|
|
|
Cleaning the energy sources for water heating among Nanjing households: barriers and opportunities for solar and natural gas |
Lingyun ZHU,Beibei LIU( ),Jun BI() |
| School of the Environment, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210046, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Energy for water heating accounts for an increasing part in residential energy demand in China. An extensive survey was conducted to analyze the determinants of household energy choices for water heaters among residents in Nanjing, China. Two sets of variables were examined as potential influences: building features and household socio-economic characteristics. Results suggest that building features such as gas availability and building structures, and household characteristics such as household head’s education degree and energy-conserving sense are crucial determinants in choosing natural gas as water heater energy. Installation permission for solar water heater, building stories, and residential location serve as determining factors in choosing solar water heaters. Based on these, barriers and opportunities are discussed for transitions toward cleaner water heating energies, and suggestions are given for local governments to promote cleaner energy replacement in China.
|
| Keywords
residential energy demand
water heating
multinomial logit model
|
|
Corresponding Author(s):
Beibei LIU
|
|
Issue Date: 20 June 2014
|
|
| 1 |
National bureau of statistic of China. China Energy Statistical Yearbook 2009. Beijing: National bureau of statistic of China, 2009 (in Chinese)
|
| 2 |
ChenS, LiN, GuanJ, XieY, SunF, NiJ. A statistical method to investigate national energy consumption in the residential building sector of China. Energy and Building, 2008, 40(4): 654–665
doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2007.04.022
|
| 3 |
HanJ, MolA P J, LuY. Solar water heaters in China: a new day dawning. Energy Policy, 2010, 38(1): 383–391
doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2009.09.029
|
| 4 |
DubinJ A, McFaddenD L. An econometric analysis of residential electric appliance holdings and consumption. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 1984, 52(2): 345–362
doi: 10.2307/1911493
|
| 5 |
NesbakkenR. Price sensitivity of residential energy consumption in Norway. Energy Economics, 1999, 21(6): 493–515
doi: 10.1016/S0140-9883(99)00022-5
|
| 6 |
VaageK. Heating technology and energy use: a discrete/continuous choice approach to Norwegian household energy demand. Energy Economics, 2000, 22(6): 649–666
doi: 10.1016/S0140-9883(00)00053-0
|
| 7 |
HewittJ A, HanemannW M. A discrete/continuous choice approach to residential water demand under block rate pricing. Land Economics, 1995, 71(2): 173–192
doi: 10.2307/3146499
|
| 8 |
OlmsteadS M, Michael HanemannW, StavinsR N. Water demand under alternative price structures. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 2007, 54(2): 181–198
doi: 10.1016/j.jeem.2007.03.002
|
| 9 |
YooS H, LeeJ S, KwakS J. Estimation of residential electricity demand function in Seoul by correction for sample selection bias. Energy Policy, 2007, 35(11): 5702–5707
doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2007.06.009
|
| 10 |
LiaoH C, ChangT F. Space-heating and water-heating energy demands of the aged in the US. Energy Economics, 2002, 24(3): 267–284
doi: 10.1016/S0140-9883(02)00014-2
|
| 11 |
MansurE T, MendelsohnR, MorrisonW. Climate change adaptation: a study of fuel choice and consumption in the US energy sector. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 2008, 55(2): 175–193
doi: 10.1016/j.jeem.2007.10.001
|
| 12 |
OuedraogoB. Household energy preferences for cooking in urban Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso. Energy Policy, 2006, 34(18): 3787–3795
doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2005.09.006
|
| 13 |
BraunF G. Determinants of households’ space heating type: a discrete choice analysis for German households. Energy Policy, 2010, 38(10): 5493–5503
doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2010.04.002
|
| 14 |
CampbellB M, VermeulenS J, MangonoJ J, MabuguR. The energy transition in action: urban domestic fuel choices in a changing Zimbabwe. Energy Policy, 2003, 31(6): 553–562
doi: 10.1016/S0301-4215(02)00098-8
|
| 15 |
RehdanzK. Determinants of residential space heating expenditures in Germany. Energy Economics, 2007, 29(2): 167–182
doi: 10.1016/j.eneco.2006.04.002
|
| 16 |
MurtishawS, SathayeJ. Quantifying the Effects of the Principal–Agent Promblem on US Residential Energy Use. California: Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, 2006
|
| 17 |
de T’SerclaesP, JollandsN. Mind the Gap: Quantifying Principal–Agent Problems in Energy Efficiency. Paris: International Energy Agency and the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, 2007
|
| 18 |
ShoveE. Comfort, Cleanliness and Convenience. Oxford: The Social Organization of Normality, 2003
|
| 19 |
LiJ, HuR. Solar thermal in China: overview and perspectives of the Chinese solar thermal market. Refocus, 2005, 6(5): 25–27
|
| 20 |
LUOZ. China Solar Water Heater Market Report 2008. Beijing: Solar Thermal Utilization Committee in China Association of Rural Energy Industry, 2008
|
| 21 |
SahakianM D. Understanding household energy consumption patterns: when “west is best” in Metro Manila. Energy Policy, 2011, 39(2): 596–602
doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2010.10.032
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
| |
Shared |
|
|
|
|
| |
Discussed |
|
|
|
|
