Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Chemical Science and Engineering

ISSN 2095-0179

ISSN 2095-0187(Online)

CN 11-5981/TQ

邮发代号 80-969

2019 Impact Factor: 3.552

Frontiers of Chemical Science and Engineering  2020, Vol. 14 Issue (6): 1065-1071   https://doi.org/10.1007/s11705-019-1909-x
  本期目录
Effect of electrolyte concentration on the tribological performance of MAO coatings on aluminum alloys
Chao Wang1(), Jun Chen1,2, Jihua He1, Jing Jiang1, Qinyong Zhang2
1. Clean Energy Materials and Engineering Center, State Key Laboratory of Electronic Thin Film and Integrated Device, School of Electronic Science and Engineering, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu 611731, China
2. School of Materials Science and Engineering, Xihua University, Chengdu 610039, China
 全文: PDF(913 KB)   HTML
Abstract

Micro-arc oxidation (MAO) is an efficient approach to improve the hardness, wear resistance, and other properties of aluminum alloys. In order to investigate the effect of the electrolyte concentration on the properties of MAO coatings for LY12 alloy, the voltage variation during the MAO process was recorded. The surface morphologies and phase compositions of the coatings produced with different electrolytes were investigated using scanning electron microscopy and X-ray diffraction, respectively. The roughness and thickness of the coatings were measured using a pocket roughness meter and an eddy-current thickness meter, respectively. The tribological performances of the coatings were investigated against GCr15 bearing steel on a ball-on-disc wear tester in open air. The results showed that with an increase in the Na2SiO3 content, the working voltage of the MAO process decreased, the roughness and thickness of the coatings increased significantly, and the relative content of the α-Al2O3 phase decreased. With an increase in the KOH content, the working voltage decreased slightly, the roughness and thickness of the coatings increased slightly, and the α- and γ-Al2O3 phase contents remained unchanged. The friction coefficient and wear rate of the coatings increased with an increase in the Na2SiO3 and KOH concentrations. A decrease in the porosity and roughness and an increase in the α-Al2O3 content of the coatings reduced their wear mass loss.

Key wordsaluminum alloy    micro-arc oxidation    coating    electrolyte concentration    tribological performance
收稿日期: 2019-08-09      出版日期: 2020-09-11
Corresponding Author(s): Chao Wang   
 引用本文:   
. [J]. Frontiers of Chemical Science and Engineering, 2020, 14(6): 1065-1071.
Chao Wang, Jun Chen, Jihua He, Jing Jiang, Qinyong Zhang. Effect of electrolyte concentration on the tribological performance of MAO coatings on aluminum alloys. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng., 2020, 14(6): 1065-1071.
 链接本文:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fcse/CN/10.1007/s11705-019-1909-x
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fcse/CN/Y2020/V14/I6/1065
Specimens S1 S2 S3 S4 S5
Concentrations of Na2SiO3/(g?L?1) 5 10 15 5 5
Concentrations of KOH/(g?L?1) 0.5 0.5 0.5 1.0 1.5
Tab.1  
Fig.1  
Fig.2  
Specimens S1 S2 S3 S4 S5
Ra/mm 1.56 2.73 3.94 1.94 2.57
Tab.2  
Fig.3  
Fig.4  
Fig.5  
Specimens S1 S2 S3 S4 S5 Al substrate
Wear mass loss/mg 0.1 0.3 0.4 0.3 0.5 3.2
Tab.3  
1 B B Buldum, B Bayhan. Effect of ball-burnishing parameters on surface roughness and surface hardness of aluminum alloy 6013. Materials Testing, 2018, 60(4): 418–422
https://doi.org/10.3139/120.111169
2 W S Miller, L Zhuang, J Bottema, A J Wittebrood, P De Smet, A Haszler, A Vieregge. Recent development in aluminium alloys for the automotive industry. Materials Science and Engineering A, 2000, 280(1): 37–49
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-5093(99)00653-X
3 X Nie, E I Meletis, J C Jiang, A Leyland, A L Yerokhin, A Matthews. Abrasive wear/corrosion properties and TEM analysis of Al2O3 coatings fabricated using plasma electrolysis. Surface and Coatings Technology, 2002, 149(2–3): 245–251
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0257-8972(01)01453-0
4 X Yang, L Chen, X Y Jin, J C Du, W B Xue. Influence of temperature on tribological properties of microarc oxidation coating on 7075 aluminium alloy at 25°C‒300°C. Ceramics International, 2019, 45(9): 12312–12318
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2019.03.146
5 X C Lv, L Cao, Y Wan, T W Xu. Effect of different electrolytes in micro-arc oxidation on corrosion and tribological performance of 7075 aluminum alloy. Materials Research Express, 2019, 6(8): 086421
https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1591/ab1da5
6 M S Yilmaz, O Sahin. Applying high voltage cathodic pulse with various pulse durations on aluminium via micro-arc oxidation (MAO). Surface and Coatings Technology, 2018, 347: 278–285
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2018.04.085
7 Y Gu, H Ma, W Yue, B Tian, L L Chen, D Mao. Microstructure and corrosion model of MAO coating on nano grained AA2024 pretreated by ultrasonic cold forging technology. Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 2016, 681: 120–127
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.03.196
8 H Nasiri-Vatan, R Ebrahimi-Kahrizsangi, M K Asgarani. Tribological performance of PEO-WC nanocomposite coating on Mg alloys deposited by plasma electrolytic oxidation. Tribology International, 2016, 98: 253–260
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.triboint.2016.02.029
9 S A Yavari, B S Necula, L E Fratila-Apachitei, J Duszczyk, I Apachitei. Biofunctional surfaces by plasma electrolytic oxidation on titanium biomedical alloys. Surface Engineering, 2016, 32(6): 411–417
https://doi.org/10.1179/1743294415Y.0000000101
10 S R Yu, Q Yao, H C Chu. Morphology and phase composition of MAO ceramic coating containing Cu on Ti6Al4V alloy. Rare Metals, 2017, 36(8): 671–675
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12598-014-0291-6
11 I S V Marques, M F Alfaro, N C Cruz, M F Mesquita, C Takoudis, C Sukotjo, M T Mathew, V A R Barão. Tribocorrosion behavior of biofunctional titanium oxide films produced by micro-arc oxidation: Synergism and mechanisms. Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials, 2016, 60: 8–21
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2015.12.030
12 S Sarbishei, M A Faghihi Sani, M R Mohammadi. Effects of alumina nanoparticles concentration on microstructure and corrosion behavior of coatings formed on titanium substrate via PEO process. Ceramics International, 2016, 42(7): 8789–8797
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2016.02.120
13 M İzmir, B Ercan. Anodization of titanium alloys for orthopedic applications. Frontiers of Chemical Science and Engineering, 2019, 13(1): 28–45
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11705-018-1759-y
14 J X Li, Y M Zhang, Y Han, Y M Zhao. Effects of micro-arc oxidation on bond strength of titanium to porcelain. Surface and Coatings Technology, 2010, 204(8): 1252–1258
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2009.10.020
15 Z Lu, Z Ouyang, N Grant, Y M Wan, D Yan, A Lennon. Manipulation of stored charge in anodic aluminium oxide/SiO2 dielectric stacks by the use of pulsed anodisation. Applied Surface Science, 2016, 363: 296–302
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2015.12.068
16 J Tian, Z Z Luo, S K Qi, X J Sun. Structure and antiwear behavior of micro-arc oxidized coatings on aluminum alloy. Surface and Coatings Technology, 2002, 154(1): 1–7
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0257-8972(01)01671-1
17 S G Xin, L X Song, R G Zhao, X F Hu. Properties of aluminium oxide coating on aluminium alloy produced by micro-arc oxidation. Surface and Coatings Technology, 2005, 199(2-3): 184–188
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2004.11.044
18 Z U Rehman, D G Lee, B H Koo. Effect of OH- concentration on the mechanical and microstructural properties of microarc oxidatoin coating produced on Al7075 alloy. Korean Journal of Materials Research, 2015, 25(10): 503–508
https://doi.org/10.3740/MRSK.2015.25.10.503
19 A Polat, M Makaraci, M Usta. Influence of sodium silicate concentration on structural and tribological properties of microarc oxidation coatings on 2017A aluminum alloy substrate. Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 2010, 504(2): 519–526
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2010.06.008
20 H Zheng, Y Wang, B Li, G R Han. The effects of Na2WO4 concentration on the properties of microarc oxidation coatings on aluminum alloy. Materials Letters, 2005, 59(2-3): 139–142
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2004.06.025
21 F Jin, P K Chu, H Tong, J Zhao. Improvement of surface porosity and properties of alumina films by incorporation of Fe micrograins in micro-arc oxidation. Applied Surface Science, 2006, 253(2): 863–868
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2006.01.024
22 C C Tseng, J L Lee, T H Kuo, S N Kuo, K H Tseng. The influence of sodium tungstate concentration and anodizing conditions on microarc oxidation (MAO) coatings for aluminum alloy. Surface and Coatings Technology, 2012, 206(16): 3437–3443
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2012.02.002
23 P Wang, T Wu, H Peng, G X Yang. Effect of NaAlO2 concentrations on the properties of micro-arc oxidation coatings on pure titanium. Materials Letters, 2016, 170: 171–174
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2016.02.024
24 Y Zong, R G Song, T S Hua, S W Cai, C Wang, H Li. Effects of current frequency on the MAO coatings on AA7050. Surface Engineering, 2019: 1–8
https://doi.org/10.1080/02670844.2019.1596577
25 N Barati, E I Meletis, F Golestani Fard, A Yerokhin, S Rastegari, M A Al Faghihi-Sani. Al2O3-ZrO2 nanostructured coatings using DC plasma electrolyticoxidation to improve tribological properties of Al substrates. Applied Surface Science, 2015, 356: 927–934
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2015.08.188
26 Y C Weng, H X Liu, S P Ji, Q Huang, H Wu, Z B Li, Z Z Wu, H Y Wang, L P Tong, R K Y Fu, P K Chu, F Pan. A promising orthopedic implant material with enhanced osteogenic and antibacterial activity: Al2O3-coated aluminum alloy. Applied Surface Science, 2018, 457: 1025–1034
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.06.233
27 G Lv, W Gu, H Chen, W R Feng, M L Khosa, L Li, E W Niu, G L Zhang, S Z Yang. Characteristic of ceramic coatings on aluminum by plasma electrolytic oxidation in silicate and phosphate electrolyte. Applied Surface Science, 2006, 253(5): 2947–2952
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2006.06.036
28 J J Zhuang, Y Q Guo, N Xiang, X Y Lu, Q Hu, R G Song. Sliding wear behaviour and microstructure of PEO coatings formed on aluminium alloy. Materials Science and Technology, 2016, 32(15): 1559–1566
https://doi.org/10.1080/02670836.2015.1132031
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed