Safety assessment for buried drainage box culvert under influence of underground connected aisle blasting: A case study

doi:10.1007/s11709-022-0906-1

Front. Struct. Civ. Eng.

2023, Vol. 17

Issue (2) : 191-204 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-022-0906-1

RESEARCH ARTICLE

Safety assessment for buried drainage box culvert under influence of underground connected aisle blasting: A case study

Wenchang SUN¹, Nan JIANG¹(

), Chuanbo ZHOU¹, Jinshan SUN², Tingyao WU¹

¹. Faculty of Engineering, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China
². Hubei (Wuhan) Institute of Explosion and Blasting Technology, Jianghan University, Wuhan 430056, China

Download: PDF(8147 KB) HTML
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks

Abstract

Blasting engineering in complex urban environments is considered to influence the safety and stability of the overlying drainage box culvert structure owing to vibration. Therefore, field blasting and vibration tests were performed on the blasting engineering of the Wuhan Metro Line 8 connected aisle, and the LS-DYNA software was used to analyze the dynamic response characteristics of an underground drainage box culvert during the blasting test. The vibration response evolution law of the buried drainage box culvert under blasting vibration was investigated, and a safe surface control standard for the blast vibration of a drainage box culvert is proposed. The results reveal that the maximum tensile stress of the box culvert structure was 0.33 MPa. The peak particle velocity (PPV) and peak tensile stress (PTS) of the drainage box culvert decreased as the water level in the box culvert increased. Based on the relationship between the tensile stress of the box culvert, PPV of the box culvert, and PPV of the surface, it is proposed that the surface control velocity of the buried drainage box culvert is 1.36 cm/s.

Keywords drainage box culvert underpass blasting dynamic response numerical simulation safety assessment

Corresponding Author(s): Nan JIANG

Just Accepted Date: 25 November 2022 Online First Date: 16 January 2023 Issue Date: 03 April 2023

Cite this article:

Wenchang SUN,Nan JIANG,Chuanbo ZHOU, et al. Safety assessment for buried drainage box culvert under influence of underground connected aisle blasting: A case study[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2023, 17(2): 191-204.

URL:

https://academic.hep.com.cn/fsce/EN/10.1007/s11709-022-0906-1
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fsce/EN/Y2023/V17/I2/191

Fig.1 Schematic diagram of relative position.

Fig.2 Schematic diagram of stratum distribution.

Tab.1 Blasthole parameters

Fig.3 Diagram of blast-hole arrangement.

Fig.4 Diagram of field monitoring point layout.

Fig.5 Diagram of field monitoring setup.

Tab.2 Results of blasting experiment

Fig.6 Diagram of numerical model and drainage box culvert.

Tab.3 Parameters of blasting material

Tab.4 Material parameters used in calculation

Tab.5 Parameters of water material model

Fig.7 Distribution characteristics of PPV. (a) Ground-monitoring points; (b) drainage-box culvert monitoring points.

Tab.6 Vibration velocity in field test and numerical simulation

Fig.8 Comparison diagram of resultant vibration velocity.

Fig.9 Propagation of blasting seismic wave. (a) 23999 μs; (b) 33999 μs; (c) 43999 μs; (d) 53999 μs.

Fig.10 Schematic diagram of relationship between drainage box culvert and surface vibration velocity.

Fig.11 Back blast surface and blast surface stress curve.

Fig.12 Tensile stress evolution of blast surface. (a) 43999 μs; (b) 55999 μs; (c) 60000 μs; (d) 80000 μs.

Fig.13 Tensile stress evolution of back blast surface. (a) 44999 μs; (b) 55000 μs; (c) 72399 μs; (d) 80000 μs.

Fig.14 Stress distribution in different parts of box culvert.

Fig.15 Numerical models of different excavation footages.

Fig.16 Influence of different excavation footage on PPV of drainage box culvert.

Fig.17 Influence of different excavation footage on PTS of drainage box culvert.

Fig.18 Schematic diagram of different water level models.

Fig.19 Evolution of PPV under different working conditions.

Fig.20 Evolution of PTS under different working conditions.

Fig.21 Schematic diagram of relationship between PPV and PTS.

Tab.7 Safety threshold of vibration velocity at different water levels

1	Y Q Zhang, N Jiang, C B Zhou, T Y Wu, X D Luo, Y Q Xia. Study on dynamic response of building structures adjacent to high-rise frames caused by blasting vibration of subway foundation pit. Journal of Sustainable Mining, 2017, 16(4): 179–188 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsm.2017.12.004
2	K X Wang, P Hu, J X Zhou. Study on fatigue damage and safety location of adjacent building structure under frequent mine earthquake. Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 2021, 17(06): 58–64 https://doi.org/10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2021.06.010
3	A Sołtys, M Twardosz, J Winzer. Control and documentation studies of the impact of blasting on buildings in the surroundings of open pit mines. Journal of the China Coal Society, 2019, 44(S1): 118–125 https://doi.org/10.13225/j.cnki.jccs.2019.0261
4	H Zhu, X Wang, Y Wang, C Ji, G Wu, L Zhang, Z Han. Damage behavior and assessment of polyurea sprayed reinforced clay brick masonry walls subjected to close-in blast loads. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2022, 167: 104283 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2022.104283
5	H Kheradi, K Nagano, H Nishi, F Zhang. 1-g shaking table tests on seismic enhancement of existing box culvert with partial ground-improvement method and its 2D dynamic simulation. Soil and Foundation, 2018, 58(3): 563–581 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sandf.2018.01.002
6	H Yatsumoto, Y Mitsuyoshi, Y Sawamura, M Kimura. Evaluation of seismic behavior of box culvert buried in the ground through centrifuge model tests and numerical analysis. Underground Space, 2019, 4(2): 147–167 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.undsp.2018.09.007
7	X Lu, Y Liu, L L Zhang. Research on deformation characteristics of tunnel box culvert structure under different construction loads. IOP Conference Series. Earth and Environmental Science, 2021, 634(1): 012136
8	G D YangG H WangW B LuX H ZhaoP Yan. Damage assessment and protection effect analysis of large water conveyance box culvert under the action of surface explosion load. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2019, 38(5): 28−37 (in Chinese)
9	X Guan, X Wang, Z Zhu, L Zhang, H Fu. Ground vibration test and dynamic response of horseshoe-shaped pipeline during tunnel blasting excavation in pebbly sandy soil. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 2020, 38(4): 3725–3736 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-020-01249-x
10	G Yang, G Wang, W Lu, X Zhao, P Yan, M Chen. Numerical modeling of surface explosion effects on shallow-buried box culvert behavior during the water diversion. Thin-walled Structures, 2018, 133(9): 153–168
11	F Jiang, S Dong, Y Zhao, Z Xie, C Guedes Soares. Investigation on the deformation response of submarine pipelines subjected to impact loads by dropped objects. Ocean Engineering, 2019, 194: 106638 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2019.106638
12	S W HeZ QuL H Ye. Experimental study on seismic vulnerability of common water supply pipelines in buildings. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2018, 51(10): 11−19 (in Chinese)
13	W CuiH F SongS R Zhang. Numerical analysis of water conveyance safety of large box culvert under impact load. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2012, 31(22): 188−192 (in Chinese)
14	M I Shahrin, R A Abdullah, S Jeon, B Jeon, R Sa’ari. Numerical simulation of rock fragmentation by blasting using Discrete Element Method and Particle Blast Method. IOP Conference Series. Materials Science and Engineering, 2019, 527(1): 012032 https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/527/1/012032
15	Y Xia, N Jiang, C Zhou, X Luo. Safety assessment of upper water pipeline under the blasting vibration induced by Subway tunnel excavation. Engineering Failure Analysis, 2019, 104: 626–642 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2019.06.047
16	N Jiang, B Zhu, X He, C Zhou, X Luo, T Wu. Safety assessment of buried pressurized gas pipelines subject to blasting vibrations induced by metro foundation pit excavation. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2020, 102: 103448 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2020.103448
17	Z Zhang, C B Zhou, S Lu, N Jiang, C Wu. Dynamic response characteristics of adjacent buried concrete pipelines under blasting vibration. Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology, 2017, 46(9): 79–84
18	B Zhu, N Jiang, C Zhou, X Luo, H Li, X Chang, Y Xia. Dynamic interaction of the pipe-soil subject to underground blasting excavation vibration in an urban soil-rock stratum. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2022, 129: 104700 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2022.104700
19	B Zhu, N Jiang, C Zhou, X Luo, Y Yao, T Wu. Dynamic failure behavior of buried cast iron gas pipeline with local external corrosion subjected to blasting vibration. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 2021, 88: 103803
20	Y Q ZhangN JiangY S JiaC B ZhouX D LuoT Y Wu. Blasting vibration response characteristics of high density polyethylene pipe in water filled state. Journal of Zhejiang University (Engineering Science), 2020, 54(11): 2120−2127 + 2137 (in Chinese)
21	B Zhu, N Jiang, Y S Jia, C B Zhou. Field experimental study on blasting vibration effect of Underpass gas pipeline. Journal of rock mechanics and engineering, 2019, 38(12): 2582–2592
22	X M GuanL ZhangL M WangH X FuD M Yu. Blasting vibration characteristics and safety standard of tunnel short distance underpass pipeline. Journal of Central South University, 2019, 50(11): 2870−2885 (in Chinese)
23	Y Q XiaN JiangC B ZhouJ S Sun. Study on dynamic response characteristics of water supply pipeline under blasting vibration of Underpass subway tunnel. Blasting, 2019, 36(1): 6−13+37 (in Chinese)
24	B ZhuN JiangC B ZhouT Y Wu. Study on dynamic response characteristics of adjacent pressure gas pipeline under blasting action of excavation of foundation pit. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2020, 39(11): 201−208 (in Chinese)
25	N Jiang, B Zhu, C Zhou, X Luo, H Li, T Wu, G Lyu. Safety criterion of gas pipeline buried in corrosive saturated soft soil subjected to blasting vibration in a coastal metro line. Thin-walled Structures, 2022, 180: 109860 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2022.109860
26	T YinC B ZhouC Q ZhengN JiangZ G Chen. Dynamic response characteristics of blasting strata in silt-rock stratum under different working conditions. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2021, 40(11): 269−276 (in Chinese)
27	G Lyu, C Zhou, N Jiang. Experimental and numerical study on tunnel blasting induced damage characteristics of grouted surrounding rock in fault zones. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 2022, 1(15): 03055
28	K Zhao, N Jiang, C Zhou, H Li, Z Cai, B Zhu. Dynamic behavior and failure of buried gas pipeline considering the pipe connection form subjected to blasting seismic waves. Thin-walled Structures, 2022, 170: 108495 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2021.108495
29	M PengC ShiJ Chen. Safety of buried pipeline under coupling effect of tunnel excavation and blasting disturbance. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2021, 40(19): 193−199 (in Chinese)
30	T Wu, N Jiang, C Zhou, X Luo, H Li, Y Zhang. Experimental and numerical investigations on damage assessment of high-density polyethylene pipe subjected to blast loads. Engineering Failure Analysis, 2022, 131: 105856 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2021.105856
31	O Abuhajar, H El Naggar, T Newson. Experimental and numerical investigations of the effect of buried box culverts on earthquake excitation. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2015, 79: 130–148
32	Z CuiS S LuH F SongD Y Zhang. Sph-fem coupling analysis of safety of large box culvert under blast load. Journal of Tianjin University Science and Technology, 2012, 45(9): 838−844 (in Chinese)
33	50010-2010 GB. Code for Design of Concrete. Beijing: General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People’s Republic of China, 2010 (in Chinese)

[1]	Linlin GU, Wei ZHENG, Wenxuan ZHU, Zhen WANG, Xianzhang LING, Feng ZHANG. Liquefaction-induced damage evaluation of earth embankment and corresponding countermeasure[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2022, 16(9): 1183-1195.
[2]	Jiaxin HE, Shaohui HE, Xiabing LIU, Jinlei ZHENG. Structural design and mechanical responses of closely spaced super-span double tunnels in strongly weathered tuff strata[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2022, 16(6): 685-703.
[3]	Huayang LEI, Yajie ZHANG, Yao HU, Yingnan LIU. Model test and discrete element method simulation of shield tunneling face stability in transparent clay[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2021, 15(1): 147-166.
[4]	Qian-Qing ZHANG, Shan-Wei LIU, Ruo-Feng FENG, Jian-Gu QIAN, Chun-Yu CUI. Finite element prediction on the response of non-uniformly arranged pile groups considering progressive failure of pile-soil system[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2020, 14(4): 961-982.
[5]	Jianling HOU, Weibing XU, Yanjiang CHEN, Kaida ZHANG, Hang SUN, Yan LI. Typical diseases of a long-span concrete-filled steel tubular arch bridge and their effects on vehicle-induced dynamic response[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2020, 14(4): 867-887.
[6]	Zhijie HUANG, Xiaodan REN, Zuyu CHEN, Daosheng LING. Centrifuge experiment and numerical analysis of an air-backed plate subjected to underwater shock loading[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2019, 13(6): 1350-1362.
[7]	Yunlin LIU, Shitao ZHU. Finite element analysis on the seismic behavior of side joint of Prefabricated Cage System in prefabricated concrete frame[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2019, 13(5): 1095-1104.
[8]	Wentao WANG, Chongzhi TU, Rong LUO. Numerical simulation of compaction parameters for sand-filled embankment using large thickness sand filling technique in Jianghan Plain district[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2018, 12(4): 568-576.
[9]	Tian ZHANG, He XIA, Weiwei GUO. Analysis on running safety of train on the bridge considering sudden change of wind load caused by wind barriers[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2018, 12(4): 558-567.
[10]	Pengfei LIU, Dawei WANG, Frédéric OTTO, Markus OESER. Application of semi-analytical finite element method to analyze the bearing capacity of asphalt pavements under moving loads[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2018, 12(2): 215-221.
[11]	Navid RAHGOZAR, Nima RAHGOZAR, Abdolreza S. MOGHADAM. Probabilistic safety assessment of self-centering steel braced frame[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2018, 12(1): 163-182.
[12]	A. ARAB, Ma. R. BANAN, Mo. R. BANAN, S. FARHADI. Estimation of relations among hysteretic response measures and design parameters for RC rectangular shear walls[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2018, 12(1): 3-15.
[13]	Abbas PARSAIE,Sadegh DEHDAR-BEHBAHANI,Amir Hamzeh HAGHIABI. Numerical modeling of cavitation on spillway’s flip bucket[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2016, 10(4): 438-444.
[14]	Mehmet Bar?? Can üLKER. Modeling of dynamic response of poroelastic soil layers under wave loading[J]. Front Struc Civil Eng, 2014, 8(1): 1-18.
[15]	Mostafa Shahrabi, Khosrow Bargi. Numerical simulation of multi-body floating piers to investigate pontoon stability[J]. Front Struc Civil Eng, 2013, 7(3): 325-331.

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed