Due to the characteristics of hesitant fuzzy sets (HFSs), one hesitant fuzzy element (HFE), which is the basic component of HFSs, can express the evaluation values of multiple decision makers (DMs) on the same alternative under a certain attribute. Thus, the HFS has its unique advantages in group decision making (GDM). Based on which, many scholars have conducted in-depth research on the applications of HFSs in GDM. We have viewed lots of relevant literature and divided the existing studies into three categories: theory, support and methods. In this paper, we elaborate on hesitant fuzzy GDM from these three aspects. The first aspect is mainly about the introduction of HFSs, HFPRs and some hesitant fuzzy aggregation operators. The second aspect describes the consensus process under hesitant fuzzy environment, which is an important support for a complete decision-making process. In the third aspect, we introduce seven hesitant fuzzy GDM approaches, which can be applied in GDM under different decision-making conditions. Finally, we summarize the research status of hesitant fuzzy GDM and put forward some directions of future research.
. [J]. Frontiers of Engineering Management, 2019, 6(2): 163-182.
Zeshui XU, Shen ZHANG. An overview on the applications of the hesitant fuzzy sets in group decision-making: theory, support and methods. Front. Eng, 2019, 6(2): 163-182.
CAcar, A Beskese, G TTemur (2018). Sustainability analysis of different hydrogen production options using hesitant fuzzy AHP. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 43(39): 18059–18076 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.08.024
2
J C RAlcantud, AGiarlotta (2019). Necessary and possible hesitant fuzzy sets: A novel model for group decision making. Information Fusion, 46: 63–76 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2018.05.005
3
UAsan, C Kadaifci, EBozdag, ASoyer, SSerdarasan (2018). A new approach to DEMATEL based on interval-valued hesitant fuzzy sets. Applied Soft Computing, 66: 34–49 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2018.01.018
4
MAshtiani, M A Azgomi (2016). A hesitant fuzzy model of computational trust considering hesitancy, vagueness and uncertainty. Applied Soft Computing, 42: 18–37 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2016.01.023
NChen, Z S Xu (2015). Hesitant fuzzy ELECTRE II Approach: A new way to handle multi-criteria decision making problems. Information Sciences, 292: 175–197 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2014.08.054
7
NChen, Z S Xu, M M Xia (2013a). Correlation coefficients of hesitant fuzzy sets and their applications to clustering analysis. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 37(4): 2197–2211 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2012.04.031
8
NChen, Z S Xu, M M Xia (2013b). Interval-valued hesitant preference relations and their applications to group decision making. Knowledge-Based Systems, 37: 528–540 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2012.09.009
9
NChen, Z S Xu, M M Xia (2015). The ELECTRE I multi-criteria decision making method based on hesitant fuzzy sets. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, 14(03): 621–657 https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219622014500187
10
S HCheng (2018). Autocratic decision making using group recommendations based on hesitant fuzzy sets for green hotels selection and bidders selection. Information Sciences, 467: 604–617 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2018.08.014
11
S KDe, S S Sana (2017). Multi-criterion multi-attribute decision-making for an EOQ model in a hesitant fuzzy environment. Pacific Science Review A. Natural Science and Engineering, 17: 61–68
12
HDincer, S Yuksel, LMartinez (2019). Balanced scorecard-based analysis about European energy investment policies: A hybrid hesitant fuzzy decision-making approach with Quality Function Deployment. Expert Systems with Applications, 115: 152–171 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2018.07.072
13
JDing, Z S Xu, N Zhao (2017). An interactive approach to probabilistic hesitant fuzzy multi-attribute group decision-making with incomplete weight information. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 32(3): 2523–2536 https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-16503
BFarhadinia (2016a). Hesitant fuzzy set lexicographical ordering and its application to multi-attribute decision making. Information Sciences, 327: 233–245 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2015.07.057
16
BFarhadinia (2016b). Utility of correlation measures for weighted hesitant fuzzy sets in medical diagnosis problems. Mathematical Modelling and Applications, 1(2): 36–45
17
N RGalo, L D D R Calache, L C R Carpinetti (2018). A group decision approach for supplier categorization based on hesitant fuzzy and ELECTRI TRI. International Journal of Production Economics, 202: 182–196 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.05.023
18
Y DHe, Z He, L XShi, S SMeng (2016). Multiple attribute group decision making based on IVHFPBMs and a new ranking method for interval-valued hesitant fuzzy information. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 99: 63–77 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2016.07.004
19
YHe, Z S Xu (2017). A consensus reaching model for hesitant information with different preference structures. Knowledge-Based Systems, 135: 99–112 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2017.08.007
20
YHe, Z S Xu, J Gu (2016). An approach to group decision making with hesitant information and its application in credit risk evaluation of enterprises. Applied Soft Computing, 43: 159–169 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2016.02.010
21
C LHwang, K Yoon (1981). Multiple Attribute Decision Making Methods and Applications. Berlin: Springer
22
H MJiang, C K Kwong, W Y Park (2017). Probabilistic fuzzy regression approach for preference modeling. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 64: 286–294 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2017.06.019
23
F FJin, Z W Ni, H Y Chen, Y P Li, L G Zhou (2016). Multiple attribute group decision making based on interval-valued hesitant fuzzy information measures. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 101: 103–115 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2016.08.019
24
J BLan, R F Jin, A Y Zheng, M M Hu (2017). Priority degrees for hesitant fuzzy sets: Applications to multiple attribute decision making. Operations Research Perspectives, 4: 67–73 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orp.2017.05.001
25
D QLi, W Y Zeng, J H Li (2015). New distance and similarity measures on hesitant fuzzy sets and their applications in multiple criteria decision making. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 40: 11–16 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2014.12.012
26
D CLiang, Z S Xu (2017). The new extension of TOPSIS method for multiple criteria decision making with hesitant Pythagorean fuzzy sets. Applied Soft Computing, 60: 167–179 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2017.06.034
27
H CLiao, Z S Xu (2013). A VIKOR-based method for hesitant fuzzy multi-criteria decision making. Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, 12(4): 373–392 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10700-013-9162-0
28
H CLiao, Z S Xu (2014a). Some new hybrid weighted aggregation operators under hesitant fuzzy multi-criteria decision making environment. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 26(4): 1601–1617
29
H CLiao, Z S Xu (2014b). Subtraction and division operations over hesitant fuzzy sets. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 27(1): 65–72
30
H CLiao, Z S Xu, M M Xia (2014). Multiplicative consistency of hesitant fuzzy preference relation and its application in group decision making. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, 13(1): 47–76 https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219622014500035
31
AMahmoudi, S Sadi-Nezhad, AMakui, M RVakili (2016). An extension on PROMETHEE based on the typical hesitant fuzzy sets to solve multi-attribute decision-making problem. Kybernetes, 45(8): 1213–1231 https://doi.org/10.1108/K-10-2015-0271
32
F YMeng, Q X An (2017). A new approach for group decision making method with hesitant fuzzy preference relations. Knowledge-Based Systems, 127: 1–15 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2017.03.010
33
F YMeng, X H Chen, Q Zhang (2015). Induced generalized hesitant fuzzy Shapley hybrid operators and their application in multi-attribute decision making. Applied Soft Computing, 28: 599–607 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2014.11.017
34
LOsiro, F R Lima-Junior, L C R Carpinetti (2018). A group decision model based on quality function deployment and hesitant fuzzy for selecting supply chain sustainability metrics. Journal of Cleaner Production, 183: 964–978 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.197
35
D HPeng, C Y Gao, Z F Gao (2013). Generalized hesitant fuzzy synergetic weighted distance measures and their application to multiple criteria decision-making. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 37(8): 5837–5850 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2012.11.016
36
J JPeng, J Q Wang, J Wang, L JYang, X HChen (2015). An extension of ELECTRE to multi-criteria decision-making problems with multi-hesitant fuzzy sets. Information Sciences, 307: 113–126 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2015.02.030
37
RPerez-Fernandez, P Alonso, HBustince, IDiaz, S Montes (2016). Applications of finite interval-valued hesitant fuzzy preference relations in group decision making. Information Sciences, 326: 89–101 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2015.07.039
38
GQian, H Wang, X QFeng (2013). Generalized hesitant fuzzy sets and their application in decision support system. Knowledge-Based Systems, 37: 357–365 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2012.08.019
39
J DQin, X W Liu, W Pedrycy (2016). Frank aggregation operators and their application to hesitant fuzzy multiple attribute decision making. Applied Soft Computing, 41: 428–452 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2015.12.030
40
PSevastjanov, L Dymova (2015). Generalized operations on hesitant fuzzy values in the framework of Dempster-Shafer theory. Information Sciences, 311: 39–58 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2015.03.041
41
G DSun, X Guan, XYi, ZZhou (2018). An innovative TOPSIS approach based on hesitant fuzzy correlation coefficient and its applications. Applied Soft Computing, 68: 249–267 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2018.04.004
42
C QTan, W T Yi, X H Chen (2015). Hesitant fuzzy Hamacher aggregation operators for multicriteria decision making. Applied Soft Computing, 26: 325–349 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2014.10.007
43
X LTian, Z S Xu, H Fujita (2018). Sequential funding the venture project or not? A prospect consensus process with probabilistic hesitant fuzzy preference information. Knowledge-Based Systems, 161: 172–184 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2018.08.002
44
VTorra (2010). Hesitant fuzzy sets. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 25: 529–539
45
S PWan, Y L Qin, J Y Dong (2017). A hesitant fuzzy mathematical programming method for hybrid multi-criteria group decision making with hesitant fuzzy truth degrees. Knowledge-Based Systems, 138: 232–248 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2017.10.002
46
G WWei (2012). Hesitant fuzzy prioritized operators and their application to multiple attribute decision making. Knowledge-Based Systems, 31: 176–182 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2012.03.011
47
Z BWu, B M Jin, J P Xu (2018). Local feedback strategy for consensus building with probability-hesitant fuzzy preference relations. Applied Soft Computing, 67: 691–705 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2017.06.011
48
Z BWu, J P Xu (2018). A consensus model for large-scale group decision making with hesitant fuzzy information and changeable clusters. Information Fusion, 41: 217–231 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2017.09.011
49
M MXia, Z S Xu (2013). Managing hesitant information GDM problems under fuzzy and multiplicative preference relations. International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-based Systems, 21(06): 865–897 https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218488513500402
50
M MXia, Z S Xu (2011a). Some techniques for aggregating hesitant and intuitionistic information based on Sasty’s 1-9 scale. Technical report
51
M MXia, Z S Xu (2011b). Hesitant fuzzy information aggregation in decision making. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 52(3): 395–407 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijar.2010.09.002
52
M MXia, Z S Xu, N Chen (2013). Some hesitant fuzzy aggregation operators with their application in group decision making. Group Decision and Negotiation, 22(2): 259–279 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-011-9261-7
53
Y JXu, C Y Li, X W Wen (2018). Missing values estimation and consensus building for incomplete hesitant fuzzy preference relations with multiplicative consistency. International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems, 11(1): 101–119 https://doi.org/10.2991/ijcis.11.1.9
54
Y JXu, D Rui, H MWang (2017). A dynamically weight adjustment in the consensus reaching process for group decision-making with hesitant fuzzy preference relations. International Journal of Systems Science, 48(6): 1311–1321 https://doi.org/10.1080/00207721.2016.1255803
55
Y JXu, F J Cabrerizo, N Herrera-Viedma (2017). A consensus model for hesitant fuzzy preference relations and its application in water allocation management. Applied Soft Computing, 58: 265–284 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2017.04.068
56
Y JXu, L Chen, R MRodriguez, FHerrera, H MWang (2016). Deriving the priority weights from incomplete hesitant fuzzy preference relations in group decision making. Knowledge-Based Systems, 99: 71–78 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2016.01.047
57
Z SXu, M M Xia (2011). On distance and correlation measures of hesitant fuzzy information. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 26(5): 410–425 https://doi.org/10.1002/int.20474
58
Z SXu, W Zhou (2017). Consensus building with a group of decision makers under the hesitant probabilistic fuzzy environment. Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, 16(4): 481–503 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10700-016-9257-5
59
Z SXu, X L Zhang (2013). Hesitant fuzzy multi-attribute decision making based on TOPSIS with incomplete weight information. Knowledge-Based Systems, 52: 53–64 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2013.05.011
60
D JYu, W Y Zhang, Y J Xu (2013). Group decision making under hesitant fuzzy environment with application to personnel evaluation. Knowledge-Based Systems, 52: 1–10 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2013.04.010
61
SZhang, Z S Xu, H Y Wu (2018). Fusions and preference relations based on probabilistic interval-valued hesitant fuzzy information in group decision making. Soft Computing, DOI: http://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-018-3465-6
62
SZhang, Z S Xu, Y He (2017). Operations and integrations of probabilistic hesitant fuzzy information in decision making. Information Fusion, 38: 1–11 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2017.02.001
63
X LZhang, Z S Xu (2014a). Interval programming method for hesitant fuzzy multi-attribute group decision making with incomplete preference over alternatives. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 75: 217–229 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2014.07.002
64
X LZhang, Z S Xu (2014b). The TODIM analysis approach based on novel measured functions under hesitant fuzzy environment. Knowledge-Based Systems, 61: 48–58 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2014.02.006
65
X LZhang, Z S Xu (2015). Hesitant fuzzy QUALIFLEX approach with a signed distance-based comparison method for multiple criteria decision analysis. Expert Systems with Applications, 42(2): 873–884 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2014.08.056
66
Z MZhang (2013). Hesitant fuzzy power aggregation operators and their application to multiple attribute group decision making. Information Sciences, 234: 150–181 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2013.01.002
67
Z MZhang (2016). Deriving the priority weights from incomplete hesitant fuzzy preference relations based on multiplicative consistency. Applied Soft Computing, 46: 37–59 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2016.04.010
68
Z MZhang, C Wang, D ZTian, KLi (2014). Induced generalized hesitant fuzzy operators and their application to multiple attribute group decision making. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 67: 116–138 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2013.10.011
69
Z MZhang, C Wang, X DTian (2015a). A decision support model for group decision making with hesitant fuzzy preference relations. Knowledge-Based Systems, 86: 77–101 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2015.05.023
70
Z MZhang, C Wang, X DTian (2015b). Multi-criteria group decision making with incomplete hesitant fuzzy preference relations. Applied Soft Computing, 36: 1–23 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2015.06.047
71
Z MZhang, C Wu (2014a). Deriving the priority weights from hesitant multiplicative preference relations in group decision making. Applied Soft Computing, 25: 107–117 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2014.08.062
72
Z MZhang, C Wu (2014b). Weighted hesitant fuzzy sets and their application to multi-criteria decision making. British Journal of Mathematics and Computer Science, 4(8): 1091–1123 https://doi.org/10.9734/BJMCS/2014/8533
73
ZZhang, X Y Kou, Q X Dong (2018). Additive consistency analysis and improvement for hesitant fuzzy preference relations. Expert Systems with Applications, 98: 118–128 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2018.01.016
74
ZZhang, X Y Kou, W Y Yu, C H Guo (2018). On priority weights and consistency for incomplete hesitant fuzzy preference relations. Knowledge-Based Systems, 143: 115–126 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2017.12.010
75
NZhao, Z S Xu, Z L Ren (2015). On typical hesitant fuzzy prioritized “or” operator in multi-attribute decision making. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 31(1): 73–100 https://doi.org/10.1002/int.21754
76
X FZhao, R Lin, G WWei (2014). Hesitant triangular fuzzy information aggregation based on Einstein operations and their application to multiple attribute decision making. Expert Systems with Applications, 41(4): 1086–1094 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2013.07.104
77
WZhou, Z S Xu (2017a). Expected hesitant VaR for tail decision making under probabilistic hesitant fuzzy environment. Applied Soft Computing, 60: 297–311 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2017.06.057
78
WZhou, Z S Xu (2017b). Group consistency and group decision making under uncertain probabilistic hesitant fuzzy preference environment. Information Sciences, 414: 276–288 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2017.06.004
79
WZhou, Z S Xu (2018). Probability calculation and element optimization of probabilistic hesitant fuzzy preference relations based on expected consistency. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 26(3): 1367–1378 https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2017.2723349
80
WZhou, Z S Xu, M H Chen (2015). Preference relations based on hesitant-intuitionistic fuzzy information and their application in group decision making. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 87: 163–175 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2015.04.020
81
BZhu (2014). Decision method for research and application based on preference relations. Nanjing: Southeast University
82
BZhu, Z S Xu (2014). Analytic hierarchy process-hesitant group decision making. European Journal of Operational Research, 239(3): 794–801 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2014.06.019
83
BZhu, Z S Xu (2018). Probability-hesitant fuzzy sets and the representation of preference relations. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 24(3): 1029–1040 https://doi.org/10.3846/20294913.2016.1266529
84
BZhu, Z S Xu, J P Xu (2014). Deriving a ranking from hesitant fuzzy preference relations under group decision making. IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics, 44(8): 1328–1337 https://doi.org/10.1109/TCYB.2013.2283021
BZhu, Z S Xu, M M Xia (2013). Hesitant fuzzy Bonferroni means for multi-criteria decision making. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 64(12): 1831–1840 https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.2013.7
87
BZhu, Z S Xu, R Zhang, MHong (2015). Generalized analytic network process. European Journal of Operational Research, 244(1): 277–288 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2015.01.011
88
BZhu, Z S Xu, R Zhang, MHong (2016). Hesitant analytic hierarchy process. European Journal of Operational Research, 250(2): 602–614 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2015.09.063
