Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering

ISSN 2095-2201

ISSN 2095-221X(Online)

CN 10-1013/X

邮发代号 80-973

2018 Impact Factor: 3.883

Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering  2018, Vol. 12 Issue (5): 8   https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-018-1084-1
  本期目录
Optimization of denitrifying phosphorus removal in a pre-denitrification anaerobic/anoxic/post-aeration+ nitrification sequence batch reactor (pre-A2NSBR) system: Nitrate recycling, carbon/nitrogen ratio and carbon source type
Weihua Zhao1,2, Meixiang Wang1, Jianwei Li1, Yu Huang1, Baikun Li1, Cong Pan1, Xiyao Li1, Yongzhen Peng1()
1. National Engineering Laboratory for Advanced Municipal Wastewater Treatment and Reuse Technology, Engineering Research Center of Beijing, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China
2. School of Marine Science and Technology, Sino-Europe Membrane Technology Research Institute, Harbin Institute of Technology, Weihai 264209, China
 全文: PDF(2825 KB)   HTML
Abstract

A novel two sludge pre-A2NSBR system was developed.

Advanced N and P removal was optimized to treat real domestic wastewater.

Nitrifiers and PAOs were enriched with 19.41% and 26.48%, respectively.

Acetate was demonstrated as the high-quality carbon source type.

Because the efficiency of biological nutrient removal is always limited by the deficient carbon source for the low carbon/nitrogen (C/N) ratio in real domestic sewage, the denitrifying phosphorus removal (DNPR) was developed as a simple and efficient method to remove nitrogen and phosphorous. In addition, this method has the advantage of saving aeration energy while reducing the sludge production. In this context, a pre-denitrification anaerobic/anoxic/post-aeration+ nitrification sequence batch reactor (pre-A2NSBR) system, which could also reduce high ammonia effluent concentration in the traditional two-sludge DNPR process, is proposed in this work. The pre-A2NSBR process was mainly composed of a DNPR SBR and a nitrifying SBR, operating as alternating anaerobic/anoxic/post-aeration+ nitrification sequence. Herein, the long-term performance of different nitrate recycling ratios (0–300%) and C/N ratios (2.5–8.8), carbon source type, and functional microbial community were studied. The results showed that the removal efficiency of total inorganic nitrogen (TIN, including NH4+-N, NO2 -N, and NO3 -N) gradually increased with the nitrate recycling ratios, and the system reached the highest DNPR efficiency of 94.45% at the nitrate recycling ratio of 300%. The optimum C/N ratio was around 3.9–7.3 with a nitrogen and phosphorus removal efficiency of 80.15% and 93.57%, respectively. The acetate was proved to be a high-quality carbon source for DNPR process. The results of fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis indicated that nitrifiers and phosphorus accumulating organisms (PAOs) were accumulated with a proportion of 19.41% and 26.48%, respectively.

Key wordsDenitrifying phosphorus removal    C/N ratio    Nitrate recycling    Carbon source type    Biological nutrient removal    Pre-A2NSBR system
收稿日期: 2018-01-23      出版日期: 2018-09-28
Corresponding Author(s): Yongzhen Peng   
 引用本文:   
. [J]. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 2018, 12(5): 8.
Weihua Zhao, Meixiang Wang, Jianwei Li, Yu Huang, Baikun Li, Cong Pan, Xiyao Li, Yongzhen Peng. Optimization of denitrifying phosphorus removal in a pre-denitrification anaerobic/anoxic/post-aeration+ nitrification sequence batch reactor (pre-A2NSBR) system: Nitrate recycling, carbon/nitrogen ratio and carbon source type. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2018, 12(5): 8.
 链接本文:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fese/CN/10.1007/s11783-018-1084-1
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fese/CN/Y2018/V12/I5/8
Fig.1  
No. Parameter
(d)
COD NH4+-N TIN PO43-P
Influent
(mg/L)
Effluent (mg/L) Removal (%) Influent (mg/L) Effluent (mg/L) Removal (%) Influent (mg/L) Effluent (mg/L) Removal (%) Influent (mg/L) Effluent (mg/L) Removal (%)
Run 1 1–32 192.44 47.35 75.39 45.50 0.53 98.84 45.94 37.26 18.89 3.64 0.13 96.43
Run 2 33–60 183.90 44.70 75.69 48.89 0.76 98.45 49.12 20.34 58.59 4.67 0.57 87.79
Run 3 61–94 216.40 46.35 78.58 53.28 0.48 99.10 53.84 13.36 75.19 3.98 0.22 94.47
Run 4 95–121) 204.93 48.20 76.48 56.37 0.46 99.18 56.89 13.49 76.29 4.42 0.28 93.67
Run 5 122–169 128.4 39.46 69.27 51.36 0.37 99.28 51.45 22.45 56.37 4.22 0.31 92.65
Run 6 170–204 193.13 41.24 78.65 49.52 0.66 98.67 49.87 15.86 68.20 4.03 0.37 90.82
Run 7 205–253 291.02 44.93 84.56 54.91 0.43 99.22 55.16 10.95 80.15 4.51 0.29 93.57
Run 8 254–277 366.90 48.33 86.83 50.26 1.76 96.50 50.35 11.39 77.38 4.33 0.97 77.60
Run 9 278–297 475.89 57.47. 87.92 53.47 14.20 73.53 53.84 28.21 47.74 4.83 3.00 38.29
Tab.1  
Fig.2  
Fig.3  
Fig.4  
Fig.5  
1 Ahn J, Daidou T, Tsuneda S, Hirata A ( 2002 ). Characterization of denitrifying phosphate-accumulating organisms cultivated under different electron acceptor conditions using polymerase chain reaction-denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis assay. Water Research, 36(2): 403–412
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(01)00222-6 pmid: 11827346
2 Boiran B, Couton Y, Germon J C (1996). Nitrification and denitrification of liquid lagoon piggery waste in a biofilm infiltration-percolation aerated system (BIPAS) reactor. Bioresource Technology, 55(1): 63–77
https://doi.org/10.1016/0960-8524(95)00142-5
3 Bortone G, Saltarelli R, Alonso V, Sorm R, Wanner J, Tilche A ( 1996 ). Biological anoxic phosphorus removal—The dephanox process. Water Science and Technology, 34(1–2): 119–128
https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.1996.0363
4 Carucci A, Ramadori R, Rossetti S, Tomei M C ( 1996 ). Kinetics of denitrification reactions in single sludge systems. Water Research, 30(1): 51–56
https://doi.org/10.1016/0043-1354(95)00127-7
5 Chen Y, Peng C, Wang J, Ye L, Zhang L, Peng Y ( 2011 ). Effect of nitrate recycling ratio on simultaneous biological nutrient removal in a novel anaerobic/anoxic/oxic (A2/O)-biological aerated filter (BAF) system. Bioresource Technology, 102(10): 5722–5727
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2011.02.114 pmid: 21459571
6 Chen Y, Randall A A, McCue T ( 2004 ). The efficiency of enhanced biological phosphorus removal from real wastewater affected by different ratios of acetic to propionic acid. Water Research, 38(1): 27–36
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2003.08.025 pmid: 14630100
7 Chen Y Z, Li B K, Ye L, Peng Y Z ( 2015 ). The combined effects of COD/N ratio and nitrate recycling ratio on nitrogen and phosphorus removal in anaerobic/anoxic/aerobic (A2/O)-biological aerated filter (BAF) systems. Biochemical Engineering Journal, 93(10): 235–242
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bej.2014.10.005
8 Crocetti G R, Hugenholtz P, Bond P L, Schuler A, Keller J, Jenkins D, Blackall L L ( 2000 ). Identification of polyphosphate-accumulating organisms and design of 16S rRNA-directed probes for their detection and quantitation. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 66(3): 1175–1182
https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.66.3.1175-1182.2000 pmid: 10698788
9 Du D, Zhang C, Zhao K, Sun G, Zou S, Yuan L, He S ( 2018 ). Effect of different carbon sources on performance of an A2N-MBR process and its microbial community structure. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 12(2): 4
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-017-0981-z
10 Elefsiniotis P, Li D ( 2006 ). The effect of temperature and carbon source on denitrification using volatile fatty acids. Biochemical Engineering Journal, 28(2): 148–155
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bej.2005.10.004
11 Ge S, Zhu Y, Lu C, Wang S, Peng Y ( 2012 ). Full-scale demonstration of step feed concept for improving an anaerobic/anoxic/aerobic nutrient removal process. Bioresource Technology, 120(3): 305–313
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2012.06.030 pmid: 22796144
12 Gong Y K, Peng Y Z, Wang S Y, Wang S ( 2014 ). Production of N2O in two biologic nitrogen removal processes: A comparison between conventional and short-cut nitrogen removal processes. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 8(4): 589–597
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-013-0571-7
13 Kuba T, VanLoosdrecht M C M, Heijnen J J ( 1996 ). Phosphorus and nitrogen removal with minimal cod requirement by integration of denitrifying dephosphatation and nitrification in a two-sludge system. Water Research, 30(7): 1702–1710
https://doi.org/10.1016/0043-1354(96)00050-4
14 Lee H S, Park S J, Yoon T I ( 2002 ). Wastewater treatment in a hybrid biological reactor using powdered minerals: Effects of organic loading rates on COD removal and nitrification. Process Biochemistry, 38(1): 81–88
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0032-9592(02)00044-4
15 Lee N M, Welander T ( 1996 ). The effect of different carbon sources on respiratory denitrification in biological wastewater treatment. Journal of Fermentation and Bioengineering, 82(3): 277–285
https://doi.org/10.1016/0922-338X(96)88820-9
16 Liu X, Wang H, Yang Q, Li J, Zhang Y, Peng Y ( 2017 ). Online control of biofilm and reducing carbon dosage in denitrifying biofilter: Pilot and full-scale application. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 11(1): 4
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-017-0895-9
17 Ma B, Wang S Y, Zhu G B, Ge S J, Wang J M, Ren N Q, Peng Y Z ( 2013 ). Denitrification and phosphorus uptake by DPAOs using nitrite as an electron acceptor by step-feed strategies. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 7(2): 267–272
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-012-0439-2
18 Ma Y, Peng Y Z, Wang X L ( 2009 ). Improving nutrient removal of the AAO process by an influent bypass flow by denitrifying phosphorus removal. Desalination, 246(1–3): 534–544
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2008.04.061
19 Paungfoo C, Prasertsan P, Burrell P C, Intrasungkha N, Blackall L L ( 2007 ). Nitrifying bacterial communities in an aquaculture wastewater treatment system using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), 16S rRNA gene cloning, and phylogenetic analysis. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 97(4): 985–990
https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.21270 pmid: 17115448
20 Pijuan M, Casas C, Baeza J A ( 2009 ). Polyhydroxyalkanoate synthesis using different carbon sources by two enhanced biological phosphorus removal microbial communities. Process Biochemistry, 44(1): 97–105
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2008.09.017
21 Sun S P, Nàcher C P i, Merkey B, Zhou Q, Xia S Q, Yang D H, Sun J H, Smets B F (2010). Effective biological nitrogen removal treatment processes for domestic wastewaters with low C/N ratios: A review. Environmental Engineering Science, 27(2): 111–126
22 Thomas M, Wright P, Blackall L, Urbain V, Keller J ( 2003 ). Optimisation of Noosa BNR plant to improve performance and reduce operating costs. Water Science and Technology, 47(12): 141–148
https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2003.0639 pmid: 12926681
23 van Loosdrecht M C M, Brandse F A, de Vries A C ( 1998 ). Upgrading of waste water treatment processes for integrated nutrient removal- The BCFS (R) process. Water Science and Technology, 37(9): 209–217
https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.1998.0359
24 Walters E, Hille A, He M, Ochmann C, Horn H ( 2009 ). Simultaneous nitrification/denitrification in a biofilm airlift suspension (BAS) reactor with biodegradable carrier material. Water Research, 43(18): 4461–4468
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2009.07.005 pmid: 19640560
25 Wang X, Wang S, Xue T, Li B, Dai X, Peng Y ( 2015 ). Treating low carbon/nitrogen (C/N) wastewater in simultaneous nitrification-endogenous denitrification and phosphorous removal (SNDPR) systems by strengthening anaerobic intracellular carbon storage. Water Research, 77: 191–200
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2015.03.019 pmid: 25875928
26 Wang Y, Geng J, Ren Z, Guo G, Wang C, Wang H ( 2013 ). Effect of COD/N and COD/P ratios on the PHA transformation and dynamics of microbial community structure in a denitrifying phosphorus removal process. Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology (Oxford, Oxfordshire), 88(7): 1228–1236
https://doi.org/10.1002/jctb.3962
27 Wanner J, Cech J S, Kos M ( 1992 ). New process design for biological nutrient removal. Water Science and Technology, 25(4–5): 445–448
https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.1992.0532
28 Yagci N, Cokgor E U, Artan N, Randall C, Orhon D ( 2007 ). The effect of substrate on the composition of polyhydroxyalkanoates in enhanced biological phosphorus removal. Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology (Oxford, Oxfordshire), 82(3): 295–303
https://doi.org/10.1002/jctb.1672
29 Yang Y, Zhang L, Shao H, Zhang S, Gu P, Peng Y ( 2017 ). Enhanced nutrients removal from municipal wastewater through biological phosphorus removal followed by partial nitritation/anammox. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 11(2): 8
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-017-0911-0
30 Yu J, Si Y ( 2004 ). Metabolic carbon fluxes and biosynthesis of polyhydroxyalkanoates in Ralstonia eutropha on short chain fatty acids. Biotechnology Progress, 20(4): 1015–1024
https://doi.org/10.1021/bp034380e pmid: 15296425
31 Zeng R J, Lemaire R, Yuan Z, Keller J ( 2003 ). Simultaneous nitrification, denitrification, and phosphorus removal in a lab-scale sequencing batch reactor. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 84(2): 170–178
https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.10744 pmid: 12966573
32 Zeng W, Li B, Yang Y, Wang X, Li L, Peng Y ( 2014 ). Impact of nitrite on aerobic phosphorus uptake by poly-phosphate accumulating organisms in enhanced biological phosphorus removal sludges. Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering, 37(2): 277–287
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00449-013-0993-4 pmid: 23771179
33 Zeng W, Peng Y Z, Wang S Y (2004). A two-stage SBR process for removal of organic substrate and nitrogen via nitrite-type nitrification-denitrification. Journal of Environmental Science and Health Part A—Toxic/Hazardous Substances & Environmental Engineering, 39(8): 2229–2239
34 Zhang M, Peng Y, Wang C, Wang C, Zhao W, Zeng W ( 2016a ). Optimization denitrifying phosphorus removal at different hydraulic retention times in a novel anaerobic anoxic oxic-biological contact oxidation process. Biochemical Engineering Journal, 106: 26–36
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bej.2015.10.027
35 Zhang M, Wang C, Peng Y, Wang S, Jia F, Zeng W ( 2016b ). Organic substrate transformation and sludge characteristics in the integrated anaerobic anoxic oxic–biological contact oxidation (A2/O–BCO) system treating wastewater with low carbon/nitrogen ratio. Chemical Engineering Journal, 283: 47–57
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2015.04.111
36 Zhang M, Yang Q, Zhang J, Wang C, Wang S, Peng Y ( 2016c ). Enhancement of denitrifying phosphorus removal and microbial community of long-term operation in an anaerobic anoxic oxic-biological contact oxidation system. Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering, 122(4): 456–466
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiosc.2016.03.019 pmid: 27133708
37 Zhang W, Hou F, Peng Y Z, Liu Q S, Wang S Y ( 2014 ). Optimizing aeration rate in an external nitrification-denitrifying phosphorus removal (ENDPR) system for domestic wastewater treatment. Chemical Engineering Journal, 245: 342–347
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2014.01.045
38 Zhang W, Peng Y, Ren N, Liu Q, Chen Y ( 2013 ). Improvement of nutrient removal by optimizing the volume ratio of anoxic to aerobic zone in AAO-BAF system. Chemosphere, 93(11): 2859–2863
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.08.047 pmid: 24035691
39 Zhao W, Huang Y, Wang M, Pan C, Li X, Peng Y, Li B ( 2018 ). Post-endogenous denitrification and phosphorus removal in an alternating anaerobic/oxic/anoxic (AOA) system treating low carbon/nitrogen (C/N) domestic wastewater. Chemical Engineering Journal, 339: 450–458
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2018.01.096
40 Zhao W, Zhang Y, Lv D, Wang M, Peng Y, Li B ( 2016 ). Advanced nitrogen and phosphorus removal in the pre-denitrification anaerobic/anoxic/aerobic nitrification sequence batch reactor (pre-A2NSBR) treating low carbon/nitrogen (C/N) wastewater. Chemical Engineering Journal, 302: 296–304
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2016.05.012
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed