Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Chemical Science and Engineering

ISSN 2095-0179

ISSN 2095-0187(Online)

CN 11-5981/TQ

邮发代号 80-969

2019 Impact Factor: 3.552

Frontiers of Chemical Science and Engineering  2020, Vol. 14 Issue (5): 763-771   https://doi.org/10.1007/s11705-019-1896-y
  本期目录
Liquid discharge plasma for fast biomass liquefaction at mild conditions: The effects of homogeneous catalysts
Sen Wang1, Shiyun Liu1, Danhua Mei1, Rusen Zhou3, Congcong Jiang2, Xianhui Zhang2, Zhi Fang1(), Kostya (Ken) Ostrikov3
1. College of Electrical Engineering and Control Science, Nanjing Tech University, Nanjing 211816, China
2. Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Plasma and Magnetic Resonance, Institute of Electromagnetics and Acoustics, Department of Electronic Science, College of Electronic Science and Technology, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361005, China
3. School of Chemistry, Physics and Mechanical Engineering, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland 4000, Australia
 全文: PDF(862 KB)   HTML
Abstract

Non-thermal plasma exhibits unique advantages in biomass conversion for the sustainable production of higher-value energy carriers. Different homogeneous catalysts are usually required for plasma-enabled biomass liquefaction to achieve time-and energy-efficient conversions. However, the effects of such catalysts on the plasma-assisted liquefaction process and of the plasma on those catalysts have not been thoroughly studied. In this study, an electrical discharge plasma is employed to promote the direct liquefaction of sawdust in a mixture of polyethylene glycol 200 and glycerol. Three commonly used chemicals, sulfuric acid, nitric acid and sodium p-toluene sulfate, were selected as catalysts. The effects of the type of catalyst and concentration on the liquefaction yield were examined; further, the roles of the catalysts in the plasma liquefaction process have been discussed. The results showed that the liquefaction yield attains a value of 90% within 5 min when 1% sulfuric acid was employed as the catalyst. Compared with the other catalysts, sulfuric acid presents the highest efficiency for the liquefaction of sawdust. It was observed that hydrogen ions from the catalyst were primarily responsible for the significant thermal effects on the liquefaction system and the generation of large quantities of active species; these effects directly contributed to a higher efficacy of the plasma-enabled liquefaction process.

Key wordsdischarge plasma    biomass liquefaction    catalyst    homogeneous catalysts
收稿日期: 2019-07-09      出版日期: 2020-05-25
Corresponding Author(s): Zhi Fang   
 引用本文:   
. [J]. Frontiers of Chemical Science and Engineering, 2020, 14(5): 763-771.
Sen Wang, Shiyun Liu, Danhua Mei, Rusen Zhou, Congcong Jiang, Xianhui Zhang, Zhi Fang, Kostya (Ken) Ostrikov. Liquid discharge plasma for fast biomass liquefaction at mild conditions: The effects of homogeneous catalysts. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng., 2020, 14(5): 763-771.
 链接本文:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fcse/CN/10.1007/s11705-019-1896-y
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fcse/CN/Y2020/V14/I5/763
Moisture/% Ash/% Lignin/% Total cellulose/% Cellulose/% C/% H/% O/% N/% HHV/(MJ·kg-1)
7.02 1.26 18.63 73.68 43.92 45.85 5.54 48.61 0.00 15.76
Tab.1  
Fig.1  
Fig.2  
Fig.3  
Fig.4  
Fig.5  
Retention time/min Name of compound 1.0% H2SO4 1.5% H2SO4 2.0% H2SO4
6.18 1,3-Dioxolane-4-methanol
6.55 1,3,6-Trioxocane
6.68 1,3-Dioxan-5-ol
8.07 (R)-(-)-2,2-Dimethyl-1,3-dioxolane-4-methanol
8.84 1,3-Dioxolane-4-methanol, 2,2-dimethyl-
10.15 Ethanol, 2-[2-(2-methoxyethoxy)ethoxy]-, acetate
10.98 1,3-Dioxolane-4-methanol, 2-ethenyl-
15.04 Monomethylolacetone
16.31 1,3-Propanediol, diacetate
19.31 Benzenamine-2-methyl-
19.52 p-Dioxane-2,5-dimethanol
20.55 1,4-Dioxane-2,6-dimethanol
21.79 1,8-Naphthyridine, 2,4,7-trimethyl-
26.54 (2S,13S)-12,13-Dihydroxy-1,4,7,10-tetraoxacyclotetradecane
28.04 Propyl 2-ethylbutanoate
33.73 1,4,7,10,13,16-Hexaoxacyclooctadecane
39.01 1,4,7,10,13,16-Hexaoxacyclooctadecane
Tab.2  
Fig.6  
Fig.7  
1 A B Koven, S S Tong, R R Farnood, C Q Jia. Alkali-thermal gasification and hydrogen generation potential of biomass. Frontiers of Chemical Science and Engineering, 2017, 11(3): 369–378
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11705-017-1662-y
2 S He, J Boom, R van der Gaast, K Seshan. Hydro-pyrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass over alumina supported Platinum, Mo2C and WC catalysts. Frontiers of Chemical Science and Engineering, 2017, 12(1): 155–161
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11705-017-1655-x
3 R Ravindran, C Sarangapari, S Jaiswal, P J Cullen, A K Jaiswal. Ferric chloride assisted plasma pretreatment of lignocellulose. Bioresource Technology, 2017, 243: 327–334
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.06.123
4 Z M A Bundhoo. Microwave-assisted conversion of biomass and waste materials to biofuels. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2018, 82(1): 1149–1177
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.09.066
5 A Bogaerts, E C Neyts. Plasma Technology: An emerging technology for energy storage. ACS Energy Letters, 2018, 3(4): 1013–1027
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsenergylett.8b00184
6 C Du, J Wu, D Ma, Y Liu, P Qiu, R Qiu, S Liao, D Gao. Gasification of corn cob using non-thermal arc plasma. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2015, 40(37): 12634–12649
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.07.111
7 A R K Gollakotaa, N Kishore, S Gu. A review on hydrothermal liquefaction of biomass. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2018, 81(1): 1378–1392
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.178
8 S Mohapatra, C Mishra, S S Behera, H Thatoi. Application of pretreatment, fermentation and molecular techniques for enhancing bioethanol production from grass biomass—A review. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2017, 78: 1007–1032
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.026
9 J D Shin, S G Hong, W S Choi, S K Park. Crude oil production and classification of organic compounds on super-critical liquefaction with rice hull. Biotechnology and Bioprocess Engineering, 2013, 18(5): 956–964
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12257-013-0122-x
10 K Tekin, S Karagöz, S Bektas. A review of hydrothermal biomass processing. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2014, 40: 673–687
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.07.216
11 E M Hassan, N Shukry. Polyhydric alcohol liquefaction of some lignocellulosic agricultural residues. Industrial Crops and Products, 2008, 27(1): 33–38
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2007.07.004
12 S Jiang, H Daly, H Xiang, Y Yan, H Zhang, C Hardacre, X Fan. Microwave-assisted catalyst-free hydrolysis of fibrous cellulose for deriving sugars and biochemical. Frontiers of Chemical Science and Engineering, 2019, 13(4): 718–726
https://doi.org/doi.org/10.1007/s11705-019-1804-5
13 E C Neyts. Atomistic simulations of plasma catalytic processes. Frontiers of Chemical Science and Engineering, 2018, 12(1): 145–154
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11705-017-1674-7
14 C Zhang, H Lin, S Zhang, Q Xie, C Ren, T Shao. Plasma surface treatment to improve surface charge accumulation and dissipation of epoxy resin exposed to DC and nanosecond-pulse voltages. Journal of Physics. D, Applied Physics, 2017, 50(40): 405203
https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6463/aa829b
15 R S Zhou, R W Zhou, X H Zhang, K Bazaka, K Ostrikov. Continuous flow removal of acid fuchsine by dielectric barrier discharge plasma water bed enhanced by activated carbon adsorption. Frontiers of Chemical Science and Engineering, 2019, 13(2): 340–349
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11705-019-1798-z
16 X Fang, C Corbella, D B Zolotukhin, M Keidar. Plasma-enabled healing of graphene nano-platelets layer. Frontiers of Chemical Science and Engineering, 2019, 13(2): 350–359
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11705-018-1787-7
17 A Molino, S Chianese, D Musmarra. Biomass gasification technology: The state of the art overview. Journal of Energy Chemistry, 2016, 25(1): 10–25
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jechem.2015.11.005
18 V S Sikarwar, M Zhao, P Clough, P Yao, X Zhong, M Z Memon, N Shah, E J Anthony, P S Fennell. An overview of advances in biomass gasification. Energy & Environmental Science, 2016, 9(10): 2939–2977
https://doi.org/10.1039/C6EE00935B
19 S Y Liu, D H Mei, M A Nahil, S Gadkari, S Gu, P T Williams, X Tu. Hybrid plasma-catalytic steam reforming of toluene as a biomass tar model compound over Ni/Al2O3 catalysts. Fuel Processing Technology, 2017, 166: 269–275
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2017.06.001
20 D Xi, R S Zhou, R W Zhou, X H Zhang, L Ye, J Li, C Jiang, Q Chen, G Sun, Q Liu, S Yang. Mechanism and optimization for plasma electrolytic liquefaction of sawdust. Bioresource Technology, 2017, 241: 545–551
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.05.132
21 R S Zhou, R W Zhou, S Wang, Z Lan, X H Zhang, Y Yin, S Tu, S Z Yang, L Ye. Fast liquefaction of bamboo shoot shell with liquid-phase microplasma assisted technology. Bioresource Technology, 2016, 218: 1275–1278
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2016.07.042
22 A Demirbaş. Calculation of higher heating values of biomass fuels. Fuel, 1997, 76(5): 431–434
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-2361(97)85520-2
23 J Akhtar, N A S Amin. A review on process conditions for optimum bio-oil yield in hydrothermal liquefaction of biomass. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2011, 15(3): 1615–1624
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2010.11.054
24 K H Kim, Y J Jo, C G Lee, E Lee. Solvothermal liquefaction of microalgal Tetraselmis sp. biomass to prepare biopolyols by using PEG 400-blended glycerol. Algal Research, 2015, 12: 539–544
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.algal.2015.08.007
25 G W Huber, S Iborra, A Corma. Synthesis of transportation fuels from biomass: Chemistry, catalysts and engineering. Chemical Reviews, 2006, 106(9): 4044–4098
https://doi.org/10.1021/cr068360d
26 T Zhang, Y Zhou, D Liu, L Petrus. Qualitative analysis of products formed during the acid catalyzed liquefaction of bagasse in ethylene glycol. Bioresource Technology, 2007, 98(7): 1454–1459
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2006.03.029
27 X Zou, T Qin, L Huang, X Zhang, Z Yang, Y Wang. Mechanisms and main regularities of biomass liquefaction with alcoholic solvents. Energy & Fuels, 2009, 23(10): 5213–5218
https://doi.org/10.1021/ef900590b
28 J J Qiao, L Zhang, D Z Yang, Z X Jia, Y Song, Z L Zhao, H Yuan, Y Xia, W C Wang. Temporal evolution of the relative vibrational population of N2 (C3Pu) and optical emission spectra of atmospheric pressure plasma jets in He mixtures. Journal of Physics. D, Applied Physics, 2019, 52(28): 285203
https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6463/ab1110
29 X Lu, G V Naidis, M Laroussi, S Reuter, D B Graves, K Ostrikov. Reactive species in non-equilibrium atmospheric-pressure plasmas: Generation, transport and biological effects. Physics Reports, 2016, 630: 1–84
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2016.03.003
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed