Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering

ISSN 2095-2201

ISSN 2095-221X(Online)

CN 10-1013/X

Postal Subscription Code 80-973

2018 Impact Factor: 3.883

Front Envir Sci Eng Chin    2009, Vol. 3 Issue (1) : 20-31    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-009-0012-9
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Bioenergy recovery from landfill gas: A case study in China
Wei WANG1(), Yuxiang LUO1, Zhou DENG2
1. Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China; 2. J&K China Cleaning Energy Technology Company Limited, Beijing 100085, China
 Download: PDF(1686 KB)   HTML
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

Landfill gas (LFG) utilization which means a synergy between environmental protection and bioenergy recovery was investigated in this study. Pressure swing adsorption technology was used in LFG purification, and laboratory experiment, pilot-scale test, and on-site demonstration were carried out in Shenzhen, China. In the laboratory experiment, A-type carbon molecular sieve was selected as the adsorbent by comparison of several other adsorbents. The optimal adsorption pressure and adsorption time were 0.25 MPa and 2 min, respectively, under which the product generation rate was 4.5 m3/h and the methane concentration was above 90%. The process and optimization of the pilot-scale test were also reported in the paper. The product gas was of high quality compared with the National Standard of Compressed Natural Gas as Vehicle Fuel (GB18047-2000), when the air concentration in feed gas was under 10.96%. The demonstration project was composed of a collection system, production system, and utilization system. The drive performance, environmental protection performance, and economic feasibility of the product gas – as alternative fuel in passenger car, truck, and bulldozer – were tested, showing the feasibility technology for LFG utilization.

Keywords landfill gas (LFG)      compressed purified landfill gas (CPLG)      pressure swing adsorption (PSA)      alternative vehicle fuel      demonstration project     
Corresponding Author(s): WANG Wei,Email:solid@tsinghua.edu.cn   
Issue Date: 05 March 2009
 Cite this article:   
Wei WANG,Yuxiang LUO,Zhou DENG. Bioenergy recovery from landfill gas: A case study in China[J]. Front Envir Sci Eng Chin, 2009, 3(1): 20-31.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fese/EN/10.1007/s11783-009-0012-9
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fese/EN/Y2009/V3/I1/20
Fig.1  
Fig.2  Adsorption characteristics of the selected adsorbents
Fig.3  Relationship between saturated adsorption and inlet pressure
Fig.4  PSA penetration curves of A-type CMS
Fig.5  Concentration and recovery rate of methane in different operation conditions of the PSA experiments
Fig.6  PSA equipment in lab
Fig.7  Flowchart of pilot-scale test
Fig.8  PSA operation process of two columns
factortest in Yulongkengtest in Xiaping
adsorption pressure/ MPa0.3, 0.45, 0.60.3, 0.45, 0.5, 0.6
adsorption time/s30, 45, 6030, 45, 60, 75, 90, 105
product gas flow(pressure 0.3 MPa)/(m3·h-1)4, 6, 8, 104, 6, 8, 10
blowback flow/(m3·h-1)0.8, 1.5, 2.00.8, 1.5, 2.0
number of operating towers2, 3, 42, 4
Tab.1  Different operation conditions of the pilot-scale test in Yulongkeng Landfill and Xiaping Sanitary Landfill
Fig.9  Influence of different operation conditions on product gas quality
Fig.10  Influence on recovery rate of CH in different operation conditions
Fig.11  Relations among the concentrations of CH and CO in product gas and the recovery rate of CH
itemsample in Yulongkengsample in XiapingCNG standard
feed gasproduct gasfeed gasproduct gas
gross calorific value/(MJ·m-3)17.6929.0822.2535.83> 31.4
total sulfur/(mg·m-3)5.22.74.7≤ 200
CO2 concentration/%32.040.2636.871.07≤ 3.0
O2 concentration/%0.370.370.220.38≤ 0.5
CH4 concentration/%49.2680.9861.9696.54
N2 concentration/%18.3318.390.941.06
Tab.2  Comparison between the quality of product gas and the standard
Fig.12  Relation between the air and CH concentration in feed gas and the quality of product gas
Fig.13  Flowchart of the PSA system
itemtesting resultCNG standard
gross calorific value/(MJ·m-3)42.05> 31.4
total sulfur/(mg·m-3)0≤ 200
H2S concentration/(mg·m-3)0≤ 15
CO2 concentration/%0.18≤ 3.0
O2 concentration/%0.2≤ 0.5
Tab.3  Testing results of CPLG
itembefore reformation(gasoline fuel)after reformation(CPLG fuel)
maximum velocity/(km·h-1)140135
idle speed/(km·h-1)2222
acceleration time*/s6.48.8
coasting distance**/m158147
fuel consumption/(m3·km-1)0.019.2
CO emission/(g·km)1.30.25
CH emission/(g·km)0.210.21
NOx emission/(g·km)0.180.14
Tab.4  Comparison results of passenger car
itembefore reformation(diesel fuel)after reformation(CPLG fuel)
maximum velocity/(km·h-1)8078
idle speed/(km·h-1)2325
acceleration time*/s17.617.8
coasting distance**/m128127
fuel consumption/(m3·km-1)0.024321.2
CO emission/(g·km)1.90.3
CH emission/(g·km)0.520.41
NOx emission/(g·km)0.350.30
Tab.5  Comparison results of truck
itembefore reformation(diesel fuel)after reformation(diesel/CPLG fuel)
grade climbing time (500 m)/s2633
fuel consumptiondiesel/(L·d-1)63.019.8
CPLG/(m3·d-1)49.5
CO emission/(g·km-1)2.31.2
CH emission/(g·km-1)0.760.41
NOx emission/(g·km-1)0.380.33
Tab.6  Comparison results of bulldozer
1 IPCC. Climate change 2001: The scientific basis. In: Houghton J T, Ding Y, Griggs D J, Noguer M, van der Linden P J, Dai X, Maskell K, Johnson C A, eds. Contribution of Working Group I to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change . Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, 2001, 101
2 IPCC. Summary for policymakers. In: Metz B, Davidson O R, Bosch P R, Dave R, Meyer L A, eds. Climate Change 2007: Mitigation, Contribution of Working Group III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change . Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, 2007, 3
3 IPCC. Climate change 1995. In: Houghton J T, Meira Filho L G, Callander B A, Harris N, Kattenberg A, Maskell K, eds. The Science of Climate Change, Published for the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, World Meteorological Organization/United Nations Environment Programme . Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, 1996, 257
4 Park J W, Shin H C. Surface emission of landfill gas from solid waste landfill. Atmospheric Environment , 2001, 35(20): 3445-3451
doi: 10.1016/S1352-2310(01)00118-2
5 Adrian K M, Mostafa A W, Rodrigo D. Modeling greenhouse gas emissions for municipal solid waste management strategies in Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. Resources, Conservation and Recycling , 2008, 52(11): 1241-1251
doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2008.06.006
6 Lombardi L, Carnevale E, Corti A. Greenhouse effect reduction and energy recovery from waste landfill. Energy , 2006, 31: 3208-3219
doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2006.03.034
7 Themelis N J, Ulloa P A. Methane generation in landfills. Renewable Energy , 2007, 32: 1243-1257
doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2006.04.020
8 National Bureau of Statistics of China. China Statistical Yearbook 2008. Beijing: Chinese Statistics Press, 2008 (in Chinese)
9 Hao X L, Yang H X, Zhang G Q. Trigeneration: A new way for landfill gas utilization and its feasibility in Hong Kong. Energy Policy , 2008, 36: 3662-3673
doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2008.05.031
10 Lee C E, Hwang C H, Lee H Y. A study on the interchangeability of LFG-LPG mixed fuels with LFG quality in domestic combustion appliances. Fuel , 2008, 87(3): 297-303
doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2007.04.025
11 Tsai W T. Bioenergy from landfill gas (LFG) in Taiwan. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews , 2007, 11: 331-344
doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2005.01.001
12 Shin H C, Park J W, Kim H S, Shin E S. Environmental and economic assessment of landfill gas electricity generation in Korea using LEAP model. Energy Policy , 2005, 33: 1261-1270
doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2003.12.002
13 Bove R, Lunghi P. Electric power generation from LFG using traditional and innovative technologies. Energy Conversion Management , 2006, 47: 1391-1401
doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2005.08.017
14 Shi L, Zhao Y C, Niu D J. Technique progress in landfill gas purification. Natural Gas Chemical Industry , 2004, 29: 58-62 (in Chinese)
15 Liu M E, Chen H L. New Separation Technology Foundation. 2nd ed. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University Press, 1993, 1-15 (in Chinese)
16 Liang G L. A perspective on the adsorbent and catalyst for gas separation in China. Low Temperature and Specialty Gases , 1996, 1: 1-4 (in Chinese)
[1] Rasool Bux MAHAR,Abdul Razaque SAHITO,Dongbei YUE,Kamranullah KHAN. Modeling and simulation of landfill gas production from pretreated MSW landfill simulator[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2016, 10(1): 159-167.
[2] Jiajun CHEN , Hao WANG , Na ZHANG , . Modified landfill gas generation rate model of first-order kinetics and two-stage reaction[J]. Front.Environ.Sci.Eng., 2009, 3(3): 313-319.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed