Please wait a minute...
购物车 申请加入邮件组 English
高级检索 图表检索
Frontiers of Chemical Science and Engineering

ISSN 2095-0179

ISSN 2095-0187(Online)

CN 11-5981/TQ

邮发代号 80-969

2019 Impact Factor: 3.552

热点文章  |  下载排行  |  浏览排行
在线投稿 免费RSS订阅
Frontiers of Chemical Science and Engineering  2015, Vol. 9 Issue (2): 125-141   https://doi.org/10.1007/s11705-015-1514-6
  本期目录
Review of solvent based carbon-dioxide capture technologies
Kathryn A. MUMFORD, Yue WU, Kathryn H. SMITH, Geoffrey W. STEVENS()
Peter Cook Centre for CCS Research, Particulate Fluids Processing Centre, Cooperative Centre for Greenhouse Gas Technologies, Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
 全文: PDF(246 KB)   HTML
Abstract：

Currently, a large proportion of global fossil fuel emissions originate from large point sources such as power generation or industrial processes. This trend is expected to continue until the year 2030 and beyond. Carbon capture and storage (CCS), a straightforward and effective carbon reduction approach, will play a significant role in reducing emissions from these sources into the future if atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions are to be stabilized and global warming limited below a threshold of 2 °C. This review provides an update on the status of large scale integrated CCS technologies using solvent absorption for CO2 capture and provides an insight into the development of new solvents, including advanced amine solvents, amino acid salts, carbonate systems, aqueous ammonia, immiscible liquids and ionic liquids. These proposed new solvents aim to reduce the overall cost CO2 capture by improving the CO2 absorption rate, CO2 capture capacity, thereby reducing equipment size and decreasing the energy required for solvent regeneration.
Key words： carbon dioxide    carbon capture    solvent absorption    large scale
收稿日期: 2015-03-17      出版日期: 2015-07-14
Corresponding Author(s): Geoffrey W. STEVENS   
 引用本文:   
. [J]. Frontiers of Chemical Science and Engineering, 2015, 9(2): 125-141.
Kathryn A. MUMFORD, Yue WU, Kathryn H. SMITH, Geoffrey W. STEVENS. Review of solvent based carbon-dioxide capture technologies. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng., 2015, 9(2): 125-141.
 链接本文:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fcse/CN/10.1007/s11705-015-1514-6
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fcse/CN/Y2015/V9/I2/125
Project lifecycle stage Solvent Facility Location Company Volume of CO2 /mtpa CO2 gas source Operation date Storage type Ref.
Operate CS: Amine, Shell Global Cansolv Boundary Dam Saskatchewan, Canada SaskPower 1.0 PCC lignite (post) 2014 EOR, geological storage [3]
Operate PS: Selexol Century Plant Texas, USA Occidential Petroleum & Sandridge Energy 8.4 Natural gas 2010 EOR [4]
Operate PS: Selexol Coffeyville Gasification Plant Kansas, USA Chaparral Energy 1.0 Fertiliser production (pre) 2013 EOR [5]
Operate CS: Benfield process Enid Fertilizer CO2-EOR Project Oklahoma, USA Chaparral Energy & Merit Energy 0.68 Fertiliser production (pre) 1982 EOR [6]
Operate PS: Rectisol Great Plains Synfuel Plant and Weyburn-Midale Project Saskatchewan, Canada Dakota Gasification (Basin Electric Power Cooperative) 3.0 IGCC (pre) 2000 EOR [7]
Operate PS: Selexol Lost Cabin Gas Plant Wyoming, USA Denbury Resources 0.9 Natural gas 2013 EOR [8]
Operate PS: Selexol Shute Creek Gas Processing Facility Wyoming, USA ExxonMobil 7.0 Natural gas 1986 EOR [9]
Operate CS: 45wt-% MDEA Sleipner?CO2 Storage Project North Sea, Norway Statoil, ExxonMobil E&P Norway, Total E&P Norge 0.9 Natural gas 1996 Dedicated geological storage [10]
Operate CS: Activated MDEA (BASF) Snøhvit CO2 Storage Project Barents Sea, Norway Statoil, Petoro, Total E&P Norge, GDF Suez E&P Norge, RWE DEA Norge 0.7 Natural gas 2008 Dedicated geological storage [11]
Operate PS: Selexol Val Verde Natural Gas Plants Texas, USA Sandridge Energy & Occidential Petroleum 1.3 Natural gas 1972 EOR [12]
Execute CS: Benfield process Alberta Carbon Trunk Line (‘ACTL’) with Agrium CO2 Stream Alberta, Canada Enhance Energy and Agrium 0.3–0.6 Fertiliser production (pre) 2015 EOR [13]
Execute PS: Rectisol Alberta Carbon Trunk Line (‘ACTL’) with North West Sturgeon Refinery CO2 Stream Alberta, Canada Enhance Energy and North West Redwater Partnership 1.2–1.4 IGCC (pre) 2017 EOR [14]
Execute CS: Activated MDEA Gorgon Carbon Dioxide Injection Project Western Australia, Australia Chevron, Shell, ExxonMobil, Osaka Gas, Tokyo Gas, Chubu Electric Power 3.4–4.0 Natural gas 2015 Dedicated geological storage [15]
Execute PS: Selexol Kemper County Energy Facility (formerly Kemper County IGCC Project) Mississippi, USA Mississippi Power (Southern Company) 3 IGCC (Brown coal) (pre) 2016 EOR [16]
Execute CS: Activated MDEA (Shell ADIP-X) Quest CCS Project Athabasca Oil Sands Project Alberta, Canada Shell Canada Energy, Chevron Canada Limited, Marathon Oil Canada Corp. 1.08 Hydrogen production (pre) 2015 Dedicated geological storage [17]
Execute CS: Diglycolamine Uthmaniyah CO2 EOR Demonstration Project Eastern Province, Saudi Arabia Saudi Aramco 0.8 Natural gas 2015 EOR [18,19]
Execute CS: Amine Abu Dhabi CCS Project (formerly Emirates Steel Industries (ESI) CCS Project) Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates Abu Dhabi National Oil Company, Abu Dhabi Future Energy Company 0.8 Iron and steel (pre) 2016 EOR [20]
Execute CS: Fluor Econamine FG PlusSM Petra Nova Carbon Capture Project Texas, USA NRG Energy, JX Nippon Oil & Gas Exploration 1.4 PCC (sub-bituminous coal) (post) 2016 EOR [21]
Tab.1  
Rectisol Companies: Linde AG, Lurgi AG.
Major components: chilled methanol.
Operating requirements or advantages:
(1)?Deep refrigeration (typical operation temperature is below 0 °C due to the fact that methanol has a relatively high vapour pressure at normal process conditions).
(2)?Water washing of effluent streams to prevent high solvent losses.
Limitations: exhibit higher selectivity for H2S over CO2.
Selexol [25] Companies: Norton, Dow, UOP.
Major components: dimethyl ether of polyethylene glycol (DPEG).
Operating requirement or advantages:
(1)?Exhibits the highest CO2 solubility among physical solvents.
(2)?No water wash is required due to a very low vapour pressure.
(3)?Able to operate at a broad temperature range: from 0 °C to 175 °C.
(4)?Selexol is less costly than Rectisol for CO2 sequestering.
Limitations: higher viscosity than most physical solvents, particularly at low temperatures, resulting in low mass transfer and high packing requirements.
Sepasolv-MPE Companies: BASF.
Major components: mixture of polyethylene glycol dialkyl ethers.
Operating requirements or advantages:
?Similar in performance and operation to Selexol process.
Limitations: no longer licensed.
Fluor solvent Companies: Fluor.
Major components: propylene carbonate (PC).
Operating requirements or advantages:
(1)?Has been in use since the late 1950s.
(2)?A higher vapour pressure than Selexol, although solvent losses are still low.
Limitations: It is not recommend for use if more than trace levels of H2S are present. It reacts irreversibly with water and is unstable at high temperatures and thus operating temperature is below 65 °C.
Purisol Companies: Lurgi GmbH.
Major components: N-methyl-2-pyrrolidone (NMP).
Operating requirements or advantages:
(1)?Water washing of treated and rejected acid gas should be taken into consideration for solvent recovery.
(2)?A higher vapour pressure than Selexol and Fluor solvent and therefore operates at ambient temperatures or below.
Limitations: exhibit higher selectivity for H2S over CO2.
Morphysorb [26] Companies: ThyssenKrupp.
Major components: N-formyl-morpholine (NFM) and N-acetyl-morpholine (NAM).
Operating requirements or advantages:
A specialty solvent first used industrially in 2002. It was developed for its high selectivity of acid gases over heavier hydrocarbons.
Tab.2  
Solvent Facility Location Company Slip-stream /MW Processing capacity /(t CO2·d−1) Source Operational date Ref.
MEA Boundary Dam Power Station Saskatchewan, Canada SaskPower 4 Lignite/ brown coal 2000 [43,44]
MEA Tarong Power Station Tarong, Australia CSIRO 0.1 2 Black coal, PCC 2008 [45]
MEA Loy Yang Power Station Latrobe Valley, Australia CSIRO 1 Brown coal, PCC 2008 [46]
MEA Huaneng Beijing Cogeneration Plant Beijing, China CSIRO 8 8 Black coal, PCC 2008 [47,48]
MEA Jilin Oil Field Jilin Province, China PetroChina 550 Natural gas 2009 [49]
MEA Brindisi Power Plant Cortemaggiore, Italy ENEL 54 Coal 2011 [50]
MDEA Elcogas Puertollano Puertollano, Spain Elcogas 5 100 Coal and petcoke IGCC 2011 [51]
MEA
Advanced amine (H3-1)		 Tokyo Electric Power Station Yokosuka, Japan Hitachi <1 Coal, PCC Early 1990s [52]
Advanced amine (H3-1) SaskPower, Shand Power Station Estevan, Saskatchewan Hitachi 120 Canadian lignite 2014 [52]
MEA
Advanced amine (H3-1)		 E.W. Brown Generating Station Kentucky, USA Hitachi 0.7 15 Coal 2014 [53]
Advanced amine (UCARSOLTM FGC 3000) Dow Chemicals, South Charleston West Virginia, USA Dow Chemical 5 Coal, PCC 2009 [54]
MEA
Advanced amine (RS-1, RS-2, RS-3)		 International Test Centre for CO2 Capture University of Regina, Canada SaskPower 0.25 1 Steam boiler 2000 [55,56]
Advanced amine (Cansolv-Shell) Aberthaw Wales, UK RWE 3 50 Coal 2013 [57]
MEA
Advanced amine (CASTOR 1, CASTOR 2)		 Dong Energy Esbjerg, Denmark European Commission Funded, IFP-run 3 24 Coal, PCC 2008 [58]
Advanced amine (KoSol series) Boryeong Thermal Power Plant Boryeong, Republic of Korea KEPCO 10 2 Coal, PCC 2010 [59]
KS-1, KM-CDR Process MHI Hiroshima R&D Centre Hiroshima, Japan MHI 1 Coal, PCC 2004 [60]
KS-1, KM-CDR Process J-Power, Matsushima Thermal Power Station Nagasaki, Japan MHI 10 Coal, PCC 2006 [60]
KS-1, KM-CDR Process KEPCO, Nanko Natural Gas Osaka, Japan MHI 0.1 2 Natural gas 1991 [60]
KS-1, KM-CDR Process Georgia Power’s Plant Yates Georgia, USA MHI and Southern Company 0.1 Coal 2010 [22]
KS-1, KM-CDR Process Plant Barry Power Station Mobile, Alabama, USA MHI, Southern Energy, Electric Power Research Institute 25 410 Coal 2011 [61]
Advanced amine
(TNO CORAL)		 CATO-2 CO2 Catcher Rotterdam, Netherlands E .ON
TNO		 0.4 6 Coal, PCC 2008 [62,63]
Amine mixture Shidongkou China Huaneng 300 Coal 2011 [64]
Amine Ferrybridge CCSPilot100+ UK SSE 5 100 Coal 2012 [65]
CESAR-1, CESAR-2 Laboratory of Engineering Thermodynamics (LTD) European Union Enhanced Separation & Recovery 54–105 Prepared flue gas 2011 [66,67]
Mixed amine
Fluor Econamine FG PlusSM		 Wilhelmshaven Germany E. ON 70 Coal 2012 [68]
Ammonia Delta Electricity Munmorah Power Station Munmorah, Australia CSIRO 3 Black coal PCC 2009 [69]
Ammonia Burger Plant Shadyside, OH, USA First Energy 1 Coal, PCC 2008 [70]
Alstom chilled ammonia Pleasant Prairie WI, USA Alstom 5 40 Coal, PCC 2008–2009 [71]
Alstom chilled ammonia AEP Mountaineer WV, USA AEP 20 Coal, PCC 2009–2011 [72]
Alstom chilled ammonia Karlshamn, Power Plant Sweden E. ON 5 40 Sulphur oil 2009–2010 [73]
Amine, chilled ammonia European CO2 Test Centre Mongstad Mongstad, Norway Norwegian Government, Statoil, Sasol, Shell 280 Natural gas 2012 [74]
Amino acid salt
(Siemens PostCapTM)		 Polk Power Plant FL, USA TampaElectric 800 IGCC 2014 [75]
Amino acid salt
(Siemens PostCapTM)		 E. ON Staudinger, Germany Siemans 1 PCC and natural gas 2009, 2012 [76]
Immobilized carbonic anhydrase with potassium carbonate National Carbon Capture Center, Plant Gaston Alabama, USA Akermin 5.6 PCC 2012 [77,78]
MEA/Piperazine/Carbonate UT/SRP (University of Texas/Separations Research Program) University of Texas, USA University of Texas 0.1–0.5 1.3–5.9 Prepared flue gas 2002 [79]
Potassium carbonate Hazelwood Power Station Latrobe Valley, Australia CO2CRC 1–25 Brown coal PCC 2009–2013 [80]
Potassium carbonate HRL Research Gasifier Mulgrave, Victoria, Australia CO2CRC 1 IGCC 2009–2010 [81]
Piperazine (concentrated) URS (University of Texas) NCCC, USA Trimeric Corporation / University of Texas 0.1–0.5 Prepared flue gas 2013 [22]
Piperazine Colorado Springs Utilities Drake #7 Colorado Spring, CO, USA Neumann Systems Group 0.5 PCC 2014 [82]
Physical-dimethyl-ether of poly-ethylene-glycol (DEPEG) Willem-Alexander Power Plant Buggenum, Netherlands Vattenfall, Nuon 33 IGCC: coal and biomass 2011 [83]
Tab.3  
Type Company Solvents Benefit Disadvantage Future work Ref.
Advanced amine Hitachi;
Dow;
KEPCO;
MHI;
Fluor;
Shell		 H3-1;
UCARSOLTM FGC 3000;
RS-1, RS-2, RS-3;
Cansolv;
CASTOR 1 & 2;
KS-1, KS-2, KS-3;
Fluor Econamines FG PlusSM		 Extensive operational/design experience available;
An extra degree of freedom determining the compositions of amine mixtures to optimise its performance		 Corrosion;
Solvent degradation; Form heat stable salts with SO2 and NO;
Amine emission;
Viscous		 Develop novel amine based solvents to lower regeneration energy required, oxidative degradation, corrosion, and increase reaction kinetics and absorption capacity;
Heat integration;
Equipment innovation such as intercooling system		 [22,119–121]
Amino acid salt Siemens;
BASF		 PostCap;
Puratreat		 Low vapour pressure;
Low oxidative degradation and emission;
Reactive towards CO2;
Low environmental impact;
Similar rate constants to MEA		 Forms heat stable salts with SO2 and NO;
High heat of regeneration		 Performance should be examined on a larger scale and in a real industrial situation [22,122–125]
Carbonate system UNOTechnology UNO MK3 Low vapour pressure;
Non-volatile;
No oxidative degradation;
Low toxicity;
Low regeneration energy;
Low environmental life-cycle impact;
Multi-impurity capture;
FGD unnecessary;
Low manufacture cost		 Reduced kinetics Scale up of plant based trials;
Process of design of large scale systems;
Examine new promoter systems;
Slurry handling system design and simulation		 [22,80,126]
Aqueous ammonia Alstom;
CSIRO;
PowerSpan		 CAP Does not decompose, high capacity, high purity product, competitive heat of regeneration High ammonia vapour pressure;
Slower kinetics than MEA;
Solid ammonium bicarbonate formation;
Ammonia emission;
Harsh conditions duo to operating temperature		 Additives to enhance CO2 absorption rate and suppress ammonia vapour, re-engineering industrial ammonium bicarbonate fertilizer production and combined capture of CO2 and SO2 [22,69,127–131]
Immiscible liquid 3H Company Self-concentrating absorbent CO2 capture process Low regeneration energy;
Non-aqueous environment to mitigate corrosion, degradation and formation of stable salts		 Mechanism and chemistry unsure;
Low maturity		 Develop new system using different liquids;
More testing and research on bench scale should be conducted		 [22]
Ionic liquid Notre Dame;
Georgia Tech.		 NDIL0046;
NDIL0157;
RevILs		 High thermal stability, no water evaporation in regeneration, no vapour pressure, tailorable Expensive;
High viscosity;
High selectivity to water		 Improve operating performance of ILs;
Improve process chemistry;
Integration of capture with manufacturing saleable goods, i.e., organic carbonates, formic acid		 [22,132–134]
Tab.4  
  
1 Working Group III of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. IPCC Special Report on Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage. 2005
2 Carbon Visuals. CCS: A 2 Degree Solution. 2014
3 P Spasoff. Saskpower selects carbon capture technology for Boundary Dam Project. 2010
4 Department of Mines and Petroleum, Australia. Fact Sheet: Century Plant. 2014
5 Global CCS Institute. Coffeyville Gasification Plant. 2014
6 Carbon Capture & Sequestration Technologies @ MIT. Enid Fertiliser Fact Sheet: Commercial EOR using Anthropogenic Carbon Dioxide. 2015
7 Global CCS Institute. Great Plains Synfuel Plant and Weyburn-Midale Project. 2014
8 Global CCS Institute. Lost Cabin Gas Plant. 2014
9 Global CCS Institute. Shute Creek Gas Processing Facility. 2014
10 E Johannessen. CO2 removal at Sleipner. 2012
11 Global CCS Institute. Snohvit CO2 storage project. 2014
12 Department of Mines and Petroleum, Australia. Fact Sheet: Val Verde Gas Plants. 2014
13 Global CCS Institute. Alberta Carbon Trunk Line (“ACTL”) with Agrium CO2 Stream. 2014
14 Global CCS Institute. Alberta Carbon Trunk Line (“ACTL”) with North Sturgeon Refinery CO2 stream. 2014
15 Chevron. Gorgon Project: Overview. 2014
16 Global CCS Institute. Kemper County Energy Facility (formerly Kemper County IGCC Project). 2014
17 Shell. Quest Carbon Capture and Storage Project. Amendment to OSCA and EPEA Approvals for the Carbon Capture Infrastructure. 2010
18 Global CCS Institute. Uthmaniyah CO2 EOR Demonstration Project. 2014
19 Global CCS Institute. Projects: Saudi Aramco Shedgum Gas Plant. 2014
20 Global CCS Institute. Abu Dhabi CCS Project (formerly Emirates Steel Industries (ESI) CCS Project). 2014
21 ZeroCO2. WA Parish CCS (Petra Nova Carbon Capture Project). 2014
22 National Energy Technology Laboratory, U.S. Department of Energy. DOE/NETL Advanced Carbon Dioxide Capture R&D Program: Technology Update. 2013
23 A A Olajire. CO2 capture and separation technologies for end-of-pipe applications—A review. Energy, 2010, 35: 2610–2628
24 W Owens, T Buchanan, M DeLallo, R Schoff, J White. Evaluaton of innovative fossil fuel power plants with CO2 removal. 2000
25 I Gainar, G Anitescu. The solubility of CO2, N2 and H2 in a mixture of dimethylether polyethylene glycolds at high pressures. Fluid Phase Equilibria, 1995, 109(2): 281–289
26 ThyssenKrupp. Morphysorb/Genosorb Physical Solvents for Acid Gas Removal, T.I. Solutions. 2014
27 R W Bucklin, R L Schendel. Comparison of fluor solvent and Selexol processes. Energy Progress, 1984, 4(3): 137–142
28 M Wang, A Lawal, P Stephenson, J Sidders, C Ramshaw. Post-combustion CO2 capture with chemical absorption: A state-of-the-art review. Chemical Engineering Research & Design, 2011, 89(9): 1609–1624
29 M R M Abu-Zahra, Z Abbas, P Singh, P Feron. Carbon Dioxide Post-Combustion Capture: Solvent Technologies Overview, Status and Future Directions. Materials and Processes for Energy: Communicating Current Research and Technological Developments. 2013
30 P J G Huttenhuis, N J Agrawal, J A Hogendoom, G F Versteeg. Gas solubility of H2S and CO2 in aqueous solutions of N-methyldiethanolamine. Journal of Petroleum Science Engineering, 2007, 55: 122–134
31 A Padurean, C C Cormos, P S Agachi. Techno-economical evaluation of post-and pre-combustion carbon dioxide capture methods applied for an IGCC power generation plant. Environmental Engineering and Management Journal, 2013, 12(11): 2191–2201
32 H W Pennline, D R Luebke, K L Jones, C R Myers, B I Morsi, Y J Heintz, J B Ilconich. Progress in carbon dioxide capture and separation research for gasification-based power generation point sources. Fuel Processing Technology, 2008, 89(9): 897–907
33 Y J Heintz, L Sehabiague, B I Morsi, K L Jones, H W Pennline. Novel physical solvents for selective CO2 capture from fuel gas streams at elevated pressures and temperatures. Energy & Fuels, 2008, 22(6): 3824–3837
34 A L Miller, T K Carlisle, A L LaFrate, B A Voss, J E Bara, Y C Hudiono, B R Wiesenauer, D L Gin, R D Noble. Design of functionalized room-temperature ionic liquid-based materials for CO2 separations and selective blocking of hazardous chemical vapors. Separation Science and Technology, 2012, 47(2): 169–177
35 M Finkenrath. Carbon dioxide capture from power generation—Status of cost and performance. Chemical Engineering & Technology, 2012, 35(3): 482
36 J Davison. Performance and costs of power plants with capture and storage of CO2. Energy, 2007, 32(7): 1163–1176
37 SaskPower. Boundary Dam project is reaping benefits. 2015
38 R Munson. Boundary Dam first to power with CCS. 2014
39 IEA Greenhouse Gas R&D Programme (IEA GHG). Evaluation of post-combustion CO2 capture solvent concepts, 2009
40 Business Wire. World’s Largest Post-Combustion Carbon Capture-Enhanced Oil Recovery Project to be built by NRG Energy and JX Nippon Oil & Gas Exploration. Construction begins at WA Parish plant near Houston. 2014
41 S Reddy, J R Scherffius, J Yonkoski, P Radgen, H Rode. Initial results from Fluor’s CO2 capture demonstration plant using econamine FG PlusSM technology at E.ON Kraftwerke’s Wilhelmshaven Power Plant. Energy Procedia, 2013, 37: 6216–6225
42 K Goto, K Yogo, T Higashii. A review of efficiency penalty in a coal-fired power plant with post-combustion CO2 capture. Applied Energy, 2013, 111: 710–720
43 J N Knudsen, J N Jensen, P J Vilhelmsen, O Biede. Experience with CO2 capture from coal flue gas in pilot-scale: Testing of different amine solvents. Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies, 2009, 1(1): 783–790
44 J N Knudsen, J Andersen, J N Jensen, O Biede. Evaluation of process upgrades and novel solvents for the post combustion CO2 capture process in pilot-scale. Energy Procedia, 2011, 4: 1558–1565
45 A Cousins, A Cottrell, A Lawson, S Huang, P H M Feron. Model verification and evaluation of the rich-split process modification at an Australian-based post combustion CO2 capture pilot plant. Greenhouse Gases-Science and Technology, 2012, 2(5): 329–345
46 Y Artanto, J Jansen, P Pearson, T Do, A Cottrell, E Meuleman, P Feron. Performance of MEA and amine-blends in the CSIRO PCC pilot plant at Loy Yang Power in Australia. Fuel, 2012, 101: 264–275
47 C Hart, H Liu. Advancing carbon capture and sequestration in China: A global learning laboratory. China Environment Series Issue 11. Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, 2010, 11: 99–121
48 Finance Wangyi. The second carbon capture project operated by Huaneng begins to construct in Shanghai 2009 (in Chinese)
49 CCUS in China. Petrochina’s CO2-EOR Research and Demonstration Project in the Jilin Oil Field. 2014
50 F Conti, G Oettinger, S Prestigiacomo, M Ferrarese, D Mennitti. ENEL: Inauguration of Italy’s first CCS pilot plant in Brindisi. 2011
51 P Casero, F García-Peña, P Coca. Elcogas pre-combustion carbon capture pilot. Real experience of commercial technology. Energy Procedia, 2013, 37: 6374–6382
52 Y Inatsune, Y Fukuda, M Sugasawa, H Kimura. Development of an environmentally conscious thermal power system. Hitachi Review, 2013, 62(1): 31–38
53 K Liu. Application of a Heat Integrated Post-Combustion CO2 Capture System. In: 2013 NETL CO2 Capture Technology Meeting, Pittsburgh, PA, 2013
54 Alstom. Charleston Carbon Capture Field Pilot. 2012
55 R Idem, P Tontiwachwuthikul, D Gelowitz, M Wilson. Latest research on fundamental studies of CO2 capture process technologies at the international test centre for CO2 capture. Energy Procedia, 2011, 4: 1707–1712
56 D Thong, N Dave, P Feron, M Azzi. Environmental Impacts of Amine-based CO2 Post Combustion Capture (PCC) Process. In: Activity 3: Process Modelling for Amine-based Post Combustion Capture Plant. Australia: CSIRO, 2012
57 RWE. Carbon dioxide capture and storage. 2014
58 J N Knudsen, J N Jensen, P J Vilhelmsen, O Biede. Experience with CO2 capture from coal flue gas in pilot-scale: Testing of different amine solvents. Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies, 2009, 1(1): 783–790
59 C K Ryu. Hadong and Boryeong 10 MW Pilot Projects. In: CSLF Technology Workshop in Seoul Korea, 2014
60 T Endo, Y Kajiya, H Nagayasu, M Iijima, T Ohishi, H Tanaka, R Mitchell. Current status of MHI CO2 capture plant technology, large scale demonstration project and road map to commercialization for coal fired flue gas application. Energy Procedia, 2011, 4: 1513–1519
61 Carbon Capture & Sequestration Technologies @ MIT. Plant Barry Fact Sheet: Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage Project. 2015
62 L. Neill CATO CO2 catcher Pilot Plant Factsheet. 2008
63 CATO. Catching carbon to clear the skies. In: Experiences and Highlights of the Dutch R&D Programme on CCS2010. 2010
64 J Tollefson. Low-cost carbon-capture project sparks interest. Nature, 2011, 469(7330): 276–277
65 Department of Energy & Climate Change, UK. Carbon Capture Project Case Studies. 2013
66 H P Mangalapally, R Notz, S Hoch, N Asprion, G Sieder, H Garcia, H Hasse. Pilot plant experimental studies of post combustion CO2 capture by reactive absorption with MEA and new solvents. Energy Procedia, 2009, 1: 963–970
67 H P Mangalapally, H Hasse. GHGT-10: Pilot plant experiments for post combustion carbon dioxide capture by reactive absorption with novel solvents. Energy Procedia, 2011, 4: 1–8
68 E Fluor,. ON Kraftwerke Carbon Capture Technology Demonstation Plant. 2014
69 H Yu, S Morgan, A Allport, A Cottrell, T Do, J McGregor, L Wardhaugh, P Feron. Results from trialling aqueous NH3 based post-combustion capture in a pilot plant at Munmorah power station: Absorption. Chemical Engineering Research & Design, 2011, 89(8A): 1204–1215
70 C R McLarnon, J L Duncan. Testing of ammonia based CO2 capture with multi-pollutant control technology. Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies, 2009, 1(1): 1027–1034
71 Alstom. We Energies Pleasant Prairie Field Pilot. 2008
72 AEP. Carbon Capture and Storage. 2014
73 Alstom. E.ON Karlshamn Carbon Capture Field Pilot. 2014
74 Carbon Capture & Sequestration Technologies @ MIT. Statoil Mongstad Fact Sheet: Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage Project. 2015
75 PennEnergy. Clean Coal: Carbon capture pilot begins at Polk IGCC plant. 2014
76 Siemens. Post-Combustion Carbon Capture. 2014
77 Southern Company Services, Inc. The National Carbon Capture Center at the Power Systems Development Facility. 2012
78 J Reardon,Advanced Low Energy Enzyme-Catalyzed Solvent for CO2 Capture. In: NETL National CO2 Capture Technology Meeting, 2013, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
79 F Seibert, E Chen, M Perry, S Briggs, R Montgomery, G Rochelle. UT/SRP CO2 capture pilot plant—Operating experience and procedures. Energy Procedia, 2011, 4: 1616–1623
80 K A Mumford, K H Smith, C J Anderson, S F Shen, W D Tao, Y A Suryaputradinata, A Qader, B Hooper, R A Innocenzi, S E Kentish, G W Stevens. Post-combustion capture of CO2: Results from the solvent absorption capture plant at hazelwood power station using potassium carbonate solvent. Energy & Fuels, 2012, 26(1): 138–146
81 K H Smith, C J Anderson, W Tao, K Endo, K A Mumford, S E Kentish, A Qader, B Hooper, G W Stevens, Pre-combustion capture of CO2—Results from solvent absorption pilot plant trials using 30wt% potassium carbonate and boric acid promoted potassium carbonate solvent. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2012, 10(6): 64–73
82 NETL. Carbon Absorber Retrofit Equipment (CARE). 2014
83 K Damen, R Faber, R Gnutek, H van Dijk, C Trapp, L Valenz. Performance and modelling of the pre-combustion capture pilot plant at the Buggenum IGCC. Energy Procedia, 2013
84 P Feron, B Hooper. Research Opportunies in Post Combustion CO2 Capture. Australia: CSIRO, 2009
85 A Kothandaraman. Carbon Dioxide Capture by Chemical Absorption: A Solvent Comparison Study. USA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2010
86 G Rochelle, E Chen, S Freeman, D Van Wagener, Q Xu, A Voice. Aqueous piperazine as the new standard for CO2 capture technology. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2011, 171(3): 725–733
87 S A Freeman, R Dugas, D H van Wagener, T Nguyen, G T Rochelle. Carbon dioxide capture with concentrated, aqueous piperazine. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2010, 4(2): 119–124
88 M Rameshni. Carbon Capture Overview. Australia: WorleyParsons, 2010
89 Y Cheng-Hsiu, H Chih-Hung, T Chung-Sung. A review of CO2 capture by absorption and adsorption. Aerosol and Air Quality Research, 2012, (5): 745
90 H Herzog. An Introduction to CO2 Separation and Capture Technologies. Cambridge, MA: MIT Energy Laboratory, 1999
91 F Lecomte, P Broutin, E Lebas. CO2 Capture; Technologies to Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions. Portland, OR, USA: Book News, Inc., 2010
92 P Singh. Incorporating Future Technological Improvements in Existing CO2 Post Combustion Capture Plants: Technical Review. Cheltenham, UK: IEAGHG, 2013
93 A Veawab, A Aroonwilas, A Chakma, P Tontiwachwuthikul. Solvent Formulation for CO2 Separation from Flue Gas Streams. Regina: University of Regina, 2001
94 A Veawab, A Aroonwilas, P Tontiwachwuthikul. CO2 absorption performance of aqueousalkanolamines in packed columns. Fuel Chemistry Division Preprints, 2002, 47(1), 49–50
95 R Idem, D Gelowitz, P Tontiwachwuthikul. Evaluation of the performance of various amine based solvents in an optimized multipurpose technology development pilot plant. Energy Procedia, 2009, 1: 1543–1548
96 S Jovanovic. M Hill. Slipstream pilot scale demonstration of a novel amine-based post-combustion technology for carbon dioxide captrue from coal-fired power plant flue gas in Techno-Economic Analysis of 550 MWe subcritical PC power plant with CO2 capture. USA: DOE, 2012
97 F Closmann, T Nguyen, G T Rochelle. MDEA/Piperazine as a solvent for CO2 capture. Energy Procedia, 2009, 1: 1351–1357
98 S Bishnoi, G T Rochelle. Absorption of carbon dioxide into aqueous piperazine: reaction kinetics, mass transfer and solubility. Chemical Engineering Science, 2000, 55(22): 5531–5543
99 P V Os. CO2 Enhanced Separation and Recovery. Netherlands: TNO, 2011
100 A Singh, K Stéphenne. Shell Cansolv CO2 capture technology: Achievement from first commercial plant. Energy Procedia, 2014, 63: 1678–1685
101 H Herzog, J Meldon, A Hatton. Advanced Post-Combustion CO2 Capture. Boston, MA, USA: Clean Air Task Force, 2009
102 J P Brouwer, P H M Feron, N A M Asbroek. Amino acid salts for CO2 capture from flue gases. In: Proceedings of the 4th Annual Conference on Carbon Capture and Sequestration, Alexandria, VA, USA, 2005
103 A H Liu, R Ma, C Song, Z Z Yang, A Yu, Y Cai, L N He, Y N Zhao, B Yu, Q W Song. Equimolar CO2 capture by N-substituted amino acid salts and subsequent conversion. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2012, 51(45): 11306–11310
104 E Sanchez-Fernandez. FdM Mercader, K Misiak, L van der Ham, M Linders, E Goetheer. New process concepts for CO2 capture based on precipitating amino acids. Energy Procedia, 2013, 37: 1160–1171
105 G Puxty, R Rowland, M Attalla. Comparison of the rate of CO2 absorption into aqueous ammonia and monoethanolamine. Chemical Engineering Science, 2010, 65(2): 915–922
106 C Anderson, T Harkin, M Ho, K Mumford, A Qader, G Stevens, B Hooper. Developments in the CO2 CRC UNO MK 3 process: A multi-component solvent process for large scale CO2 capture. Energy Procedia, 2013, 37: 225
107 C E Taylor. An Overview of Carbon Capture Regulations and Technologies. In: 2011 ICAC Meeting, Mobile, AL, USA, 2011
108 K Smith, U Ghosh, A Khan, M Simioni, K Endo, X Zhao, S Kentish, A Qader, B Hooper, G Stevens. Recent developments in solvent absorption technologies at the CO2 CRC in Australia. Energy Procedia, 2009, 1(1): 1549
109 H Thee, N J Nicholas, K H Smith, G da Silva, S E Kentish, G W Stevens. A kinetic study of CO2 capture with potassium carbonate solutions promoted with various amino acids: Glycine, sarcosine and proline. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2014, 20: 212–222
110 J T Cullinane, G T Rochelle. Carbon dioxide absorption with aqueous potassium carbonate promoted by piperazine. Chemical Engineering Science, 2004, 59(17): 3619–3630
111 H Thee, Y A Suryaputradinata, K A Mumford, K H Smith, G da Silva, S E Kentish, G W Stevens. A kinetic and process modeling study of CO2 capture with MEA-promoted potassium carbonate solutions. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2012, 210: 271–279
112 H Thee, K H Smith, G da Silva, S E Kentish, G W Stevens. Carbonic anhydrase promoted absorption of CO2 into potassium carbonate solutions. Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, 2015, 5(1): 108–114
113 H Thee, K H Smith, G da Silva, S E Kentish, G W Stevens. Carbon dioxide absorption into unpromoted and borate-catalyzed potassium carbonate solutions. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2012, 181–182: 694–701
114 K Smith, G Xiao, K Mumford, J Gouw, I Indrawan, N Thanumurthy, D Quyn, R Cuthbertson, A Rayer, N Nicholas, A Lee, G da Silva, S Kentish, T Harkin, A Qader, C Anderson, B Hooper, G Stevens. Demonstration of a concentrated potassium carbonate process for CO2 capture. Energy and Fuels, 2013, 28(1): 299–306
115 C Anderson, B Hooper, A Qader, T Harkin, K Smith, K Mumford, J Pandit, M Ho, A Lee, N Nicholas, Indrawan, J Gouw, J Xiao, N Thanumurthy, N Temple, G Stevens, D Wiley. Recent developments in the UNO MK 3 Process—A low cost, environmentally benign precipitating process for CO2 capture. Energy Procedia, 2014, 63: 1773–1780
116 Illinois State Geological Survey, Bench-Scale Development of a Hot Carbonate Absorption Process with Crystallization-Enabled High Pressure Stripping for Post Pressure Stripping for Post-Combustion CO2 Capture. In: Project Review Meeting, Pittsburgh, PA, USA, 2013
117 K A Mumford, S J Pas, T Linseisen, T M Statham, N Johann Nicholas, A Lee, K Kezia, R Vijayraghavan, D R MacFarlane, G W Stevens. Evaluation of the protic ionic liquid, N,N-dimethyl-aminoethylammonium formate for CO2 capture. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2015, 32: 129–134
118 E J Maginm. Ionic Liquids: Breakthrough Absorption Technology for Post-Combustion CO2 Capture. USA: University of Notre Dame, 2013
119 F Vega, A Sanna, B Navarrete, M M Maroto-Valer, V Cortes. Degradation of amine-based solvents in CO2 capture process by chemical absorption. Greenhouse Gases-Science and Technology, 2014, 4(6): 707–733
120 L Dumee, C Scholes, G Stevens, S Kentish. Purification of aqueous amine solvents used in post combustion CO2 capture: A review. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2012, 10: 443–455
121 A J Reynolds, T V Verheyen, S B Adeloju, E Meuleman, P Feron. Towards commercial scale postcombustion capture of CO2 with monoethanolamine solvent: Key considerations for solvent management and environmental impacts. Environmental Science & Technology, 2012, 46(7): 3643–3654
122 S P Yan, Q Y He, S F Zhao, H Zhai, M H Cao, P Ai. CO2 removal from biogas by using green amino acid salts: Performance evaluation. Fuel Processing Technology, 2015, 129: 203–212
123 A Sodiq, A V Rayer, A A Olanrewaju, M R M Abu Zahra. Reaction kinetics of carbon dioxide (CO2) absorption in sodium salts of taurine and proline using a stopped-flow technique. International Journal of Chemical Kinetics, 2014, 46(12): 730–745
124 M Rabensteiner, G Kinger, M Koller, G Gronald, S Unterberger, C Hochenauer. Investigation of the suitability of aqueous sodium glycinate as a solvent for post combustion carbon dioxide capture on the basis of pilot plant studies and screening methods. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2014, 29: 1–15
125 C C Wei, G Puxty, P Feron. Amino acid salts for CO2 capture at flue gas temperatures. Chemical Engineering Science, 2014, 107: 218–226
126 T Grant, C Anderson, B Hooper. Comparative life cycle assessment of potassium carbonate and monoethanolamine solvents for CO2 capture from post combustion flue gases. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2014, 28: 35–44
127 N Yang, H Yu, L C Li, D Y Xu, W F Han, P Feron. Aqueous ammonia (NH3) based post combustion CO2 capture: A review. Oil & Gas Science and Technology-Revue Energies Nouvelles, 2014, 69(5): 931–945
128 C K Ahn, K Han, M S Lee, J Y Kim, H D Chun, Y Kim, J M Park. Experimental studies of additivies for suppression of ammonia vaporization in the ammonia based CO2 capture process. Energy Procedia, 2013, 37: 7108–7116
129 S Salentinig, P Jackson, M Attalla. Strategic vapor suppressing additives for ammonia based CO2 capture solvent. Energy Procedia, 2013, 37: 241–246
130 H Yu, Q Y Xiang, M X Fang, Q Yang, P Feron. Promoted CO2 absorption in aqueous ammonia. Greenhouse Gases-Science and Technology, 2012, 2(3): 200–208
131 Q Zhuang, B Clements, Y Li. From ammonium bicarbonate fertilizer production process to power plant CO2 capture. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2012, 10: 56–63
132 S Kumar, J H Cho, I Moon. Ionic liquid-amine blends and CO2BOLs: Prospective solvents for natural gas sweetening and CO2 capture technology-A review. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2014, 20: 87–116
133 Y Chen, Y Y Cao, X F Sun, C Y Yan, T C Mu. New criteria combined of efficiency, greenness, and economy for screening ionic liquids for CO2 capture. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2013, 16: 13–20
134 Z Z Yang, Y N Zhao, L N He. CO2 chemistry: Task-specific ionic liquids for CO2 capture/activation and subsequent conversion. RSC Advances, 2011, 1(4): 545–567
135 J K J Yong, G W Stevens, F Caruso, S E Kentish. The use of carbonic anhydrase to accelerate carbon dioxide capture processes. Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology (Oxford, Oxfordshire), 2015, 90(1): 3–10
136 NETL. The Energy lab PROJECT FACTS: Post-Combustion CO2 Capture for Existing PC Boilers by Self-Concentrating Amine Absorbent. 2011
137 Global CCS Institute. The Global Status of CCS. 2014
138 National Energy Technology Laboratory. Carbon Capture: Technology program plan. 2013
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed