J Peng, F L Peng, N Yabuki, T Fukuda. Factors in the development of urban underground space surrounding metro stations: A case study of Osaka, Japan. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2019, 91: 103009
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2019.103009
|
137 |
L He, Y Song, S Dai, K Durbak. Quantitative research on the capacity of urban underground space—The case of Shanghai, China. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2012, 32: 168–179
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2012.06.008
|
138 |
ITA Working Group on Costs-Benefits of Underground Urban Transportation. Cost-benefit methods for underground urban public transportation systems. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 1990, 5(1–2): 39–68
|
139 |
J J Lin, C W Lo. Valuing user external benefits and developing management strategies for metro system underground arcades. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2008, 23(2): 103–110
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2006.12.003
|
140 |
J Nishi, T Tanaka, T Seiki, H Ito, K Okuyama. Estimation of the value of the internal and external environment in underground space use. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2000, 15(1): 79–89
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0886-7798(00)00032-8
|
141 |
J W Zhao, F L Peng, T Q Wang, X Y Zhang, B N Jiang. Advances in master planning of urban underground space (UUS) in China. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2016, 55: 290–307
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2015.11.011
|
142 |
Y K Qiao, F L Peng. Lessons learnt from urban underground space use in Shanghai—From Lujiazui business district to Hongqiao central business district. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2016, 55: 308–319
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2015.12.001
|
143 |
F L Peng, J W Zhao, K Liu, J C Li. Underground Development Control in CBD Based on the Regulatory Plan: The Case of Phase I of Shanghai Hongqiao CBD. Urban Planning Forum, 2013, 1: 78–84 (in Chinese)
|
144 |
M Labbé. Architecture of underground spaces: From isolated innovations to connected urbanism. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2016, 55: 153–175
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2016.01.004
|
145 |
A C Roberts, G I Christopoulos, J Car, C K Soh, M Lu. Psycho-biological factors associated with underground spaces: What can the new era of cognitive neuroscience offer to their study? Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2016, 55: 118–134
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2015.12.016
|
146 |
E H Lee, G I Christopoulos, M Lu, M Q Heo, C K Soh. Social aspects of working in underground spaces. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2016, 55: 135–145
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2015.12.012
|
147 |
E H Lee, C Luo, Y L Sam, A C Roberts, K W Kwok, J Car, C K Soh, G I Christopoulos. The underground workspaces questionnaire (UWSQ): Investigating public attitudes toward working in underground spaces. Building and Environment, 2019, 153: 28–34
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2019.02.017
|
148 |
E E Nang, G Abuduxike, P Posadzki, U Divakar, N Visvalingam, N Nazeha, G Dunleavy, G I Christopoulos, C K Soh, K Jarbrink, M Soljak, J Car. Review of the potential health effects of light and environmental exposures in underground workplaces. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2019, 84: 201–209
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2018.11.022
|
149 |
Z Tan, A C Roberts, G I Christopoulos, K W Kwok, J Car, X Li, C K Soh. Working in underground spaces: Architectural parameters, perceptions and thermal comfort measurements. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2018, 71: 428–439
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2017.09.002
|
150 |
T Okubo, T Osaki, E Nozaki, A Uemura, K Sakai, M Matushita, J Matsuo, S Nakamura, S Kamiya, H Yamaguchi. Walker occupancy has an impact on changing airborne bacterial communities in an underground pedestrian space, as small-dust particles increased with raising both temperature and humidity. PLoS One, 2017, 12(9): e0184980
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0184980
|
151 |
L Morawska, J W Tang, W Bahnfleth, P M Bluyssen, A Boerstra, G Buonanno, J Cao, S Dancer, A Floto, F Franchimon, C Haworth, J Hogeling, C Isaxon, J L Jimenez, J Kurnitski, Y Li, M Loomans, G Marks, L C Marr, L Mazzarella, A K Melikov, S Miller, D K Milton, W Nazaroff, P V Nielsen, C Noakes, J Peccia, X Querol, C Sekhar, O Seppänen, S Tanabe, R Tellier, K W Tham, P Wargocki, A Wierzbicka, M Yao. How can airborne transmission of COVID-19 indoors be minimised? Environment International, 2020, 142: 105832
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2020.105832
|
152 |
Q Meng, J Kang, H Jin. Field study on the influence of spatial and environmental characteristics on the evaluation of subjective loudness and acoustic comfort in underground shopping streets. Applied Acoustics, 2013, 74(8): 1001–1009
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2013.02.003
|
153 |
J Kim, S H Cha, C Koo, S K Tang. The effects of indoor plants and artificial windows in an underground environment. Building and Environment, 2018, 138: 53–62
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.04.029
|
154 |
F van der Hoeven, K Juchnevic. The significance of the underground experience: Selection of reference design cases from the underground public transport stations and interchanges of the European Union. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2016, 55: 176–193
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2015.12.015
|
155 |
A Ciepiela. Underground Public Space. Cracow’s Tunnels of Fear? Materials Science and Engineering, 2019, 471(9): 092017
|
156 |
E H Lee, G I Christopoulos, K W Kwok, A C Roberts, C K Soh. A psychosocial approach to understanding underground spaces. Frontiers in Psychology, 2017, 8: 452
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00452
|
157 |
B Y Wang, Y Shu. Study of directional indicator design in underground space. Journal of Tongji University, 2002, 30(1): 111–115
|
158 |
Y Shi, G Zhai, S Zhou, Y Lu, W Chen, J Deng. How can cities respond to flood disaster risks under multi-scenario simulation? A case study of Xiamen, China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2019, 16(4): 618
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16040618
|
159 |
J Wu, W Fang, Z Hu, B Hong. Application of Bayesian approach to dynamic assessment of flood in urban underground spaces. Water (Basel), 2018, 10(9): 1112
https://doi.org/10.3390/w10091112
|
160 |
H M Lyu, W J Sun, S L Shen, A Arulrajah. Flood risk assessment in metro systems of mega-cities using a GIS-based modeling approach. Science of the Total Environment, 2018, 626: 1012–1025
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.01.138
|
161 |
H M Lyu, S L Shen, A N Zhou, W H Zhou. Flood risk assessment of metro systems in a subsiding environment using the interval FAHP–FCA approach. Sustainable Cities and Society, 2019, 50: 101682
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2019.101682
|
162 |
H M Lyu, S L Shen, J Yang, Z Y Yin. Inundation analysis of metro systems with the storm water management model incorporated into a geographical information system. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 2019, 23(10): 4293–4307
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-4293-2019
|
163 |
H M Lyu, W H Zhou, S L Shen, A N Zhou. Inundation risk assessment of metro system using AHP and TFN-AHP in Shenzhen. Sustainable Cities and Society, 2020, 56: 102103
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102103
|
164 |
H M Lyu, W J Sun, S L Shen, A Zhou. Risk assessment using a new consulting process in fuzzy AHP. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 2020, 146(3): 04019112
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001757
|
165 |
H M Lyu, S L Shen, J Yang, A Zhou. Risk assessment of earthquake-triggered geohazards surrounding Wenchuan, China. Natural Hazards Review, 2020, 21(3): 05020007
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000375
|
166 |
H M Lyu, S L Shen, A Zhou, J Yang. Risk assessment of mega-city infrastructures related to land subsidence using improved trapezoidal FAHP. Science of the Total Environment, 2020, 717: 135310
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135310
|
167 |
Z Chen, H Zhu, Z Yan, L Zhao, Y Shen, A Misra. Experimental study on physical properties of soft soil after high temperature exposure. Engineering Geology, 2016, 204: 14–22
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2016.01.014
|
168 |
Z G Yan, Y Zhang, Y Shen, H Zhu, Y Lu. A multilayer thermo-elastic damage model for the bending deflection of the tunnel lining segment exposed to high temperatures. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2020, 95: 103142
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2019.103142
|
169 |
Y Zhang, J W Ju, Q Chen, Z Yan, H Zhu, Z Jiang. Characterizing and analyzing the residual interfacial behavior of steel fibers embedded into cement-based matrices after exposure to high temperatures. Composites. Part B, Engineering, 2020, 191: 107933
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.107933
|
170 |
Y Zhang, J W Ju, H Zhu, Q Guo, Z Yan. Micromechanics based multi-level model for predicting the coefficients of thermal expansion of hybrid fiber reinforced concrete. Construction & Building Materials, 2018, 190: 948–963
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.09.030
|
171 |
Z Yan, Y Shen, H Zhu, Y Lu. Experimental Study of Tunnel Segmental joints Subjected to Elevated Temperature. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2016, 53: 46–60
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2016.01.005
|
172 |
Z Yan, Q Guo, H Zhu. Full-scale experiments on fire characteristics of road tunnel at high altitude. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2017, 66: 134–146
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2017.04.007
|
173 |
H Zhu, Y Shen, Z Yan, Q Guo, Q Guo. A numerical study on the feasibility and efficiency of point smoke extraction strategies in large cross-section shield tunnel fires using CFD modeling. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2016, 44: 158–170
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2016.09.005
|
174 |
Q Guo, H Zhu, Z Yan, Y Zhang, Y Zhang, T Huang. Experimental studies on the gas temperature and smoke back-layering length of fires in a shallow urban road tunnel with large cross-sectional vertical shafts. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2019, 83: 565–576
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2018.10.010
|
175 |
T Zhang, Y Zhang, Z Xiao, Z Yang, H Zhu, J W Ju, Z Yan. Development of a novel bio-inspired cement-based composite material to improve the fire resistance of engineering structures. Construction & Building Materials, 2019, 225: 99–111
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.07.121
|
176 |
Z G Yan, Y Shen, H H Zhu, X Li, Y Lu. Experimental investigation of reinforced concrete and hybrid fibre reinforced concrete shield tunnel segments subjected to elevated temperature. Fire Safety Journal, 2015, 71: 86–99
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.firesaf.2014.11.009
|
177 |
Y Zhang, Z Yan, H Zhu, Y Shen, Q Guo, Q Guo. Experimental investigation of pedestrian evacuation using an extra-long steep-slope evacuation path in a high altitude tunnel fire. Sustainable Cities and Society, 2019, 46: 101423
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2019.101423
|
178 |
Q Guo, H Zhu, Y Zhang, Z Yan. Theoretical and experimental studies on the fire-induced smoke flow in naturally ventilated tunnels with large cross-sectional vertical shafts. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2020, 99: 103359
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2020.103359
|
179 |
A Kallianiotis, D Papakonstantinou, V Arvelaki, A Benardos. Evaluation of evacuation methods in underground metro stations. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 2018, 31: 526–534
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.06.009
|
180 |
M Bettelini. Systems approach to underground safety. Underground Space, 2020, 5(3): 258–266
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.undsp.2019.04.005
|
181 |
Z Yan, Y Zhang, Q Guo, H Zhu, Y Shen, Q Guo. Numerical study on the smoke control using point extraction strategy in a large cross-section tunnel in fire. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2018, 82: 455–467
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2018.08.019
|
182 |
H M Lyu, S L Shen, A N Zhou, J Yang. Perspectives for flood risk assessment and management for mega-city metro system. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2019, 84: 31–44
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2018.10.019
|
183 |
Z S Yang, F L Peng, Y K Qiao, Y Y Hu. A new cryogenic sealing process for the launch and reception of a tunnel shield. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2019, 85: 406–417
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2019.01.007
|
184 |
F L Peng, Y H Dong, H L Wang, J W Jia, Y L Li. Remote-control technology performance for excavation with pneumatic caisson in soft ground. Automation in Construction, 2019, 105: 102834
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2019.102834
|
185 |
H Zhu, W Ding, Y Qiao, D Xie. Micro-disturbed construction control technology system for shield driven tunnels and its application. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2014, 36(11): 1983–1993 (in Chinese)
|
186 |
M Nakai. Preservation and restoration of Tokyo Station Marunouchi Building. Japan Railway Transport Review, 2013, 61: 6–15
|
187 |
K Namikawa, Y Terashima, T Inoue, J Koseki, Y Miyashita, M Matsumoto. Construction of Expressway Branch Junction Structure Using Non-Cut-and-Cover Enlargement Method to Combine Two Shield Tunnels in Sedimentary Soft Rock. 2016
|
188 |
H Zhu, J Yan, W Liang. Challenges and development prospects of ultra-long and ultra-deep mountain tunnels. Engineering (Beijing), 2019, 5(3): 384–392
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eng.2019.04.009
|
189 |
L von der Tann, N Metje, H Admiraal, B Collins. The hidden role of the subsurface for cities. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers. Civil Engineering, 2018, 171(6): 31–37
https://doi.org/10.1680/jcien.17.00028
|
190 |
A Rajabifard. Sustainable Development Goals Connectivity Dilemma: Land and Geospatial Information for Urban and Rural Resilience. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2020
|
191 |
A Rajabifard, S Sabri, Y Chen, M Agunbiade, M Kalantari. Urban analytics data infrastructure: Critical SDI for measuring and monitoring the national and local process of SDGs. Sustainable Development Goals Connectivity Dilemma (Open Access): Land and Geospatial Information for Urban and Rural Resilience. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2020,243–256
|
192 |
L Maring, M Blauw. Asset management to support urban land and subsurface management. Science of the Total Environment, 2018, 615: 390–397
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.09.109
|
193 |
M Kalantari, A Rajabifard, H Olfat, C Pettit, A Keshtiarast. Automatic spatial metadata systems—The case of Australian urban research infrastructure network. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 2017, 44(4): 327–337
https://doi.org/10.1080/15230406.2016.1154805
|
194 |
CSDILA. Fishermans bend digital twin project. Coordinates, 2019, 15(10): 37–38
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
|
Shared |
|
|
|
|
|
Discussed |
|
|
|
|