Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Earth Science

ISSN 2095-0195

ISSN 2095-0209(Online)

CN 11-5982/P

邮发代号 80-963

2019 Impact Factor: 1.62

Frontiers of Earth Science  2020, Vol. 14 Issue (3): 493-511   https://doi.org/10.1007/s11707-019-0758-8
  本期目录
Computational investigation on hydrodynamic and sediment transport responses influenced by reclamation projects in the Meizhou Bay, China
Gefei DENG2, Yongming SHEN1,2(), Changping LI3, Jun TANG2
1. Institute of Environmental and Ecological Engineering, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, China
2. State Key Laboratory of Coastal and Offshore Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China
3. Research Center for Eco-Environmental Engineering, Dongguan University of Technology, Dongguan 523808, China
 全文: PDF(4326 KB)   HTML
Abstract

Reclamation projects are the main method of coastal exploitation, and the hydrodynamic environmental effect, together with the sediment transport response of the reclamation project, is important to the project’s site selection and environmental protection. Herein, a 3D numerical model based on the finite volume community ocean model (FVCOM) is applied to simulate the changes in the Meizhou Bay’s hydrodynamic environment and sediment transport after a reclamation project. The reclamation project greatly alters the shape of the shoreline and narrows the bay, leading to a significant change in its hydrodynamic environment and sediment transport. After the project, the clockwise coastal residual current in the corner above the Meizhou Island gradually disappears. An obvious counter-clockwise coastal residual current emerges around the rectangular corner. The tidal prism decreases by 0.65 × 109 and 0.44 × 109 m3 in the spring and neap tides, respectively. The residence time presents a major increase. These changes lead to the weakening of the water exchange capacity and the reduction of the self-purification capacity of the bay. Currents in the tidal channel weaken, whilst currents in the horizontal channel strengthen. The strength and scope of particle trajectories around the horizontal channel and the Meizhou Island enhance. The suspended sediment concentration (SSC) increases in the majority of the Meizhou Bay but decreases in the lateral bay. The eastern corner of Z2 shows a tendency to erode. The western region of the Meizhou Island, the upper portion of the rectangular corner and the western corner of Z4 show a tendency to deposit. The reclamation project increases the maximum storm surges by 0.06 m and decreases the maximum significant wave heights by 0.09 m.

Key wordsMeizhou Bay    FVCOM+SWAN    reclamation project    hydrodynamic environment    SSC    typhoon
收稿日期: 2018-05-26      出版日期: 2020-12-04
Corresponding Author(s): Yongming SHEN   
 引用本文:   
. [J]. Frontiers of Earth Science, 2020, 14(3): 493-511.
Gefei DENG, Yongming SHEN, Changping LI, Jun TANG. Computational investigation on hydrodynamic and sediment transport responses influenced by reclamation projects in the Meizhou Bay, China. Front. Earth Sci., 2020, 14(3): 493-511.
 链接本文:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fesci/CN/10.1007/s11707-019-0758-8
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fesci/CN/Y2020/V14/I3/493
Fig.1  
Fig.2  
Fig.3  
Fig.4  
Station Longitude Latitude M2 S2 K1 O1
H/m g/(° ) H/m g/(° ) H/m g/(° ) H/m g/(° )
Nanao 117.02°E 23.47°N −0.13 −0.98 0.00 −57.56 −0.06 12.79 0.00 8.19
Dongshan 117.57°E 23.75°N 0.01 7.86 0.15 −2.97 −0.05 9.72 0.00 3.81
Futouwan 117.87°E 23.92°N 0.12 0.71 0.26 −0.81 −0.02 3.41 0.02 4.49
Jinmen 118.17°E 24.38°N 0.01 25.38 0.21 0.81 −0.02 0.62 0.01 6.56
Weitou 118.57°E 24.53°N −0.23 14.32 0.05 −7.46 −0.09 −8.02 −0.06 −1.33
Jiangjunao 119.52°E 23.37°N −0.05 19.69 0.06 0.83 −0.01 −2.83 0.01 3.45
Magong 119.55°E 23.55°N −0.05 17.94 0.18 0.30 0.00 −3.05 0.02 0.61
Xinhuawan 119.58°E 25.33°N 0.02 22.57 0.09 −6.93 −0.05 −1.49 −0.02 0.90
Baishadao 119.60°E 23.73°N −0.03 17.31 0.17 1.76 −0.01 −3.62 0.01 0.60
Kouhu 120.17°E 23.70°N −0.02 20.73 0.11 −7.28 0.02 −7.26 0.03 −5.79
Gaoxiong 120.27°E 22.62°N 0.04 −9.07 0.02 −0.44 −0.04 −6.99 0.00 −9.83
Taizhong 120.55°E 24.33°N 0.06 15.50 0.15 −10.24 0.01 −2.79 0.01 −21.02
Checheng 120.68°E 22.07°N −0.01 2.08 0.02 28.27 −0.02 −7.69 0.01 0.09
Houlong 120.75°E 24.62°N 0.00 10.46 0.09 −19.27 0.00 −4.40 0.01 5.89
Chongwu 118.95°E 24.88°N 0.01 3.43 0.18 5.06 −0.03 −3.56 0.00 4.19
Pingtan 119.83°E 25.47°N −0.03 1.21 0.10 −24.26 −0.05 −9.69 −0.01 −1.54
Jinjiang 118.67°E 24.63°N 0.10 4.39 0.20 −11.23 −0.03 0.36 0.01 12.46
Maximum absolute error 0.23 25.38 0.26 57.56 0.09 12.79 0.06 21.02
Tab.1  
Fig.5  
Fig.6  
Fig.7  
Fig.8  
Fig.9  
Fig.10  
Time Central Location Central Pressure /hPa Maximum Wind Speed /(m·s−1)
Longitude Latitude
2010/9/19 0:00 123.7°E 23.9°N 935 52
2010/9/19 6:00 122.3°E 24.0°N 935 52
2010/9/19 12:00 121.0°E 23.2°N 950 45
2010/9/19 18:00 120.0°E 23.1°N 970 35
2010/9/20 0:00 119.3°E 23.5°N 970 35
2010/9/20 6:00 118.1°E 23.8°N 970 35
Tab.2  
Fig.11  
Fig.12  
Fig.13  
Fig.14  
Fig.15  
Fig.16  
Fig.17  
Reclamation Sea area/km2 Spring tide Neap tide
Tidal prism
/(109 m3)
Change
/(109 m3)
Change rate Tidal prism
/(109 m3)
Change
/(109 m3)
Change rate
Before 1014.30 5.46 3.31
After 876.98 4.81 −0.65 −13.61% 2.87 −0.44 −15.49%
Tab.3  
Zone Reclamation Spring tide Neap tide
Amplitude
/day
Change
/day
Change rate Amplitude
/day
Change
/day
Change rate
Z1 Before 14.65 30
After 30 15.35 104.78% 30
Z2 Before 16.97 14.12
After 19.67 2.70 15.91% 15.50 1.38 9.77%
Z3 Before 8.47 12.85
After 16.18 7.71 91.03% 24.53 11.68 90.89%
Z4 Before 22.72 23.72
After 30 7.28 32.04% 30 6.28 26.48%
Z5 Before 8.52 9.31
After 9.73 1.21 14.20% 10.62 1.31 14.07%
Tab.4  
Fig.18  
Fig.19  
Reclamation Maximum storm surges Maximum significant wave heights
Amplitude/m Change/m Change rate Amplitude/m Change/m Change rate
Before 2.55 1.91
After 2.61 0.06 2.35% 1.82 −0.09 −4.71%
Tab.5  
1 J C Chen (1988). A primary study on sedimental resource in Meizhou Bay. J Fujian Normal U (Natural Science), 4(3): 104–111
2 C Chen, H Liu, R C Beardsley (2003). An unstructured, finite-volume, three-dimensional, primitive equation ocean model: application to coastal ocean and estuaries. J Atmos Ocean Technol, 20(1): 159–186
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0426(2003)020<0159:AUGFVT>2.0.CO;2
3 C Chen, H Huang, R C Beardsley, H Liu, Q Xu, G Cowles (2007). A finite volume numerical approach for coastal ocean circulation studies: comparisons with finite difference models. J Geophys Res, 112(C3): C03018
https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JC003485
4 W B Chen, W C Liu, M H Hsu (2012). Computational investigation of typhoon-induced storm surges along the coast of Taiwan. Nat Hazards, 64(2): 1161–1185
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-012-0287-1
5 T Fujita (1952). Pressure distribution within typhoon. Geophys Mag, 23(4): 437–451
6 Y K Guo, J S Zhang, L X Zhang, Y M Shen (2009). Computational investigation of typhoon-induced storm surge in Hangzhou Bay, China. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci, 85(4): 530–536
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2009.09.021
7 Y K Guo, X G Wu, C H Pan, J S Zhang (2012). Numerical Simulation of the Tidal Flow and Suspended Sediment Transport in the Qiantang Estuary. J Waterw Port Coast Ocean Eng, 138(3): 192–202
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WW.1943-5460.0000118
8 X F Guo, C Wang, C H Chen, J J Tang (2014). Numerical simulation of the transport diffusion of suspended matter during the construction of Fengwei reclamation project at Meizhou Bay. J Appl Oceanography, 33(1): 125–132 (in Chinese)
9 K Hasselmann, T P Barnett, E Bouws, H Carlson, D E Cartwright, K Enke, J A Ewing, H Gienapp, D E Hasselmann, P Kruseman, A Meerburg, P Müller, D J Olbers, K Richter, W Sell, H Walden (1973). Measurements of Wind-Wave Growth and Swell Decay during the Joint North Sea Wave Project (JONSWAP). Deutches Hydrographisches Institut
10 G J Holland (1980). An analytic model of the wind and pressure profiles in hurricanes. Mon Weather Rev, 108(8): 1212–1218
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1980)108<1212:AAMOTW>2.0.CO;2
11 G J Holland (2008). A revised hurricane and pressure-wind model. Mon Weather Rev, 136(9): 3432–3445
https://doi.org/10.1175/2008MWR2395.1
12 Q Z Hou, L Q Zuo, Y J Lu, Z L Wang, S P Mo, X J She (2017). Hydrodynamic environment response to human interventions in a Macro Tidal Bay: the example of the Quanzhou Bay. J Basic Sci Eng S, 25(6): 1124–1138 (in Chinese)
13 C P Jelesnianski (1965). A Numerical calculation of storm surges induced by a tropical storm impinging on a Continental shelf. Mon Weather Rev, 93(6): 343–358
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1993)093<0343:ANCOS>2.3.CO;2
14 H Jia, Y M Shen, M R Su, C X Yu (2018). Numerical simulation of hydrodynamic and water quality effects of shoreline changes in Bohai Bay. Front Earth Sci, 12(3): 625–639
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11707-018-0688-x
15 X H Liu, W R Huang (2009). Modeling sediment resuspension and transport induced by storm wind in Apalachicola Bay, USA. Environ Model Softw, 24(11): 1302–1313
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2009.04.006
16 H Liu, W R Pan, Z B Luo, X F Shi (2009). Numerical study on the tidal regime in Meizhou Bay. J Oceanogr Taiwan, 28: 118–122 (in Chinese)
17 Z B Luo, W R Pan, G R Zhang (2007). The sediment properties and transportation rules of the Xiuyu Sea-route in Meizhou Bay. J Xiamen U Natural S, 46(3): 382–385
18 V A Myers (1957). Maximum hurricane winds. Bull Am Meteorol Soc, 38(4): 227–228
19 G L Mellor, T Yamada (1982). Development of a turbulence closure model for geophysical fluid problems. Rev Geophys Space Phys, 20(4): 851–875
https://doi.org/10.1029/RG020i004p00851
20 H E Pelling, J A Mattias Green (2013). Sea level rise and tidal power plants in the Gulf of Maine. J Geophys Res Oceans, 118(6): 2863–2873
https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrc.20221
21 Y M Shen, H Jia, C P Li, J Tang (2018). Numerical simulation of saltwater intrusion and storm surge effects of reclamation in Pearl River Estuary, China. Appl Ocean Res, 79: 101–112
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apor.2018.07.013
22 P J Vickery, P F Skerlj, A C Steckley, L A Twisdale (2000). Hurricane wind field model for use in hurricane simulations. J Struct Eng, 126(10): 1203–1221
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2000)126:10(1203)
23 H E Willoughby, M E Rahn (2004). Parametric representation of the primary hurricane vortex. Part I: Observations and evaluation of the Holland (1980) model. Mon Weather Rev, 132(12): 3033–3048
https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR2831.1
24 Y Xu, D W Chen, L Li, P L Li (2015). Numerical modeling of strom surge in Taiwan Strait caused by Typhoon FANAPI. Periodical Ocean U C, 45(2): 008–017 (in Chinese)
25 Z C Zhu, Z J Hu, Y Q Zhang, W Q Chi, J Q Liu, S H Bian, C B Xiong (2014). Numerical simulation and observations of vertical non-uniform of water temperature in the Meizhou Bay influenced by warm water discharge. Adv Marine Sci, 32(2): 230–238 (in Chinese)
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed