Radicals are important intermediates in direct coal liquefaction. Certain radicals can cause the cleavage of chemical bonds. At high temperatures, radical fragments can be produced by the splitting of large organic molecules, which can break strong chemical bonds through the induction pyrolysis of radicals. The reaction between the formation and annihilation of coal radical fragments and the effect of hydrogen-donor solvents on the radical fragments are discussed in lignite hydrogenolysis. Using the hydroxyl and ether bonds as indicators, the effects of different radicals on the cleavage of chemical bond were investigated employing density functional theory calculations and lignite hydrogenolysis experiments. Results showed that the adjustment of the coal radical fragments could be made by the addition of hydrogen-donor solvents. Results showed that the transition from coal radical fragment to H radical leads to the variation of product distribution. The synergistic mechanism of hydrogen supply and hydrogenolysis of hydrogen-donor solvent was proposed.
. [J]. Frontiers of Chemical Science and Engineering, 2022, 16(12): 1689-1699.
Wang Li, Wen-Ying Li, Xing-Bao Wang, Jie Feng. Regulation of radicals by hydrogen-donor solvent in direct coal liquefaction. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng., 2022, 16(12): 1689-1699.
S Vasireddy, B Morreale, A Cugini, C S Song, J J Spivey. Clean liquid fuels from direct coal liquefaction: chemistry, catalysis, technological status and challenges. Energy & Environmental Science, 2011, 4( 2): 311– 345 https://doi.org/10.1039/C0EE00097C
2
W Y Li W Li J Feng. An overview on issues for lignite direct liquefaction. Journal of the China Coal Society, 2020, 45(1): 414– 423 (in Chinese)
3
Z Chen, J Xie, Q Liu, H Wang, S Gao, L Shi, Z Liu. Characterization of direct coal liquefaction catalysts by their sulfidation behavior and tetralin dehydrogenation activity. Journal of the Energy Institute, 2019, 92( 4): 1213– 1222 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joei.2018.05.009
4
E Dorrestijn, L J J Laarhoven, I W C E Arends, P Mulder. The occurrence and reactivity of phenoxyl linkages in lignin and low rank coal. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis, 2000, 54( 1–2): 153– 192 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-2370(99)00082-0
5
X Y Wei, E Ogata, Z H Qin, J Z Liu, Z M Zong, K Shen, S L Zhou, H Q Li. Advances in the study of hydrogen transfer to model compounds for coal liquefaction. Fuel Processing Technology, 2000, 62( 2–3): 103– 107 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-3820(99)00114-9
6
J Barraza, Silva E Coley, J Piñeres. Effect of temperature, solvent/coal ratio and beneficiation on conversion and product distribution from direct coal liquefaction. Fuel, 2016, 172 : 153– 159 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2015.12.072
7
X B Wang, H H Fan, Z Z Xie, W Y Li. Further discussion on the mechanism of hydrogen transfer in direct coal liquefaction. Catalysis Today, 2021, 374 : 185– 191 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2020.10.009
8
J C Yan, Z Q Bai, J Bai, W Li. Chemical structure and reactivity alterations of brown coals during thermal treatment with aromatic solvents. Fuel Processing Technology, 2015, 137 : 117– 123 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2015.04.009
9
B Niu, L J Jin, Y Li, Z W Shi, H Q Hu. Isotope analysis for understanding the hydrogen transfer mechanism in direct liquefaction of Bulianta coal. Fuel, 2017, 203 : 82– 89 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2017.04.079
10
R R Hou, K L Pang, Z Q Bai, Z H Feng, D H Ye, Z X Guo, L X Kong, J Bai, W Li. Study on carboxyl groups in direct liquefaction of lignite: conjoint analysis of theoretical calculations and experimental methods. Fuel, 2021, 286 : 119298 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2020.119298
11
R R Hou, Z Q Bai, H Y Zheng, Z H Feng, D H Ye, Z X Guo, L X Kong, J Bai, W Li. Behaviors of hydrogen bonds formed by lignite and aromatic solvents in direct coal liquefaction: combination analysis of density functional theory and experimental methods. Fuel, 2020, 265 : 117011 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2020.117011
12
P Hao, Z Q Bai, R R Hou, J L Xu, J Bai, Z X Guo, L X Kong, W Li. Effect of solvent and atmosphere on product distribution, hydrogen consumption and coal structural change during preheating stage in direct coal liquefaction. Fuel, 2018, 211 : 783– 788 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2017.09.122
L Petrakis, D W Grandy. Free radicals in coals and coal conversion. 2. Effect of liquefaction processing conditions on the formation and quenching of coal free radicals. Fuel, 1980, 59( 4): 227– 232 https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-2361(80)90139-8
16
L Petrakis, D W Grandy. Free radicals in coal and coal conversions. 6. Effects of liquefaction process variables on the in-situ observation of free radicals. Fuel, 1981, 60( 11): 1017– 1021 https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-2361(81)90042-9
17
L Petrakis, G L Jones, D W Grandy, A B King. Free radicals in coal and coal conversions. 10. Kinetics and reaction pathways in hydroliquefaction. Fuel, 1983, 62( 6): 681– 689 https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-2361(83)90307-1
18
K H Kim, X Bai, R C Brown. Pyrolysis mechanisms of methoxy substituted α-O-4 lignin dimeric model compounds and detection of free radicals using electron paramagnetic resonance analysis. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis, 2014, 110 : 254– 263 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2014.09.008
19
Z Z Chen, X R Zhang, Z Y Liu, Q Y Liu, T Xu. Quantification of reactive intermediate radicals and their induction effect during pyrolysis of two n-alkylbenzenes. Fuel Processing Technology, 2018, 178 : 126– 132 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2018.05.025
20
X Guo, Z Liu, Y Xiao, X Xu, X Xue, Q Liu. The Boltzmann-Monte-Carlo-Percolation (BMCP) model on pyrolysis of coal: the volatiles’ reactions. Fuel, 2018, 230 : 18– 26 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2018.05.016
21
S S Bi, X J Guo, B Wang, X Xu, L F Zhao, Q Y Liu. A DFT simulation on induction reactions involved radicals during pyrolysis of heavy organics. Journal of Fuel Chemistry & Technology, 2021, 49( 5): 684– 693 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1872-5813(21)60067-1
22
Y Han, D Jiang, J Zhang, W Li, Z Gan, J Gu. Development, applications and challenges of ReaxFF reactive force field in molecular simulations. Frontiers of Chemical Science and Engineering, 2016, 10( 1): 16– 38 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11705-015-1545-z
23
B Yan, G Zhang, P Gao, H Li, S Ren, W Wu. Dissolution behavior of hydrogen in the model recycle solvent of mild direct coal liquefaction. Fuel Processing Technology, 2021, 223 : 106982 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2021.106982
24
J K Bai, X B Zhang, W Li, X B Wang, Z Y Du, W Y Li. Rate constant of hydrogen transfer from H-donor solvents to coal radicals. Fuel, 2022, 318 : 12361 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2022.123621
25
X R Zhang, Z Y Liu, Z Z Chen, T Xu, Q Y Liu. Bond cleavage and reactive radical intermediates in heavy tar thermal cracking. Fuel, 2018, 233 : 420– 426 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2018.06.036
26
C Zhu, J P Cao, X B Feng, X Y Zhao, Z Yang, J Li, M Zhao, Y P Zhao, H C Bai. Theoretical insight into the hydrogenolysis mechanism of lignin dimer compounds based on experiments. Renewable Energy, 2021, 163 : 1831– 1837 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2020.10.094
27
L Li, H J Fan, H Q Hu. A theoretical study on bond dissociation enthalpies of coal based model compounds. Fuel, 2015, 153 : 70– 77 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2015.02.088
28
T Xie, J P Cao, C Zhu, X Y Zhao, M Zhao, Y P Zhao, X Y Wei. Selective cleavage of C–O bond in benzyl phenyl ether over Pd/AC at room temperature. Fuel Processing Technology, 2019, 188 : 190– 196 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2019.02.022
29
L Kong, G Li, L Jin, H Hu. Pyrolysis behaviors of two coal-related model compounds on a fixed-bed reactor. Fuel Processing Technology, 2015, 129 : 113– 119 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2014.09.009
30
W Li J Feng M M Feng X B Wang W Y Li. Distribution, migration and transformation of oxygen during the hydrogenation reaction of lignite. Journal of the China Coal Society, 2021, 46(4): 1080– 1087 (in Chinese)
Y Zhao, D G Truhlar. The M06 suite of density functionals for main group thermochemistry, thermochemical kinetics, noncovalent interactions, excited states, and transition elements: two new functionals and systematic testing of four M06-class functionals and 12 other functionals. Theoretical Chemistry Accounts, 2007, 120( 1–3): 215– 241 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00214-007-0310-x
33
M Biczysko, P Panek, G Scalmani, J Bloino, V Barone. Harmonic and anharmonic vibrational frequency calculations with the double-hybrid B2PLYP method: analytic second derivatives and benchmark studies. Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation, 2010, 6( 7): 2115– 2125 https://doi.org/10.1021/ct100212p
34
K Hemelsoet, V V Speybroeck, M Waroquier. Bond dissociation enthalpies of large aromatic carbon-centered radicals. Journal of Physical Chemistry A, 2008, 112( 51): 13566– 13573 https://doi.org/10.1021/jp801551c
35
S Liang, Y Hou, W Wu, H Li, Z He, S Ren. Residues characteristics and structural evolution of Naomaohu coal during a mild direct liquefaction process. Fuel Processing Technology, 2021, 215 : 106753 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2021.106753
36
J Feng, W Y Li, K C Xie. Research on coal structure using FT-IR. Journal of China University of Mining and Technology, 2002, 31( 5): 362– 366
37
H Shui, X Ma, L Yang, T Shui, C Pan, Z Wang, Z Lei, S Ren, S Kang, C C Xu. Thermolysis of biomass-related model compounds and its promotion on the thermal dissolution of coal. Journal of the Energy Institute, 2017, 90( 3): 418– 423 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joei.2016.04.001
38
C Zhu, S Ding, H Hojo, H Einaga. Controlling diphenyl ether hydrogenolysis selectivity by tuning the Pt support and H-donors under mild conditions. ACS Catalysis, 2021, 11( 20): 12661– 12672 https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.1c03999
39
M J Trewhella, A Grint. Condensation of phenolic groups during coal liquefaction model compound studies. Fuel, 1988, 67( 8): 1135– 1138 https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-2361(88)90383-3
40
J Liu, X Jiang, J Shen, H Zhang. Chemical properties of superfine pulverized coal particles. Part 1. Electron paramagnetic resonance analysis of free radical characteristics. Advanced Powder Technology, 2014, 25( 3): 916– 925 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apt.2014.01.021
