Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Philosophy in China

ISSN 1673-3436

ISSN 1673-355X(Online)

CN 11-5743/B

Postal Subscription Code 80-983

Front Phil Chin    2012, Vol. 7 Issue (2) : 270-283     DOI: 10.3868/s030-001-012-0016-0
research-article |
Sense and Reference of Predicates: Comments on Frege’s Theory of Sense-Reference
CHEN Xiaoping()
Institute of Philosophy, School of Public Administration, South China Normal University, Guangzhou 510006, China
Download: PDF(281 KB)   HTML
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract  

Frege argued that a predicate was a functional expression and the reference of it a concept, which as a predicative function had one or more empty places and was thus incomplete. Frege’s view gives rise to what has been known as the paradox of the concept “horse.” In order to resolve this paradox, I argue for an opposite view which retains the point that a predicate is a function, i.e. that a predicative function is complete in a sense. Specifically speaking, a predicate performing the function of a predicate has at least one empty place and has no reference, while a predicate performing the function of a subject does not have any empty place but does have a reference. Frege not only regarded a concept with one or more empty places as the reference of a predicate but also took a set of objects without any empty place to be the extension of a concept with one or more empty places. Thus, it presents a complex relationship between the reference of a predicate and its corresponding extension, leading to disharmony in his theory. I argue that this is because there is a major defect in Frege’s theory of meaning, namely the neglect of common names. What he called extensions of concepts are actually extensions of common names, and the references of predicates and the extensions of common names have a substantial difference despite being closely related.

Keywords Frege      sense      reference      predicate      function     
Corresponding Authors: CHEN Xiaoping,Email:chenxp267@126.com   
Issue Date: 05 June 2012
URL:  
http://academic.hep.com.cn/fpc/EN/10.3868/s030-001-012-0016-0     OR     http://academic.hep.com.cn/fpc/EN/Y2012/V7/I2/270
[1] MOU Bo. On the Double-Reference Character of “Hexagram” Names in the Yijing: Engaging Fregean&Kripkean Approaches to the Issue of How Reference Is Possible[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2014, 9(4): 523-537.
[2] YUGUO Fei. Scientific Realism and the Meanings of Theoretical Terms[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2014, 9(3): 431-440.
[3] GUO Peng. The Semantic Function of Descriptions Associated with Proper Names: Comments on Kripke’s Criticism of Searle[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2014, 9(2): 268-279.
[4] Bernard Linsky. Russell’s Paradox of Predicates[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2014, 9(1): 149-165.
[5] Markus Gabriel. The Meaning of “Existence” and the Contingency of Sense[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2014, 9(1): 109-129.
[6] MA Minghui. The Semantic Relationistic Approach to Generalized Fregean Puzzles[J]. Front Phil Chin, 2012, 7(3): 404-421.
[7] YE Feng. Some Naturalistic Comments on Frege’s Philosophy of Mathematics[J]. Front Phil Chin, 2012, 7(3): 378-403.
[8] Hirotoshi Tabata. Frege’s Result: Frege’s Theorem and Related Matters[J]. Front Phil Chin, 2012, 7(3): 351-366.
[9] CHEN Xiaoping. How Does Downward Causation Exist?—A Comment on Kim’s Elimination of Downward Causation[J]. Front Phil Chin, 2010, 5(4): 652-665.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed