Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Chemical Science and Engineering

ISSN 2095-0179

ISSN 2095-0187(Online)

CN 11-5981/TQ

邮发代号 80-969

2019 Impact Factor: 3.552

Frontiers of Chemical Science and Engineering  2022, Vol. 16 Issue (8): 1198-1210   https://doi.org/10.1007/s11705-021-2133-z
  本期目录
Sulfonic acid-functionalized mesoporous silica catalyst with different morphology for biodiesel production
Vinayak Hegde, Parimal Pandit, Pranita Rananaware, Varsha P. Brahmkhatri()
Centre for Nano and Material Sciences, Jain University, Jain Global Campus, Bengaluru 562112, India
 全文: PDF(5900 KB)   HTML
Abstract

Sulfonic acid functionalized mesoporous silica based solid acid catalysts with different morphology were designed and fabricated. The synthesized materials were characterized by various physicochemical and spectroscopic techniques like scanning electron microscope-energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, Brunauer–Emmett–Teller surface area, thermogravimetric analysis and n-butylamine acidity. The shape of catalysts particles plays an important role in its activity. The sulfonic acid functionalized mesoporous silica catalysts of spherical shape and the cube shape were assessed for catalytic activity in biodiesel production. The catalytic biodiesel production reaction over the catalysts were studied by esterification of free fatty acid, oleic acid with methanol. The effect of various reaction parameters such as catalyst concentration, acid/alcohol molar ratio, catalyst amount, reaction temperature and reaction time on catalytic activity were investigated to optimize the conditions for maximum conversion. It was sulfonated cubic shape mesoporous silica which exhibited better activity as compared to the spherical shape silica catalysts. Additionally, the catalyst was regenerated and reused up to three cycles without any significant loss in activity. The present catalysts exhibit superior performance in biodiesel production and it can be used for the several biodiesel feedstock’s that are rich in free fatty acids.

Key wordssolid acid catalyst    mesoporous silica    sulfonic acid    biodiesel    esterification    oleic acid
收稿日期: 2021-06-05      出版日期: 2022-08-02
Corresponding Author(s): Varsha P. Brahmkhatri   
 引用本文:   
. [J]. Frontiers of Chemical Science and Engineering, 2022, 16(8): 1198-1210.
Vinayak Hegde, Parimal Pandit, Pranita Rananaware, Varsha P. Brahmkhatri. Sulfonic acid-functionalized mesoporous silica catalyst with different morphology for biodiesel production. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng., 2022, 16(8): 1198-1210.
 链接本文:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fcse/CN/10.1007/s11705-021-2133-z
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fcse/CN/Y2022/V16/I8/1198
  
Fig.1  
Fig.2  
Material O/% Si/% S/%
SNP 59.00 41.00
S–SH 44.77 51.21 4.02
S–SOH 47.93 50.53 1.54
CNP 58.85 41.18
C–SH 64.55 30.41 5.04
C–SOH 67.43 30.22 2.35
Tab.1  
Fig.3  
Fig.4  
Materials Surface area/(m2·g–1) Pore diameter/nm n-Butyl amine acidity/(mmol·g–1)
SNP 1078 6.26 0.21
S–SH 808 5.51
S–SOH 1204 5.78 1.13
CNP 1044 4.00 0.48
C–SH 831 3.78
C–SOH 1464 4.95 1.55
Tab.2  
Fig.5  
Fig.6  
Fig.7  
Fig.8  
Fig.9  
Fig.10  
  
Material Substrate Amount of catalyst Mole ratio alcohol/acid Reaction time Reaction temperature/°C Conversion/% Ref.
C–SOH OA 75 mg 40:1 8 h 60 92 Present work
S–SOH OA 75 mg 40:1 8 h 60 78 Present work
MIL–101(Cr)–SO3H OA 0.1 g 10 mL methanol, 1 mL
OA
20 min 120 93 [42]
Coal-based solid acid OA 8% Methanol: oleic acid 10:1 4 h 67 97 [43]
ICS–SO3H Palm fatty
acid distillate
2% Methanol:palm fatty acid distillate 10:1 3 h 75 94 [44]
Sulfonated activated
carbon
OA 12% Ethanol:OA 7:1 3 h 85 96 [45]
SO3H@ZrP OA 5% Methanol:oleic acid 9:1 5 h 65 89 [46]
HSiW/SBA-15 OA 0.40 g Methanol:OA 20:1 8 h 60 89.7 [47]
ZS/HMS Citric acid 0.31 Citric acid (0.05?mol), n-butanol (0.2?mol) 2 h 120 93 [48]
Tab.3  
1 S Yang, Y Yang, R K Kankala, B Li. Sustainability assessment of synfuels from biomass or coal: an insight on the economic and ecological burdens. Renewable Energy, 2018, 118: 870–878
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2017.11.073
2 A Demirbas. Importance of biodiesel as transportation fuel. Energy Policy, 2007, 35(9): 4661–4670
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2007.04.003
3 A Demirbas. Progress and recent trends in biodiesel fuels. Energy Conversion and Management, 2009, 50(1): 14–34
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2008.09.001
4 B Chen, J Wang, T He, F Jie, B Chen. Impact of biodiesel on engine oil quality: role of methyl oleate and performance of sulfonate detergent additive. Fuel, 2019, 244: 454–460
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2019.02.045
5 P V Navaneeth, C K Suraj, P S Mehta, K Anand. Predicting the effect of biodiesel composition on the performance and emission of a compression ignition engine using a phenomenological model. Fuel, 2021, 293: 120453
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2021.120453
6 R Jothiramalingam, M K Wang. Review of recent developments in solid acid, base, and enzyme catalysts (heterogeneous) for biodiesel production via transesterification. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2009, 48(13): 6162–6172
https://doi.org/10.1021/ie801872t
7 A Kondaiah, Y Sesha Rao, Satishkumar, N D Kamitkar, S Jafar Ali Ibrahim, J Chandradass, T T M Kannan. Influence of blends of castor seed biodiesel and diesel on engine characteristics. Materials Today: Proceedings, 2021, 45: 7043–7049
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.01.653
8 A Macario, G Giordano, B Onida, D Cocina, A Tagarelli, A M Giuffrè. Biodiesel production process by homogeneous/heterogeneous catalytic system using an acid-base catalyst. Applied Catalysis A, General, 2010, 378(2): 160–168
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2010.02.016
9 F Guo, Z G Peng, J Y Dai, Z L Xiu. Calcined sodium silicate as solid base catalyst for biodiesel production. Fuel Processing Technology, 2010, 91(3): 322–328
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2009.11.003
10 N Boon-anuwat, W Kiatkittipong, F Aiouache, S Assabumrungrat. Process design of continuous biodiesel production by reactive distillation: comparison between homogeneous and heterogeneous catalysts. Chemical Engineering and Processing, 2015, 92: 33–44
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cep.2015.03.025
11 S Soltani, U Rashid, S I Al-Resayes, I A Nehdi. Recent progress in synthesis and surface functionalization of mesoporous acidic heterogeneous catalysts for esterification of free fatty acid feedstocks: a review. Energy Conversion and Management, 2017, 141: 183–205
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2016.07.042
12 X Tan, P Sudarsanam, J Tan, A Wang, H Zhang, H Li, S Yang. Sulfonic acid-functionalized heterogeneous catalytic materials for efficient biodiesel production: a review. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 2021, 9(1): 104719
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2020.104719
13 A Patel, V Brahmkhatri, N Singh. Biodiesel production by esterification of free fatty acid over sulfated zirconia. Renewable Energy, 2013, 51: 227–233
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2012.09.040
14 V Brahmkhatri, A Patel. 12-Tungstophosphoric acid anchored to SBA-15: an efficient, environmentally benign reusable catalysts for biodiesel production by esterification of free fatty acids. Applied Catalysis A, General, 2011, 403(1): 161–172
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2011.06.027
15 V Brahmkhatri, A Patel. Biodiesel production by esterification of free fatty acids over 12-tungstophosphoric acid anchored to MCM-41. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2011, 50(11): 6620–6628
https://doi.org/10.1021/ie102066q
16 G Mohammadi Ziarani, N Lashgari, A Badiei. Sulfonic acid-functionalized mesoporous silica (SBA-Pr-SO3H) as solid acid catalyst in organic reactions. Journal of Molecular Catalysis A Chemical, 2015, 397: 166–191
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcata.2014.10.009
17 P Wang, Y Zhao, J Liu. Versatile design and synthesis of mesoporous sulfonic acid catalysts. Science Bulletin, 2018, 63(4): 252–266
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scib.2018.01.017
18 P Verma, Y Kuwahara, K Mori, R Raja, H Yamashita. Functionalized mesoporous SBA-15 silica: recent trends and catalytic applications. Nanoscale, 2020, 12(21): 11333–11363
https://doi.org/10.1039/D0NR00732C
19 J A S Costa, R A de Jesus, D O Santos, J B Neris, R T Figueiredo, C M Paranhos. Synthesis, functionalization, and environmental application of silica-based mesoporous materials of the M41S and SBA-n families: a review. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 2021, 9(3): 105259
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2021.105259
20 T T Hoang Thi, V D Cao, T N Q Nguyen, D T Hoang, V C Ngo, D H Nguyen. Functionalized mesoporous silica nanoparticles and biomedical applications. Materials Science and Engineering C, 2019, 99: 631–656
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2019.01.129
21 H Kholafazad Kordasht, M Pazhuhi, P Pashazadeh-Panahi, M Hasanzadeh, N Shadjou. Multifunctional aptasensors based on mesoporous silica nanoparticles as an efficient platform for bioanalytical applications: recent advances. Trends in Analytical Chemistry, 2020, 124: 115778
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trac.2019.115778
22 J Gañán, S Morante-Zarcero, D Pérez-Quintanilla, I Sierra. 2-Mercaptopyrimidine-functionalized mesostructured silicas to develop electrochemical sensors for a rapid control of scopolamine in tea and herbal tea infusions. Microchemical Journal, 2020, 157: 104877
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.microc.2020.104877
23 I Thushari, S Babel. Sustainable utilization of waste palm oil and sulfonated carbon catalyst derived from coconut meal residue for biodiesel production. Bioresource Technology, 2018, 248: 199–203
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.06.106
24 T Liu, Z Li, W Li, C Shi, Y Wang. Preparation and characterization of biomass carbon-based solid acid catalyst for the esterification of oleic acid with methanol. Bioresource Technology, 2013, 133: 618–621
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2013.01.163
25 E Rafiee, F Mirnezami. Temperature regulated Brønsted acidic ionic liquid-catalyze esterification of oleic acid for biodiesel application. Journal of Molecular Structure, 2017, 1130: 296–302
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molstruc.2016.10.049
26 A F Peixoto, M M A Soliman, T V Pinto, S M Silva, P Costa, E C B A Alegria, C Freire. Highly active organosulfonic aryl-silica nanoparticles as efficient catalysts for biomass derived biodiesel and fuel additives. Biomass and Bioenergy, 2021, 145: 105936
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2020.105936
27 P Zhang, H Wu, M Fan, W Sun, P Jiang, Y Dong. Direct and postsynthesis of tin-incorporated SBA-15 functionalized with sulfonic acid for efficient biodiesel production. Fuel, 2019, 235: 426–432
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2018.08.029
28 P Kasinathan, C Lang, E M Gaigneaux, A M Jonas, A E Fernandes. Influence of site pairing in hydrophobic silica-supported sulfonic acid bifunctional catalysts. Langmuir, 2020, 36(46): 13743–13751
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.langmuir.0c01759
29 R Viscardi, V Barbarossa, R Maggi, F Pancrazzi. Effect of acidic MCM-41 mesoporous silica functionalized with sulfonic acid groups catalyst in conversion of methanol to dimethyl ether. Energy Reports, 2020, 6: 49–55
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2020.10.042
30 Z Tai, M A Isaacs, C M A Parlett, A F Lee, K Wilson. High activity magnetic core-mesoporous shell sulfonic acid silica nanoparticles for carboxylic acid esterification. Catalysis Communications, 2017, 92: 56–60
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catcom.2017.01.004
31 E M Usai, M F Sini, D Meloni, V Solinas, A Salis. Sulfonic acid-functionalized mesoporous silicas: microcalorimetric characterization and catalytic performance toward biodiesel synthesis. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, 2013, 179: 54–62
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2013.05.008
32 T T V Tran, M Obpirompoo, S Kongparakul, S Karnjanakom, P Reubroycharoen, G Guan, N Chanlek, C Samart. Glycerol valorization through production of di-glyceryl butyl ether with sulfonic acid functionalized KIT-6 catalyst. Carbon Resources Conversion, 2020, 3: 182–189
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crcon.2020.12.003
33 C Decarpigny, R Bleta, A Ponchel, E Monflier. Oxidation of 2,5-diformfylfuran to 2,5-furandicarboxylic acid catalyzed by Candida antarctica lipase B immobilized in a cyclodextrin-templated mesoporous silica. The critical role of pore characteristics on the catalytic performance. Colloids and Surfaces. B, Biointerfaces, 2021, 200: 111606
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2021.111606
34 S Rahman, S Shah, C Santra, D Sen, S Sharma, J K Pandey, S Mazumder, B Chowdhury. Controllable synthesis of niobium doped mesoporous silica materials with various morphologies and its activity for oxidative catalysis. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, 2016, 226: 169–178
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2015.12.049
35 A Patel, V Brahmkhatri. Kinetic study of oleic acid esterification over 12-tungstophosphoric acid catalyst anchored to different mesoporous silica supports. Fuel Processing Technology, 2013, 113: 141–149
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2013.03.022
36 X Wang, Y Zhang, W Luo, A A Elzatahry, X Cheng, A Alghamdi, A M Abdullah, Y Deng, D Zhao. Synthesis of ordered mesoporous silica with tunable morphologies and pore sizes via a nonpolar solvent-assisted Stöber method. Chemistry of Materials, 2016, 28(7): 2356–2362
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b00499
37 F P Ballistreri, G A Tomaselli, R M Toscano. Selective and mild oxidation of thiols to sulfonic acids by hydrogen peroxide catalyzed by methyltrioxorhenium. Tetrahedron Letters, 2008, 49(20): 3291–3293
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tetlet.2008.03.068
38 S Brunauer, L S Deming, W E Deming, E Teller. On a theory of the van der Waals adsorption of gases. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 1940, 62(7): 1723–1732
https://doi.org/10.1021/ja01864a025
39 E Cano-Serrano, J M Campos-Martin, J L G Fierro. Sulfonic acid-functionalized silica through quantitative oxidation of thiol groups. Chemical Communications, 2003, (2): 246–247
https://doi.org/10.1039/b210766j
40 M Kruk, M Jaroniec, A J L Sayari. Application of large pore MCM-41 molecular sieves to improve pore size analysis using nitrogen adsorption measurements. Langmuir, 1997, 13(23): 6267–6273
https://doi.org/10.1021/la970776m
41 R J Isaifan, S Ntais, E A Baranova. Particle size effect on catalytic activity of carbon-supported Pt nanoparticles for complete ethylene oxidation. Applied Catalysis A, General, 2013, 464-465: 87–94
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2013.05.027
42 Z Hasan, J W Jun, S H Jhung. Sulfonic acid-functionalized MIL-101(Cr): an efficient catalyst for esterification of oleic acid and vapor-phase dehydration of butanol. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2015, 278: 265–271
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2014.09.025
43 H Yu, S Niu, C Lu, J Li, Y Yang. Sulfonated coal-based solid acid catalyst synthesis and esterification intensification under ultrasound irradiation. Fuel, 2017, 208: 101–110
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2017.06.122
44 M C Nongbe, T Ekou, L Ekou, K B Yao, E Le Grognec, F X Felpin. Biodiesel production from palm oil using sulfonated graphene catalyst. Renewable Energy, 2017, 106: 135–141
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2017.01.024
45 S Niu, Y Ning, C Lu, K Han, H Yu, Y Zhou. Esterification of oleic acid to produce biodiesel catalyzed by sulfonated activated carbon from bamboo. Energy Conversion and Management, 2018, 163: 59–65
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2018.02.055
46 Y Zhou, H Ding, J Liu, R S Parnas, A Clearfield, M Xiao, Y Meng, L Sun. Solid acid catalyst based on single-layer α-zirconium phosphate nanosheets for biodiesel production via esterification. Catalysts, 2018, 8(1): 1–17
https://doi.org/10.3390/catal8010017
47 Y Chen, Y Cao, Y Suo, G P Zheng, X X Guan, X C Zheng. Mesoporous solid acid catalysts of 12-tungstosilicic acid anchored to SBA-15: characterization and catalytic properties for esterification of oleic acid with methanol. Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers, 2015, 51: 186–192
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtice.2015.01.008
48 H Yang, H Song, H Zhang, P Chen, Z Zhao. Esterification of citric acid with n-butanol over zirconium sulfate supported on molecular sieves. Journal of Molecular Catalysis A Chemical, 2014, 381: 54–60
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcata.2013.10.001
[1] FCE-21067-OF-HV_suppl_1 Download
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed