The healthy and stable development of energy efficiencies in existing buildings cannot be separated from effective policy operation, and evaluating policy effectiveness contributes to scientifically-sound government decision-making. This paper creates an evaluation index system and a grey comprehensive evaluation model for policy effectiveness for energy efficiency in existing buildings using three dimensions: 1) the effect of the policy itself; 2) the administrative effect of the policy; and 3) policy implementation effects. It chooses the government’s subsidy policy and preferential tax policy at market cultivation stage for its empirical comparative evaluation. The evaluation indicates that the former is more effective. Finally, it puts forward policy development suggestions from the perspective of: 1) clarifying incentive object; 2) broadening incentive scope; 3) increasing incentive intensity; and 4) innovating incentive mode.
. [J]. Frontiers of Engineering Management, 2014, 1(4): 341-347.
Xing Wei,Han-ding Guo. A Comprehensive Evaluation of Policy Effectiveness for Energy Efficiency in Existing Buildings. Front. Eng, 2014, 1(4): 341-347.
Index system of policy effectiveness evaluation of EEEB
Implementation effect of EEEB policy (U1)
0.473
Average annual growth rate of total output value of energy service industry (U11)
0.43
Economic contribution of EEEB (U12)
0.26
Average annual growth rate of transformation area (U13)
0.16
Energy saving rate after transformation (U14)
0.09
Energy consumption per unit of GDP (U15)
0.06
Effect of policy itself (U2)
0.316
Completeness of policy system (U21)
0.43
Definiteness of policy goal (U22)
0.26
Suitability of policy content (U23)
0.16
Operability of policy tools (U24)
0.09
Dynamic property of policy update (U25)
0.06
Management effect of policy (U3)
0.211
Proportion of management institutions of energy saving (U31)
0.43
Transparency of management (U32)
0.26
Simplified degree of management (U33)
0.16
Elasticity of policy implementation (U34)
0.09
People’s satisfaction of management (U35)
0.06
Tab.1
Object
Index
E1
E2
E3
E4
E5
Object
Index
E1
E2
E3
E4
E5
Policy 1
U11
5
3.5
4
4.5
3
Policy 2
U11
4
4.5
4
3
3
U12
4
4
4.5
5
4
U12
5
3
3
3.5
4
U13
5
5
3.5
3.5
4
U13
5
3
3
3
3
U14
4
4
3
3
3.5
U14
3
4
4
4
4
U15
5
4
3
3
3
U15
4
2
3
2
4
U21
5
3
5
3
3.5
U21
5
4
2
3
3
U22
4
4
3
3.5
3
U22
4
3
3
5
2
U23
4
3.5
4.5
5
3.5
U23
4
3
3
2
3
U24
5
4.5
4
3.5
3
U24
3
3
4
3
3
U25
4.5
3
3.5
5
3
U25
3.5
2.5
3.5
3.5
3
U31
3.5
4.5
4
4
3.5
U31
3
3.5
3.5
2.5
3.5
U32
3
4
4
4
4
U32
2
4
3
3
3
U33
4
4.5
5
4
3.5
U33
3
3.5
3
3
2.5
U34
3.5
3.5
4
4.5
3
U34
3
4
3.5
2.5
2
U35
5
3
3.5
3
3.5
U35
2
2.5
4
3.5
3
Tab.2
1
Bertoldip, R. 2006. Energy service companies in European countries: current status and a strategy to foster their development. Energy Policy, 34, 1818–1832
2
Carlsson-Kanyama, A., Linden, A., & Eriksson, B. 2005. Residential energy behavior: does generation matter. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 29, 239–253
3
Chen, M. 2012. Establishing evaluation system of the ESCO’s core competitiveness based on grey comprehensive evaluation. Zhejiang: Zhejiang Gongshang University, 63–75
4
Guo, H., Ma, X., & Shang, L. 2012. Practical and theoretic review on fostering market of energy efficiency in existing buildings. Science & Technology Progress and Policy, 29, 151–156
5
Han, Q., Liu, C., Zhang, Y., & Jin, Z. 2009. Economic in incentive contract design with a symmetric information in building energy efficiency retrofit. China Civil Engineering Journal, 42, 129–133
6
James, E. 2004. Public policy. Nanjing: Huaxia Publishing Press, 35–44
7
Jeffery, A., & Drezner. 1999. Designing effective incentives for energy conservation in the public sector. (Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree). Claremont Graduate University, California.
8
Liu, Y. 2011. Study on economic incentive for improving energy efficiency of existing residential buildings. Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press, 92–99
9
Lu, S. 2007. External analysis and incentive polices of building energy efficiency. Construction Economy, (4), 43–46
10
Ma, L., Li, H., & Qi, Y. 2012. Analysis on policy-making process of China’s energy-saving performance assessment institution—Taking perspective of central-local interaction. Journal of Public Management, 9(1), 1–8,121
11
Milou, B., & Niels, B. 2007. Government regulation as an impetus for innovation: evidence from energy performance regulation in the Dutch residential building sector. Energy Policy, (35), 4812–4825
12
Wei, X., & Guo, H. 2014. Research and analysis on domestic and international building practice of policies and regulations system in energy efficiency in existing building. Construction Economy, 35, 68–72
13
Xu, Z., Guo, H., & Ren, S. 2009. Analysis on information asymmetry and countermeasure research of energy efficiency market in existing building. Construction Economy, (6), 94–98
14
Yang, L. 2006. Interest difference and policy game: unique interpretation of relationship between central and the local government. Chongqing Social Sciences, (7), 101–105
15
Yang, X., Hui, X., & Zhang, L. 2012. Grey comprehensive evaluation of housing policies effectiveness. China Soft Science, (11), 183–192
16
Zhang, L., & Wang, Y. 2008. Research on economic incentive polices of energy efficiency in existing building. Construction Economy, (6), 94–96
17
Zhang, Y., Guo, H.D., Guo, H.G., & Wang, S. 2009. The evaluation method of government supervision on the main branch of engineering quality in construction phase. Journal of Chongqing Institute of Technology, 23, 57–62
