Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Earth Science

ISSN 2095-0195

ISSN 2095-0209(Online)

CN 11-5982/P

Postal Subscription Code 80-963

2018 Impact Factor: 1.205

Front. Earth Sci.    2019, Vol. 13 Issue (3) : 641-655    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11707-019-0751-2
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Landform classification based on optimal texture feature extraction from DEM data in Shandong Hilly Area, China
Hongchun ZHU1, Yuexue XU1, Yu CHENG1, Haiying LIU2(), Yipeng ZHAO1
1. College of Geomatics, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao 266590, China
2. College of Computer Science and Engineering, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao 266590, China
 Download: PDF(2539 KB)   HTML
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

Texture and its analysis methods are crucial for image feature extraction and classification. Digital elevation model (DEM) is the most important data source of digital terrain analysis and landform classification, and considerable research values are gained from texture feature extraction and analysis from DEM data. In this research, on the basis of optimal texture feature extraction, the hilly area in Shandong, China, was selected as the study area, and DEM data with a resolution of 500 m were used as the experimental data for landform classification. First, second-order texture measures and texture image were extracted from DEM data by using a gray level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM). Second, the variation characteristics of each texture measure were analyzed, and the optimal feature parameters, such as direction, gray level, and texture window, were determined. Meanwhile, the texture feature value, combined with maximum information, was calculated, and the multiband texture image was obtained by resolving three optimal texture measure images. Finally, a support vector machine (SVM) method was adopted to classify landforms on the basis of the multiband texture image. Results indicated that the texture features of DEM data can be sufficiently represented and measured via the quantitative GLCM method. However, the feature parameters during the texture feature value calculation required further optimization. Based on the image texture from DEM data, efficient classification accuracy and ideal classification effect were achieved.

Keywords DEM data      image texture      feature extraction      Gray Level Co-occurrence Matrix (GLCM)      optimal parametric analysis      landform classification     
Corresponding Author(s): Haiying LIU   
Just Accepted Date: 01 April 2019   Online First Date: 14 August 2019    Issue Date: 15 October 2019
 Cite this article:   
Hongchun ZHU,Yuexue XU,Yu CHENG, et al. Landform classification based on optimal texture feature extraction from DEM data in Shandong Hilly Area, China[J]. Front. Earth Sci., 2019, 13(3): 641-655.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fesci/EN/10.1007/s11707-019-0751-2
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fesci/EN/Y2019/V13/I3/641
Fig.1  Distribution of three sample areas study area.
Test area Area/km2 Altitude/m Relief/m Average altitude/m Average relief/m
TA-a 3600 3?75 0?50 15 4.78
TA-b 3600 22?538 0?225 155 37.04
TA-c 3600 107?915 2?237 402 60.17
Tab.1  Major landform characteristics of three sample areas in Shandong Province, China
Fig.2  The flowchart of quantitative extracting texture feature for landform classification.
Fig.3  Training process of SVM method.
Fig.4  The texture feature value of four directions in sample areas: (a, b) northwest plain; (c, d) hilly area; (e, f) central mountain.
Fig.5  The texture feature values of contrast in different landforms: (a) the mean value of texture feature; (b) the standard deviation value of texture feature.
Fig.6  The mean value of texture features in different gray levels among three sample areas: (a, b) Northwest plain; (c, d) hilly area; (e, f) central mountain.
Fig.7  VC of the texture feature value in different windows: (a) northwest plain; (b) hilly area; (c) central mountain.
Fig.8  Changes of texture feature value in different texture windows: (a, b) Northwest plain; (c, d) hilly area; (e, f) central mountain.
Fig.9  Details of landform classification.
Fig.10  Landform classification result: (a) classification map; (b) reference map.
Landform types Altitude/m Relief/m Attribute
Plain?areas 0?50 <30 Lower?altitude plain area
Hilly?areas 51?500 30?200 Lower?altitude hilly area
Mountainous areas 501?1500 200?500 Small relief mountain
Tab.2  The landform class table
Fig.11  VC of the texture feature value in DEM data with a resolution of 30 m.
Data sources Landform types Accuracy assessment Correct
classified
counts
Total
pixel counts
Producer accuracy/% User accuracy/%
Texture image extracted from DEM data Plain?areas 99.46 94.17 328917 330694
Hilly?areas 90.72 99.28 254133 280131
Mountainous areas 98.96 53.24 6405 6472
Total

Overall Accuracy 95.48% Kappa Coefficient 0.91

589455 617297
Only DEM data Plain?areas 100 91.97 330694 330694
Hilly?areas 88.85 100 248892 280131
Mountainous areas 100 73.14 6472 6472
Total

Overall Accuracy 94.93% Kappa Coefficient 0.89

586058 617297
Tab.3  Landform classification accuracy in different data sources
1 M Arebey, M A Hannan, R A Begum, H Basri (2012). Solid waste bin level detection using gray level co-occurrence matrix feature extraction approach. J Environ Manage, 104: 9–18
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.03.035
2 J A C Ballantine, G S Okin, D E Prentiss, D A Roberts (2005). Mapping North African landforms using continental scale unmixing of MODIS imagery. Remote Sens Environ, 97(4): 470–483
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2005.04.023
3 T Blaschke, G J Hay, M Kelly, S Lang, P Hofmann, E Addink, R Queiroz Feitosa, F van der Meer, H van der Werff, F van Coillie, D Tiede (2014). Geographic object-based image analysis––towards a new paradigm. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens, 87: 180–191
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2013.09.014
4 P Bugnicourt, S Guitet, V F Santos, L Blanc, E D Sotta, N Barbier, P Couteron (2018). Using textural analysis for regional landform and landscape mapping, Eastern Guiana Shield. Geomorphology, 317: 23–44
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2018.03.017
5 I Champion, C Germain, J P Da Costa, A Alborini, P Dubois-Fernandez (2014). Retrieval of forest stand age from SAR image texture for varying distance and orientation values of the gray level co-occurrence matrix. IEEE Geosci Remote Sens Lett, 11(1): 5–9
https://doi.org/10.1109/LGRS.2013.2244060
6 C C Chang, C J Lin (2011). LIBSVM: a library for support vector machines. ACM transactions on intelligent systems and technology (TIST), 2(3): 27
7 P R Chowdhury, B Deshmukh, A Goswami (2007). Machine extraction of landforms from multispectral images using texture and neural methods. Computing: Theory and Applications (ICCTA'07). International Conference on. IEEE, 2007: 721–725
8 H Ding, J M Na, X L Huang, G A Tang, K Liu (2018). Stability analysis unit and spatial distribution pattern of the terrain texture in the northern Shaanxi Loess Plateau. J Mt Sci, 15(3): 577–589
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-017-4551-4
9 H Ding, F Tao, W F Zhao, J M Na, G A Tang (2016). An object-based method for Chinese landform types classification. Int Arch Photogramm Remote Sens Spat Inf Sci, XLI-B7: 213–217
10 L Drăguţ, T Blaschke (2006). Automated classification of landform elements using object-based image analysis. Geomorphology, 81(3–4): 330–344
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2006.04.013
11 C J S Ferro, T A Warner (2002). Scale and Texture in digital image classification. Photogramm Eng Remote Sensing, 68(1): 51–64
12 M Hall-Beyer (2017). Practical guidelines for choosing GLCM textures to use in landscape classification tasks over a range of moderate spatial scales. Int J Remote Sens, 38(5): 1312–1338
https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2016.1278314
13 R M Haralick (1979). Statistical and structural approaches to texture. Proc IEEE, 67(5): 786–804
https://doi.org/10.1109/PROC.1979.11328
14 R M Haralick, K Shanmugam (1973). Textural features for image classification. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern, SMC-3 (6): 610–621
https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMC.1973.4309314
15 J K Hawkins (1970). Textural properties for pattern recognition. In: Picture Processing and Psychopictorics. New York: Academic Press, 347–370
16 L T K Ho, M Umitsu (2011). Micro-landform classification and flood hazard assessment of the Thu Bon alluvial plain, central Vietnam via an integrated method utilizing remotely sensed data. Appl Geogr, 31(3): 1082–1093
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2011.01.005
17 X L Huang, G A Tang, K Liu (2015). Influence of DEM resolution on the extraction of terrain texture feature. Journal of Geo-Information Science, 17(7): 822–829
18 A Karahaliou, S Skiadopoulos, I Boniatis, P Sakellaropoulos, E Likaki, G Panayiotakis, L Costaridou (2007). Texture analysis of tissue surrounding microcalcifications on mammograms for breast cancer diagnosis. Br J Radiol, 80(956): 648–656
https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr/30415751
19 T Kavzoglu, I Colkesen (2009). A kernel functions analysis for support vector machines for land cover classification. Int J Appl Earth Obs Geoinf, 11(5): 352–359
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2009.06.002
20 M Kim, M Madden, T A Warner (2009). Forest type mapping using object-specific texture measures from multispectral Ikonos imagery. Photogramm Eng Remote Sensing, 75(7): 819–829
https://doi.org/10.14358/PERS.75.7.819
21 A Lefebvre, T Corpetti (2017). Monitoring the morphological transformation of Beijing old city using remote sensing texture analysis. IEEE J Sel Top Appl Earth Obs Remote Sens, 10(2): 539–548
https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTARS.2016.2627545
22 K Liu, H Ding, G A Tang, A X Zhu, X Yang, S Jiang, J J Cao (2017). An object-based approach for two-level gully feature mapping using high-resolution DEM and imagery: a case study on Hilly Loess Plateau region, China. Chin Geogr Sci, 27(3): 415–430
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11769-017-0874-x
23 K Liu, G A Tang, Y Tao, S Jiang (2012). GLCM based quantitative analysis of terrain texture from DEMs. Journal of Geo-Information Science., 14(6): 751–760
https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1047.2012.00751
24 G N Lv, L Y Xiong, M Chen, G A Tang, Y H Sheng, X J Liu, Z Y Song, Y Q Lu, Z Y Yu, K Zhang, M Z Wang (2017). Chinese progress in geomorphometry. J Geogr Sci, 27(11): 1389–1412
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-017-1442-0
25 F M G Martins, H M Fernandez, J M G P Isidoro, A Jordán, L Zavala (2016). Classification of landforms in Southern Portugal (Ria Formosa Basin). J Maps, 12(3): 422–430
https://doi.org/10.1080/17445647.2015.1035346
26 A Materka, M Strzelecki (1998). Texture analysis methods–a review. Technical University of Lodz, Institute of Electronics, COST B11 report, Brussels, 9–11
27 P Mohanaiah, P Sathyanarayana, L GuruKumar (2013). Image texture feature extraction using GLCM approach. Int J Sci Res Public, 3(5): 290–294
28 M Mokarram, G Roshan, S Negahban (2015). Landform classification using topography position index (case study: salt dome of Korsia-Darab plain, Iran). Model Earth Syst Environ, 1(4): 40-46
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-015-0055-9
29 H C Nair, A Joseph, V Padmakumari Gopinathan (2018). GIS Based landform classification using digital elevation model: a case study from two river basins of Southern Western Ghats, Kerala, India. Model Earth Syst Environ, 4(4): 1355–1363
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-018-0490-5
30 T Ota, N Mizoue, S Yoshida (2011). Influence of using texture information in remote sensed data on the accuracy of forest type classification at different levels of spatial resolution. J For Res, 16(6): 432–437
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10310-010-0233-6
31 Y O Ouma, J Tetuko, R Tateishi (2008). Analysis of co-occurrence and discrete wavelet transform textures for differentiation of forest and non-forest vegetation in very-high-resolution optical-sensor imagery. Int J Remote Sens, 29(12): 3417–3456
https://doi.org/10.1080/01431160701601782
32 A Piloyan, M Konečný (2017). Semi-automated classification of landform elements in Armenia based on SRTM DEM using k-means unsupervised classification. Quaest Geogr, 36(1): 93–103
https://doi.org/10.1515/quageo-2017-0007
33 O D A Prima, A Echigo, R Yokoyama, T Yoshida (2006). Supervised landform classification of Northeast Honshu from DEM-derived thematic maps. Geomorphology, 78(3‒4): 373–386
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2006.02.005
34 A Puissant, J Hirsch, C Weber (2005). The utility of texture analysis to improve per-pixel classification for high to very high spatial resolution imagery. Int J Remote Sens, 26(4): 733–745
https://doi.org/10.1080/01431160512331316838
35 D D G Radford, M J Cracknell, M J Roach, G V Cumming (2018). Geological mapping in Western Tasmania using radar and random forests. IEEE J Sel Top Appl Earth Obs Remote Sens, 11(9): 3075–3087
https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTARS.2018.2855207
36 V F Rodriguez-Galiano, M Chica-Olmo, F Abarca-Hernandez, P M Atkinson, C Jeganathan (2012). Random forest classification of mediterranean land cover using multi-seasonal imagery and multi-seasonal texture. Remote Sens Environ, 121: 93–107
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2011.12.003
37 P Singh, A Gupta, M Singh (2014). Hydrological inferences from watershed analysis for water resource management using remote sensing and GIS techniques. Egypt J Remote Sens Space Sci, 17(2): 111–121
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrs.2014.09.003
38 M J Smith, C F Pain (2009). Applications of remote sensing in geomorphology. Prog Phys Geogr, 33(4): 568–582
https://doi.org/10.1177/0309133309346648
39 D Srivastava, B Rajitha, S Agarwal, S Singh (2018). Pattern-based image retrieval using GLCM. Neural Comput Appl, 8: 1–14
40 A Subasi, M Ismail Gursoy (2010). EEG signal classification using PCA, ICA, LDA and support vector machines. Expert Syst Appl, 37(12): 8659–8666
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2010.06.065
41 D Tian, A L Liu, H Ding, W Zhang, W Qi (2016). Improvement of object-oriented classification method for landform types. Geography and Geo-Information Science, 32(2): 46–50
42 V Vapnik (1963). Pattern recognition using generalized portrait method. Autom Remote Control, 24: 774–780
43 V N Vapnik (1997). The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory. New York: Springer-Verlag
44 C Z Wang, G A Tang, S Yuan, J W Sun, K Liu (2015). A method for identifying the lunar morphology based on texture from DEMs. Journal of Geo-Information Science, 17(1): 45–53
45 L Y Xiong, A X Zhu, L Zhang, G A Tang (2018). Drainage basin object-based method for regional-scale landform classification: a case study of loess area in China. Phys Geogr, 39(6): 523–541
https://doi.org/10.1080/02723646.2018.1442062
46 Z A Zakaria, A Shabri (2012). Streamflow forecasting at ungaged sites using support vector machines. Appl Math Sci, 6(60): 3003–3014
47 L X Zhang, R Z Ruan, S Xia (2015). Parameter analysis of image texture of wetland in the Hongze Lake. Remote Sensing for Land and Resources, 27(1): 75–80
48 W F Zhao, L Y Xiong, H Ding, G A Tang (2017). Automatic recognition of loess landforms using Random Forest method. J Mt Sci, 14(5): 885–897
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-016-4320-9
49 Z B Zheng, Y Q Zhou (1997). A study of texture and description for aerial images. Acta Geodaetica et Cartographica Sinica, 26(3): 228–234
50 C H Zhou, W M Cheng, J K Qian, B Y Li, B P Zhang (2009). Research on the classification system of digital land geomorphology of 1:1000000 in China. Journal of Geo-Information Science, 11(6): 707–724
https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1047.2009.00707
51 H C Zhu, W Huang, H Y Liu (2018a). Loess terrain segmentation from digital elevation models based on the region growth method. Phys Geogr, 39(1): 51–66
https://doi.org/10.1080/02723646.2017.1342215
52 H C Zhu, Y P Zhao, H Y Liu (2018b). Scale characters analysis for gully structure in the watersheds of loess landforms based on digital elevation models. Front Earth Sci, 12(2): 431–443
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11707-018-0696-x
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed