Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering

ISSN 2095-2430

ISSN 2095-2449(Online)

CN 10-1023/X

Postal Subscription Code 80-968

2018 Impact Factor: 1.272

Front. Struct. Civ. Eng.    2022, Vol. 16 Issue (2) : 239-249    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-021-0804-y
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Numerical analysis of vehicle-bridge coupling vibration concerning nonlinear stress-dependent damping
Pengfei LI1,2, Jinquan ZHANG1,2(), Shengqi MEI2,3,4, Zhenhua DONG1,2, Yan MAO1,2
1. Bridge and Tunnel Technology Research Center, Research Institute of Highway, Ministry of Transport, Beijing 100088, China
2. National Engineering Laboratory of Bridge Structure Safety Technology, Research Institute of Highway, Ministry of Transport, Beijing 100088, China
3. State Key Laboratory of Mechanical Behavior and System Safety of Traffic Engineering Structures, Shijiazhuang Tiedao University, Shijiazhuang 050043, China
4. School of Civil Engineering, Shijiazhuang Tiedao University, Shijiazhuang 050043, China
 Download: PDF(6345 KB)   HTML
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

Damping is known to have a considerable influence on the dynamic behavior of bridges. The fixed damping ratios recommended in design codes do not necessarily represent the complicated damping characteristics of bridge structures. This study investigated the application of stress-dependent damping associated with vehicle-bridge coupling vibration and based on that investigation proposed the stress-dependent damping ratio. The results of the investigation show that the stress-dependent damping ratio is significantly different from the constant damping ratio (5%) defined in the standard specification. When vehicles travel at speeds of 30, 60, and 90, the damping ratios of the bridge model are 3.656%, 3.658%, and 3.671%, respectively. The peak accelerations using the regular damping ratio are 18.9%, 21.3%, and 14.5% of the stress-dependent damping ratio, respectively. When the vehicle load on the bridge is doubled, the peak acceleration of the mid-span node increases by 5.4 times, and the stress-related damping ratio increases by 2.1%. A corrugated steel-web bridge is being used as a case study, and the vibration response of the bridge is compared with the measured results. The acceleration response of the bridge which was calculated using the stress-dependent damping ratio is significantly closer to the measured acceleration response than that using the regular damping ratio.

Keywords vehicle-bridge vibration system      dynamic analysis      stress-dependent damping      energy dissipation     
Corresponding Author(s): Jinquan ZHANG   
Just Accepted Date: 19 January 2022   Online First Date: 28 March 2022    Issue Date: 20 April 2022
 Cite this article:   
Pengfei LI,Jinquan ZHANG,Shengqi MEI, et al. Numerical analysis of vehicle-bridge coupling vibration concerning nonlinear stress-dependent damping[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2022, 16(2): 239-249.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fsce/EN/10.1007/s11709-021-0804-y
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fsce/EN/Y2022/V16/I2/239
Fig.1  Three-axle vehicle model.
parameter value
Zli: height of the car body at mass center (m) 1.173
fli2: wheelbase: axle one to axle two (m) 3.6
fli3: wheelbase: axle two to axle three (m) 5
ali3: wheelbase: one axle (m) 1.8
Mli: sprung mass (kg) 28500
mli1: unsprung mass: one axis (kg) 550
mli2: unsprung mass: two axes (kg) 550
mli3: unsprung mass: Three axes (kg) 550
ksli1: spring stiffness: one axis (N·mm−1) 900
ksli2: spring stiffness: two axes (N·mm−1) 2500
ksli3: spring stiffness: three axes (N·mm−1) 2500
Ktli1-3: tire stiffness (N·mm−1) 1300
csli1: damping: one-axis absorber (kN·m−1·s) 50
csli2: damping: two-axis absorber (kN·m−1·s) 30
csli3: damping: two-axis absorber (kN·m−1·s) 30
ctli1-3: damping: tire (kN·m−1·s) 50
Tab.1  Parameters of the three-axle vehicles
Fig.2  Sectional dimensions of the box girder with corrugated steel webs (cm).
Fig.3  Model of the box girder with corrugated steel webs.
Fig.4  Calculation steps to determine the stress-related dissipation factors.
Fig.5  The deflections in the mid-span of the bridge obtained from the finite element model and proposed program.
speed (km/h) stress-related loss factor (%) stress-dependent damping ratio (%)
30 1.312 0.656
60 1.316 0.658
90 1.342 0.671
Tab.2  Stress-related damping ratios at different speeds
Fig.6  Midspan acceleration of the bridge for vehicles traveling at 30 km/h.
Fig.7  Midspan acceleration of the bridge for vehicles traveling at 60 km/h.
Fig.8  Midspan acceleration of the bridge for vehicles traveling at 90 km/h.
Fig.9  Midspan acceleration of the bridge for vehicles traveling at 60 km/h.
Fig.10  Midspan deflection of the bridge for vehicles traveling at 60 km/h.
Fig.11  Profile of the box girder with corrugated steel webs (cm).
Fig.12  Sectional dimension of the box girder (cm).
Fig.13  Schematic diagram of the bridge.
speed (km/h) stress-dependent dissipation factor (%) stress-dependent damping ratio (%)
10 1.488 0.744
20 1.480 0.740
30 1.480 0.740
Tab.3  Stress-related damping ratios at different speeds
Fig.14  Acceleration response at the midspan of the bridge for vehicles traveling at 10 km/h. (a) Comparison of the measured data and calculated values (constant damping ratio); (b) comparison of the measured data and calculated values (stress-dependent damping ratio).
Fig.15  Acceleration response at the midspan of the bridge for vehicles traveling at 20 km/h. (a) Comparison of the measured data and calculated values (constant damping ratio); (b) comparison of the measured data and calculated values (stress-dependent damping ratio).
1 P Paultre, O Chaallal, J Proulx. Bridge dynamics and dynamic amplification factors—A review of analytical and experimental findings. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 1992, 19( 2): 260– 278
https://doi.org/10.1139/l92-032
2 E Khan, J A Lobo, D G Linzell. Live load distribution and dynamic amplification on a curved prestressed concrete transit rail bridge. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 2018, 23( 6): 04018029
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001236
3 C Broquet, S F Bailey, M Fafard, E Brühwiler. Dynamic behavior of deck slabs of concrete road bridges. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 2004, 9( 2): 137– 146
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2004)9:2(137
4 L Deng, Y Yu, Q Zou, C S Cai. State-of-the-art review of dynamic impact factors of highway bridges. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 2015, 20( 5): 04014080
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000672
5 Y B Yang, Z L Wang, K Shi, H Xu, J P Yang. Adaptive amplifier for a test vehicle moving over bridges: Theoretical study. International Journal of Structural Stability and Dynamics, 2021, 21( 3): 2150042
https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219455421500425
6 S E Abdel Raheem. Dynamic characteristics of hybrid tower of cable-stayed bridges. Steel and Composite Structures, 2014, 17( 6): 803– 824
https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2014.17.6.803
7 J Mashhadi, H Saffari. Effects of damping ratio on dynamic increase factor in progressive collapse. Steel and Composite Structures, 2016, 22( 3): 677– 690
https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2016.22.3.677
8 H D Zhang, J Wang, X Zhang, G Liu. Effects of viscous damping models on a single-layer latticed dome during earthquakes. Structural Engineering and Mechanics, 2017, 62( 4): 455– 464
https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2017.62.4.455
9 Y Fujino, K Kimura, H Tanaka. Wind Resistant Design of Bridges in Japan: Developments and Practices. Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media, 2012
10 R M Barker, J A Puckett. Design of Highway Bridges: An LRFD Approach. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, 2013
11 A Alipour, B Shafei, M Shinozuka. Performance evaluation of deteriorating highway bridges located in high seismic areas. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 2011, 16( 5): 597– 611
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000197
12 P Code. Eurocode 8: Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance. Brussels: European Committee for Standardization, 2001
13 S D C Caltrans. Caltrans Seismic Design Criteria. Version 1.6. Sacramento, CA: California Department of Transportation, 2010
14 R Green. Dynamic response of bridge superstructures-Ontario observations. In: Proceeding of a Symposium of Dynamic Behavior of Bridges at the Transport and Road Research Laboratory. Crowthorne: Transport and Road Research Laboratory (TRRL), 1977
15 J R Billing. Dynamic loading and testing of bridges in Ontario. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 1984, 11( 4): 833– 843
https://doi.org/10.1139/l84-101
16 P F Li, Y F Wang, B D Liu, L Su. Damping properties of highway bridges in China. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 2014, 19( 5): 04014005
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000578
17 J R Casas. Full-scale dynamic testing of the Alamillo cable-stayed bridge in Sevilla (Spain). Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 1995, 24( 1): 35– 51
https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290240104
18 F Myrvoll, A M Kaynia, E Hjorth-Hansen, E Strømmen. Full-scale dynamic performance testing of the bridge structure and the special cable friction dampers on the cable-stayed Uddevalla bridge. In: Proceeding of 20th IMAC Conference on Structural Dynamics, Los Angeles: SPIE Press, 2002
19 F Magalhães, Á Cunha, E Caetano, R Brincker. Damping estimation using free decays and ambient vibration tests. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 2010, 24( 5): 1274– 1290
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2009.02.011
20 C Rebelo, da Silva L Simões, C Rigueiro, M Pircher. Dynamic behavior of twin single-span ballasted railway viaducts—Field measurements and modal identification. Engineering Structures, 2008, 30( 9): 2460– 2469
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2008.01.023
21 M Ülker-Kaustell, R Karoumi. Application of the continuous wavelet transform on the free vibrations of a steel–concrete composite railway bridge. Engineering Structures, 2011, 33( 3): 911– 919
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.12.012
22 M Ülker-Kaustell, R Karoumi. Influence of nonlinear stiffness and damping on the train-bridge resonance of a simply supported railway bridge. Engineering Structures, 2012, 41 : 350– 355
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.03.060
23 G C Hart, R Vasudevan. Earthquake design of buildings: Damping. Journal of the Structural Division, 1975, 101( 1): 11– 30
https://doi.org/10.1061/JSDEAG.0003964
24 F A Charney. Unintended consequences of modeling damping in structures. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2008, 134( 4): 581– 592
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2008)134:4(581
25 R Eyre, G P Tilly. Damping measurements on steel and composite bridges. In: Proceeding of a Symposium on Dynamic Behavior of Bridges at the Transport and Road Research Laboratory. Crowthorne: Transport and Road Research Laboratory (TRRL), 1977
26 G P Tilly. Damping of highway bridges: A review. In: Proceeding of a Symposium on Dynamic Behavior of Bridges at the Transport and Road Research Laboratory. Crowthorne: Transport and Road Research Laboratory (TRRL), 1977
27 M F Green, D Cebon. Modal testing of two highway bridges. In: Proceeding of 11th International Modal Analysis Conference. Kissimme (FL): Society for Experimental Mechanics, 1993
28 J L Hou, W B Xu, Y J Chen, K Zhang, H Sun, Y Li. Typical diseases of a long-span concrete-filled steel tubular arch bridge and their effects on vehicle-induced dynamic response. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, 2020, 14( 4): 867– 887
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-020-0649-9
29 Z Sun. Moving-inertial-loads-induced dynamic instability for slender beams considering parametric resonances. Journal of Vibration and Acoustics, 2016, 138( 1): 011014
https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4031518
30 Z Jin, B Huang, S Pei, Y Zhang. Energy-based additional damping on bridges to account for vehicle-bridge interaction. Engineering Structures, 2021, 229 : 111637
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.111637
31 B Glatz, J Fink. A redesigned approach to the additional damping method in the dynamic analysis of simply supported railway bridges. Engineering Structures, 2021, 241 : 112415
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112415
32 C D Stoura, E G Dimitrakopoulos. Additional damping effect on bridges because of vehicle-bridge interaction. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 2020, 476 : 115294
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2020.115294
33 B J Lazan. Damping of Materials and Members in Structural Mechanics. Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1968
34 Y F Wang, Y H Pan, J Wen, L Su. Material damping evaluation of frames made of different materials. Materials Research Innovations, 2014, 18( sup3): 53– 58
35 Y Kume, F Hashimoto, S Maeda. Material damping of cantilever beams. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 1982, 80( 1): 1– 10
https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-460X(82)90386-8
36 G D Gounaris, N K Anifantis. Structural damping determination by finite element approach. Computers & Structures, 1999, 73( 1-5): 445– 452
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-7949(98)00257-0
37 G D Gounaris, E Antonakakis, C A Papadopoulos. Hysteretic damping of structures vibrating at resonance: An iterative complex eigensolution method based on damping-stress relation. Computers & Structures, 2007, 85( 23−24): 1858– 1868
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2007.02.026
38 S Q Mei, L Su, P F Li, Y Wang. Material damping of concrete under cyclic axial compression. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 2018, 30( 3): 04017295
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0002146
39 L Su, Y F Wang, P F Li, S Mei, K Guo. Seismic analysis of bridges based on stress-dependent damping. Structural Engineering and Mechanics, 2017, 62( 3): 281– 289
https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2017.62.3.281
[1] Rooh ULLAH, Amjad NASEER, Muhammad FAHIM, Mohammad ASHRAF, Eid BADSHAH. Effect of eccentricity in reinforced concrete beam-column-slab connection under cyclic loading[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2021, 15(2): 390-398.
[2] El Houcine MOURID, Said MAMOURI, Adnan IBRAHIMBEGOVIC. Progressive collapse of 2D reinforced concrete structures under sudden column removal[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2020, 14(6): 1387-1402.
[3] Mahrad FAHIMINIA, Aydin SHISHEGARAN. Evaluation of a developed bypass viscous damper performance[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2020, 14(3): 773-791.
[4] Nishant SHARMA, Kaustubh DASGUPTA, Arindam DEY. Optimum lateral extent of soil domain for dynamic SSI analysis of RC framed buildings on pile foundations[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2020, 14(1): 62-81.
[5] Alireza FARZAMPOUR, Matthew Roy EATHERTON. Parametric computational study on butterfly-shaped hysteretic dampers[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2019, 13(5): 1214-1226.
[6] Zhenyuan LUO, Weiming YAN, Weibing XU, Qinfei ZHENG, Baoshun WANG. Experimental research on the multilayer compartmental particle damper and its application methods on long-period bridge structures[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2019, 13(4): 751-766.
[7] Behrouz BEHNAM, Fahimeh SHOJAEI, Hamid Reza RONAGH. Seismic progressive-failure analysis of tall steel structures under beam-removal scenarios[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2019, 13(4): 904-917.
[8] Asghar AMANI DASHLEJEH. Isogeometric analysis of coupled thermo-elastodynamic problems under cyclic thermal shock[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2019, 13(2): 397-405.
[9] Neftalí SARMIENTO-SOLANO, Miguel P. ROMO. Dynamic in-plane transversal normal stresses in the concrete face of CFRD[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2019, 13(1): 135-148.
[10] Ruipeng LI,Yunfeng ZHANG,Le-Wei TONG. Numerical study of the cyclic load behavior of AISI 316L stainless steel shear links for seismic fuse device[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2014, 8(4): 414-426.
[11] Asskar Janalizadeh CHOOBBASTI, Sadegh REZAEI, Farzad FARROKHZAD, Pedram Haidarzaeh AZAR. Evaluation of site response characteristic using nonlinear method (Case study: Babol, Iran)[J]. Front Struc Civil Eng, 2014, 8(1): 69-82.
[12] Fadzli M. NAZRI, Pang Yew KEN. Seismic performance of moment resisting steel frame subjected to earthquake excitations[J]. Front Struc Civil Eng, 2014, 8(1): 19-25.
[13] Zhongguo GUAN, Jianzhong LI, Yan XU, Hao LU. Higher-order mode effects on the seismic performance of tall piers[J]. Front Arch Civil Eng Chin, 2011, 5(4): 496-502.
[14] Babak EBRAHIMIAN. Numerical analysis of nonlinear dynamic behavior of earth dams[J]. Front Arch Civil Eng Chin, 2011, 5(1): 24-40.
[15] Dakuo FENG, Ga ZHANG, Jianmin ZHANG, . Three-dimensional seismic response analysis of a concrete-faced rockfill dam on overburden layers[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2010, 4(2): 258-266.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed