Comparison of membrane fouling in ultrafiltration of down-flow and up-flow biological activated carbon effluents
Lu Ao1, Wenjun Liu2(), Yang Qiao2, Cuiping Li3, Xiaomao Wang2
1. Department of Military Installation, Army Logistics University of PLA, Chongqing 401331, China 2. School of Environment, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China 3. Urban Planning & Design Institute of Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518028, China
The UF membrane fouling by down- and up-flow BAC effluents were compared.
Up-flow BAC effluent fouled the membrane faster than down-flow BAC effluent.
The combined effects dominated irreversible fouling.
The extent of fouling exacerbated by inorganic particles was higher.
The TMP, permeate flux, and normalized membrane flux during 21 days of UF of DBAC and UBAC effluents.
Fouling during ultrafiltration of down- and up-flow biological activated carbon effluents was investigated to determine the roles of polysaccharides, proteins, and inorganic particles in ultrafiltration membrane fouling. During ultrafiltration of down- flow biological activated carbon effluent, the trans-membrane pressure was≤26 kPa and the permeate flux was steady at 46.7 L?m−2?h−1. However, during ultrafiltration of up-flow biological activated carbon effluent, the highest trans-membrane pressure was almost 40 kPa and the permeate flux continuously decreased to 30 L?m−2?h−1. At the end of the filtration period, the normalized membrane fluxes were 0.88 and 0.62 for down- and up-flow biological activated carbon effluents, respectively. The membrane removed the turbidity and polysaccharides content by 47.4% and 30.2% in down- flow biological activated effluent and 82.5% and 22.4% in up-flow biological activated carbon effluent, respectively, but retained few proteins. The retention of polysaccharides was higher on the membrane that filtered the down- flow biological activated effluent compared with that on the membrane that filtered the up-flow biological activated carbon effluent. The polysaccharides on the membranes fouled by up-flow biological activated carbon and down- flow biological activated effluents were spread continuously and clustered, respectively. These demonstrated that the up-flow biological activated carbon effluent fouled the membrane faster. Membrane fouling was associated with a portion of the polysaccharides (not the proteins) and inorganic particles in the feed water. When there was little difference in the polysaccharide concentrations between the feed waters, the fouling extent was exacerbated more by inorganic particles than by polysaccharides.
Ao L, Liu W, Zhao L, Wang X (2016). Membrane fouling in ultrafiltration of natural water after pretreatment to different extents. Journal of Environmental Sciences (China), 43(5): 234–243 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2015.09.008
pmid: 27155429
2
Boudaud N, Machinal C, David F, Fréval-Le Bourdonnec A, Jossent J, Bakanga F, Arnal C, Jaffrezic M P, Oberti S, Gantzer C (2012). Removal of MS2, Qb and GA bacteriophages during drinking water treatment at pilot scale. Water Research, 46(8): 2651–2664 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2012.02.020
pmid: 22421032
3
Carroll T, King S, Gray S R, Bolto B A, Booker N A (2000). The fouling of microfiltration membranes by NOM after coagulation treatment. Water Research, 34(11): 2861–2868 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(00)00051-8
4
Chang H, Liu B, Liang H, Yu H, Shao S, Li G (2017). Effect of filtration mode and backwash water on hydraulically irreversible fouling of ultrafiltration membrane. Chemosphere, 179: 254–264 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.03.122
pmid: 28371709
5
Chen M Y, Lee D J, Yang Z, Peng X F, Lai J Y (2006). Fluorecent staining for study of extracellular polymeric substances in membrane biofouling layers. Environmental Science & Technology, 40(21): 6642–6646 https://doi.org/10.1021/es0612955
pmid: 17144290
6
Chen W, Westerhoff P, Leenheer J A, Booksh K (2003). Fluorescence excitation-emission matrix regional integration to quantify spectra for dissolved organic matter. Environmental Science & Technology, 37(24): 5701–5710 https://doi.org/10.1021/es034354c
pmid: 14717183
7
Chen X D, Wang Z, Liu D Y, Xiao K, Guan J, Xie Y F, Wang X M, Waite T D (2018). Role of adsorption in combined membrane fouling by biopolymers coexisting with inorganic particles. Chemosphere, 191: 226–234 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.09.139
pmid: 29035794
8
Cho J W, Amy G, Pellegrino J, Yoon Y M (1998). Characterization of clean and natural organic matter (NOM) fouled NF and UF membranes, and foulants characterization. Desalination, 118(1–3): 101–108 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0011-9164(98)00100-3
9
Escobar I C, Hoek E M, Gabelich C J, DiGiano F A, Le Gouellec Y A, Berube P, Howe K J, Allen J, Atasi K Z, Benjamin M M, Brandhuber P J, Brant J, Chang Y J, Chapman M, Childress A, Conlon W J, Cooke T H, Crossley I A, Crozes G F, Huck P M, Kommineni S N, Jacangelo J G, Karimi A A, Kim J H, Lawler D F, Li Q L, Schideman L C, Sethi S, Tobiason J E, Tseng T, Veerapanemi S, Zander A K (2005). Committee Report: Recent advances and research needs in membrane fouling. Journal- American Water Works Association, 97(8): 79–89 https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1551-8833.2005.tb07452.x
10
Geismar N, Berube P R, Barbeau B (2012). Variability and limits of the unified membrane fouling index: application to the reduction of low-pressure membrane fouling by ozonation and biofiltration. Desalination and Water Treatment, 43(1–3): 91–101 https://doi.org/10.1080/19443994.2012.672214
11
Grabińska-Loniewska A, Perchuć M, Korniłowicz-Kowalska T (2004). Biocenosis of BAC(F)s used for groundwater treatment. Water Research, 38(7): 1695–1706 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2003.12.041
pmid: 15026224
12
Gray S R, Dow N, Orbell J D, Tran T, Bolto B A (2011). The significance of interactions between organic compounds on low pressure membrane fouling. Water Science and Technology, 64(3): 632–639 https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2011.488
pmid: 22097041
13
Guo J, Hu J, Tao Y, Zhu J, Zhang X (2014). Effect of ozone on the performance of a hybrid ceramic membrane-biological activated carbon process. Journal of Environmental Sciences (China), 26(4): 783–791 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1001-0742(13)60477-5
pmid: 25079408
14
Hagen K (1998). Removal of particles, bacteria and parasites with ultrafiltration for drinking water treatment. Desalination, 1–3(119): 85–91 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0011-9164(98)00117-9
15
Hallé C, Huck P M, Peldszus S, Haberkamp J, Jekel M (2009). Assessing the performance of biological filtration as pretreatment to low pressure membranes for drinking water. Environmental Science & Technology, 43(10): 3878–3884 https://doi.org/10.1021/es803615g
pmid: 19544902
16
Han L, Liu W, Chen M, Zhang M, Liu S, Sun R, Fei X (2013). Comparison of NOM removal and microbial properties in up-flow/down-flow BAC filter. Water Research, 47(14): 4861–4868 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2013.05.022
pmid: 23866148
17
Howe K J, Clark M M (2002). Fouling of microfiltration and ultrafiltration membranes by natural waters. Environmental Science & Technology, 36(16): 3571–3576 https://doi.org/10.1021/es025587r
pmid: 12214651
18
Huang G, Meng F, Zheng X, Wang Y, Wang Z, Liu H, Jekel M (2011). Biodegradation behavior of natural organic matter (NOM) in a biological aerated filter (BAF) as a pretreatment for ultrafiltration (UF) of river water. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 90(5): 1795–1803 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-011-3251-1
pmid: 21494866
19
Jarusutthirak C, Amy G (2006). Role of soluble microbial products (SMP) in membrane fouling and flux decline. Environmental Science & Technology, 40(3): 969–974 https://doi.org/10.1021/es050987a
pmid: 16509344
20
Jermann D, Pronk W, Boller M (2008). Mutual influences between natural organic matter and inorganic particles and their combined effect on ultrafiltration membrane fouling. Environmental Science & Technology, 42(24): 9129–9136 https://doi.org/10.1021/es800654p
pmid: 19174882
21
Katsoufidou I S, Sioutopoulos D C, Yiantsios S G, Karabelas A J (2010). UF membrane fouling by mixtures of humic acids and sodium alginate Fouling mechanisms and reversibility. Desalination, 264(3 3SI): 220–227 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2010.08.017
22
Katsoufidou K, Yiantsios S G, Karabelas A J (2008). An experimental study of UF membrane fouling by humic acid and sodium alginate solutions: The effect of backwashing on flux recovery. Desalination, 220(1–3): 214–227 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2007.02.038
23
Kennedy M D, Chun H K, Yangali V, Heijman B, Schippers J C (2005). Natural organic matter (NOM) fouling of ultrafiltration membranes: fractionation of NOM in surface water and characterisation by LC-OCD. Desalination, 178(1–3): 73–83 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2005.02.004
24
Kennedy M D, Kamanyi J, Heijman B G J, Amy G (2008). Colloidal organic matter fouling of UF membranes: role of NOM composition & size. Desalination, 220(1–3): 200–213 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2007.05.025
25
Kim W H, Nishijima W, Shoto E, Okada M (1997). Pilot plant study on ozonation and biological activated carbon process for drinking water treatment. Water Science and Technology, 35(8): 21–28 https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.1997.0293
26
Kimura K, Hane Y, Watanabe Y, Amy G, Ohkuma N (2004). Irreversible membrane fouling during ultrafiltration of surface water. Water Research, 38(14-15): 3431–3441 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2004.05.007
pmid: 15276760
27
Kimura K, Tanaka K, Watanabe Y (2014). Microfiltration of different surface waters with/without coagulation: clear correlations between membrane fouling and hydrophilic biopolymers. Water Research, 49(2): 434–443 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2013.10.030
pmid: 24210507
28
Kong L, Kadokami K, Duong H T, Chau H T C (2016). Screening of 1300 organic micro-pollutants in groundwater from Beijing and Tianjin, North China. Chemosphere, 165: 221–230 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.08.084
pmid: 27657814
29
Law C, Li X Y, Li Q L (2010). The Combined Colloid-Organic Fouling on Nanofiltration Membrane for Wastewater Treatment and Reuse. Separation Science and Technology, 45(7): 935–940 https://doi.org/10.1080/01496391003657055
30
Lee N, Amy G, Croué J P (2006). Low-pressure membrane (MF/UF) fouling associated with allochthonous versus autochthonous natural organic matter. Water Research, 40(12): 2357–2368 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2006.04.023
pmid: 16777172
31
Lin T, Chen W, Wang L (2010). Particle properties in granular activated carbon filter during drinking water treatment. Journal of Environmental Sciences (China), 22(5): 681–688 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1001-0742(09)60163-7
pmid: 20608503
32
Munla L, Peldszus S, Huck P M (2012). Reversible and irreversible fouling of ultrafiltration ceramic membranes by model solutions. Journal- American Water Works Association, 104(10): 47–48 https://doi.org/10.5942/jawwa.2012.104.0137
33
Nakatsuka S, Nakate I, Miyano T (1996). Drinking water treatment by using ultrafiltration hollow fiber membranes. Desalination, 106(1–3): 55–61 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0011-9164(96)00092-6
34
Peiris R H, Budman H, Moresoli C, Legge R L (2010). Understanding fouling behaviour of ultrafiltration membrane processes and natural water using principal component analysis of fluorescence excitation-emission matrices. Journal of Membrane Science, 357(1–2): 62–72 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2010.03.047
35
Shao J, Hou J, Song H (2011). Comparison of humic acid rejection and flux decline during filtration with negatively charged and uncharged ultrafiltration membranes. Water Research, 45(2): 473–482 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2010.09.006
pmid: 20863548
36
Subhi N, Verliefde A, Chen V, Le-Clech P (2012). Assessment of physicochemical interactions in hollow fibre ultrafiltration membrane by contact angle analysis. Journal of Membrane Science, 403(6): 32–40 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2012.02.007
37
Tian J Y, Ernst M, Cui F Y, Jekel M (2013). Effect of different cations on UF membrane fouling by NOM fractions. Chemical Engineering Journal, 223(5): 547–555 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2013.03.043
38
Wang J, Wang X C (2006). Ultrafiltration with in-line coagulation for the removal of natural humic acid and membrane fouling mechanism. Journal of Environmental Sciences (China), 18(5): 880–884 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1001-0742(06)60008-9
pmid: 17278741
39
Wang Y, Tang K W, Xu Z X, Tang Y, Liu H F (2009). Water quality assessment of surface drinking water sources in cities and towns of China. Water Resource Protection, 25(2): 1–4, 68
40
Xiao K, Sun J, Shen Y, Liang S, Liang P, Wang X M, Huang X (2016). Fluorescence properties of dissolved organic matter as a function of hydrophobicity and molecular weight: Case studies from two membrane bioreactors and an oxidation ditch. RSC Advances, 6(29): 24050–24059 https://doi.org/10.1039/C5RA23167A
41
Xiao P, Xiao F, Wang D S, Qin T, He S P (2012). Investigation of organic foulants behavior on hollow-fiber UF membranes in a drinking water treatment plant. Separation and Purification Technology, 95(1): 109–117 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2012.04.028
42
Yamamura H, Okimoto K, Kimura K, Watanabe Y (2007). Influence of calcium on the evolution of irreversible fouling in microfiltration/ultrafiltration membranes. Journal of Water Supply: Research & Technology- Aqua, 56(6–7): 425–434 https://doi.org/10.2166/aqua.2007.018
43
Yang J S, Yuan D X, Weng T P (2010). Pilot study of drinking water treatment with GAC, O-3/BAC and membrane processes in Kinmen Island, Taiwan. Desalination, 263(1–3): 271–278 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2010.06.069
44
Zheng L J, Gao H J, Song Y H, Han L, Lu C J (2016). Comprehensive evaluation and analysis of surface water quality for typical cities of China. Huanjing Gongcheng Jishu Xuebao, 6(3): 252–258
