Sorption and desorption of pymetrozine on six Chinese soils

doi:10.1007/s11783-014-0715-4

Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering

2016, Vol. 10

Issue (1): 1-10 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-014-0715-4

本期目录

Sorption and desorption of pymetrozine on six Chinese soils

Mingxing GAO^1,², Yingying LI¹, Hong YANG¹(

), Yucheng GU³

¹. Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Pesticide Science, College of Sciences, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China
². Syngenta Nantong Crop Protection Co., Ltd., Nantong Economic & Technological Development Area, Nantong 226009, China
³. Syngenta Jealott’s Hill International Research Centre, Bracknell, Berkshire, RG42 6EY, UK

全文: PDF(424 KB) HTML

Abstract：

Pymetrozine is a selective insecticide with a unique chemical structure and mode to control hemipteran and homopteran. While pymetrozine has brought great benefits to crop production by killing insects, its residues in soil may have a detrimental effect on environment. Therefore, it is of great importance to investigate its behaviors in soil. In this study, the sorption and desorption of pymetrozine on six Chinese soils were investigated using a batch equilibrium approach to understand its mobile behavior in the soils. Both sorption and desorption isotherms of pymetrozine were in good agreement with the Freundlich model. The sorption coefficient K_F varied between 3.37 and 58.32 mL∙g⁻¹ and the sorption isotherms were nonlinear, with 1/n ranging from 0.57 to 0.91. A regression equation was proposed to predict the sorption of pymetrozine on six different soil samples: log K_F = 4.3708 − 4.5709 × log (pH in 0.01mol·L⁻¹ CaCl₂) + 0.4700 × log OC% + 0.0057 × sand (%) + 0.0022 × CEC(clay), with R² = 0.9982. The organic carbon content of soil positively affected the sorption of pymetrozine, but soil pH had a negative effect on the sorption. Additionally, effects of CaCl₂ concentration, soil to solution ratio and pesticide form were investigated. The sorption was promoted with an increase in soil to solution ratio and a decrease in CaCl₂ concentration. The possible variation of the five formulated products of pymetrozine was also investigated.

Key words： pymetrozine sorption desorption soil

收稿日期: 2013-07-13 出版日期: 2015-12-03

Corresponding Author(s): Hong YANG

引用本文:

. [J]. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 2016, 10(1): 1-10.
Mingxing GAO, Yingying LI, Hong YANG, Yucheng GU. Sorption and desorption of pymetrozine on six Chinese soils. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2016, 10(1): 1-10.

链接本文:

https://academic.hep.com.cn/fese/CN/10.1007/s11783-014-0715-4
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fese/CN/Y2016/V10/I1/1

Tab.1

Fig.1

Tab.2

Fig.2

Fig.3

Fig.4

Fig.5

1	I Ishaaya, A Barazani, S Kontsedalov, A R Horowitz. Insecticides with novel modes of action: Mechanism, selectivity and cross-resistance. Entomological Research, 2007, 37(3): 148–152 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-5967.2007.00104.x
2	G Shen, X Hu, Y Hu. Kinetic study of the degradation of the insecticide pymetrozine in a vegetable-field ecosystem. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2009, 164(2–3): 497–501 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.08.020 pmid: 18801616
3	P Harrewijn, H Kayser. Pymetrozine, a fast-acting and selective inhibitor of Aphid feeding. In-situ studies with electronic monitoring of feeding behaviour. Pesticide Science, 1997, 49(2): 130– 140 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9063(199702)49:2<130::AID-PS509>3.0.CO;2-U
4	H G Xu. Effects of 25% pymetrozine WP (Feidian) on Nilaparvata lugens in rice fields. Modern Agricultural Science and Technology, 2012, 16: 123–126 (in Chinese)
5	United States Environmental Protection Agency. Fact sheet of pymetrozine, 2000
6	L Jiang, L Ma, Y Sui, S Q Han, H Yang. Mobilization and plant accumulation of prometryne in soil by two different sources of organic matter. Journal of Environmental Monitoring, 2011, 13(7): 1935–1943 https://doi.org/10.1039/c0em00679c pmid: 21655603
7	L Jiang, J Huang, L Liang, P Y Zheng, H Yang. Mobility of prometryne in soil as affected by dissolved organic matter. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2008, 56(24): 11933–11940 https://doi.org/10.1021/jf8023134 pmid: 19053378
8	J J Zhang, L J Yang, L N Wei, X Du, L L Zhou, L Jiang, Q Ding, H Yang. Environmental impact of two organic amendments on sorption and mobility of propachlor in soils. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 2012, 12(9): 1380–1388 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-012-0561-6
9	A Mudhoo, V K Garg. Sorption, transport and transformation of atrazine in soils, minerals and composts: A Review. Pedosphere, 2011, 21(1): 11–25 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1002-0160(10)60074-4
10	C Margoum, C Malessard, V Gouy. Investigation of various physicochemical and environmental parameter influence on pesticide sorption to ditch bed substratum by means of experimental design. Chemosphere, 2006, 63(11): 1835–1841 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2005.10.032 pmid: 16360194
11	G Chen, C Lin, L Chen, H Yang. Effect of size-fractionation dissolved organic matter on the mobility of prometryne in soil. Chemosphere, 2010, 79(11): 1046–1055 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2010.03.038 pmid: 20400172
12	Q Ding, H L Wu, Y Xu, L J Guo, K Liu, H M Gao, H Yang. Impact of low molecular weight organic acids and dissolved organic matter on sorption and mobility of isoproturon in two soils. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2011, 190(1–3): 823–832 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.04.003 pmid: 21524848
13	M Kah, C D Brown. Adsorption of ionisable pesticides in soils. Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 2006, 188: 149–217 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-32964-2_5 pmid: 17016919
14	H Yang, X Wu, L X Zhou. Effects of two types of dissolved organic matter on chlorotoluron sorption and desorption in two Chinese soils. Pedosphere, 2005, 4: 432–440
15	N M Nagy, J Kónya. Study of pH-dependent charges of soils by surface acid-base properties. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 2007, 305(1): 94–100 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2006.09.040 pmid: 17064719
16	OECD. Guidelines for the testing of chemicals. Test No. 106: Adsorption desorption using a batch equilibrium method. OECD (Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development), Paris, 2000
17	European Commission. Health and Consumer Protection Directorate-General. Review report for the active substance pymetrozine, , 2002
18	J P Carlier, T Rougelot, N Burlion. Performance evaluation of models describing sorption isotherm in cementitious materials between saturation and oven dryness. Construction & Building Materials, 2012, 37: 58–66 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.07.032
19	H Z Freundlich. Over the adsorption in solution. Journal of Physical Chemistry, 1904, 57A: 385–470
20	I Langmuir. The Adsorption of gases on plane surfaces of glass, mica, and platinum. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 1918, 40(9): 1361–1403 https://doi.org/10.1021/ja02242a004
21	K M Doretto, S Rath. Sorption of sulfadiazine on Brazilian soils. Chemosphere, 2013, 90(6): 2027–2034 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2012.10.084 pmid: 23245764
22	W L Huang, P A Peng, Z Q Yu, J M Fu. Effects of organic matter heterogeneity on sorption and desorption of organic contaminants by soils and sediments. Applied Geochemistry, 2003, 18(7): 955–972 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-2927(02)00205-6
23	R K Ghosh, N Singh. Sorption of metolachlor and atrazine in fly ash amended soils: comparison of optimized isotherm models. Journal of Environmental Science and Health. Part. B, Pesticides, Food Contaminants, and Agricultural Wastes, 2012, 47(7): 718–727 https://doi.org/10.1080/03601234.2012.669288 pmid: 22560035
24	J Zhang, Z Li, G Ge, W Sun, Y Liang, L Wu. Impacts of soil organic matter, pH and exogenous copper on sorption behavior of norfloxacin in three soils. Journal of Environmental Sciences (China), 2009, 21(5): 632–640 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1001-0742(08)62318-9 pmid: 20108665
25	C T Chiou, P E Porter, D W Schmedding. Partition equilibria of nonionic organic compounds between soil organic matter and water. Environmental Science and Technology, 1983, 1(4): 227–231 https://doi.org/10.1021/es00110a009 pmid: 22263773
26	I Quiñones, G Guiochon. Derivation and application of a Jovanovic–Freundlich isotherm model for single-component adsorption on heterogeneous surfaces. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 1996, 183(1): 57–67 https://doi.org/10.1006/jcis.1996.0518
27	Y K Kim, S J Lim, M H Han, J Y Cho. Sorption characteristics of oxytetracycline, amoxicillin, and sulfathiazole in two different soil types. Geoderma, 2012, 185–186: 97–101 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2012.03.016
28	J P Gustafsson, L B Mwamila, K Kergoat. The pH dependence of phosphate sorption and desorption in Swedish agricultural soils. Geoderma, 2012, 189-190: 304–311 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2012.05.014
29	A Bhandari, J T Novak, D F Berry. Binding of 4-monochlorophenol to soil. Environmental Science and Technology, 1996, 30(7): 2305–2311 https://doi.org/10.1021/es950691c
30	J Cao, H Guo, H M Zhu, L Jiang, H Yang. Effects of SOM, surfactant and pH on the sorption-desorption and mobility of prometryne in soils. Chemosphere, 2008, 70(11): 2127–2134 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2007.08.062 pmid: 17923148
31	G Pan, C Jia, D Zhao, C You, H Chen, G Jiang. Effect of cationic and anionic surfactants on the sorption and desorption of perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) on natural sediments. Environmental Pollution, 2009, 157(1): 325–330 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2008.06.035 pmid: 18722698
32	L W Pan, R L Siegrist, M Crimi. Effects of in situ remediation using oxidants or surfactants on subsurface organic matter and sorption of trichloroethene. Ground Water Monitoring and Remediation, 2012, 32(2): 96–105 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6592.2011.01377.x
33	S Dai, G Liu, Y Qian, X Cheng. The sorption behavior of complex pollution system composed of aldicarb and surfactant—SDBS. Water Research, 2001, 35(9): 2286–2290 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(00)00491-7 pmid: 11358309

[1]

Download

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed