Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Chemical Science and Engineering

ISSN 2095-0179

ISSN 2095-0187(Online)

CN 11-5981/TQ

邮发代号 80-969

2019 Impact Factor: 3.552

Frontiers of Chemical Science and Engineering  2022, Vol. 16 Issue (2): 303-315   https://doi.org/10.1007/s11705-021-2044-z
  本期目录
Energy-efficient recovery of tetrahydrofuran and ethyl acetate by triple-column extractive distillation: entrainer design and process optimization
Ao Yang1,2, Yang Su3, Tao Shi2, Jingzheng Ren2, Weifeng Shen1(), Teng Zhou4,5()
1. School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing 401331, China
2. Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China
3. School of Intelligent Technology and Engineering, Chongqing University of Science & Technology, Chongqing 401331, China
4. Process Systems Engineering, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, D-39106 Magdeburg, Germany
5. Process Systems Engineering, Max Planck Institute for Dynamics of Complex Technical Systems, D-39106 Magdeburg, Germany
 全文: PDF(2821 KB)   HTML
Abstract

An energy-efficient triple-column extractive distillation process is developed for recovering tetrahydrofuran and ethyl acetate from industrial effluent. The process development follows a rigorous hierarchical design procedure that involves entrainer design, thermodynamic analysis, process design and optimization, and heat integration. The computer-aided molecular design method is firstly used to find promising entrainer candidates and the best one is determined via rigorous thermodynamic analysis. Subsequently, the direct and indirect triple-column extractive distillation processes are proposed in the conceptual design step. These two extractive distillation processes are then optimized by employing an improved genetic algorithm. Finally, heat integration is performed to further reduce the process energy consumption. The results indicate that the indirect extractive distillation process with heat integration shows the highest performance in terms of the process economics.

Key wordsextractive distillation    solvent selection    conceptual design    process optimization    heat integration
收稿日期: 2020-11-08      出版日期: 2022-01-10
Corresponding Author(s): Weifeng Shen,Teng Zhou   
 引用本文:   
. [J]. Frontiers of Chemical Science and Engineering, 2022, 16(2): 303-315.
Ao Yang, Yang Su, Tao Shi, Jingzheng Ren, Weifeng Shen, Teng Zhou. Energy-efficient recovery of tetrahydrofuran and ethyl acetate by triple-column extractive distillation: entrainer design and process optimization. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng., 2022, 16(2): 303-315.
 链接本文:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fcse/CN/10.1007/s11705-021-2044-z
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fcse/CN/Y2022/V16/I2/303
Fig.1  
Group ID Group j Valence ν(j) Group classification
1 CH3 1 Mg a)
2 CH2 2 Mg a)
3 CH 3 Mg a)
4 C 4 Mg a)
14 OH(P) 1 Ceg b)
15 CH3OH 0 Sg c)
16 H2O 0 Sg c)
18 CH3CO 1 Ceg b)
19 CH2CO 2 Nceg d)
20 CHO 1 Ceg b)
21 CH3COO 1 Ceg b)
22 CH2COO 2 Nceg d)
23 HCOO 1 Ceg b)
24 CH3–O 1 Ceg b)
25 CH2–O 2 Nceg d)
26 CH–O 3 Nceg d)
27 THF 0 Sg c)
61 Furfural 0 Sg c)
67 DMSO 0 Sg c)
72 DMF 0 Sg c)
81 OH(S) 1 Ceg b)
82 OH(T) 1 Ceg b)
Tab.1  
Fig.2  
Fig.3  
Fig.4  
Fig.5  
Fig.6  
Fig.7  
Fig.8  
Fig.9  
Fig.10  
Item Direct process Indirect process without heat integration Indirect process with heat integration
TCC/US$ 1219334.38 1229563.80 1141299.66
AOC/(US$·year–1) 990875.54 1003771.81 992933.19
TAC/(US$·year–1) 1397320.33 1413626.41 1373366.41
Tab.2  
1 M A Santaella, A Orjuela, P C Narváez. Comparison of different reactive distillation schemes for ethyl acetate production using sustainability indicators. Chemical Engineering and Processing, 2015, 96: 1–13
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cep.2015.07.027
2 L S Tran, M Verdicchio, F Monge, R C Martin, R Bounaceeur, B Sirjean, P A Glaude, M U Alzueta, F Battin Leclerc. An experimental and modeling study of the combustion of tetrahydrofuran. Combustion and Flame, 2015, 162(5): 1899–1918
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2014.12.010
3 Z He, S Lin, C Gong, Y Xi. Study on separating tetrahydrofuran from the mixture made up tetrahydrofuran, ethyl acetate and water. Journal of Shenyang Institute of Chemical Technology, 1996, 10(2): 143–147
4 O A Deorukhkar, B S Deogharkar, Y S Mahajan. Purification of tetrahydrofuran from its aqueous azeotrope by extractive distillation: pilot plant studies. Chemical Engineering and Processing, 2016, 105: 79–91
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cep.2016.04.006
5 Y Yin, Y Yang, M De Lourdes Mendoza, S Zhai, W Feng, Y Wang, M Gu, L Cai, L Zhang. Progressive freezing and suspension crystallization methods for tetrahydrofuran recovery from Grignard reagent wastewater. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2017, 144: 180–186
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.01.012
6 X Zhang, J He, C Cui, J Sun. A systematic process synthesis method towards sustainable extractive distillation processes with preconcentration for separating the binary minimum azeotropes. Chemical Engineering Science, 2020, 227: 115932
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2020.115932
7 E Graczová, B Šulgan, S Barabas, P Steltenpohl. Methyl acetatemethanol mixture separation by extractive distillation: economic aspects. Frontiers of Chemical Science and Engineering, 2018, 12(4): 670–682
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11705-018-1769-9
8 C Wang, Z Zhang, X Zhang, C Guang, J Gao. Comparison of pressure-swing distillation with or without crossing curved-boundary for separating a multiazeotropic ternary mixture. Separation and Purification Technology, 2019, 220: 114–125
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2019.03.047
9 S Liang, Y Cao, X Liu, X Li, Y Zhao, Y Wang, Y Wang. Insight into pressure-swing distillation from azeotropic phenomenon to dynamic control. Chemical Engineering Research & Design, 2017, 117: 318–335
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2016.10.040
10 Z Han, Y Ren, H Li, X Li, X Gao. Simultaneous extractive and azeotropic distillation separation process for production of PODEn from formaldehyde and methylal. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2019, 58(13): 5252–5260
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.8b06044
11 E Haaz, B Szilagyi, D Fozer, A J Toth. Combining extractive heterogeneous-azeotropic distillation and hydrophilic pervaporation for enhanced separation of non-ideal ternary mixtures. Frontiers of Chemical Science and Engineering, 2020, 14(5): 913–927
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11705-019-1877-1
12 A Yang, W Shen, S Wei, L Dong, J Li, V Gerbaud. Design and control of pressure-swing distillation for separating ternary systems with three binary minimum azeotropes. AIChE Journal. American Institute of Chemical Engineers, 2019, 65(4): 1281–1293
https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.16526
13 W Li, L Zhong, Y He, J Meng, F Yao, Y Guo, C Xu. Multiple steady-states analysis and unstable operating point stabilization in homogeneous azeotropic distillation with intermediate entrainer. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2015, 54(31): 7668–7686
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.5b00572
14 V Gerbaud, I Rodriguez Donis, L Hegely, P Lang, F Denes, X You. Review of extractive distillation. Process design, operation, optimization and control. Chemical Engineering Research & Design, 2019, 141: 229–271
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2018.09.020
15 H Li, Y Wu, X Li, X Gao. State-of-the-art of advanced distillation technologies in China. Chemical Engineering & Technology, 2016, 39(5): 815–833
https://doi.org/10.1002/ceat.201500656
16 A Yang, S Sun, T Shi, D Xu, J Ren, W Shen. Energy-efficient extractive pressure-swing distillation for separating binary minimum azeotropic mixture dimethyl carbonate and ethanol. Separation and Purification Technology, 2019, 229: 115817
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2019.115817
17 T Shi, A Yang, S Jin, W Shen, S Wei, J Ren. Comparative optimal design and control of two alternative approaches for separating heterogeneous mixtures isopropyl alcohol-isopropyl acetate-water with four azeotropes. Separation and Purification Technology, 2019, 225: 1–17
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2019.05.061
18 Q Pan, X Shang, J Li, S Ma, L Li, L Sun. Energy-efficient separation process and control scheme for extractive distillation of ethanol-water using deep eutectic solvent. Separation and Purification Technology, 2019, 219: 113–126
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2019.03.022
19 X Shi, X Zhu, X Zhao, Z Zhang. Performance evaluation of different extractive distillation processes for separating ethanol/tert-butanol/water mixture. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 2020, 137: 246–260
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2020.02.015
20 A Yang, H Zou, I L Chien, D Wang, S Wei, J Ren, W Shen. Optimal design and effective control of triple-column extractive distillation for separating ethyl acetate/ethanol/water with multiazeotrope. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2019, 58(17): 7265–7283
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.9b00466
21 S Cignitti, I Rodriguez-Donis, J Abildskov, X You, N Shcherbakova, V Gerbaud. CAMD for entrainer screening of extractive distillation process based on new thermodynamic criteria. Chemical Engineering Research & Design, 2019, 147: 721–733
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2019.04.038
22 H C Woo, Y H Kim. Solvent selection for extractive distillation using molecular simulation. AIChE Journal. American Institute of Chemical Engineers, 2019, 65(9): e16665
https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.16665
23 Y Cui, Z Zhang, X Shi, C Guang, J Gao. Triple-column side-stream extractive distillation optimization via simulated annealing for the benzene/isopropanol/water separation. Separation and Purification Technology, 2020, 236: 116303
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2019.116303
24 Z Zhu, G Li, Y Dai, P Cui, D Xu, Y Wang. Determination of a suitable index for a solvent via two-column extractive distillation using a heuristic method. Frontiers of Chemical Science and Engineering, 2020, 14(5): 824–833
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11705-019-1867-3
25 W Shen, L Dong, S Wei, J Li, H Benyounes, X You, V Gerbaud. Systematic design of an extractive distillation for maximum-boiling azeotropes with heavy entrainers. AIChE Journal. American Institute of Chemical Engineers, 2015, 61(11): 3898–3910
https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.14908
26 M Blahušiak, A A Kiss, K Babic, S R A Kersten, G Bargeman, B Schuur. Insights into the selection and design of fluid separation processes. Separation and Purification Technology, 2018, 194: 301–318
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2017.10.026
27 R Gani, E Brignole. Molecular design of solvents for liquid extraction based on UNIFAC. Fluid Phase Equilibria, 1983, 13: 331–340
https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-3812(83)80104-6
28 C Gertig, L Kröger, L Fleitmann, J Scheffczyk, A Bardow, K Leonhard. Rx-COSMO-CAMD: computer-aided molecular design of reaction solvents based on predictive kinetics from quantum chemistry. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2019, 58(51): 22835–22846
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.9b03232
29 Q Liu, L Zhang, L Liu, J Du, Q Meng, R Gani. Computer-aided reaction solvent design based on transition state theory and COSMO-SAC. Chemical Engineering Science, 2019, 202: 300–317
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2019.03.023
30 T Zhou, J Wang, K McBride, K Sundmacher. Optimal design of solvents for extractive reaction processes. AIChE Journal. American Institute of Chemical Engineers, 2016, 62(9): 3238–3249
https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.15360
31 L Zhang, J Pang, Y Zhuang, L Liu, J Du, Z Yuan. Integrated solvent-process design methodology based on COSMO-SAC and quantum mechanics for TMQ (2,2,4-trimethyl-1,2-H-dihydroquinoline) production. Chemical Engineering Science, 2020, 226: 115894
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2020.115894
32 Z Song, C Zhang, Z Qi, T Zhou, K Sundmacher. Computer-aided design of ionic liquids as solvents for extractive desulfurization. AIChE Journal. American Institute of Chemical Engineers, 2018, 64(3): 1013–1025
https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.15994
33 H Chao, Z Song, H Cheng, L Chen, Z Qi. Computer-aided design and process evaluation of ionic liquids for n-hexane-methylcyclopentane extractive distillation. Separation and Purification Technology, 2018, 196: 157–165
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2017.06.054
34 T Zhou, Z Song, X Zhang, R Gani, K Sundmacher. Optimal solvent design for extractive distillation processes: a multiobjective optimization-based hierarchical framework. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2019, 58(15): 5777–5786
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.8b04245
35 R O Silva, C M Torres, L Bonfim Rocha, O C M Lima, A Coutu, L Jiménez, L M M Jorge. Multi-objective optimization of an industrial ethanol distillation system for vinasse reduction—a case study. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2018, 183: 956–963
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.179
36 T Waltermann, T Grueters, D Muenchrath, M Skiborowski. Efficient optimization-based design of energy-integrated azeotropic distillation processes. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 2020, 133: 106676
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2019.106676
37 D Krone, E Esche, N Asprion, M Skiborowski, J U Repke. Conceptual design based on superstructure optimization in GAMS with accurate thermodynamic models. Computer-Aided Chemical Engineering, 2020, 48: 15–20
https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-823377-1.50146-4
38 X Li, C Cui, H Li, X Gao. Process synthesis and simulation-based optimization of ethylbenzene/styrene separation using double-effect heat integration and self-heat recuperation technology: a techno-economic analysis. Separation and Purification Technology, 2019, 228: 115760
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2019.115760
39 Y Su, S Jin, X Zhang, W Shen, M R Eden, J Ren. Stakeholder-oriented multi-objective process optimization based on an improved genetic algorithm. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 2020, 132: 106618
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2019.106618
40 K F Kruber, T Grueters, M Skiborowski. Efficient design of intensified extractive distillation processes based on a hybrid optimization approach. Computer-Aided Chemical Engineering, 2019, 46: 859–864
https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-818634-3.50144-2
41 A Yang, Y Su, I L Chien, S Jin, C Yan, S Wei, W Shen. Investigation of an energy-saving double-thermally coupled extractive distillation for separating ternary system benzene/toluene/cyclohexane. Energy, 2019, 186: 115756
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2019.07.086
42 X You, J Gu, V Gerbaud, C Peng, H Liu. Optimization of pre-concentration, entrainer recycle and pressure selection for the extractive distillation of acetonitrile-water with ethylene glycol. Chemical Engineering Science, 2018, 177: 354–368
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2017.11.035
43 S O Momoh. Assessing the accuracy of selectivity as a basis for solvent screening in extractive distillation processes. Separation Science and Technology, 1991, 26(5): 729–742
https://doi.org/10.1080/01496399108049911
44 J Marrero, R Gani. Group-contribution based estimation of pure component properties. Fluid Phase Equilibria, 2001, 183: 183–208
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-3812(01)00431-9
45 I Rodriguez Donis, V Gerbaud, X Joulia. Thermodynamic insights on the feasibility of homogeneous batch extractive distillation, 1. azeotropic mixtures with a heavy entrainer. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2009, 48(7): 3544–3559
https://doi.org/10.1021/ie801060n
46 J M Douglas. Conceptual Design of Chemical Processes. 1st ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1988, 461–462
47 W L Luyben. Distillation Design and Control Using Aspen Simulation. 1st ed. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, 2013, 87–89
48 Q Zhang, M Liu, C Li, A Zeng. Heat-integrated pressure-swing distillation process for separation of the maximum-boiling azeotrope diethylamine and methanol. Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers, 2018, 93: 644–659
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtice.2018.09.018
49 J Yang, X Pan, M Yu, P Cui, Y Ma, Y Wang, J Gao. Vaporliquid equilibrium for binary and ternary systems of tetrahydrofuran, ethyl acetate and N-methyl pyrrolidone at pressure 101.3 kPa. Journal of Molecular Liquids, 2018, 268: 19–25
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2018.07.038
50 M Xia, H Shi, C Niu, Z Ma, H Lu, Y Xiao, B Hou, L Jia, D Li. The importance of pressure-sensitive pinch/azeotrope feature on economic distillation design. Separation and Purification Technology, 2020, 250: 116753
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2020.116753
[1] FCE-20101-OF-YA_suppl_1 Download
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed