Drift analysis of MH370 debris in the southern Indian Ocean
Jia GAO1,2,3, Lin MU1,3(), Xianwen BAO1, Jun SONG4, Yang DING1
1. College of Oceanic and Atmospheric Sciences, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266100, China 2. National Marine Data and Information Service, Tianjin 300171, China 3. College of Marine Science and Technology, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China 4. School of Marine Science and Environment Engineering, Dalian Ocean University, Dalian 116023, China
Malaysian Airlines Flight MH370 disappeared on 8 March 2014, while flying from Kuala Lumpur to Beijing. A flaperon from the flight was found on Reunion Island in July 2015. Two more confirmed pieces of debris were found in Mauritius and Tanzania, and 19 unconfirmed items were found off Mozambique, South Africa, and Madagascar. Drift buoys originating from the designated underwater search area arrived in Reunion Island, Mauritius, and Tanzania. Some of these buoys took a similarly long time as did real debris to reach these destinations, following a heading northeast and then west. For the present study, a maritime object drift prediction model was developed. “High resolution surface currents, Stokes drift, and winds” were processed, and a series of model experiments were constructed. The predicted trajectories of the modeled objects were similar to the observed trajectories of the drift buoys. Many modeled objects drifted northward then westward, ending up in Reunion Island, Mauritius, and Tanzania with probabilities of 5‰, 5‰, and 19‰, respectively. At the end of the simulation, most objects were located near 10°S in the western Indian Ocean. There were significant differences between experiments with different leeway factors, possibly because of the influence of southeast trade winds. The north part of the underwater search area is most likely to be the crash site, because the predicted trajectories of objects originating here are consistent with the many pieces of debris found along the east coast of Africa and the absence of such findings on the west coast of Australia.
. [J]. Frontiers of Earth Science, 2018, 12(3): 468-480.
Jia GAO, Lin MU, Xianwen BAO, Jun SONG, Yang DING. Drift analysis of MH370 debris in the southern Indian Ocean. Front. Earth Sci., 2018, 12(3): 468-480.
Allen A A (2005). Leeway divergence, Technical Report CG-D-05-05. US Coast Guard Research and Development Center, Groton, CT, USA
2
Alves O, Robert C (2005). Tropical Pacific Ocean model error covariances from Monte Carlo simulations. Q J R Meteorol Soc, 131(613): 3643–3658 https://doi.org/10.1256/qj.05.113
3
Ardhuin F, Marie L, Rascle N, Forget P, Roland A (2009). Observation and estimation of Lagrangian, stokes and Eulerian currents induced by wind and waves at the sea surface. J Phys Oceanogr, 39(11): 2820–2838 https://doi.org/10.1175/2009JPO4169.1
Australian Transportation Safety Bureau (2015). MH370 – Definition of Underwater Search Areas. ATSB Transport Safety Report, External Aviation Investigation AE-2014-054, 3 December 2015
6
Australian Transportation Safety Bureau (2016). MH370 – First Principles Review. ATSB Transport Safety Report, Aviation External Investigation AE-2014-054, 20 December 2016
7
Breivik Ø, Allen A A (2008). An operational search and rescue model for the Norwegian Sea and the North Sea. J Mar Syst, 69(1–2): 99–113 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmarsys.2007.02.010
8
Campos R M, Soares C G (2016). Comparison of HIPOCAS and ERA wind and wave reanalysis in the North Atlantic Ocean. Ocean Eng, 112: 320–334 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2015.12.028
9
Chassignet E P, Hurlburt H E, Metzger E J, Smedstad O M, Cummings J A, Halliwell G R, Bleck R, Baraille R, Wallcraft A J, Lozano C, Tolman H L, Srinivasan A, Hankin S, Cornillon P, Weisberg R, Barth A, He R, Werner F, Wilkin J (2009). US GODAE: global ocean prediction with the HYbrid Coordinate Ocean Model (HYCOM). Oceanography (Wash DC), 22(2): 64–75 https://doi.org/10.5670/oceanog.2009.39
10
Chaudhuri A H, Ponte R M, Forget G, Heimabach P (2013). A comparison of atmospheric reanalysis surface products over the ocean and implications for uncertainties in air-sea boundary forcing. J Clim, 26(1): 153–170 https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00090.1
11
Cummings J A (2005). Operational multivariate ocean data assimilation. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 131(613): 3583–3604 https://doi.org/10.1256/qj.05.105
12
Cummings J A, Smedstad O M (2013). Variational data assimilation for the global ocean, data assimilation for atmospheric. In: Park S K, Xu L, eds. Data Assimilation for Atmospheric, Oceanic and Hydrologic Applications. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg,303–343
13
Dee D P, Uppala S M, Simmons A J, Berrisford P, Poli P, Kobayashi S, Andrae U, Balmaseda M A, Balsamo G, Bauer P, Bechtold P, Beljaars A C M, van de Berg L, Bidlot J, Bormann N, Delsol C, Dragani R, Fuentes M, Geer A J, Haimberger L, Healy S B, Hersbach H, Hólm E V, Isaksen L, Kållberg P, Köhler M, Matricardi M, McNally A P, Monge-Sanz B M, Morcrette J J, Park B K, Peubey C, de Rosnay P, Tavolato C, Thépaut J N, Vitart F (2011). The ERA-Interim reanalysis: configuration and performance of the data assimilation system. Q J R Meteorol Soc, 137(656): 553–597 https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.828
14
Eichhorn M, Haertel A (2016). A debris backwards flow simulation system for Malaysia Airlines flight 370. IEEE OCEANS 2016 – Shanghai, 10‒13 April 2016 https://doi.org/10.1109/OCEANSAP.2016.7485732
Gao J, Mu L, Wang G S, Li C, Dong J X, Bao X W, Li H, Song J (2016). Drift analysis and prediction of debris from Malaysia Airlines flight MH370. Chin Sci Bull, 61(21): 2409–2418 (in Chinese)
17
Hui Z, Xu Y (2016). The impact of wave-induced Coriolis-Stokes forcing on satellite-derived ocean surface currents. J Geophys Res Oceans, 121(1): 410–426 https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JC011082
18
Jansen E, Coppini G, Pinardi N (2016). Drift simulation of MH370 debris using supersensemble techniques. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci, 16(7): 1623–1628 https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-16-1623-2016
19
Joseph S, Wallcraft A J, Jensen T G, Ravichandran M, Shenoi S S C, Nayak S (2012). Weakening of spring Wyrtki jets in the Indian Ocean during 2006–2011. J Geophys Res, 117: C04012 https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JC007581
20
Mo D, Hou Y, Li J, Liu Y (2016). Study on the storm surges induced by cold waves in the northern East China Sea. J Mar Syst, 160: 26–39 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmarsys.2016.04.002
21
Montecinos A, Muñoz R C, Oviedo S, Martínez A, Villagrán V (2017). Climatological Characterization of Puelche Winds down the Western Slope of the Extratropical Andes Mountains Using the NCEP Climate Forecast System Reanalysis. J Appl Meteorol Climatol, 56(3): 677–696 https://doi.org/10.1175/JAMC-D-16-0289.1
22
Philipps O (1977). The Dynamics of the Upper Ocean.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 336–337
23
Polton J A, Lewis D M, Belcher S E (2005). The Role of Wave-Induced Coriolis-Stokes Forcing on the Wind-Driven Mixed Layer. J Phys Oceanogr, 35(6): 444–457
24
Rahn D A, Garreaud R (2014). A synoptic climatology of the near-surface wind along the west coast of South America. Int J Climatol, 34(3): 780–792 https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.3724
25
Rimac A, von Storch J S, Eden C, Haak H (2013). The influence of high-resolution wind stress field on the power input to near-inertial motions in the ocean. Geophys Res Lett, 40(18): 4882–4886 https://doi.org/10.1002/grl.50929
26
Saha S, Moorthi S, Wu X, Wang J, Nadiga S, Tripp P, Behringer D, Hou H T, Chuang H, Iredell M, Ek M, Meng J, Yang R, Mendez M P, van den Dool H, Zhang Q, Wang W, Chen M, Becker E (2014). The NCEP Climate Forecast System Version2. J Clim, 27(6): 2185–2208 https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00823.1
27
Yin Y, Lin X, He R, Hou Y (2017). Impact of mesoscale eddies on Kuroshio intrusion variability northeast of Taiwan. J Geophys Res Oceans, 122(4): 3021–3040 https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JC012263
28
Yu L, Zhong S, Bian X, Heilman W E (2016). Climatology and trend of wind power resources in China and its surrounding regions: a revisit using climate forecast system reanalysis data. Int J Climatol, 36(5): 2173–2188 https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.4485
