Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Chemical Science and Engineering

ISSN 2095-0179

ISSN 2095-0187(Online)

CN 11-5981/TQ

邮发代号 80-969

2019 Impact Factor: 3.552

Frontiers of Chemical Science and Engineering  2023, Vol. 17 Issue (9): 1141-1161   https://doi.org/10.1007/s11705-022-2230-7
  本期目录
A review on co-pyrolysis of agriculture biomass and disposable medical face mask waste for green fuel production: recent advances and thermo-kinetic models
Melvin X. J. Wee1, Bridgid L. F. Chin1,2(), Agus Saptoro1, Chung L. Yiin3,4, Jiuan J. Chew5, Jaka Sunarso5, Suzana Yusup6, Abhishek Sharma7,8
1. Department of Chemical and Energy Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Science, Curtin University Malaysia, CDT 250, Miri 98009, Malaysia
2. Energy and Environment Research Cluster, Faculty of Engineering and Science, Curtin University Malaysia, CDT 250, Miri 98009, Malaysia
3. Department of Chemical Engineering and Energy Sustainability, Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Malaysia Sarawak (UNIMAS), Kota Samarahan 94300, Malaysia
4. Institute of Sustainable and Renewable Energy (ISuRE), Universiti Malaysia Sarawak (UNIMAS), Kota Samarahan 94300, Malaysia
5. Research Centre for Sustainable Technologies, Faculty of Engineering, Computing and Science, Swinburne University of Technology, Kuching 93350, Malaysia
6. Generation Unit (Fuel Technology & Combustion), Tenaga Nasional Berhad (TNB) Research Sdn Bhd, Kajang 43000, Malaysia
7. Department of Chemical Engineering, Manipal University Jaipur, Jaipur 303007, India
8. Chemical & Environmental Engineering, School of Engineering, RMIT University, Melbourne, Victoria 3000, Australia
 全文: PDF(1893 KB)   HTML
Abstract

The Association of Southeast Asian Nations is blessed with agricultural resources, and with the growing population, it will continue to prosper, which follows the abundance of agricultural biomass. Lignocellulosic biomass attracted researchers’ interest in extracting bio-oil from these wastes. However, the resulting bio-oil has low heating values and undesirable physical properties. Hence, co-pyrolysis with plastic or polymer wastes is adopted to improve the yield and quality of the bio-oil. Furthermore, with the spread of the novel coronavirus, the surge of single-use plastic waste such as disposable medical face mask, can potentially set back the previous plastic waste reduction measures. Therefore, studies of existing technologies and techniques are referred in exploring the potential of disposable medical face mask waste as a candidate for co-pyrolysis with biomass. Process parameters, utilisation of catalysts and technologies are key factors in improving and optimising the process to achieve commercial standard of liquid fuel. Catalytic co-pyrolysis involves a series of complex mechanisms, which cannot be explained using simple iso-conversional models. Hence, advanced conversional models are introduced, followed by the evolutionary models and predictive models, which can solve the non-linear catalytic co-pyrolysis reaction kinetics. The outlook and challenges for the topic are discussed in detail.

Key wordsbiomass    COVID-19 waste    catalyst    pyrolysis    kinetics
收稿日期: 2022-04-16      出版日期: 2023-08-29
Corresponding Author(s): Bridgid L. F. Chin   
 引用本文:   
. [J]. Frontiers of Chemical Science and Engineering, 2023, 17(9): 1141-1161.
Melvin X. J. Wee, Bridgid L. F. Chin, Agus Saptoro, Chung L. Yiin, Jiuan J. Chew, Jaka Sunarso, Suzana Yusup, Abhishek Sharma. A review on co-pyrolysis of agriculture biomass and disposable medical face mask waste for green fuel production: recent advances and thermo-kinetic models. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng., 2023, 17(9): 1141-1161.
 链接本文:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fcse/CN/10.1007/s11705-022-2230-7
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fcse/CN/Y2023/V17/I9/1141
CountryPolicies/strategiesRef.
CambodiaEnergy Sector Development Policy and Rural Electrification Policy, 2007[4]
Rural electrification fund subsidy and investment incentives are provided as support to the policy
? Providing reliable, affordable quality supply of electricity to the consumers
? Promoting private-owned facilities in the renewable energy sector to instigate competition between the companies
? Providing electricity to 70% of the rural households by the year 2030
IndiaThe Electricity Act, 2003[5]
? To encourage the co-generation of electricity with renewable sources
? Specify the terms and conditions for the determination of tariff, which forms the National Electricity Policy and the Tariff policy
Tariff Policy, 2006
? States that renewable energy shall be distributed with a preferential tariff determined by the appropriate commission
? Bidding process within suppliers offering renewable energy from the same source
National Rural Electrification Policies, 2006
? Provision of access of electricity to all households by the year 2009
? Quality and reliable power supply at affordable rates
? Providing off grid solutions for rural areas
Integrated Energy Policy Report (Planning Commission), 2006
Recommends a solution to meet the energy demand of India in an integrated process up to 2031–2032
IndonesiaGovernment Rule No. 3 on Supply of Electricity, 2005[6]
To ease the private-own power producers to set up renewable energy plants
Blueprint of National Energy Implementation Program 2005–2025
? To outline plans for energy supply security
? To provide guidelines for various sectors involving renewable and non-renewable energies
? To provide subsidies to enhance energy efficiency
Presidential Regulation No. 5 on National Energy Policy, 2006
? To set goals to promote diversification of energy sources
? To reduce energy consumption by 1% per year as target
Presidential Decree No. 1 on Supply and Use of Biofuels, 2006
Setting targets and guidelines for biofuels utilisation and development
Ministerial Regulation No. 2 on Medium Scale Power Generation from Renewable Energy Sources, 2006
To set pricing guidelines for projects ranging from 1 to 10 MW
Energy Law, 2007
Providing renewable energy developers with investment incentives
Electricity Law, 2010
To encourage private companies to participate in energy supply
To provide priority in the utilisation of renewable energy
To promote small scaled distributed power generation from renewable sources
Ministerial Regulation No. 4/2012, 2012
To set the Feed-in-Tariff for electricity generated from biomass
Ministerial Regulation No. 27/2014, 2014
? To set goals to increase the renewable energy portion to 23% by the year 2025, and 31% by 2050
? Feed-in-tariffs for renewable energy
? To encourage the government and private sectors to utilise biofuels for power generation
MalaysiaFive-Fuel Diversification Policy, 2001[7]
To include renewable energy in the energy supply mix of power generation
National Biofuel Policy, 2006
? To reduce dependency on fossil fuels
? Providing subsidies to promote the demand for alternate sources of energy
National Renewable Energy Policy and Action Plan, 2010
? Increase the renewable energy contribution in the energy supply mix
? Promote growth of the renewable energy sector
? Maintaining the renewable energy at an affordable price
? Instigate awareness to the community on renewable energy
ThailandCommittee on Biofuel Development and Promotion (CBDP), 2008[8]
Government subsidies from the State Oil Fund biodiesel price reduction
Second Alternative Energy Development Plan (2008–2022), 2008
? To increase the proportion of alternative energy to 20% of the national total energy consumption by 2022
? To utilise renewable energy as a substitute for imported oil
? To increase energy security of Thailand
? Promote integrated green energy utilisation in communities
? Enhance the development of alternative energy industry
? Research and development of efficient technology to harvest renewable energy
VietnamRenewable Energy Action Plan, 2001[9]
Government intervention to promote renewable energy
The Law of Electric, 2004
Support electricity generation from renewable sources by providing investment incentives, preferential electricity prices and taxes
Decision 1855/QD-TTg: 27 Dec 2007
? National Energy Development Strategy up to 2020 with outlook to 2050
? To encourage the development of new and renewable energies, bioenergy to meet the socioeconomic requirements
? To meet the target of 5% of primary commercial energy by 2020 and 11% by 2050
Decision No. 177/QD-TTg:20 Nov 2007
? To develop biofuel, as an alternative for fossil fuels
? To build a legal framework for biofuel development
? To develop materials for biofuel production
? To enhance biofuel extraction
National Program for Biofuels Development, 2011
? Develop biofuel to partly replace fossil fuels
? Create the legal framework for biofuel development
? Develop relevant materials for biofuel production
? Develop biofuel extraction technologies
MyanmarMyanmar Energy Master Plan, 2015[10]
? To study the energy demand development from 2014 to 2035
? To set a goal to achieve 15%–20% share of renewable energy in 2020
? To improve the rural renewable energy usage
? To achieve 57% hydropower, 5% solar and wind by 2030
LaosThe Electric Law, 1997[11]
Setting standards for the administration, production, distribution, transmission and the import and export of electricity
The Power Sector Policy Statement, 2001
? To increase the electricity supply rate to 90% by 2020
? Promotes the public and private partnerships in hydropower development (500 kV grid)
The 8th National Socio-economic Development Plan (NSEDP), 2016–2020
Promotes sustainability and diversification of renewable energy sources
The Renewable Energy Development Strategy
To increase the renewable energy share to 30% and substitute 10% of the transport fuel with biofuels by 2025
PhilippinesR. A. No. 9367: The Biofuels Act, 2006[12]
Encourage the utilisation of biofuel-blended transport fuels by providing fiscal incentives
R. A. No. 9513: The Renewable Energy Act, 2008
? Enhance the renewable energy development by providing fiscal and non-fiscal incentives
? To reduce the country’s reliance of fossil fuels
? Adopts renewable portfolio standards, feed-in-tariffs, net-metering, and Green Energy Option policy instruments
Tab.1  
Fig.1  
SamplePKSPPFEFBRice huskRice straw (RS)Bagasse
Proximate analysis/(wt %)
Moisture5.736.568.754.50
Ash2.215.333.0212.4013.606.50
Volatile matter73.7475.9979.6758.6070.1072.70
Fixed carbon18.3712.398.6524.4016.3020.80
Ultimate analysis/(wt %)
C53.7850.2748.7943.2037.1036.30
H7.207.077.335.005.205.80
S0.510.630.680.000.100.00
N0.000.420.000.300.500.30
O36.336.2840.1851.443.551.10
Tab.2  
Fig.2  
Fig.3  
SamplePPPSLDPEHDPEWaste tires
Proximate analysis/(wt %)
Moisture0.200.001.10
Ash0.100.000.008.10
Volatile matter99.8099.5099.98100.0062.50
Fixed carbon0.000.500.020.0028.20
Ultimate analysis/(wt %)
C85.4089.5085.4785.3484.60
H14.508.5014.2112.227.70
S0.000.000.110.001.40
N0.000.000.080.000.40
O0.002.000.132.444.30
HHV/(MJ·kg–1)46.0040.1046.4036.80
LHV/(MJ·kg–1)43.1043.1035.10
Tab.3  
BiomassCatalystBio-oil yield/(wt %)ReactorScale, feed weight/gRef.
RSHZSM-521.50Microwave pyrolysis200–800[22]
Bagasse22.40
PP74.20
PS92.30
Baggase: PS43.80
B:PP35.70
RS:PS31.20
RS:PP24.50
RSZSM-547.40Fixed bed reactor10[83]
Y zeolite55.20
Mordenite49.10
SBA-1537.30
Rice husk and WGPFHZSM-5/MCM4167.90% hydrocarbon relative contentTubular reactor0.001[81]
HZSM560.20% hydrocarbon relative content
Seaweed biomassZSM-551.48Hydro-pyrolysis10[32]
MCM-4141.84
BambooHZSM-549.14Bubbling fluidised bed100 g·h–1[77]
Tab.4  
BiomassCatalystCategoryBio-oil yield/(wt %)ReactorScale, feed weight/gRef.
EFBFCaOBasic metal oxide39.90 (5 wt % CaO);40.40 (10 wt % CaO)Fixed bed reactor15[85]
MgOBasic metal oxide39.30 (5 wt % MgO);42.30 (10 wt % MgO)
ZnOAcidic metal oxide44.70 (5 wt % ZnO);42.20 (10 wt % ZnO)
Cotton stalkCaOBasic metal oxide50.00Fixed bed reactor[84]
RSMgCl2Metal salt oxide48.40Fixed bed reactor10[83]
FeCl3Metal salt32.20
CuCl2Metal salt41.50
MnCl2Metal salt45.30
CaOBasic metal oxide38.70
CaCO3Basic metal oxide30.50
MgOBasic metal oxide52.10
MgCO3Basic metal oxide42.40
CeO2Acidic metal oxide52.30
ZnOAcidic metal oxide46.20
ZrO2Acidic metal oxide48.30
TiO2Acidic metal oxide48.20
EFBCaOBasic metal oxide58.49Fixed bed reactor50[89]
PETPtMetal catalystTube furnace1[86]
Pd
PP-poplar wood compositeZnOAcidic metal oxidePyrolysis-gas chromatography/mass spectrometry0.5 mg[87]
CaOBasic metal oxide
Fe2O3Acidic metal oxide
MgOBasic metal oxide
Tab.5  
BiomassCatalystBio-oil yield/wt %ReactorScale, feed weight/gRef.
BambooBiochar20.20 (5 wt % biochar)18.70 (10 wt % biochar)16.34 (20 wt % biochar)Microwave pyrolysis50[95]
BambooN-doped biochar61.00 (10 wt % biochar)63.00 (30 wt % biochar)62.00 (50 wt % biochar)Fixed bed reactor3[96]
PKSFe/activated carbon7.96Microwave pyrolysis10[97]
Rice huskRice hull ashFixed bed reactor0.0055[92]
Rice huskCoal bottom ashFixed bed reactor0.0055[93]
PKSRed mud37.37–39.95Fixed bed reactor2[103]
BambooRed mud50.34Bubbling fluidised bed100 g·h–1[77]
EFBPalm oil sludgeFixed bed reactor15[90]
LDPECalcinated fly ash (900 °C)76.22–80.02Semi batch reactor50[98]
Calcinated fly ash (800 °C)70.96–71.36
Natural fly ash68.20–71.70
HDPE (plastic tub pieces)Fly ash (10 wt %)50.84Lab scale pyrolyzer unit1 kg[100]
LDPEKaolin (1350 mesh)64.66% aliphatics,93.91% hydrocarbons, 30.07% H2Quartz furnace tube100[99]
Pine sawdust and PE (50 wt %)Ni-pine sawdust biochar70.40 wt % (gas yield)Fixed bed reactor1[101]
Corn stalk-HDPE mixtureActivated carbonTubular reactor2[102]
Tab.6  
Fig.4  
Biomass/catalystLearning algorithm/ topologyPrediction resultANN parametersRef.
Chlorella vulgarislimestone, HZSM-5PDSEThermal degradationInputs: heating rate; heat flow; reactor temperatureOutputs: remaining mass[88]
Rice husk, sewage sludgeLevenberg–Marquardt (LM)Thermal degradationInputs: reactor temperature; blend compositionOutputs: mass loss[21]
Chlorella vulgaris, peanut shell, microalgae ashLMThermal degradationInputs: heating rate; reactor temperatureOutputs: mass loss[124]
Sewage sludge, peanut shellLMThermal degradationInputs: blend compositions; heating rates; reactor temperatureOutputs: remaining mass[122]
Rice huskScaled conjugate gradient and LMThermal degradationInputs: heating rate; reactor temperatureOutputs: remaining mass[125]
Lignocellulosic biomassRandom forest schematicBiochar yieldDataset: physicochemical properties of lignocellulosic biomass[126]
Sewage sludgeLMHHV of syngasDataset: physicochemical properties of biomass[127]
Mexican sunflower (Tithonia diversifolia)LMBio-oil yieldInputs: heating rate; flow rate; particle size; reactor temperatureOutput: bio-oil yield[128]
Tab.7  
FeedstockCatalystKinetic modelEα/ (kJ·mol–1)A/ min–1ΔH/ (kJ·mol–1)ΔS/ (J·mol–1·K–1)ΔG/ (kJ·mol–1)Ref.
Pterocarpus indicusCoats-redfern112.0103.0–138.0183.00[35]
Intsia bijuga99.089.0–120.0160.00
Corn stover66.057.0–173.0147.00
HDPE546.0533.0420.0226.00
LDPE487.0475.0348.0231.00
PP423.0411.0273.0222.00
Rice hullDAEM175.42.939 × 1017170.2[130]
FWO177.77.991 × 1016172.6
LimestoneDAEM123.35.803 × 1011117.9
LimestoneFWO132.54.148 × 1012127.1
EggshellDAEM96.12.033 × 101090.8
EggshellFWO100.41.948 × 10995.2
Sewage sludge (97.5% conversion)KAS123.61.440 × 106119.5139.4187.69[51]
FWO132.71.560 × 109128.6138.8196.50
Friedman92.40.010388.3295.4232.80
Popescu200.99.740 × 1010196.8219.3304..00
Microalgae:microalgae ash:peanut shell 9:2:9FWO142.62.010 × 1014137.0[124]
Garlic huskKAS154.0149.4150.60[104]
FWO154.9150.4150.50
Starink154.3149.8150.50
Staghorn sumacFWO167.9178.9[106]
KAS169.4167.2
Starink169.8167.6
Azadirachta indicaFWO6.288 × 1015188.5–43.3215.40[30]
Friedman8.586 × 1015190.9–39.4215.40
Vyazovkin2.965 × 1020199.7–26.0215.20
Phyllantus emblicaFWO2.075 × 1014189.9–40.9215.30[30]
Friedman2.864 × 1013181.3–55.1215.60
Vyazovkin3.534 × 1013179.4–58.3215.60
Rice huskFriedman186[92]
KAS178
FWO180
Rice hull ashFriedman148
Rice hull ashKAS148
Rice hull ashFWO146
Chlorella vulgarisKAS156.22.898 × 1020151[131]
FWO158.12.358 × 1020153
HZSM-5KAS145.32.790 × 1014140
HZSM-5FWO147.84.908 × 1014143
LimestoneKAS138.86.360 × 1015133
LimestoneFWO142.18.880 × 1015137
Tab.8  
1 Z A AdnanV Saniayan. Renewable energy outlook for ASEAN: a REmap analysis. Asean Centre for Energy & IRENA Report, 2016
2 M Miranda. Governments across Southeast Asia accelerate renewable energy investment to revive the pandemic-hit economies. Power Technology Report, 2020
3 M Erdiwansyah, R Mamat, M S M Sani, F Khoerunnisa, A Kadarohman. Target and demand for renewable energy across 10 ASEAN countries by 2040. Electricity Journal, 2019, 32(10): 106670
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tej.2019.106670
4 M Sarraf, B Rismanchi, R Saidur, H W Ping, N A Rahim. Renewable energy policies for sustainable development in Cambodia. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2013, 22: 223–229
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.02.010
5 I R Pillai, R Banerjee. Renewable energy in India: status and potential. Energy, 2009, 34(8): 970–980
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2008.10.016
6 S Dani, A Wibawa. Challenges and policy for biomass energy in Indonesia. Journal of International Economic Law, 2018, 15(5): 41–47
7 S Mekhilef, M Barimani, A Safari, Z Salam. Malaysia’s renewable energy policies and programs with green aspects. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2014, 40: 497–504
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.07.095
8 S Wattana. Bioenergy development in Thailand: challenges and strategies. Energy Procedia, 2014, 52: 506–515
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2014.07.104
9 K Truong, C Huong, T Dang Xuan, D Trung, T Khanh. Current status and future plan of development of bioenergy crops as renewable energy sources in Vietnam. Journal of Biology and Nature, 2016, 5: 1–8
10 Myanmar Energy Master Plan. IEA, 2017
11 Energy policy and administration. Open Development Laos Website, 2018
12 Bangkok. East and Southeast Asia renewable energy statistics workshop. IRENA Website, 2016
13 R Hirschmann. Palm oil industry in Indonesia—statistics & facts. Statista Website, 2022
14 Malaysia palm oil production by year. Indexmundi, 2020
15 S K Loh. The potential of the Malaysian oil palm biomass as a renewable energy source. Energy Conversion and Management, 2017, 141: 285–298
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2016.08.081
16 N Kumar, R S Chhokar, R P Meena, A S Kharub, S C Gill, S C Tripathi, O P Gupta, S K Mangrauthia, R M Sundaram, C P Sawant, A Gupta, A Naorem, M Kumar, G P Singh. Challenges and opportunities in productivity and sustainability of rice cultivation system: a critical review in Indian perspective. Cereal Research Communications, 2022, 50: 573–601
https://doi.org/10.1007/s42976-021-00214-5
17 L Dai, Y Wang, Y Liu, C He, R Ruan, Z Yu, L Jiang, Z Zeng, Q Wu. A review on selective production of value-added chemicals via catalytic pyrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass. Science of the Total Environment, 2020, 749: 142386
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142386
18 T Kan, V Strezov, T Evans, J He, R Kumar, Q Lu. Catalytic pyrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass: a review of variations in process factors and system structure. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2020, 134: 110305
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2020.110305
19 P Sivagurunathan, T Raj, C S Mohanta, S Semwal, A Satlewal, R P Gupta, S K Puri, S S V Ramakumar, R Kumar. 2G waste lignin to fuel and high value-added chemicals: approaches, challenges and future outlook for sustainable development. Chemosphere, 2021, 268: 129326
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.129326
20 H Yang, R Yan, H Chen, D H Lee, D T Liang, C Zheng. Pyrolysis of palm oil wastes for enhanced production of hydrogen rich gases. Fuel Processing Technology, 2006, 87(10): 935–942
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2006.07.001
21 S R Naqvi, Z Hameed, R Tariq, S A Taqvi, I Ali, M B K Niazi, T Noor, A Hussain, N Iqbal, M Shahbaz. Synergistic effect on co-pyrolysis of rice husk and sewage sludge by thermal behavior, kinetics, thermodynamic parameters and artificial neural network. Waste Management, 2019, 85: 131–140
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2018.12.031
22 D V Suriapparao, R Vinu, A Shukla, S Haldar. Effective deoxygenation for the production of liquid biofuels via microwave assisted co-pyrolysis of agro residues and waste plastics combined with catalytic upgradation. Bioresource Technology, 2020, 302: 122775
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2020.122775
23 R Geyer, J R Jambeck, K L Law. Production, use, and fate of all plastics ever made. Science Advances, 2017, 3(7): e1700782
https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1700782
24 J R Jambeck, R Geyer, C Wilcox, T R Siegler, M Perryman, A Andrady, R Narayan, K L Law. Plastic waste inputs from land into the ocean. Science, 2015, 347(6223): 768–771
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1260352
25 F Abnisa, P A Alaba. Recovery of liquid fuel from fossil-based solid wastes via pyrolysis technique: a review. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 2021, 9(6): 106593
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2021.106593
26 Y Liang, Q Song, N Wu, J Li, Y Zhong, W Zeng. Repercussions of COVID-19 pandemic on solid waste generation and management strategies. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 2021, 15(6): 115
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-021-1407-5
27 F Chaib. Shortage of personal protective equipment endangering health workers worldwide. World Health Organization Website, 2020
28 Silva A L Patrício, J C Prata, A C Duarte, D Barcelò, T Rocha-Santos. An urgent call to think globally and act locally on landfill disposable plastics under and after Covid-19 pandemic: pollution prevention and technological (Bio) remediation solutions. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2021, 426: 131201
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2021.131201
29 Silva A L Patrício, J C Prata, C Mouneyrac, D Barcelò, A C Duarte, T Rocha-Santos. Risks of Covid-19 face masks to wildlife: present and future research needs. Science of the Total Environment, 2021, 792: 148505
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148505
30 R K Mishra, K Mohanty. Kinetic analysis and pyrolysis behaviour of waste biomass towards its bioenergy potential. Bioresource Technology, 2020, 311: 123480
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2020.123480
31 J Akhtar, N Saidina Amin. A review on operating parameters for optimum liquid oil yield in biomass pyrolysis. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2012, 16(7): 5101–5109
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2012.05.033
32 X Hu, M Gholizadeh. Biomass pyrolysis: a review of the process development and challenges from initial researches up to the commercialisation stage. Journal of Energy Chemistry, 2019, 39: 109–143
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jechem.2019.01.024
33 R Miandad, M A Barakat, M Rehan, A S Aburiazaiza, I M I Ismail, A S Nizami. Plastic waste to liquid oil through catalytic pyrolysis using natural and synthetic zeolite catalysts. Waste Management, 2017, 69: 66–78
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2017.08.032
34 M V Navarro, J M López, A Veses, M S Callén, T García. Kinetic study for the co-pyrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass and plastics using the distributed activation energy model. Energy, 2018, 165: 731–742
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.09.133
35 J N V Salvilla, B I G Ofrasio, A P Rollon, F G Manegdeg, R R M Abarca, M D G de Luna. Synergistic co-pyrolysıs of polyolefin plastics with wood and agricultural wastes for biofuel production. Applied Energy, 2020, 279: 115668
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.115668
36 L Wang, M Chai, R Liu, J Cai. Synergetic effects during co-pyrolysis of biomass and waste tire: a study on product distribution and reaction kinetics. Bioresource Technology, 2018, 268: 363–370
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2018.07.153
37 K B Ansari, S Z Hassan, R Bhoi, E Ahmad. Co-pyrolysis of biomass and plastic wastes: a review on reactants synergy, catalyst impact, process parameter, hydrocarbon fuel potential, COVID-19. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 2021, 9(6): 106436
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2021.106436
38 P Roy, G Dias. Prospects for pyrolysis technologies in the bioenergy sector: a review. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2017, 77: 59–69
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.03.136
39 A V Bridgwater. Review of fast pyrolysis of biomass and product upgrading. Biomass and Bioenergy, 2012, 38: 68–94
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2011.01.048
40 T Y A Fahmy, Y Fahmy, F Mobarak, M El-Sakhawy, R E Abou-Zeid. Biomass pyrolysis: past, present, and future. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 2020, 22(1): 17–32
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-018-0200-5
41 S Papari, K Hawboldt. A review on the pyrolysis of woody biomass to bio-oil: focus on kinetic models. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2015, 52: 1580–1595
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.07.191
42 G Perkins, T Bhaskar, M Konarova. Process development status of fast pyrolysis technologies for the manufacture of renewable transport fuels from biomass. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2018, 90: 292–315
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.03.048
43 S Y Foong, R K Liew, Y Yang, Y W Cheng, P N Y Yek, W A Wan Mahari, X Y Lee, C S Han, D V N Vo, Q Van Le, M Aghbashlo, M Tabatabaei, C Sonne, W Peng, S S Lam. Valorization of biomass waste to engineered activated biochar by microwave pyrolysis: progress, challenges, and future directions. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2020, 389: 124401
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2020.124401
44 F M Tsai, T D Bui, M L Tseng, M K Lim, J Hu. Municipal solid waste management in a circular economy: a data-driven bibliometric analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020, 275: 124132
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124132
45 P Andreo-Martínez, V M Ortiz-Martínez, N García-Martínez, los Ríos A P de, F J Hernández-Fernández, J Quesada-Medina. Production of biodiesel under supercritical conditions: state of the art and bibliometric analysis. Applied Energy, 2020, 264: 114753
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.114753
46 M Losse, M Geissdoerfer. Mapping socially responsible investing: a bibliometric and citation network analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2021, 296: 126376
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126376
47 J Murillo, L M Villegas, L M Ulloa-Murillo, A R Rodríguez. Recent trends on omics and bioinformatics approaches to study SARS-CoV-2: a bibliometric analysis and mini-review. Computers in Biology and Medicine, 2021, 128: 104162
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2020.104162
48 G Bensidhom, A Ben Hassen Trabelsi, M A mahmood, S Ceylan. mahmood M A, Ceylan S. Insights into pyrolytic feedstock potential of date palm industry wastes: kinetic study and product characterization. Fuel, 2021, 285: 119096
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2020.119096
49 A Domínguez, J A Menéndez, M Inguanzo, J J Pis. Investigations into the characteristics of oils produced from microwave pyrolysis of sewage sludge. Fuel Processing Technology, 2005, 86(9): 1007–1020
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2004.11.009
50 P Ghodke, R N Mandapati. Investigation of particle level kinetic modeling for babul wood pyrolysis. Fuel, 2019, 236: 1008–1017
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2018.09.084
51 S R Naqvi, R Tariq, Z Hameed, I Ali, S A Taqvi, M Naqvi, M B K Niazi, T Noor, W Farooq. Pyrolysis of high-ash sewage sludge: thermo-kinetic study using TGA and artificial neural networks. Fuel, 2018, 233: 529–538
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2018.06.089
52 J P Polin, H D Carr, L E Whitmer, R G Smith, R C Brown. Conventional and autothermal pyrolysis of corn stover: overcoming the processing challenges of high-ash agricultural residues. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis, 2019, 143: 104679
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2019.104679
53 R K Singh, D Pandey, T Patil, A N Sawarkar. Pyrolysis of banana leaves biomass: physico-chemical characterization, thermal decomposition behavior, kinetic and thermodynamic analyses. Bioresource Technology, 2020, 310: 123464
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2020.123464
54 A Tabal, A Barakat, A Aboulkas, K El harfi. Pyrolysis of ficus nitida wood: determination of kinetic and thermodynamic parameters. Fuel, 2021, 283: 119253
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2020.119253
55 Z Ding, H Chen, J Liu, H Cai, F Evrendilek, M Buyukada. Pyrolysis dynamics of two medical plastic wastes: drivers, behaviors, evolved gases, reaction mechanisms, and pathways. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2021, 402: 123472
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.123472
56 S Honus, S Kumagai, G Fedorko, V Molnár, T Yoshioka. Pyrolysis gases produced from individual and mixed PE, PP, PS, PVC, and PET—Part I: Production and physical properties. Fuel, 2018, 221: 346–360
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2018.02.074
57 W Jeon, Y D Kim, K H Lee. A comparative study on pyrolysis of bundle and fluffy shapes of waste packaging plastics. Fuel, 2021, 283: 119260
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2020.119260
58 S Jung, S Lee, X Dou, E E Kwon. Valorization of disposable COVID-19 mask through the thermo-chemical process. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2021, 405: 126658
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2020.126658
59 G K Parku, F X Collard, J F Görgens. Pyrolysis of waste polypropylene plastics for energy recovery: influence of heating rate and vacuum conditions on composition of fuel product. Fuel Processing Technology, 2020, 209: 106522
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2020.106522
60 F Xu, B Wang, D Yang, J Hao, Y Qiao, Y Tian. Thermal degradation of typical plastics under high heating rate conditions by TG-FTIR: pyrolysis behaviors and kinetic analysis. Energy Conversion and Management, 2018, 171: 1106–1115
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2018.06.047
61 Y K Park, J M Ha, S Oh, J Lee. Bio-oil upgrading through hydrogen transfer reactions in supercritical solvents. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2021, 404: 126527
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2020.126527
62 D Kwon, S Jung, K Y A Lin, Y F Tsang, Y K Park, E E Kwon. Synergistic effects of CO2 on complete thermal degradation of plastic waste mixture through a catalytic pyrolysis platform: a case study of disposable diaper. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2021, 419: 126537
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.126537
63 W A Wan Mahari, S Awang, N A Z Zahariman, W Peng, M Man, Y K Park, J Lee, C Sonne, S S Lam. Microwave co-pyrolysis for simultaneous disposal of environmentally hazardous hospital plastic waste, lignocellulosic, and triglyceride biowaste. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2022, 423: 127096
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.127096
64 Y K Park, B Lee, H W Lee, A Watanabe, J Jae, Y F Tsang, Y M Kim. Co-feeding effect of waste plastic films on the catalytic pyrolysis of Quercus variabilis over microporous HZSM-5 and HY catalysts. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2019, 378: 122151
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2019.122151
65 Y Hu, W Yu, H Wibowo, Y Xia, Y Lu, M Yan. Effect of catalysts on distribution of polycyclic-aromatic hydrocarbon (PAHs) in bio-oils from the pyrolysis of dewatered sewage sludge at high and low temperatures. Science of the Total Environment, 2019, 667: 263–270
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.02.320
66 X Zhang, H Lei, L Zhu, X Zhu, M Qian, G Yadavalli, J Wu, S Chen. Thermal behavior and kinetic study for catalytic co-pyrolysis of biomass with plastics. Bioresource Technology, 2016, 220: 233–238
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2016.08.068
67 X Lin, Z Zhang, Q Wang, J Sun. Interactions between biomass-derived components and polypropylene during wood-plastic composite pyrolysis. Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery, 2020, 12(8): 3345–3357
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-020-00861-4
68 E Önal, B B Uzun, A E Pütün. Bio-oil production via co-pyrolysis of almond shell as biomass and high density polyethylene. Energy Conversion and Management, 2014, 78: 704–710
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2013.11.022
69 J Sun, J Luo, J Lin, R Ma, S Sun, L Fang, H Li. Study of co-pyrolysis endpoint and product conversion of plastic and biomass using microwave thermogravimetric technology. Energy, 2022, 247: 123547
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2022.123547
70 J Yang, J Rizkiana, W B Widayatno, S Karnjanakom, M Kaewpanha, X Hao, A Abudula, G Guan. Fast co-pyrolysis of low density polyethylene and biomass residue for oil production. Energy Conversion and Management, 2016, 120: 422–429
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2016.05.008
71 D Ojha, S Shukla, S Raghunath, R S Sachin, R Vinu. Understanding the interactions between cellulose and polypropylene during fast co-pyrolysis via experiments and DFT calculations. Chemical Engineering Transactions, 2016, 50: 67–72
72 B B Uzoejinwa, X He, S Wang, A El-Fatah Abomohra, Y Hu, Q Wang. Co-pyrolysis of biomass and waste plastics as a thermochemical conversion technology for high-grade biofuel production: recent progress and future directions elsewhere worldwide. Energy Conversion and Management, 2018, 163: 468–492
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2018.02.004
73 X Lin, L Kong, X Ren, D Zhang, H Cai, H Lei. Catalytic co-pyrolysis of torrefied poplar wood and high-density polyethylene over hierarchical HZSM-5 for mono-aromatics production. Renewable Energy, 2021, 164: 87–95
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2020.09.071
74 R Pogaku, B S Hardinge, H Vuthaluru, H A Amir. Production of bio-oil from oil palm empty fruit bunch by catalytic fast pyrolysis: a review. Biofuels, 2016, 7(6): 647–660
https://doi.org/10.1080/17597269.2016.1187539
75 L Dai, N Zhou, H Li, W Deng, Y Cheng, Y Wang, Y Liu, K Cobb, H Lei, P Chen, R Ruan. Recent advances in improving lignocellulosic biomass-based bio-oil production. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis, 2020, 149: 104845
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2020.104845
76 H Yang, R Yan, T Chin, D T Liang, H Chen, C Zheng. Thermogravimetric analysis-fourier transform infrared analysis of palm oil waste pyrolysis. Energy & Fuels, 2004, 18(6): 1814–1821
https://doi.org/10.1021/ef030193m
77 H V Ly, J W Park, S S Kim, H T Hwang, J Kim, H C Woo. Catalytic pyrolysis of bamboo in a bubbling fluidized-bed reactor with two different catalysts: HZSM-5 and red mud for upgrading bio-oil. Renewable Energy, 2020, 149: 1434–1445
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.10.141
78 M H M Ahmed, N Batalha, H M D Mahmudul, G Perkins, M Konarova. A review on advanced catalytic co-pyrolysis of biomass and hydrogen-rich feedstock: insights into synergistic effect, catalyst development and reaction mechanism. Bioresource Technology, 2020, 310: 123457
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2020.123457
79 X Jin, J H Lee, J W Choi. Catalytic co-pyrolysis of woody biomass with waste plastics: effects of HZSM-5 and pyrolysis temperature on producing high-value pyrolytic products and reducing wax formation. Energy, 2022, 239: 121739
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2021.121739
80 D K Ratnasari, M A Nahil, P T Williams. Catalytic pyrolysis of waste plastics using staged catalysis for production of gasoline range hydrocarbon oils. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis, 2017, 124: 631–637
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2016.12.027
81 Z Li, Z Zhong, B Zhang, W Wang, G V S Seufitelli, F L P Resende. Catalytic fast co-pyrolysis of waste greenhouse plastic films and rice husk using hierarchical micro-mesoporous composite molecular sieve. Waste Management, 2020, 102: 561–568
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2019.11.012
82 Y Zhao, Y Wang, D Duan, R Ruan, L Fan, Y Zhou, L Dai, J Lv, Y Liu. Fast microwave-assisted ex-catalytic co-pyrolysis of bamboo and polypropylene for bio-oil production. Bioresource Technology, 2018, 249: 69–75
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.09.184
83 Z Cao, J Niu, Y Gu, R Zhang, Y Liu, L Luo. Catalytic pyrolysis of rice straw: screening of various metal salts, metal basic oxide, acidic metal oxide and zeolite catalyst on products yield and characterization. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020, 269: 122079
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122079
84 X Chen, Y Chen, H Yang, W Chen, X Wang, H Chen. Fast pyrolysis of cotton stalk biomass using calcium oxide. Bioresource Technology, 2017, 233: 15–20
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.02.070
85 Y Y Chong, S Thangalazhy-Gopakumar, H K Ng, L Y Lee, S Gan. Effect of oxide catalysts on the properties of bio-oil from in-situ catalytic pyrolysis of palm empty fruit bunch fiber. Journal of Environmental Management, 2019, 247: 38–45
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.06.049
86 S Kim, C Park, J Lee. Reduction of polycyclic compounds and biphenyls generated by pyrolysis of industrial plastic waste by using supported metal catalysts: a case study of polyethylene terephthalate treatment. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2020, 392: 122464
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.122464
87 X Lin, Z Zhang, Z Zhang, J Sun, Q Wang, C U Pittman. Catalytic fast pyrolysis of a wood-plastic composite with metal oxides as catalysts. Waste Management, 2018, 79: 38–47
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2018.07.021
88 S Y Teng, A C M Loy, W D Leong, B S How, B L F Chin, V Máša. Catalytic thermal degradation of Chlorella vulgaris: evolving deep neural networks for optimization. Bioresource Technology, 2019, 292: 121971
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2019.121971
89 S Thangalazhy-Gopakumar, C Wei Lee, S Gan, H Kiat Ng, L Yee Lee. Comparison of bio-oil properties from non-catalytic and in-situ catalytic fast pyrolysis of palm empty fruit bunch. Materials Today: Proceedings, 2018, 5(11): 23456–23465
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2018.11.088
90 L W Chow, S A Tio, J Y Teoh, C G Lim, Y Y Chong, S Thangalazhy-Gopakumar. Sludge as a relinquishing catalyst in co-pyrolysis with palm empty fruit bunch fiber. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis, 2018, 132: 56–64
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2018.03.015
91 J Y Jeong, U D Lee, W S Chang, S H Jeong. Production of bio-oil rich in acetic acid and phenol from fast pyrolysis of palm residues using a fluidized bed reactor: influence of activated carbons. Bioresource Technology, 2016, 219: 357–364
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2016.07.107
92 A C M Loy, D K W Gan, S Yusup, B L F Chin, M K Lam, M Shahbaz, P Unrean, M N Acda, E Rianawati. Thermogravimetric kinetic modelling of in-situ catalytic pyrolytic conversion of rice husk to bioenergy using rice hull ash catalyst. Bioresource Technology, 2018, 261: 213–222
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2018.04.020
93 A C M Loy, S Yusup, M K Lam, B L F Chin, M Shahbaz, A Yamamoto, M N Acda. The effect of industrial waste coal bottom ash as catalyst in catalytic pyrolysis of rice husk for syngas production. Energy Conversion and Management, 2018, 165: 541–554
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2018.03.063
94 D M Santosa, C Zhu, F A Agblevor, B Maddi, B Q Roberts, I V Kutnyakov, S J Lee, H Wang. In situ catalytic fast pyrolysis using red mud catalyst: impact of catalytic fast pyrolysis temperature and biomass feedstocks. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering, 2020, 8(13): 5156–5164
https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.9b07439
95 Q Dong, H Li, M Niu, C Luo, J Zhang, B Qi, X Li, W Zhong. Microwave pyrolysis of moso bamboo for syngas production and bio-oil upgrading over bamboo-based biochar catalyst. Bioresource Technology, 2018, 266: 284–290
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2018.06.104
96 W Chen, Y Fang, K Li, Z Chen, M Xia, M Gong, Y Chen, H Yang, X Tu, H Chen. Bamboo wastes catalytic pyrolysis with N-doped biochar catalyst for phenols products. Applied Energy, 2020, 260: 114242
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.114242
97 Y An, A Tahmasebi, X Zhao, T Matamba, J Yu. Catalytic reforming of palm kernel shell microwave pyrolysis vapors over iron-loaded activated carbon: enhanced production of phenol and hydrogen. Bioresource Technology, 2020, 306: 123111
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2020.123111
98 P Gaurh, H Pramanik. Production of benzene/toluene/ethyl benzene/xylene (BTEX) via multiphase catalytic pyrolysis of hazardous waste polyethylene using low cost fly ash synthesized natural catalyst. Waste Management, 2018, 77: 114–130
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2018.05.013
99 W Luo, Z Fan, J Wan, Q Hu, H Dong, X Zhang, Z Zhou. Study on the reusability of kaolin as catalysts for catalytic pyrolysis of low-density polyethylene. Fuel, 2021, 302: 121164
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2021.121164
100 P Nalluri, P Prem Kumar, M R Ch Sastry. Experimental study on catalytic pyrolysis of plastic waste using low cost catalyst. Materials Today: Proceedings, 2021, 45: 7216–7221
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.02.478
101 D Xu, Y Xiong, S Zhang, Y Su. The synergistic mechanism between coke depositions and gas for H2 production from co-pyrolysis of biomass and plastic wastes via char supported catalyst. Waste Management, 2021, 121: 23–32
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2020.11.044
102 D Zhang, X Lin, Q Zhang, X Ren, W Yu, H Cai. Catalytic pyrolysis of wood-plastic composite waste over activated carbon catalyst for aromatics production: effect of preparation process of activated carbon. Energy, 2020, 212: 118983
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.118983
103 G Chang, P Shi, Y Guo, L Wang, C Wang, Q Guo. Enhanced pyrolysis of palm kernel shell wastes to bio-based chemicals and syngas using red mud as an additive. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020, 272: 122847
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122847
104 R K Singh, T Patil, A N Sawarkar. Pyrolysis of garlic husk biomass: physico-chemical characterization, thermodynamic and kinetic analyses. Bioresource Technology Reports, 2020, 12: 100558
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biteb.2020.100558
105 N Sbirrazzuoli. Determination of pre-exponential factors and of the mathematical functions f(α) or G(α) that describe the reaction mechanism in a model-free way. Thermochimica Acta, 2013, 564: 59–69
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tca.2013.04.015
106 Ahmad M Sajjad, H Liu, H Alhumade, Tahir M Hussain, G Çakman, A Yıldız, S Ceylan, A Elkamel, B Shen. A modified DAEM: to study the bioenergy potential of invasive Staghorn sumac through pyrolysis, ANN, TGA, kinetic modeling, FTIR and GC-MS analysis. Energy Conversion and Management, 2020, 221: 113173
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2020.113173
107 S Hameed, A Sharma, V Pareek, H Wu, Y Yu. A review on biomass pyrolysis models: kinetic, network and mechanistic models. Biomass and Bioenergy, 2019, 123: 104–122
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2019.02.008
108 E Cano-Pleite, M Rubio-Rubio, N García-Hernando, A Soria-Verdugo. Microalgae pyrolysis under isothermal and non-isothermal conditions. Algal Research, 2020, 51: 102031
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.algal.2020.102031
109 Y Ding, W Zhang, L Yu, K Lu. The accuracy and efficiency of GA and PSO optimization schemes on estimating reaction kinetic parameters of biomass pyrolysis. Energy, 2019, 176: 582–588
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2019.04.030
110 M Aghbashlo, F Almasi, A Jafari, M H Nadian, S Soltanian, S S Lam, M Tabatabaei. Describing biomass pyrolysis kinetics using a generic hybrid intelligent model: a critical stage in sustainable waste-oriented biorefineries. Renewable Energy, 2021, 170: 81–91
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2021.01.111
111 A I Ferreiro, M Rabaçal, M Costa. A combined genetic algorithm and least squares fitting procedure for the estimation of the kinetic parameters of the pyrolysis of agricultural residues. Energy Conversion and Management, 2016, 125: 290–300
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2016.04.104
112 Y Ding, Y Zhang, J Zhang, R Zhou, Z Ren, H Guo. Kinetic parameters estimation of pinus sylvestris pyrolysis by Kissinger–Kai method coupled with particle swarm optimization and global sensitivity analysis. Bioresource Technology, 2019, 293: 122079
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2019.122079
113 M Buyukada. Co-combustion of peanut hull and coal blends: artificial neural networks modeling, particle swarm optimization and Monte Carlo simulation. Bioresource Technology, 2016, 216: 280–286
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2016.05.091
114 L Xu, Y Jiang, L Wang. Thermal decomposition of rape straw: pyrolysis modeling and kinetic study via particle swarm optimization. Energy Conversion and Management, 2017, 146: 124–133
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2017.05.020
115 M Majid, B L F Chin, Z A Jawad, Y H Chai, M K Lam, S Yusup, K W Cheah. Particle swarm optimization and global sensitivity analysis for catalytic co-pyrolysis of Chlorella vulgaris and plastic waste mixtures. Bioresource Technology, 2021, 329: 124874
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2021.124874
116 Q Y Duan, V K Gupta, S Sorooshian. Shuffled complex evolution approach for effective and efficient global minimization. Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, 1993, 76(3): 501–521
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00939380
117 Y Ding, J Zhang, Q He, B Huang, S Mao. The application and validity of various reaction kinetic models on woody biomass pyrolysis. Energy, 2019, 179: 784–791
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2019.05.021
118 Y Ding, C Wang, M Chaos, R Chen, S Lu. Estimation of beech pyrolysis kinetic parameters by Shuffled Complex Evolution. Bioresource Technology, 2016, 200: 658–665
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2015.10.082
119 H Liu, B Chen, C Wang. Pyrolysis kinetics study of biomass waste using Shuffled Complex Evolution algorithm. Fuel Processing Technology, 2020, 208: 106509
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2020.106509
120 L Hasalová, J Ira, M Jahoda. Practical observations on the use of Shuffled Complex Evolution (SCE) algorithm for kinetic parameters estimation in pyrolysis modeling. Fire Safety Journal, 2016, 80: 71–82
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.firesaf.2016.01.007
121 M Al-Yaari, D Ibrahim. Application of artificial neural networks to predict the catalytic pyrolysis of HDPE using non-isothermal TGA data. Polymers, 2020, 12(8): 1813
https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12081813
122 H Bi, C Wang, X Jiang, C Jiang, L Bao, Q Lin. Thermodynamics, kinetics, gas emissions and artificial neural network modeling of co-pyrolysis of sewage sludge and peanut shell. Fuel, 2021, 284: 118988
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2020.118988
123 H K Balsora, K S, V Dua, J B Joshi, G Kataria, A Sharma, A G Chakinala. Machine learning approach for the prediction of biomass pyrolysis kinetics from preliminary analysis. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 2022, 10(3): 108025
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2022.108025
124 J T Bong, A C M Loy, B L F Chin, M K Lam, D K H Tang, H Y Lim, Y H Chai, S Yusup. Artificial neural network approach for co-pyrolysis of Chlorella vulgaris and peanut shell binary mixtures using microalgae ash catalyst. Energy, 2020, 207: 118289
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.118289
125 P A Alaba, S I Popoola, F Abnisal, C S Lee, O S Ohunakin, E Adetiba, M B Akanle, M F Abdul Patah, A A A Atayero, W M A Wan Daud. Thermal decomposition of rice husk: a comprehensive artificial intelligence predictive model. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry, 2020, 140(4): 1811–1823
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-019-08915-0
126 X Zhu, Y Li, X Wang. Machine learning prediction of biochar yield and carbon contents in biochar based on biomass characteristics and pyrolysis conditions. Bioresource Technology, 2019, 288: 121527
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2019.121527
127 H Li, Q Xu, K Xiao, J Yang, S Liang, J Hu, H Hou, B Liu. Predicting the higher heating value of syngas pyrolyzed from sewage sludge using an artificial neural network. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 2020, 27(1): 785–797
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-06885-2
128 J K Whiteman, E B Gueguim Kana. Comparative assessment of the artificial neural network and response surface modelling efficiencies for biohydrogen production on sugar cane molasses. BioEnergy Research, 2014, 7(1): 295–305
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-013-9375-7
129 Y Zhang, M S Ahmad, B Shen, P Yuan, I A Shah, Q Zhu, M Ibrahim, A Bokhari, J J Klemeš, A Elkamel. Co-pyrolysis of lychee and plastic waste as a source of bioenergy through kinetic study and thermodynamic analysis. Energy, 2022, 256: 124678
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2022.124678
130 D K W Gan, A C M Loy, B L F Chin, S Yusup, P Unrean, E Rianawati, M N Acda. Kinetics and thermodynamic analysis in one-pot pyrolysis of rice hull using renewable calcium oxide based catalysts. Bioresource Technology, 2018, 265: 180–190
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2018.06.003
131 M J B Fong, A C M Loy, B L F Chin, M K Lam, S Yusup, Z A Jawad. Catalytic pyrolysis of Chlorella vulgaris: kinetic and thermodynamic analysis. Bioresource Technology, 2019, 289: 121689
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2019.121689
132 R Kumar Mishra, K Mohanty. Co-pyrolysis of waste biomass and waste plastics (polystyrene and waste nitrile gloves) into renewable fuel and value-added chemicals. Carbon Resources Conversion, 2020, 3: 145–155
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crcon.2020.11.001
133 F Abnisa, W M A Wan Daud. A review on co-pyrolysis of biomass: an optional technique to obtain a high-grade pyrolysis oil. Energy Conversion and Management, 2014, 87: 71–85
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2014.07.007
134 J Scheirs. Feedstock recycling and pyrolysis of waste plastics. Manhattan: John Wiley & Sons Inc., 2006, 381–433
135 S M Gouws, M Carrier, J R Bunt, H W J P Neomagus. Co-pyrolysis of coal and raw/torrefied biomass: a review on chemistry, kinetics and implementation. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2021, 135: 110189
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2020.110189
136 J Lede. Biomass fast pyrolysis reactors: a review of a few scientific challenges and of related recommended research topics. Oil & Gas Science and Technology, 2013, 68(5): 801–814
https://doi.org/10.2516/ogst/2013108
137 R Venderbosch, W Prins. Fast pyrolysis technology development. Biofuels, Bioproducts & Biorefining, 2010, 4(2): 178–208
https://doi.org/10.1002/bbb.205
138 S Yousef, J Eimontas, I Stasiulaitiene, K Zakarauskas, N Striūgas. Pyrolysis of all layers of surgical mask waste as a mixture and its life-cycle assessment. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 2022, 32: 519–531
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2022.05.011
139 P Brassard, S Godbout, L Hamelin. Framework for consequential life cycle assessment of pyrolysis biorefineries: a case study for the conversion of primary forestry residues. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2021, 138: 110549
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2020.110549
140 S Neha, K Prasanna Kumar Ramesh, N Remya. Techno-economic analysis and life cycle assessment of microwave co-pyrolysis of food waste and low-density polyethylene. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, 2022, 52: 102356
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2022.102356
141 V V Joshi, G Swaminathan, S P S Prabhakaran. Life cycle assessment of the co-combustion system of single-use plastic waste and lignite coal to promote circular economy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2021, 329: 129579
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129579
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed