Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Chemical Science and Engineering

ISSN 2095-0179

ISSN 2095-0187(Online)

CN 11-5981/TQ

邮发代号 80-969

2019 Impact Factor: 3.552

Frontiers of Chemical Science and Engineering  2023, Vol. 17 Issue (5): 581-593   https://doi.org/10.1007/s11705-022-2235-2
  本期目录
Highly efficient and selective removal of vanadium from tungstate solutions by microbubble floating-extraction
Hanyu Wang, Shengpeng Su, Yanfang Huang, Bingbing Liu, Hu Sun, Guihong Han()
School of Chemical Engineering, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China
 全文: PDF(12187 KB)   HTML
Abstract

Selective separation of dissolved tungsten and vanadium is of great significance for the utilization of the secondary resources of these elements. In this work, selective removal of vanadium from tungstate solutions via microbubble floating-extraction was systematically investigated. The results indicated that vanadium can be more easily mineralized over tungsten from tungstate solutions using methyl trioctyl ammonium chloride as mineralization reagent under weak alkaline conditions. Owing to the higher bubble and interface mass transfer rates, high-efficiency enrichment and deep separation of vanadium could be achieved easily. Additionally, the deep recovery of tungsten and vanadium from the floated organic phase could be easily realized using a mixed solution of sodium hydroxide and sodium chloride as stripping agents. The separation mechanism mainly included the formation of hydrophobic complexes, their attachment on the surface of rising bubbles, and their mass transfer at the oil–water interface. Under the optimal conditions, the removal efficiency of vanadium reached 98.5% with tungsten loss below 8% after two-stage microbubble floating-extraction. Therefore, the microbubble floating-extraction could be an efficient approach for separating selectively vanadium from tungstate solutions, exhibiting outstanding advantages of high separation efficiency and low consumption of organic solvents.

Key wordstungsten    vanadium    selective separation    reagent mineralization    microbubble floating-extraction
收稿日期: 2022-06-03      出版日期: 2023-04-28
Corresponding Author(s): Guihong Han   
 引用本文:   
. [J]. Frontiers of Chemical Science and Engineering, 2023, 17(5): 581-593.
Hanyu Wang, Shengpeng Su, Yanfang Huang, Bingbing Liu, Hu Sun, Guihong Han. Highly efficient and selective removal of vanadium from tungstate solutions by microbubble floating-extraction. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng., 2023, 17(5): 581-593.
 链接本文:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fcse/CN/10.1007/s11705-022-2235-2
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fcse/CN/Y2023/V17/I5/581
Fig.1  
Fig.2  
IndexFormulaNomenclature
Mineralization efficiencyM=1?CMCF×100%CF, CM, CR, CS, and CFL represent the concentrations of tungsten and vanadium in the feed, supernatant, raffinate, stripping solution, and floated organic phases; VFL and VS are the volumes of the floated organic phase and stripping solution, respectively; DV and DW are the distribution coefficient of V and W, respectively.
Flotation efficiencyF=(1?CRCF)×100%
Stripping efficiencyST=CS×VSCFL×VFL×100%
Distribution coefficientD=CFLCR
Separation factorβV,W=DVDW
Tab.1  
Equation No.Relevant reactionlg kFormulaRef.
(1)WO42? + H+ = HWO24?3.5[HWO4?] = 103.5[WO42?][H+][8]
(2)7WO42? + 8H+ = W7O246? + 4H2O65.19[W7O246?] = 1065.19[WO42?]7[H+]8[35]
(3)7WO42? + 9H+ = HW7O245? + 4H2O69.96[HW7O245?] = 1069.96[WO42?]7[H+]9[35]
(4)12WO42? + 14H+ = H2W12O4210? + 6H2O115.38[H2W12O4210?] = 10115.38[WO42?]12[H+]14[8]
(5)VO43? + H+ = HVO42?13.36[HVO42?] = 1013.36[VO43?][H+][8]
(6)2VO43? + 3H+ = HV2O73? + H2O37.17[HV2O73?] = 1037.17[VO43?]2[H+]3[8]
(7)4VO43? + 8H+ = V4O124? + H2O95.11[V4O124?] = 1095.11[VO43?]4[H+]8[8]
(8)VO43? + 4H+ = VO2+ + 2H2O28.23[VO2+] = 1028.23[VO43?][H+]4[8]
(9)2VO43? + 4WO42? + 10H+ = V2W4O194? + 5H2O99.29[V2W4O194?] = 1099.29[VO43?]2[WO42?]4[H+]10[8]
(10)3VO43? + 3WO42?+ 10H+ = V3W3O195? + 5H2O105.49[V3W3O195?] = 10105.49[VO43?]3[WO42?]3[H+]10[8]
Tab.2  
Fig.3  
Fig.4  
Fig.5  
Fig.6  
Fig.7  
Fig.8  
Fig.9  
MethodFeed solutionsExperimental conditionSeparation efficiency/%Ref.
Solvent extraction1.0 g?L?1 tungsten0.1 g?L?1 vanadium0.1 mol?L?1 LiX63-decyl alcohol-kerosene pH = 8.0Tungsten extraction could be neglectedVanadium extraction of 70%[5]
Solvent extraction52.5 g?L?1 tungsten6.4 g?L?1 vanadium20% Aliquat336-40% 2-octanol-sulfonated kerosene as the organic phase pH = 8.7, O/A = 2/1Tungsten extraction of 12.34%Vanadium extraction of 97.13%[49]
Solvent extraction10 g?L?1 tungsten1.0 g?L?1 vanadium10% Aliquat336-10% 2-octanol-sulfonated kerosene as the organic phase pH = 8.6, O/A = 1/6Tungsten extraction of 7.74%Vanadium extraction of 92.02%[50]
Microbubble floating-extraction10 g?L?1 tungsten1.0 g?L?1 vanadium1% Aliquat336 as the mineralization reagent, 10% 2-octanol-sulfonated kerosene as the organic phase, pH = 8.5, and O/A = 1/5Tungsten flotation efficiency of 6.11%Vanadium flotation efficiency of 95.44%This work
Tab.3  
Fig.10  
1 T H Nguyen, M S Lee. Separation of vanadium and tungsten from sodium molybdate solution by solvent extraction. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2014, 53(20): 8608–8614
https://doi.org/10.1021/ie500486y
2 W J Zhang, Y Q Chen, J Y Che, C Y Wang, B Z Ma. Green leaching of tungsten from synthetic scheelite with sulfuric acid-hydrogen peroxide solution to prepare tungstic acid. Separation and Purification Technology, 2020, 241: 116752
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2020.116752
3 Z S Liu, J Huang, Y M Zhang, T Liu, P C Hu, H Liu, Q S Zheng. Separation and recovery of vanadium and iron from oxalic-acid-based shale leachate by coextraction and stepwise stripping. Separation and Purification Technology, 2020, 244: 116532
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2020.116532
4 H T Truong, T H Nguyen, M S Lee. Separation of molybdenum(VI), rhenium(VII), tungsten(VI), and vanadium(V) by solvent extraction. Hydrometallurgy, 2017, 171: 298–305
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydromet.2017.06.006
5 I H Choi, H R Kim, G Moon, R K Jyothi, J Y Lee. Spent V2O5–WO3/TiO2 catalyst processing for valuable metals by soda roasting-water leaching. Hydrometallurgy, 2018, 175: 292–299
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydromet.2017.12.010
6 Q J Zhang, Y F Wu, H R Yuan. Recycling strategies of spent V2O5–WO3/TiO2 catalyst: a review. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 2020, 161: 104983
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104983
7 F Ferella. A review on management and recycling of spent selective catalytic reduction catalysts. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020, 246: 118990
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118990
8 J L Zhang, Z W Zhao. Thermodynamic analysis of tungsten–vanadium separation in W(VI)-V(V)-H2O system. Chinese Journal of Nonferrous Metals, 2014, 24(6): 1656–1662 (in Chinese)
9 L Luo, K J Liu, A Shibayama, W T Yen, T Fujita, O Shindo, T Katai. Recovery of tungsten and vanadium from tungsten alloy scrap. Hydrometallurgy, 2004, 72(1-2): 1–8
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-386X(03)00121-X
10 L Luo, T Miyazaki, A Shibayama, W T Yen, T Fujita. Separation of vanadium and tungsten from a sodium tungstate solution. Canadian Metallurgical Quarterly, 2003, 42(4): 411–420
https://doi.org/10.1179/cmq.2003.42.4.411
11 X Z Zhu, G S Huo, J Ni, Q Song. Removal of tungsten and vanadium from molybdate solutions using ion exchange resin. Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China, 2017, 27(12): 2727–2732
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1003-6326(17)60301-7
12 W C Wu, T Y Tsai, Y H Shen. Tungsten recovery from spent SCR catalyst using alkaline leaching and ion exchange. Minerals, 2016, 6(4): 107–117
https://doi.org/10.3390/min6040107
13 L P Wang, G Q Zhang, W J Guan, L Zeng, Q Zhou, Y Xia, Q Wang, Q G Li, Z Y Cao. Complete removal of trace vanadium from ammonium tungstate solutions by solvent extraction. Hydrometallurgy, 2018, 179: 268–273
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydromet.2018.06.016
14 T H Nguyen, M S Lee. A review on the separation of molybdenum, tungsten, and vanadium from leach liquors of diverse resources by solvent extraction. Geosystem Engineering, 2016, 19(5): 247–259
https://doi.org/10.1080/12269328.2016.1186577
15 L Zeng, C Y Yong. A literature review of the recovery of molybdenum and vanadium from spent hydrodesulphurisation catalysts. Part II: separation and purification. Hydrometallurgy, 2009, 98(1-2): 10–20
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydromet.2009.03.012
16 J W Kim, I J Hwang. Separation of valuables from spent selective catalytic reduction catalyst leaching solution by fabricated anion extraction resins. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 2018, 6(1): 1100–1108
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2017.11.040
17 J Wu, C Wei, X B Li, S F Wang, M S Wang, C X Li. Selective extraction of Mo using Cyanex-272 and tributyl phosphate from low grade Ni−Mo ore leach liquor. Separation and Purification Technology, 2012, 99: 120–126
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2012.08.007
18 A M Wilson, P J Bailey, P A Tasker, J R Turkington, R A Grant, J B Love. Solvent extraction: the coordination chemistry behind extractive metallurgy. Chemical Society Reviews, 2014, 43(1): 123–134
https://doi.org/10.1039/C3CS60275C
19 K Huang, J Liu, H Z Wu, H Z Liu. A new bubbling extraction tower: toward liquid–liquid solvent extraction at large aqueous-to-oil phase ratios. AIChE Journal, 2015, 61(11): 3889–3897
https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.14904
20 J Liu, K Huang, H Z Wu, H Z Liu. A feasible strategy for calculating the required mass transfer height of a new bubbling organic liquid membrane extraction tower directly based upon the experimental kinetic data. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2016, 55(16): 4426–4434
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.5b04734
21 P C Rout, K Sarangi. A comparative study on extraction of Mo(VI) using both solvent extraction and hollow fiber membrane technique. Hydrometallurgy, 2013, 133: 149–155
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydromet.2013.01.005
22 C S Liao, F X Cheng, S Wu, C H Yan. Review and recent progresses on theory of countercurrent extraction. Journal of the Chinese Society of Rare Earths, 2017, 35: 1–8 (in Chinese)
23 W T Wang, F N Sang, J H Xu, Y D Wang, G S Luo. The enhancement of liquid–liquid extraction with high phase ratio by microfluidic-based hollow droplet. RSC Advances, 2015, 5(100): 82056–82064
https://doi.org/10.1039/C5RA15769B
24 J Liu, K Huang, X H Wu, H Z Liu. Enrichment of low concentration rare earths from leach solutions of ion-adsorption ores by bubbling organic liquid membrane extraction using N1923. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering, 2017, 5(9): 8070–8078
https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b01682
25 J Liu, K Huang, X H Wu, W Q Liu, W Y Song, H Z Liu. Extraction of rare earths using bubbling organic liquid membrane with un-saponified P507. Hydrometallurgy, 2018, 175: 340–347
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydromet.2017.12.015
26 Y F Huang, K P Shi, B B Liu, S P Su, G H Han. Research status and prospect of deep separation technology for dissolved molybdenum and vanadium. Conservation and Utilization of Mineral, 2021, 41(5): 65–72 (in Chinese)
27 G H Han, H Y Wang, S P Su, Y F Huang, B B Liu. Research progress and discussion on selective separation technology of dissolved tungsten and vanadium. Chinese Journal of Nonferrous Metals, 2021, 31(11): 3380–3395 (in Chinese)
28 G H Han, J W Wang, B B Liu, H Sun, Y F Huang. Progress and prospect of cobalt recovery from cobalt slag produced by zinc hydrometallurgy. Journal of Guizhou University, 2022, 39(2): 1–6
29 S P Su, Y F Huang, B B Liu, G H Han, Y B Xue, Y Z Wang. A feasible strategy for deeply separating low concentrations of molybdenum from tungstate solutions with a high-efficiency microbubble floating-extraction concept. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering, 2021, 10(1): 146–158
https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.1c05287
30 J H Kang, Y H Hu, W Sun, R Q Liu, Z Y Gao, Q J Guan, H H Tang, Z G Yin. Utilisation of FGD gypsum for silicate removal from scheelite flotation wastewater. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2018, 341: 272–279
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2018.02.043
31 J H Chen. The interaction of flotation reagents with metal ions in mineral surfaces: a perspective from coordination chemistry. Minerals Engineering, 2021, 171: 107067
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mineng.2021.107067
32 K T Valsaraj, J L Porter, E K Liljenfeldt, C Springer. Solvent sublation for the removal of hydrophobic chlorinated compounds from aqueous solutions. Water Research, 1986, 20(9): 1161–1175
https://doi.org/10.1016/0043-1354(86)90063-1
33 A B C Sola, P K Parhi, J Y Lee, H N Kang, R K Jyothi. Environmentally friendly approach to recover vanadium and tungsten from spent SCR catalyst leach liquors using Aliquat 336. RSC Advances, 2020, 10(34): 19736–19746
https://doi.org/10.1039/D0RA02229B
34 Y F Huang, B Zhang, B B Liu, S P Su, G H Han, H Guo, Y J Cao. Clean and deep separation of molybdenum and rhenium from ultra-low concentration solutions via vapidly stepwise selective coagulation and flocculation precipitation. Separation and Purification Technology, 2021, 267: 118632
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2021.118632
35 J L Zhang, Z W Zhao, X Y Chen, X H Liu. Thermodynamic analysis for separation of tungsten and molybdenum in W–Mo–H2O system. Chinese Journal of Nonferrous Metals, 2013, 23(5): 1463–1470 (in Chinese)
36 H Y Wu, W J Wang, Y F Huang, G H Han, S Z Yang, S P Su, H Sana, W J Peng, Y J Cao, J T Liu. Comprehensive evaluation on a prospective precipitation-flotation process for metal-ions removal from wastewater simulants. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2019, 371: 592–602
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.03.048
37 J H Jeon, A B C Sola, J Y Lee, J R Koduru, R K Jyothi. Separation of vanadium and tungsten from synthetic and spent catalyst leach solutions using an ion-exchange resin. RSC Advances, 2022, 12(6): 3635–3645
https://doi.org/10.1039/D1RA05253E
38 P Xiong, Y M Zhang, J Huang, S X Bao, X Yang, C Shen. High-efficient and selective extraction of vanadium(V) with N235-P507 synergistic extraction system. Chemical Engineering Research & Design, 2017, 120: 284–290
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2017.02.027
39 T N Kovács, G Pokol, F Gáber, D Nagy, T Igricz, I E Lukács, Z Fogarassy, K Balázsi, I M Szilágyi. Preparation of iron tungstate (FeWO4) nanosheets by hydrothermal method. Materials Research Bulletin, 2017, 95: 563–569
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.materresbull.2017.08.031
40 S Rakshit, B Sallman, A Davantes, G Lefevre. Tungstate(VI) sorption on hematite: an in situ ATR-FTIR probe on the mechanism. Chemosphere, 2017, 168: 685–691
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.11.007
41 S Jayadas, M L Reddy. Solvent extraction separation of vanadium(V) from multivalent metal chloride solutions using 2-ethylhexyl phosphonic acid mono-2-ethylhexyl ester. Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology, 2002, 77(10): 1149–1156
https://doi.org/10.1002/jctb.690
42 H Mahandra, R Singh, B Gupta. Recovery of vanadium(V) from synthetic and real leach solutions of spent catalyst by solvent extraction using Cyphos IL 104. Hydrometallurgy, 2020, 196: 105405
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydromet.2020.105405
43 Y Bal, K E Bal, G Cote, A Lallam. Characterization of the solid third phases that precipitate from the organic solutions of Aliquat® 336 after extraction of molybdenum(VI) and vanadium(V). Hydrometallurgy, 2004, 75(1-4): 123–134
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydromet.2004.07.004
44 S Paul, E Berrier, M C K França, J G Eon. Oxidative dehydrogenation of propane under steady-state and transient regimes over alumina-supported catalysts prepared from mixed V2W4O194‒ hexametalate precursors. Journal of Natural Gas Chemistry, 2010, 19(2): 123–133
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1003-9953(09)60043-8
45 Y F Qi, E B Wang, J Li, Y G Li. Two organic-inorganic poly (pseudo-rotaxane)-like composite solids constructed from polyoxovanadates and silver organonitrogen polymers. Journal of Solid State Chemistry, 2009, 182(10): 2640–2645
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jssc.2009.07.022
46 A A Nayl, H F Aly. Solvent extraction of V(V) and Cr(III) from acidic leach liquors of ilmenite using Aliquat 336. Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China, 2015, 25(12): 4183–4191
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1003-6326(15)64021-3
47 S P Su, W J Wang, B B Liu, Y F Huang, S Z Yang, H Y Wu, G H Han, Y J Cao. Enhancing surface interactions between humic surfactants and cupric ion: DFT computations coupled with MD simulations study. Journal of Molecular Liquids, 2021, 324: 114781
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2020.114781
48 P Y Bi, H R Dong, J Dong. The recent progress of solvent sublation. Journal of Chromatography A, 2010, 1217(16): 2716–2725
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2009.11.020
49 Q Li, L S Xiao, G Q Zhang, Z Y Cao, Q G Li, L Zeng, W J Guan. Vanadium separation from sodium tungstate solution by solvent extraction with quaternary ammonium salt of N263. Rare Metals and Cemented Carbides, 2017, 45(2): 20–27 (in Chinese)
50 H Y WangG H HanY F HuangS P Su. Solvent extraction separation of tungsten and vanadium from simulated leaching solution of spent SCR catalyst. In: Ouchi T, Azimi G, Forsberg K, Kim H, Alam S, Neelameggham N, Baba A, Peng H, eds. Rare Metal Technology 2022. Berlin: Springer, 2022
[1] FCE-22062-OF-WH_suppl_1 Download
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed