Please wait a minute...
购物车 申请加入邮件组 English
高级检索 图表检索
Frontiers of Chemical Science and Engineering

ISSN 2095-0179

ISSN 2095-0187(Online)

CN 11-5981/TQ

邮发代号 80-969

2019 Impact Factor: 3.552

热点文章  |  下载排行  |  浏览排行
在线投稿 免费RSS订阅
Frontiers of Chemical Science and Engineering  2018, Vol. 12 Issue (4): 697-707   https://doi.org/10.1007/s11705-018-1774-z
  本期目录
Performance assessment of a power-to-gas process based on reversible solid oxide cell
Hanaâ Er-rbib, Nouaamane Kezibri, Chakib Bouallou()
Centre for Energy Efficiency?of Systems, MINES ParisTech, PSL Research University, Paris 75006, France
 全文: PDF(402 KB)   HTML
Abstract：

Due to the foreseen growth of sustainable energy utilization in the upcoming years, storage of the excess production is becoming a rather serious matter. In this work, a promising solution to this issue is investigated using one of the most emerging technologies of electricity conversion: reversible solid oxide cells (RSOC). A detailed model was created so as to study the RSOC performance before implementing it in the global co-electrolysis Aspen PlusTM model. The model was compared to experimental results and showed good agreement with the available data under steady state conditions. The system was then scaled up to a 10 MW co-electrolysis unit operating at 1073 K and 3 bar. The produced syngas is subsequently directed to a methanation unit to produce a synthetic natural gas (SNG) with an equivalent chemical power of 8.3 MWth. Additionally, as a result of a heat integration analysis, the methanation process provides steam and electricity to operate the rest of the units in the process. A final CO2 capture step is added to ensure the required specifications of the produced SNG for gas network injection. Lastly, the overall performance of the power-to-gas process was evaluated taking into account the energy consumption of each unit.
Key words： renewable electricity    storage    co-electrolysis    methanation    carbone capture
收稿日期: 2018-03-26      出版日期: 2019-01-03
Corresponding Author(s): Chakib Bouallou   
 引用本文:   
. [J]. Frontiers of Chemical Science and Engineering, 2018, 12(4): 697-707.
Hanaâ Er-rbib, Nouaamane Kezibri, Chakib Bouallou. Performance assessment of a power-to-gas process based on reversible solid oxide cell. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng., 2018, 12(4): 697-707.
 链接本文:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fcse/CN/10.1007/s11705-018-1774-z
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fcse/CN/Y2018/V12/I4/697
Fig.1  
Fig.2  
Fig.3  
Experimental data Graves [19] Zhan et al. [20]
Temperature /K 1123 1073
Pressure /MPa 0.1 0.1
Total molar flow in fuel side /(mol?s−1) 2.84×10?4 1.74×10−4
Composition in fuel side /% 1st test 2nd test 3rd test
H2O 45 50 25 50
CO2 45 50 25 25
H2 10 0 25 25
CO 0 0 25 0
Total molar flow in air side /(mol?s?1) 5.68 ×10−4 5×10−10
Composition in air side /% 1st test 2nd test 3rd test
O2 1 1 1 1
N2 0 0 0 0
Tab.1  
Fig.4  
Fig.5  
Fig.6  
Fig.7  
Stream Feed gas 1st Reactor outlet 2nd Reactor outlet 3rd Reactor outlet
Flow rate /(kmol?h−1) H2 103 23.4 9.83 2.60
CO 33.9 4.60 0.75 0.05
H2O 3.79 29.0 33.8 37.1
CO2 10.4 12.5 11.9 10.7
CH4 – 27.3 31.7 33.6
Temperature /K 553 909 785 654
Pressure /bar 15.4 15.2 14.0 13.4
Tab.2  
Fig.8  
Fig.9  
BOP Component Electric consumption /kW Unrecovered cooling power
Thermal power /kW Hot source temperature /K Corresponding electric power /kW
Co-electolyzer unit Electric heater 64.7 – – –
Cooler – –57.9 343 –8.45
Methanation unit Condenser – –620 441 –208
Gas compressor 534 – – –
Recycle compressor 22.4 – – –
Pump 6.75 – – –
CO2 capture unit MEA cooler – –258 330 –29.1
Pump 6.60 – – –
Total BOP consumption 634.5 Unrecovered heat –245.5
Tab.3  
1 EIA. International energy outlook 2017 overview. US Energy Information Administration, 2017, IEO2017: 143
2 NKezibri, C Bouallou. Conceptual design and modelling of an industrial scale power to gas-oxy-combustion power plant. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2017, 42(30): 19411–19419
3 MDe Saint Jean, PBaurens, CBouallou, KCouturier. Economic assessment of a power-to-substitute-natural-gas process including high-temperature steam electrolysis. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2015, 40(20): 6487–6500
4 MGötz, J Lefebvre, FMörs, AMcDaniel Koch, FGraf, S Bajohr. Renewable power-to-gas: A technological and economic review. Renewable Energy, 2016, 85: 1371–1390
5 MBailera, P Lisbona, L MRomeo, SEspatolero. Power to gas projects review: Lab, pilot and demo plants for storing renewable energy and CO2. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2017, 69: 292–312
6 GGahleitner. Hydrogen from renewable electricity: An international review of power-to-gas pilot plants for stationary applications. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2013, 38(5): 2039–2061
7 D MBierschenk, J RWilson, S ABarnett. High efficiency electrical energy storage using a methane-oxygen solid oxide cell. Energy & Environmental Science, 2011, 4(3): 944–951
8 EGiglio, A Lanzini, MSantarelli, PLeone. Synthetic natural gas via integrated high-temperature electrolysis and methanation: Part II-Economic analysis. Journal of Energy Storage, 2015, 2: 64–79
9 E R J BReznicek. Renewable energy-driven reversible solid oxide cell systems for grid-energy storage and power-to-gas applications. ECS Transactions, 2017, 78(1): 2913–2923
10 JUdagawa, P Aguiar, N PBrandon. Hydrogen production through steam electrolysis: Control strategies for a cathode-supported intermediate temperature solid oxide electrolysis cell. Journal of Power Sources, 2008, 180(1): 354–364
11 QCai, E Luna-Ortiz, C SAdjiman, N PBrandon. The effects of operating conditions on the performance of a solid oxide steam electrolyser: A model-based study. Fuel Cells (Weinheim), 2010, 10(6): 1114–1128
12 JLaurencin, D Kane, GDelette, JDeseure, FLefebvre-Joud. Modelling of solid oxide steam electrolyser: Impact of the operating conditions on hydrogen production. Journal of Power Sources, 2011, 196(4): 2080–2093
13 APerna, M Minutillo, EJannelli. Designing and analyzing an electric energy storage system based on reversible solid oxide cells. Energy Conversion and Management, 2018, 159: 381–395
14 PKazempoor, R J Braun. Model validation and performance analysis of regenerative solid oxide cells: Electrolytic operation. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2014, 39(6): 2669–2684
15 HXu, B Chen, JIrvine, MNi. Modeling of CH4-assisted SOEC for H2O/CO2 co-electrolysis. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2016, 41(47): 21839–21849
16 FPetipas, A Brisse, CBouallou. Model-based behaviour of a high temperature electrolyser system operated at various loads. Journal of Power Sources, 2013, 239: 584–595
17 MBailera, N Kezibri, L MRomeo, SEspatolero, PLisbona, CBouallou. Future applications of hydrogen production and CO2 utilization for energy storage: Hybrid power to gas-oxycombustion power plants. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2017, 42(19): 13625–13632
18 YRedissi, H Er-Rbib, CBouallou. Storage and restoring the electricity of renewable energies by coupling with natural gas grid. In: Proceedings of 2013 International Renewable and Sustainable Energy Conference. Ouarzazate, Morocco: IEEE, 2013, 430–435
19 CGraves, S D Ebbesen, M Mogensen. Co-electrolysis of CO2 and H2O in solid oxide cells: Performance and durability. Solid State Ionics, 2011, 192(1): 398–403
20 ZZhan, W Kobsiriphat, J RWilson, MPillai, IKim, S A Barnett. Syngas production by coelectrolysis of CO2/H2O: The basis for a renewable energy cycle. Energy & Fuels, 2009, 23(6): 3089–3096
21 HEr-Rbib, N Kezibri, CBouallou. Dynamic simulation of reversible solid oxide cell (RSOC). Chemical Engineering Transactions, 2017, 61: 1075–1080
22 KKhorsand, M A Marvast, N Pooladian, MKakavand. Modeling and simulation of methanation catalytic reactor in ammonia unit. Petroleum and Coal, 2007, 49(1): 46–53
23 S KRyi, S W Lee, K R Hwang, J S Park. Production of synthetic natural gas by means of a catalytic nickel membrane. Fuel, 2012, 94: 64–69
24 PFrontera, A Macario, MFerraro, PAntonucci. Supported catalysts for CO2 methanation: A review. Catalysts, 2017, 7(2): 59
25 JKopyscinski, T J Schildhauer, S M A Biollaz. Production of synthetic natural gas (SNG) from coal and dry biomass—A technology review from 1950 to 2009. Fuel, 2010, 89(8): 1763–1783
26 HEr-rbib, C Bouallou. Modeling and simulation of CO methanation process for renewable electricity storage. Energy, 2014, 75: 81–88
27 RTilagone, B. Lecointe Natural gas-fossil energy. Techniques de L’ingénieur, 2014, BM2591 (in French)
28 I CKemp. Pinch Analysis and Process Integration—A User Guide on Process Integration for the Efficient Use of Energy. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2007, 313–378
29 TBlumberg, M Sorgenfrei, GTsatsaronis. Modelling and evaluation of an IGCC concept with carbon capture for the co-production of SNG and electricity. Sustainability Journal, 2015, 7: 16213–16225
30 J M GAmann, CBouallou. A new aqueous solvent based on a blend of N-methyldiethanolamine and triethylene tetramine for CO2 recovery in post-combustion: Kinetics study. Energy Procedia, 2009, 1(1): 901–908
31 YZhang, C C Chen. Modeling CO2 absorption and desorption by aqueous monoethanolamine solution with Aspen rate-based model. Energy Procedia, 2013, 37: 1584–1596
32 MGarcia, H K Knuutila, S Gu. ASPEN PLUS simulation model for CO2 removal with MEA: Validation of desorption model with experimental data. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 2017, 5(5): 4693–4701
33 JDavis, G Rochelle. Thermal degradation of monoethanolamine at stripper conditions. Energy Procedia, 2009, 1: 327–333
34 S SWarudkar, K R Cox, M S Wong, G J Hirasaki. Influence of stripper operating parameters on the performance of amine absorption systems for post-combustion carbon capture: Part II. Vacuum strippers. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2013, 16: 351–360
35 J M GAmann, CBouallou. CO2 capture from power stations running with natural gas (NGCC) and pulverized coal (PC): Assessment of a new chemical solvent based on aqueous solutions of N-methyldiethanolamine+ triethylene tetramine. Energy Procedia, 2009, 1: 909–916
36 MSterner. Bioenergy and renewable power methane in integrated 100% renewable energy systems. Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency, 2009, 14: 230
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed