Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Chemical Science and Engineering

ISSN 2095-0179

ISSN 2095-0187(Online)

CN 11-5981/TQ

邮发代号 80-969

2019 Impact Factor: 3.552

Frontiers of Chemical Science and Engineering  2022, Vol. 16 Issue (6): 963-972   https://doi.org/10.1007/s11705-021-2081-7
  本期目录
A microextraction approach for rapid extraction and separation of Mn(II) and Co(II) using saponified D2EHPA system
Yiwei Zhou, Chen Zhuo, Jinpei Huang, Haipeng Liu, Jianhong Xu()
The State Key Laboratory of Chemical Engineering, Department of Chemical Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
 全文: PDF(1361 KB)   HTML
Abstract

In this paper, we proposed a microextraction approach for the extraction and separation of Mn(II) and Co(II) from sulfate solution simulating leachate of spent lithium-ion battery cathode materials using saponified di-(2-ethylhexyl)phosphoric acid system. The effects of the following operational variables were investigated: equilibrium pH, tri-n-butyl phosphate concentration, saponification rate, two-phase ratio and residence time. The results showcased that the microextractor can reach the extraction equilibrium within 20 s, thereby greatly reducing necessary extraction time comparing to that of conventional processes. The volumetric mass transfer coefficient showed 8–21 times larger than that of batch device. With the help of microextractor, 95% of Mn(II) was extracted with a single theoretical stage at a chosen two-phase ratio of 3:1, and the separation factor βMn/Co was as large as 65.5. In the subsequent stripping step, more than 99% of manganese from loaded phase was easily stripped under optimal conditions. The microextraction approach greatly enhances the mass transfer while enabling a continuous and controllable extraction process within a simple structure design. When extracting spent electrode material with microextractors, the comprehensive recovery of mangenese can reach 96%. The microextraction approach has a good applicability in the spent lithium-ion battery cathode materials recycling at both bench and industrial scales.

Key wordsextraction equilibrium    mass transfer coefficient    microextraction    multicomponent extraction    di-(2-ethylhexyl)phosphoric acid
收稿日期: 2021-03-30      出版日期: 2022-06-28
Corresponding Author(s): Jianhong Xu   
 引用本文:   
. [J]. Frontiers of Chemical Science and Engineering, 2022, 16(6): 963-972.
Yiwei Zhou, Chen Zhuo, Jinpei Huang, Haipeng Liu, Jianhong Xu. A microextraction approach for rapid extraction and separation of Mn(II) and Co(II) using saponified D2EHPA system. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng., 2022, 16(6): 963-972.
 链接本文:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fcse/CN/10.1007/s11705-021-2081-7
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fcse/CN/Y2022/V16/I6/963
Fig.1  
Fig.2  
Fig.3  
Fig.4  
Fig.5  
Experimental method R kLa/ s 1
Microextraction approach 1 0.19
Microextraction approach 2 0.30
Batch method 1 0.023
Batch method 2 0.014
Tab.1  
Fig.6  
Fig.7  
Fig.8  
Fig.9  
1 International Energy Agency. Global EV Outlook 2019: Scaling-up the Transition to Electric Mobility. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2019, 16–17
2 G Harper, R Sommerville, E Kendrick, L Driscoll, P Slater, R Stolkin, A Walton, P Christensen, O Heidrich, S Lambert, et al.Recycling lithium-ion batteries from electric vehicles. Nature, 2019, 575(7781): 75–86
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1682-5
3 W Lv, Z Wang, H Cao, Y Sun, Y Zhang, Z Sun. A critical review and analysis on the recycling of spent lithium-ion batteries. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering, 2018, 6(2): 1504–1521
https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b03811
4 J W Fergus. Recent developments in cathode materials for lithium ion batteries. Journal of Power Sources, 2010, 195(4): 939–954
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.08.089
5 K M Winslow, S J Laux, T G Townsend. A review on the growing concern and potential management strategies of waste lithium-ion batteries. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 2018, 129: 263–277
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.11.001
6 M K Jha, A Kumari, A K Jha, V Kumar, J Hait, B D Pandey. Recovery of lithium and cobalt from waste lithium ion batteries of mobile phone. Waste Management (New York, N.Y.), 2013, 33(9): 1890–1897
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2013.05.008
7 B Swain, J Jeong, J Lee, G H Lee, J S Sohn. Hydrometallurgical process for recovery of cobalt from waste cathodic active material generated during manufacturing of lithium ion batteries. Journal of Power Sources, 2007, 167(2): 536–544
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.02.046
8 G Dorella, M B Mansur. A study of the separation of cobalt from spent Li-ion battery residues. Journal of Power Sources, 2007, 170(1): 210–215
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.04.025
9 M R Hossain, S Nash, G Rose, S Alam. Cobalt loaded D2EHPA for selective separation of manganese from cobalt electrolyte solution. Hydrometallurgy, 2011, 107(3-4): 137–140
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydromet.2011.02.011
10 N V Thakur. Extraction studies of base metals (Mn, Cu, Co and Ni) using the extractant 2-ethylhexyl 2-ethylhexyl phosphonic acid, PC 88A. Hydrometallurgy, 1998, 48(1): 125–131
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-386X(97)00061-3
11 F Wang, F He, J Zhao, N Sui, L Xu, H Liu. Extraction and separation of cobalt(II), copper(II) and manganese(II) by Cyanex272, PC-88A and their mixtures. Separation and Purification Technology, 2012, 93: 8–14
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2012.03.018
12 B Swain, C Mishra, J Jeong, J Lee, H S Hong, B D Pandey. Separation of Co(II) and Li(I) with Cyanex 272 using hollow fiber supported liquid membrane: a comparison with flat sheet supported liquid membrane and dispersive solvent extraction process. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2015, 271: 61–70
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2015.02.040
13 S H Joo, S M Shin, D Shin, C Oh, J P Wang. Extractive separation studies of manganese from spent lithium battery leachate using mixture of PC88A and Versatic 10 acid in kerosene. Hydrometallurgy, 2015, 156: 136–141
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydromet.2015.06.002
14 J M Zhao, X Y Shen, F L Deng, F C Wang, Y Wu, H Z Liu. Synergistic extraction and separation of valuable metals from waste cathodic material of lithium ion batteries using Cyanex272 and PC-88A. Separation and Purification Technology, 2011, 78(3): 345–351
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2010.12.024
15 N K Batchu, C H Sonu, M S Lee. Solvent extraction equilibrium and modeling studies of manganese from sulfate solutions by a mixture of Cyanex 301 and TBP. Hydrometallurgy, 2014, 144–145: 1–6
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydromet.2014.01.009
16 C Y Cheng. Purification of synthetic laterite leach solution by solvent extraction using D2EHPA. Hydrometallurgy, 2000, 56(3): 369–386
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-386X(00)00095-5
17 A Azizitorghabeh, F Rashchi, A Babakhani, M Noori. Synergistic extraction and separation of Fe(III) and Zn(II) using TBP and D2EHPA. Separation Science and Technology, 2017, 52(3): 476–486
https://doi.org/10.1080/01496395.2016.1250778
18 D Haghshenas Fatmehsari, D Darvishi, S Etemadi, A R Eivazi Hollagh, E Keshavarz Alamdari, A A Salardini. Interaction between TBP and D2EHPA during Zn, Cd, Mn, Cu, Co and Ni solvent extraction: a thermodynamic and empirical approach. Hydrometallurgy, 2009, 98(1–2): 143–147
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydromet.2009.04.010
19 D Ciceri, J M Perera, G W Stevens. The use of microfluidic devices in solvent extraction. Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology (Oxford, Oxfordshire), 2013, 89(6): 771–786
https://doi.org/10.1002/jctb.4318
20 J H Xu, J Tan, S W Li, G S Luo. Enhancement of mass transfer performance of liquid-liquid system by droplet flow in microchannels. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2008, 141(1): 242–249
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2007.12.030
21 E Kamio, Y Seike, H Yoshizawa, H Matsuyama, T Ono. Microfluidic extraction of docosahexaenoic acid ethyl ester: comparison between slug flow and emulsion. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, American Chemical Society, 2011, 50(11): 6915–6924
https://doi.org/10.1021/ie102207c
22 M Tokeshi, T Minagawa, K Uchiyama, A Hibara, K Sato, H Hisamoto, T Kitamori. Continuous-flow chemical processing on a microchip by combining microunit operations and a multiphase flow network. Analytical Chemistry, 2002, 74(7): 1565–1571
https://doi.org/10.1021/ac011111z
23 M Darekar, N Sen, K K Singh, S Mukhopadhyay, K T Shenoy, S K Ghosh. Liquid-liquid extraction in microchannels with Zinc-D2EHPA system. Hydrometallurgy, 2014, 144–145: 54–62
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydromet.2014.01.010
24 J D Tice, A D Lyon, R F Ismagilov. Effects of viscosity on droplet formation and mixing in microfluidic channels. Analytica Chimica Acta, 2004, 507(1): 73–77
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2003.11.024
25 Y Song, Z Zhao, L He. Lithium recovery from Li3PO4 leaching liquor: solvent extraction mechanism of saponified D2EHPA system. Separation and Purification Technology, 2020, 249: 117161
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2020.117161
26 Y Hirayama, M Hinoue, H Tokumoto, A Matsuoka, K Noishiki, A Muto. Liquid-liquid extraction and separation of cobalt and lithium ions using a slug flow microreactor. Journal of Chemical Engineering of Japan, 2018, 51(3): 222–228
https://doi.org/10.1252/jcej.17we152
27 A Muto, Y Hirayama, H Tokumoto, A Matsuoka, K Noishiki. Liquid-liquid extraction of lithium ions using a slug flow microreactor: effect of extraction reagent and microtube material. Solvent Extraction and Ion Exchange, 2017, 35(1): 61–73
https://doi.org/10.1080/07366299.2016.1272388
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed